F5 Advanced WAF Reviews

Most of the time, we use it as a load balancer. It's for the client’s applications. They then apply WAF policies, of course, if the customer wants, and also an APM solution, like VPN access or Web Box, like a web and reverse protocol. Customers vary in terms of what they want.

The WAF and APM are very useful. I like the modules.

The solution has been mostly stable and reliable.

It can scale.

The BNS module needs improvement.

I’ve been using the solution for the last four and a half or five years. It’s been a while.

Most of the time, the stability is okay. For the most part, we don’t have issues with bugs or the solution crashing. It’s fine.

The solution can scale as necessary.

We have a lot of telecom and banking clients that use the solution. I’m not sure how much in total each client has in terms of users. Whoever would be using it would be more on the technical side.

We do plan to increase usage and to continue to offer this to our clients.

We help with the support as well as implementation. If a client runs into issues, they can always talk to us.

I’ve contacted the technical support of F5. However, I haven’t used them that much. They have always been okay. I’ve never had issues with them.

Sometimes the setup is straightforward. Other times it’s more complicated. It depends on the client and the project. How long the deployment takes depends on what they want.

You only need one person to handle deployment and maintenance tasks.

We are an integrator and can help customers set up the solution.

While there may be a potential for ROI, I don’t track it.

I’m not sure about the licensing. I don’t handle this aspect of the product.

We’re platinum partners with F5 in Greece. We’re integrators and resellers. We work with different versions.

The solution can be deployed both on the cloud and on-premises.

I’d recommend the solution to others.

I would rate the solution nine out of ten. We’ve been pretty happy with its capabilities.

F5 Advanced WAF could improve the precision of the scanning. There are many false positives. They should improve their threat database.

I have been using F5 Advanced WAF for three years.

F5 Advanced WAF is a stable solution, we are satisfied. It is more stable than ForiWeb.

I have found F5 Advanced WAF to be scalable.

The local support is good and they have been helpful. However, if we raise an issue to the global support they take a lot of time to return our inquiry.

The price of the enterprise solution is reasonable. However, if you are a small to medium-sized business the price could be difficult to afford.

F5 Advanced WAF pricing structure should be adjusted to meet the need of small to medium-sized companies.

I rate F5 Advanced WAF an eight out of ten.

The DCI feature is very valuable. The solution is very robust, and I like the setup.

With this solution, you can set distinct perimeters that you can monitor. You can go very granular, which makes it possible to set up very specific perimeters that you are then able to secure.

The solution is tedious. It takes a lot of discrete settings so one needs to get detailed and granular when they use the solution. It takes you a whole lot of energy and concentration to configure. It needs to be much more straightforward, like other web solutions.

They need to have a way to define attack signatures. It might help improve the user experience.

The solution is quite stable. Since 2016, there hasn't been any concern in regards to security.

The solution is highly scalable.

Technical support is excellent. It's top-notch.

The initial setup was very straightforward. The solution is very compact. It takes more than one month for effective deployment.

The solution isn't too expensive. The license allows you to license what you need and leave out what you don't need.

We currently deal with the on-premises deployment model.

I would recommend the solution for use as an efficient firewall. Security is a complex thing, however, and I would advise others to use multiple vendors for different layers.

I would rate the solution ten out of ten.

We use the F5 Advanced WAF for TicTac on house applications at our Induction University.

One of the most valuable features is the Local Traffic Manager.

The Sandbox integration feature could be improved.

I have been using F5 Advanced WAF for approximately one year.

F5 Advanced WAF is reliable.

The solution is scalable.

We have one customer that has multiple sites that use this solution. They have 24 universities using the clusters.

The technical support is good.

The installation is straightforward.

I am able to do the installation by myself.

There is an annual subscription for this solution.

I would recommend this solution to others that are satisfied with the load balancer provided. If not then they could go to another solution with different load balancers for their needs.

I rate F5 Advanced WAF a nine out of ten.

Our primary use case for this solution is web application security. We deploy this solution on-premises.

We have found the accessibility feature most valuable. For example, the solution is easily accessible on mobile and laptop devices and allows you to send and receive money from anyone.

The delay times on firmware patches and software updates could be better and improved.

We have been using this solution for seven years.

The solution is stable.

The solution is scalable.

The initial setup is complex but easy once you understand the product.

Their pricing is very good for the quality of the product they have delivered in the market. It is a standard licensing cost annually.

We chose this product because we believe it is the best product for us. There are other firewalls in the market, but you always look for the best as a vendor.