Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users
Forcepoint Risk Adaptive Protection for DLP Logo

Forcepoint Risk Adaptive Protection for DLP pros and cons

Vendor: Forcepoint
3.5 out of 5

Pros & Cons summary

Buyer's Guide

Get pricing advice, tips, use cases and valuable features from real users of this product.
Get the report

Prominent pros & cons

PROS

Forcepoint was chosen as part of a cybersecurity strategy to prevent data leakage.
It influences policy enforcement, cloud application access control, and endpoint network coverage.
Forcepoint Risk Adaptive Protection for DLP is a highly regarded DLP-based option.
Valuable features include policy management and endpoint status.
It offers supplementary servers, OCR, and IRR as additional features.

CONS

It requires two to three separate servers for deployment.
Malware-centric aspect of the SaaS needs improvement.
Use cases are limited and could benefit from a broader scope.
After-sale support could be improved.
Inability to monitor some encrypted data or data leaking in incognito mode.
 

Forcepoint Risk Adaptive Protection for DLP Pros review quotes

Nataraj KS - PeerSpot reviewer
CISO at V Guard Industries Ltd
Jan 15, 2024
We chose Forcepoint as part of our cybersecurity strategy, and one of the key expectations was to prevent data leakage.
CP
Director at Specsia
Feb 19, 2024
It primarily influences policy enforcement, cloud application access control, and endpoint network coverage.
TA
Solution Specialist at South Asian Technologies
Apr 9, 2025
Forcepoint Risk Adaptive Protection for DLP is purely a DLP-based solution, which makes it the best option available.
Learn what your peers think about Forcepoint Risk Adaptive Protection for DLP. Get advice and tips from experienced pros sharing their opinions. Updated: February 2026.
881,757 professionals have used our research since 2012.
SK
Cyber Security Engineer at Infratech Co
Jan 16, 2026
The most valuable features in Forcepoint Risk Adaptive Protection for DLP include policy management and endpoint status, as well as supplementary servers, OCR, IRR, and additional features.
 

Forcepoint Risk Adaptive Protection for DLP Cons review quotes

Nataraj KS - PeerSpot reviewer
CISO at V Guard Industries Ltd
Jan 15, 2024
From an end user's perspective, it's not always clear what's happening with the DLP. It would be beneficial to have more use cases available, perhaps on a countrywide basis.
CP
Director at Specsia
Feb 19, 2024
The deployment is a little bit difficult. It requires two to three separate servers for databases and the application.
TA
Solution Specialist at South Asian Technologies
Apr 9, 2025
The SaaS solution needs improvement, especially the malware-centric part, although the CASB is better but mostly data-centric. The after-sale support could also be improved.
Learn what your peers think about Forcepoint Risk Adaptive Protection for DLP. Get advice and tips from experienced pros sharing their opinions. Updated: February 2026.
881,757 professionals have used our research since 2012.
SK
Cyber Security Engineer at Infratech Co
Jan 16, 2026
In my perspective, there are several things that need to be improved in Forcepoint Risk Adaptive Protection for DLP, such as the inability to monitor some encrypted data or data leaking in incognito mode.