Google Cloud Platform Cloud Identity-Aware Proxy Reviews

The product helps to connect VMs and servers. 

I am impressed with the product's security. 

The solution should be more user-friendly and should have descriptive manuals on the page website. 

I have been using the product for one and a half years. 

The product is stable. 

My company has more than 10 users for the solution. 

The solution's price is normal. 

I would rate the product a nine out of ten. 

I use Google Cloud Platform Cloud Identity-Aware Proxy in my company for BNB Chain.

The most valuable feature of the solution is that it is a very simple solution. Google Cloud Platform Identity-Aware Proxy is cheaper than AWS and allows users to keep tabs on factors like location and timelines.

I think the product is easy to use on any server. If I want to use the product or open it on other systems, I think it's very easy.

The UI of the solution is an area with certain shortcomings where improvements are required. The product needs to be made user-friendly.

I have been using Google Cloud Platform Cloud Identity-Aware Proxy for two or three years.

It is a very stable solution. Stability-wise, I rate the solution a ten out of ten.

It is a scalable solution.

Around three people in my company, consisting of the cloud manager and cloud engineer, use the product to set up a website.

I think that the product's initial setup phase was straightforward.

Not many steps are required to take care of the deployment phase of the product. In a few steps, one can finish the deployment of the product.

Two engineers are required to take care of the deployment and maintenance processes of the product.

The solution can be deployed in ten minutes.

The solution can be deployed by myself in my company.

I wouldn't recommend the product to other users.

I rate the overall tool a ten out of ten.

We use the product to migrate the data from the center to the cloud.

The platform’s most valuable features include storage, machine, and cloud functionality.

The product’s migration process could be easier to understand.

We have been using Google Cloud Platform Cloud for two to three years.

The platform has good stability.

It is a scalable product. Yet, the complexity depends on the amount of data and workload.

Google has good technical support services.

The initial setup process is straightforward.

I rate Google Cloud Platform Cloud an eight out of ten.

For Google Cloud Platform (GCP), we use it as our infrastructure. We host our infrastructures and create our machines, services and automation pipelines. For Google Cloud Identity, we use it as an identity portal for all of our applications. In addition, the internal application for the tools is used for monitoring the product.

The Cloud Identity in GCP is very good and reliable. It can be published fast. Also, Google Cloud Identity allows you to create groups and give access by group instead of by user. It allows you to create different access policies for every component of new infrastructure, and from a security perspective, this is good.

The Google Cloud UI has a lot of bugs, and they are working on enhancing it. There are a lot of things that need to be enhanced. For example, sometimes, the snapshot portal makes you have a schedule to create multiple snapshots when you have a huge infrastructure hosted on Google Cloud. Sometimes the browser or the UI hangs when looking for a specific snapshot. Also, Google Cloud support responds very quickly, but the UI still needs to have more enhancements related to the performance.

The integration of the solution for patching, updating, and installing the updates could be better. For example, they have a solution called "always patching," which needs to be enhanced. It is not purely a SaaS solution. It should be mostly platform as a solution, not software.

We have been using this solution for more than two years.

It is a stable solution. However, it would be more stable if Google cared more about the UI.

It is a scalable solution. Most of the teams in our company use this solution. The number of people needed for deployment and maintenance depends on whether it is a small or medium company solution. Only one person is needed for a small environment, while two or three are required for a medium environment. The team that supports the solution comprises network and security people. We plan to increase our usage of the solution as our customer base increases.

The technical support is good, and they are very responsive. I rate the technical support an eight out of ten.

I personally have used Azure and AWS in the past.

The initial setup was easy, and it was just plug-and-play. If you have a good understanding of infrastructure, this solution is perfect. It allows us to build an entire infrastructure for a startup or medium company in one hour. To do this, we need to try the script with the machines we need. Next, we need to define the CPU, memory and application we want to install on the machine. Then we can click and run the playbook or the tier forms script and go back after hours. By then, everything has been created, and we'll have an infrastructure that can handle a small startup.

The deployment depends on the complexity. If it is a small deployment, it might take less time, but a larger deployment will take more. For example, if we want to use a machine on GCP, it might take about two to three minutes, but if we have a huge deployment for multiple machines with multiple loop balances, records, and firewall rules, it might take 40 minutes to one hour. We completed the deployment in-house.

I rate this solution an eight out of ten. Regarding advice, I would recommend planning for everything and keeping it simple. It is also important to monitor consumption on the Google Cloud to ensure you are not paying for something you are not using.

Most cloud providers have the same features, but the main difference between them is the solution's availability and cost. Most of the features are only utilized at 30% or 50%.

The solution should have better integration. 

The solution is stable. 

The solution is scalable.

The technical support is up to par. 

As with AWS, the solution is easy to install. 

50 or 60 days are needed for the deployment. 

Around three or four people are needed for the deployment and maintenance. 

The customer purchases an annually sponsored license. 

We have a maximum of around 20 customers making use of the solution. 

We support Azure, AWS and Google Cloud Platform Cloud Identity-Aware Proxy, depending on the customer's architecture. 

For the most part, I would not recommend the solution to others, as our expertise is more with AWS and Azure.

I rate Google Cloud Platform Cloud Identity-Aware Proxy as an eight out of ten. 

The solution can be used for building the infrastructure on the cloud.

The solution's security should be improved.

I have been working with Google Cloud Platform Cloud Identity-Aware Proxy for a few months.

The solution's stability seems good.

Google Cloud Platform Cloud Identity-Aware Proxy is a scalable solution.

Before Google Cloud Platform Cloud Identity, I worked with AWS and Azure. I switched to Google Cloud Platform Cloud Identity because of the client's needs.

Google Cloud Platform Cloud Identity-Aware Proxy is a cloud-based solution.

Overall, I rate the solution a seven out of ten.

Google Cloud Platform's Cloud Identity-Aware Proxy manages our organization's entire user database across the Middle East region for PwC. In addition, the solution is used to run virtual environments and storage solutions. It also serves our needs for AI or any other applications, including using Apps Script.

The solution's speed, processing power, and user functionality are some of its most valuable features.

I think the solution has some issues in document accessing and accessing of some data at times when you have automated scripts. So, maybe that could be made better in the solution. Sometimes, it just fails to get some documents, and then it resumes normally. Google should work to enhance the overall features of the solution.

I have experience with Google Cloud Platform Cloud Identity-Aware Proxy for four and a half years. Also, I am using the latest version of the solution.

The solution offers medium to high stability to its users.

Though I never used the solution from a scalability standpoint, I assume that its scalability would be fine.

I never contacted the solution's technical support team because our organization has an internal IT department.

I previously used Azure. However, my company never used Azure.

The solution's initial setup process was fine. I assume that one person is required for the deployment process of the solution.

I would recommend the solution to those planning to use it in the future. Overall, I rate the solution an eight out of ten.

This is a service. We use it for our business, for operations. 

This can be deployed easily. 

The solution is stable. It's reliable. 

There is good documentation available. There is a lot of information available online to help new users. 

It is hard to find expertise, ad most people deal with AWS. 

The solution is quite expensive. 

We'd like the solution to continue to make security features more robust. We need to protect against data leaks and also need to protect customer information. 

We've been using the solution for less than a year now. We're a new company.

This is a stable, reliable product. It does not have bugs or glitches. It doesn't crash or freeze. 

We're a new company. This solution hasn't been used for too long, and we haven't really launched anything yet. Right now, it is still just internally dealt with. Likely less than 100 people deal with it right now. 

The support could be better. There needs to be more knowledgeable. It could be that there aren't enough people with a good knowledge base in our country. Most people are comfortable with AWS, and not necessarily with GCP. However, I don't typically deal with technical support. 

We also use AWS, which is what most companies use. 

The solution is very easy to set up and deploy. It's not a complex process. We can easily deploy applications, APIs, et cetera. However, I did not handle the initial setup myself and therefore cannot speak from firsthand experience. 

We do find it to be more expensive than AWS. 

I'm not sure what version of the solution we're using. 

I'd recommend the solution to others. There's not a problem with deploying it. The business decision comes more about the deployment and support costs and if that makes sense to everyone in the company. It's higher than AWS, which is something that needs to be considered, especially since most people are more familiar with AWS. 

I'd rate the solution eight out of ten. It's well documented and does have available support. 

We are a customer and end-user.