Huntress is one of our security layers. We also use Webroot for antivirus and SentinelOne. Huntress is particularly valuable because when we first implemented it, we discovered several potential issues with our PCs that we were able to address quickly. More recently, it has allowed us to be notified immediately if something bad is happening.
We implemented Huntress to improve our security posture.
Last weekend, we experienced a potential breach prevented by Huntress' automated response. It involved the general manager at a car dealership who was unaware of an ongoing penetration test. This caused confusion until we contacted someone knowledgeable about the situation, allowing us to restore normalcy. This incident highlights the potential for serious consequences had the breach not been prevented.
Huntress is easy to use. The portal is transparent, and the manual or automatic remediation recommendations are well-defined.
It is a valuable addition to the SMB market. It is affordable and powerful.
Since we started using Huntress, things have become more automated. One valuable feature they recently introduced is a test mode, which allows us to gauge our response to a simulated emergency without triggering an actual alert.
Huntress' 24/7 monitoring is helpful. While it will alert us at all times, the alerts are usually important. The only low priority item is password alerting. When Huntress finds files that might have clear text passwords, it's not a high risk, but it's still good to inform the client about potential security issues.
The auto-remediation capabilities are excellent because they allow for a set it and forget it approach, or users can simply revisit the portal to verify that everything is as expected.
Huntress has helped reduce the need for expensive security tools and the hiring of security analysts. This can lead to savings equivalent to the cost of two security analysts, which is approximately $200,000 per year.
Huntress has improved our security. It generally doesn't interfere with our other tools, as sometimes our antivirus or some of the other tools tend to flag legitimate activities.
We have integrated Huntress with Webroot and SentinelOne. They each play a role in the security posture.
We noticed an improvement in our security within a few weeks. Of course, there were many things to handle, especially when rolling it out at a new location. We tend to clean up a little bit initially, which increases our workload slightly. But once we get through that initial phase, everything runs smoothly.
Huntress has saved us 20 percent in resources.
The most valuable aspect of Huntress is its ability to isolate legacy systems from the network, preventing the spread of threats. The automated remediation feature also provides significant value.
Huntress excels at explaining threats when they are presented in clear language. However, the sheer volume of threats and occasional ambiguity in remediation steps can make comprehensive tracking challenging. Ultimately, the clarity of their alerts is paramount for effective threat communication and could benefit from clearer remediation steps.
I have been using Huntress for four years.
I would rate the stability of Huntress nine out of ten.
I would rate the scalability of Huntress eight out of ten.
The initial deployment was done using a script, taking one day. We integrate it with ConnectWise to push scripts out to PCs and monitor the deployment to ensure continuous operation and services running. We receive alerts for this, making it maintenance-heavy but ultimately worthwhile.
Our deployment strategy was straightforward: set up the company, then implement and activate the scripts. I'm not heavily involved in deployments, but I've written a few scripts. When issues arise, like when our tool ThreatLocker halts a deployment, I step in to troubleshoot and resolve the problem.
Any prevention or early detection of an attack, like catching a cold before it spreads, will lead to significant savings in time, investment, and reputation. If we, as the Managed Service Provider, experience an exploit, it will negatively impact our reputation. Therefore, safeguarding our reputation is the best form of seeing a return on investment.
I would rate Huntress nine out of ten. The services tend to stop, so we have a small script that restarts them. I don't know if there's a way they can make their service more resilient. That would reduce our maintenance burden.
We have 20 people that use Huntress in our organization.
We use Huntress on almost 25,000 devices.
Huntress requires minimal maintenance.
I would recommend Huntress to others. It lets you know about real-world attacks happening in near real-time. A couple of years ago, I remember Huntress alerted us about a laptop stolen at an airport, and we were able to isolate that laptop. It was eventually returned to the company, and they just had to call us to let us know. You can also turn off isolation, so it's not just a security feature, but it's almost like having LoJack for your laptop.