What is our primary use case?
We are a managed service provider with a wide range of clients. We support their businesses and computers, and as a standard, we install the software on any of the computers we manage.
How has it helped my organization?
Huntress is very easy to use. That is one of the reasons why we switched to Huntress two to three years ago. The console is simpler and quicker than the competitor I was using. There are not many actions to take. It just runs, and if there is something to look at, they send us an email to escalate. It is one of those things where when you install it, you do not have to log in and check unless they alert you.
Once they did an awesome thing where they scanned the computers for any files that said passwords or logins. Sometimes people keep all their logins in one Excel file and call it passwords. It basically scanned the computers and gave us a warning about the computers that had a file called passwords.xls and informed us to let them know to not do that. I reached out and I ended up converting a few of those clients to use password managers and things like that. It was a one-time scan they did, but it was awesome of them to do that.
We were able to see its financial benefit immediately. After a month or two, it started caching things and alerting us. It was pretty quick. Within the first quarter of using it, we were already happy with it. I knew I was going to keep it for a long time.
SMBs do not always have a big budget for IT. Huntress is the best you can get without ramping up your budget. There is another one that we use for the companies that have more budget. It is called BlackPoint, but it is not an apple-to-apple comparison. I cannot compare these two because BlackPoint does a little bit more than what Huntress offers at this time.
The solution is fully managed by Huntress 24/7. That has been great. It has affected us in a positive way where we get an alert, and we know if something was already done by Huntress or if we need to take action. If we need to take action, they list specific instructions on what needs to be done, which is nice. We do not have to figure out how or what. That has definitely helped. We are also able to manage Windows Defender. When we want to put exceptions in and things like that, we do not have to go to each computer. We just put it in the policy, and it alters the settings of Windows Defender.
For remediation, Huntress can automatically remediate low-severity threats. There is one option where they automatically do it, and then depending on the issue, there is also a button that you can click to remediate the issue right from the control panel. That saves so much time investigating. If you need to isolate the computer, you can isolate the computer, so it does not spread out to the rest. It is definitely positive.
Huntress helped reduce the need for expensive security tools or to hire expensive security analysts. They basically do it all. The only thing higher is an MDR, but I assume they will eventually get into the MDR space. I know they have recently added something that looks at your Microsoft 365 tenant, similarly to how they look at your computers. I can see the product growing and growing. They keep adding things that their competitors are doing.
It has taken our security up a notch from where we were. It has not missed anything. It was not like something happened where I was like, "Why didn't Huntress see this?" That has not happened in the past two to three years. It has made our security stronger. Because we protect our clients, we need to make sure we are doing that. I am confident in having Huntress out there on the machines.
The Huntress' SOC team is very responsive. Other solutions would never reach out to you or do anything like that. If something is detected, they just send automatic emails to check it out. Anytime I have had a meeting with Huntress about a new product or a new service, there are higher-ups on the call with me. It feels very like a small company even though they are not. You get a small company experience with them where you can get someone on the phone. If you need to talk to someone higher up, they will be on the call. I appreciate that. They are always ready to hop on a call or tell me more. If I need to know more, they will happily talk to me. They always check in on me. My reps often ping me to make sure I do not need anything.
We have combined Huntress with other solutions. The only reason we combine is that the customer has more budget. Huntress is what we give everyone. If they have more budget, we will pair that with BlackPoint, which is an MDR that actively remediates anything that does not look good. They are connected to a 24/ 7 security center with people stopping these attacks live as they happen, and you are watching them as they happen. There is an agent for the computer as well. There are some things that overlap with Huntress on what it does, but the ultimate one is 24/7. They will remediate something at three in the morning and leave you a voicemail explaining what happened, but that solution costs three times what Huntress costs. That is why the customer has the budget, we put both of them.
What is most valuable?
The price point is attractive. It compares favorably to SentinelOne, which I was using at the time.
Huntress works more simply. I appreciate how Windows Defender can be managed on computers with it. Previously, I could not modify it unless I had special Microsoft licensing, so it was beneficial to control Windows Defender through a central console to add policies and things like that.
What needs improvement?
One thing they could improve is evolving from an EDR to an MDR, like Blackpoint. This transition would enable automatic remediation of anything that looks dangerous, including within Microsoft 365. For instance, when one of my clients' Microsoft 365 account was breached, Blackpoint identified suspicious activity and disabled the account. It was in Dallas, and we are in California. Blackpoint knew something was wrong there, and they went in and disabled the account. Developing more automated remediation features would elevate them to an MDR level, but I understand that it might affect pricing. They are trying to keep it at a good price point because once they go to MDR, it is probably going to double the price.
For now, I find the current features satisfactory, as they continue to add improvements. They have added security awareness training and then log collectors. They are adding pillars as they move along, and I assume they are going to have an option for MDR.
For how long have I used the solution?
I have been using this solution for two to three years.
What do I think about the stability of the solution?
The stability is perfect. I would rate it a ten out of ten for that. It barely takes up resources on the computer, and I have had no issues with lagging or crashing. I have never needed to reinstall it once installed. It operates smoothly without needing further intervention. I once experienced installation trouble due to other issues on the computer, but we resolved it. Once it is on the computer, it is smooth sailing.
What do I think about the scalability of the solution?
It offers substantial scalability. The admin panel appears to have no limitations. I can add as many as I need, and it organizes them as per organization. I can easily scale from one machine to thousands without any fuss. There is no need to upgrade anything on their end; I just need more seeds, and that is it.
How are customer service and support?
Regarding responsiveness, they are pretty quick. Though not recent, they responded the same day, which is great. I had no problems with their knowledgeability. They offered the option to call, but I contacted them via email and received a quick, helpful response. Overall, I am satisfied with their support.
How would you rate customer service and support?
Which solution did I use previously and why did I switch?
Before Huntress, we were on a quest for the ideal solution. Initially, we used Webroot but were dissatisfied and switched to SentinelOne. We were primarily using SentinelOne until Huntress came along. Huntress impressed us with its simple admin panel, unlike SentinelOne's clunky interface. Huntress definitely has a very simple admin panel. It is very easy to find things or switch between organizations, and it is fast.
SentinelOne kept upgrading their admin panel and we had to log in again and again. It would take a minute or two just to get in because of all the updates they kept doing. With Huntress, you are quickly in and already clicking around. It is fast. It was a pretty easy switch when the time came.
For its software class as an EDR, I cannot think of one that does it better than them. Even SentinelOne does not quite do what they do. Huntress is doing what no one is doing for that price. Most of the time, EDRs do not do remediation at all. Huntress is doing at least the low-level ones automatically at times, but other EDRs will not do it. They just tell you that there was suspicious activity. Check it out. That separates Huntress from the rest at this point in time.
Cost-wise, it is similar to others. It may be fifty cents more than other competing prices. It is very close, but the value is there. I would not switch to a cheaper thing because whatever I am paying for Huntress is worth it.
How was the initial setup?
The initial setup was incredibly easy. Using our RMM remote management, we ran a provided script on all computers. Within a day, the software was fully operational. It detects customer information from the RMM and organizes it efficiently. We opted to install it across all systems, leading to a well-organized admin panel.
Within a day, we had it across a bunch of computers. It was rather simple. We tested on ours in the beginning. It took one day to fully have it out. It was very simple with a script.
It does not require any maintenance from our side. It updates itself. If there is an agent version, I do not have to go in there and hit the button unlike others. With SentinelOne, I would get an email when there was a new version, and I had to go and update them by hand. If I wanted to do it automatically, I have to set up all these policies, but for Huntress, there is no need. It updates itself. As long as the agent is online, it will update the agents, so there is literally no maintenance. I do not have to go in there and update anything. It just runs.
What's my experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing?
It is very fair. I started at $2.50 and now I am at $3.50. When I signed up, I thought it was too cheap. It now reflects the price. It is very fair. I do not think you can find anything better.
It is competitive pricing-wise. It is not too expensive or too cheap. It is just right. I do not know if they are going to raise it anytime soon because they keep adding things, but for now, the price point and what it does is what makes it so popular.
I am in a group with other managed service providers like me, and we meet once a week. All of them use Huntress as well. It is very popular for companies like ours because it allows us to protect the clients more without breaking the bank. If you do not have a big budget, the pricing is still very practical.
What other advice do I have?
I would rate it a nine out of ten. It is as close as it can get for what it does, including support and scalability. I am happy with it. I hope they remain independent and do not get bought out and changed. That happens a lot. They are proud of what they do, and there still are the original people who started it. I hope they always keep that.
Which deployment model are you using for this solution?
Public Cloud
Disclosure: PeerSpot contacted the reviewer to collect the review and to validate authenticity. The reviewer was referred by the vendor, but the review is not subject to editing or approval by the vendor. The reviewer's company has a business relationship with this vendor other than being a customer: MSP