Top 10 IBM Cloud Private Alternatives

Vendor: IBM

3.4 out of 5

5 reviews
60% willing to recommend

403 followers

Top IBM Cloud Private Competitors

Discover the top alternatives and competitors to IBM Cloud Private based on the interviews we conducted with its users. The top alternative solutions include Microsoft Azure, Amazon AWS, and Red Hat OpenShift. The alternatives are sorted based on how often peers compare the solutions.

IBM Alternatives Report

Learn what solutions real users are comparing with IBM, and compare use cases, valuable features, and pricing.

Get the alternatives report

Microsoft Azure

4.2 out of 5

Microsoft Azure

4.2 out of 5

Microsoft Azure offers extensive global reach and integration with Microsoft tools, excelling in services like AI and IoT. In comparison, IBM Cloud Private focuses on containerized environments and enterprise security, making it suitable for businesses needing robust private cloud functionalities despite higher initial costs.

Download IBM Cloud Private vs. Microsoft Azure Report

Pricing

Microsoft Azure offers transparent and flexible setup costs, while IBM Cloud Private presents a more complex pricing structure. Users may find Microsoft's clear cost approach preferable compared to IBM's potentially intricate initial price evaluation.

View comparison

Pricing

Amazon AWS

4.2 out of 5

Amazon AWS

4.2 out of 5

Amazon AWS excels in scalability with broad global infrastructure, appealing for flexibility and cost-effectiveness. In comparison, IBM Cloud Private provides robust security and compliance, making it ideal for enterprises with specific regulatory needs, despite a higher initial investment for in-depth solutions.

Download Amazon AWS vs. IBM Cloud Private Report

Pricing

Amazon AWS typically has a lower initial setup cost compared to IBM Cloud Private, which tends to have higher upfront expenses due to its customizable on-premises infrastructure requirements.

View comparison

Pricing

Amazon AWS typically has a lower initial setup cost compared to IBM Cloud Private, which tends to have higher upfront expenses due to its customizable on-premises infrastructure requirements.

Red Hat OpenShift

4.2 out of 5

Red Hat OpenShift

4.2 out of 5

Red Hat OpenShift offers extensive automation and attractive multi-cloud integration, appealing to organizations seeking flexibility. In comparison, IBM Cloud Private excels in data management and security, making it suitable for companies prioritizing stringent data compliance. Red Hat's competitive pricing supports faster ROI, while IBM's advanced features benefit complex operations.

Download IBM Cloud Private vs. Red Hat OpenShift Report

Pricing

Red Hat OpenShift has a straightforward setup cost, while IBM Cloud Private features a more complex and potentially higher initial spending requirement.

View comparison

Pricing

Red Hat OpenShift has a straightforward setup cost, while IBM Cloud Private features a more complex and potentially higher initial spending requirement.

VMware Tanzu Platform

4.0 out of 5

VMware Tanzu Platform

4.0 out of 5

IBM Cloud Private attracts cost-conscious buyers with competitive pricing and robust IBM service integration. In comparison, VMware Tanzu impresses tech buyers with extensive Kubernetes offerings ideal for scalability, alongside its advanced innovation and agility for improved business efficiency and potential growth opportunities.

Download IBM Cloud Private vs. VMware Tanzu Platform Report

Pricing

IBM Cloud Private typically requires lower setup costs, focusing on predictable pricing, whereas VMware Tanzu Platform involves higher initial investments due to comprehensive features and flexibility.

View comparison

Pricing

Pivotal Cloud Foundry

3.8 out of 5

Pivotal Cloud Foundry

3.8 out of 5

Pivotal Cloud Foundry offers robust scalability, ideal for large-scale applications. In comparison, IBM Cloud Private excels with comprehensive integration options, attracting enterprises with complex IT environments. Tech buyers consider pricing and support in Pivotal, while IBM offers flexibility and advanced hybrid capabilities.

Download IBM Cloud Private vs. Pivotal Cloud Foundry Report

Pricing

Pivotal Cloud Foundry's setup cost is typically higher due to its comprehensive features, while IBM Cloud Private offers a more economical setup option appealing to businesses with budget constraints.

View comparison

Pricing

Google App Engine

4.1 out of 5

Google App Engine

4.1 out of 5

Google App Engine offers scalability and flexibility for serverless environments. In comparison, IBM Cloud Private appeals to businesses needing on-premises solutions. Google App Engine provides cost-effective pay-as-you-go pricing, while IBM Cloud Private justifies higher costs with robust features and long-term benefits.

Download Google App Engine vs. IBM Cloud Private Report

Pricing

Google App Engine presents a minimal setup cost, targeting developers seeking simplicity, whereas IBM Cloud Private involves higher initial expenses, appealing to enterprises desiring comprehensive control and on-premise deployment. The choice hinges on the desired balance of cost and c...

View comparison

Pricing

Related categories

PaaS Clouds

Infrastructure as a Service Clouds (IaaS)

Server Virtualization Software