IBM SAN Volume Control offers ultra-low latency, optimizing performance while minimizing power use. It emphasizes sustainability and security, supporting seamless integration of heterogeneous storage types to boost flexibility and manageability.
| Product | Mindshare (%) |
|---|---|
| IBM SAN Volume Control | 3.8% |
| NetApp OnCommand Insight | 7.9% |
| SolarWinds Storage Resource Monitor | 6.7% |
| Other | 81.6% |
IBM SAN Volume Control enhances cost-effective and performance-driven storage management. It fosters user-friendly operations with easy configuration and management, supporting migrations, server updates, and storage expansions. Its virtualization layer allows seamless integration of storage types. The system supports high availability through data replication, making it suitable for diverse environments like SAP HANA, VMware, Hyper-V, and Oracle RAC setups.
What are the key features of IBM SAN Volume Control?Primarily adopted in industries requiring heterogeneous storage management, IBM SAN Volume Control serves extensively in SAP HANA and VMware. It supports Hyper-V infrastructures and Oracle RAC, ensuring high availability through center replication. Banking sectors utilize it for cross-location disk visibility, typically deploying it on-premises for robust application support.
IBM SAN Volume Control was previously known as IBM SVC.
| Author info | Rating | Review Summary |
|---|---|---|
| Senior Manager ICT & at Bangalore International Airport Limited | 4.0 | I appreciate IBM SAN Volume Control for its ultra-low latency, cost and performance optimization, and minimal power consumption. However, enhancements are needed in patch management and storage expansion. Overall, it offers good ROI with reliable security features. |
| Head of Database Administration, SAN and Storage Infrastructure at United Bulgarian Bank AD | 5.0 | I rate this solution 10/10 for its ease of use, configuration, and excellent support. My main wish is for improved virtualized storage box capacity and an upgrade to our SAN infrastructure. |
| Senior Services Engineer at KENAC COMPUTER SYSTEMS | 4.5 | I use IBM SAN Volume Control for heterogeneous storage management, valuing its copy services, performance metrics, and analysis. It could benefit from improved integration with other vendor systems, yet it's shown a positive ROI, making it worth the investment. |
| Sales Engineer at a tech services company with 51-200 employees | 5.0 | I find IBM SAN Volume Control easy to manage for migrations, stable, and scalable, offering good ROI and flexible licensing. My primary concern is the outdated snapshot functionality, which relies on flash copy instead of competitor-like snap volumes, an area needing significant improvement. |
| Storage and Backups Manager at a tech services company with 1,001-5,000 employees | 4.5 | I find SAN Volume Controller's virtualization layer excellent for diverse storage. However, I am frustrated by IBM's slow support and high per-terabyte licensing costs. Despite these issues, I rate the solution a nine out of ten. |
