Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users
IBM Watson for Cyber Security Logo

Top 10 IBM Watson for Cyber Security Alternatives

Vendor: IBM
4.0 out of 5
Leave a review

Top IBM Watson for Cyber Security Competitors

Discover the top alternatives and competitors to IBM Watson for Cyber Security based on the interviews we conducted with its users. The top alternative solutions include Splunk Enterprise Security, Elastic Security, and LogRhythm SIEM. The alternatives are sorted based on how often peers compare the solutions.

IBM Alternatives Report

Learn what solutions real users are comparing with IBM, and compare use cases, valuable features, and pricing.
Get the alternatives report
IBM Watson for Cyber Security Logo
IBM Watson for Cyber Security Logo
Splunk Enterprise Security
4.2 out of 5
Splunk Enterprise Security offers real-time threat detection and flexible analytics. In comparison, IBM Watson for Cyber Security with AI integration provides superior threat insights. Splunk Enterprise Security ensures quick deployment, while IBM Watson for Cyber Security's complexity delivers advanced threat management.
Download IBM Watson for Cyber Security vs. Splunk Enterprise Security Report
Splunk Enterprise Security incurs a complex initial setup cost, while IBM Watson for Cyber Security offers a less complicated implementation, highlighting a key difference in their approach to setup and installation.
View comparison
Pricing
Splunk Enterprise Security incurs a complex initial setup cost, while IBM Watson for Cyber Security offers a less complicated implementation, highlighting a key difference in their approach to setup and installation.
IBM Watson for Cyber Security Logo
Elastic Security
3.9 out of 5
IBM Watson for Cyber Security Logo
Elastic Security
3.9 out of 5
IBM Watson excels in AI-driven threat detection and automated responses, while Elastic Security impresses with its seamless integration with the Elastic Stack and cost-effectiveness. In comparison, IBM Watson has a steeper learning curve, whereas Elastic Security is easier to deploy initially.
Download Elastic Security vs. IBM Watson for Cyber Security Report
IBM Watson for Cyber Security typically has higher setup costs, making it more suitable for larger enterprises, while Elastic Security offers a more cost-effective setup appealing to small and medium-sized businesses.
View comparison
Pricing
IBM Watson for Cyber Security typically has higher setup costs, making it more suitable for larger enterprises, while Elastic Security offers a more cost-effective setup appealing to small and medium-sized businesses.
IBM Watson for Cyber Security Logo
LogRhythm SIEM
4.1 out of 5
IBM Watson for Cyber Security Logo
LogRhythm SIEM
4.1 out of 5
LogRhythm SIEM offers robust log management and threat detection with user-friendly deployment and cost-effective pricing. In comparison, IBM Watson for Cyber Security provides AI-driven functionalities and comprehensive threat intelligence, offering greater long-term benefits despite complex deployment and higher initial costs. Both cater to different security needs.
Download IBM Watson for Cyber Security vs. LogRhythm SIEM Report
LogRhythm SIEM has a higher initial setup cost compared to IBM Watson for Cyber Security, but offers more comprehensive installation support.
View comparison
Pricing
LogRhythm SIEM has a higher initial setup cost compared to IBM Watson for Cyber Security, but offers more comprehensive installation support.
IBM Watson for Cyber Security Logo
Sentinel
3.8 out of 5
IBM Watson for Cyber Security Logo
Sentinel
3.8 out of 5
Sentinel offers competitive pricing, comprehensive threat detection, and user-friendly dashboards. In comparison, IBM Watson for Cyber Security provides advanced analytics and superior AI-driven insights, despite a higher cost. Sentinel excels in ease of deployment, while IBM Watson delivers significant ROI through its advanced features.
Download IBM Watson for Cyber Security vs. Sentinel Report
Sentinel has a lower initial setup cost, making it more accessible, while IBM Watson for Cyber Security presents a higher upfront investment with advanced capabilities.
View comparison
Pricing
Sentinel has a lower initial setup cost, making it more accessible, while IBM Watson for Cyber Security presents a higher upfront investment with advanced capabilities.
IBM Watson for Cyber Security Logo
Anomali
3.9 out of 5
IBM Watson for Cyber Security Logo
Anomali
3.9 out of 5
Anomali focuses on threat detection and sharing capabilities for proactive security. In comparison, IBM Watson utilizes AI-driven automation for comprehensive analytics and deeper insights. Anomali's ease of deployment appeals to those needing quick integration, while IBM Watson's complex setup is suited for advanced environments.
Download Anomali vs. IBM Watson for Cyber Security Report
Anomali has a low setup cost, while IBM Watson for Cyber Security presents a higher initial investment. The setup cost difference is notable, impacting the affordability and initial budget considerations for organizations seeking effective cybersecurity solutions.
View comparison
Pricing
Anomali has a low setup cost, while IBM Watson for Cyber Security presents a higher initial investment. The setup cost difference is notable, impacting the affordability and initial budget considerations for organizations seeking effective cybersecurity solutions.
IBM Watson for Cyber Security Logo
IBM Watson for Cyber Security Logo
ManageEngine Log360
3.8 out of 5
ManageEngine Log360 attracts buyers with its pricing and customer service, while IBM Watson appeals with advanced AI-driven features that justify higher costs. In comparison, IBM Watson's complex setup is mitigated by superior support. Both offer unique advantages depending on budget and security needs.
Download IBM Watson for Cyber Security vs. ManageEngine Log360 Report
ManageEngine Log360 offers a lower initial setup cost, attracting smaller enterprises, whereas IBM Watson for Cyber Security has a higher setup cost, potentially justifiable by larger businesses seeking advanced features and scalability.
View comparison
Pricing
ManageEngine Log360 offers a lower initial setup cost, attracting smaller enterprises, whereas IBM Watson for Cyber Security has a higher setup cost, potentially justifiable by larger businesses seeking advanced features and scalability.
IBM Watson for Cyber Security Logo
Logpoint
3.8 out of 5
IBM Watson for Cyber Security Logo
Logpoint
3.8 out of 5
Logpoint's competitive pricing and responsive support make it attractive for budget-conscious buyers. In comparison, IBM Watson’s higher price is justified by its AI-driven threat detection and comprehensive data insights. Logpoint is noted for straightforward deployment, while IBM Watson offers robust customer service and advanced AI features.
Download IBM Watson for Cyber Security vs. Logpoint Report
Logpoint has a straightforward setup cost, while IBM Watson for Cyber Security presents a more complex pricing model.
View comparison
Pricing
Logpoint has a straightforward setup cost, while IBM Watson for Cyber Security presents a more complex pricing model.
IBM Watson for Cyber Security Logo
Trellix ESM
3.7 out of 5
IBM Watson for Cyber Security Logo
Trellix ESM
3.7 out of 5
Trellix ESM's comprehensive features and straightforward deployment make it ideal for ease of use. In comparison, IBM Watson excels in advanced AI capabilities and ROI, offering superior analytics and threat detection. Trellix ESM is intuitive, while IBM Watson benefits complex environments with precision and extensibility.
Download IBM Watson for Cyber Security vs. Trellix ESM Report
Trellix ESM involves higher setup costs, whereas IBM Watson for Cyber Security is known for more budget-friendly setup expenses. This significant difference highlights a key consideration between the two solutions for prospective users.
View comparison
Pricing
Trellix ESM involves higher setup costs, whereas IBM Watson for Cyber Security is known for more budget-friendly setup expenses. This significant difference highlights a key consideration between the two solutions for prospective users.
IBM Watson for Cyber Security Logo
Netsurion
4.2 out of 5
IBM Watson for Cyber Security Logo
Netsurion
4.2 out of 5
IBM Watson excels in advanced threat intelligence through its cognitive computing capabilities, while Netsurion is valued for affordability and comprehensive managed services. In comparison, IBM's sophisticated analytics and AI offer deeper insights, whereas Netsurion ensures practical security solutions, appealing to budget-conscious organizations.
Download IBM Watson for Cyber Security vs. Netsurion Report
IBM Watson for Cyber Security has higher setup costs compared to Netsurion, which offers a more budget-friendly setup.
View comparison
Pricing
IBM Watson for Cyber Security has higher setup costs compared to Netsurion, which offers a more budget-friendly setup.
IBM Watson for Cyber Security Logo
DNIF HYPERCLOUD
3.8 out of 5
IBM Watson for Cyber Security Logo
DNIF HYPERCLOUD
3.8 out of 5
IBM Watson for Cyber Security offers comprehensive threat detection and actionable threat intelligence, making it ideal for integrated systems. In comparison, DNIF HYPERCLOUD excels in scalability and real-time threat identification, appealing to those needing advanced analytics. DNIF HYPERCLOUD's competitive pricing and faster ROI attract budget-conscious buyers.
Download DNIF HYPERCLOUD vs. IBM Watson for Cyber Security Report
IBM Watson for Cyber Security has a higher setup cost compared to DNIF HYPERCLOUD, making it more suitable for enterprises with larger budgets while DNIF offers a more cost-effective option.
View comparison
Pricing
IBM Watson for Cyber Security has a higher setup cost compared to DNIF HYPERCLOUD, making it more suitable for enterprises with larger budgets while DNIF offers a more cost-effective option.
IBM Watson for Cyber Security Logo
IBM Watson for Cyber Security Logo
Logsign Next-Gen SIEM
3.8 out of 5
Logsign Next-Gen SIEM offers favorable pricing and straightforward deployment. In comparison, IBM Watson for Cyber Security excels in features and advanced analytical functions. Logsign has comprehensive threat detection, while IBM Watson’s AI-driven insights offer superior functionality. Logsign is cost-effective, whereas IBM Watson delivers substantial long-term value.
Download IBM Watson for Cyber Security vs. Logsign Next-Gen SIEM Report
Logsign Next-Gen SIEM is affordable to set up with low initial costs, while IBM Watson for Cyber Security has a higher setup cost, reflecting its premium positioning.
View comparison
Pricing
Logsign Next-Gen SIEM is affordable to set up with low initial costs, while IBM Watson for Cyber Security has a higher setup cost, reflecting its premium positioning.
IBM Watson for Cyber Security Logo
Logz.io
4.1 out of 5
IBM Watson for Cyber Security Logo
Logz.io
4.1 out of 5
IBM Watson for Cyber Security offers robust threat intelligence, excelling in customer service. In comparison, Logz.io provides advanced analytics and real-time monitoring. IBM Watson integrates well with enterprise solutions, while Logz.io delivers quicker ROI and competitive pricing, making it cost-effective with a more intuitive user experience.
Download IBM Watson for Cyber Security vs. Logz.io Report
IBM Watson for Cyber Security has a higher setup cost compared to Logz.io, which offers a more affordable initial implementation.
View comparison
Pricing
IBM Watson for Cyber Security has a higher setup cost compared to Logz.io, which offers a more affordable initial implementation.
IBM Watson for Cyber Security Logo
RSA enVision
3.6 out of 5
IBM Watson for Cyber Security Logo
RSA enVision
3.6 out of 5
RSA enVision offers robust log management and efficient alerting with competitive pricing. In comparison, IBM Watson for Cyber Security excels with advanced AI capabilities and comprehensive threat intelligence, justifying its higher cost. RSA enVision suits quicker deployments, while IBM Watson may provide superior long-term ROI.
Download IBM Watson for Cyber Security vs. RSA enVision Report
RSA enVision has moderately low setup costs, while IBM Watson for Cyber Security features higher setup costs but offers more advanced capabilities.
View comparison
Pricing
RSA enVision has moderately low setup costs, while IBM Watson for Cyber Security features higher setup costs but offers more advanced capabilities.
IBM Watson for Cyber Security Logo
IBM Watson for Cyber Security Logo
ClearSkies SaaS NG SIEM
3.8 out of 5
IBM Watson for Cyber Security excels in advanced AI capabilities and real-time threat intelligence. In comparison, ClearSkies SaaS NG SIEM offers ease of integration and customizability. IBM Watson may improve complexity and integration, while ClearSkies could enhance documentation and reporting. Pricing favors ClearSkies for cost-effectiveness.
Download ClearSkies SaaS NG SIEM vs. IBM Watson for Cyber Security Report
IBM Watson for Cyber Security features a moderate one-time setup cost, while ClearSkies SaaS NG SIEM is noted for its low initial investment, making it the more budget-friendly option.
View comparison
Pricing
IBM Watson for Cyber Security features a moderate one-time setup cost, while ClearSkies SaaS NG SIEM is noted for its low initial investment, making it the more budget-friendly option.
IBM Watson for Cyber Security Logo
IBM Watson for Cyber Security Logo
Fortra's Event Manager
1 out of 5

Organizations have different requirements and varying degrees of resources. Event Manager is easy-to-use, yet sophisticated. As a result, organizations of all sizes and industries rely on our security information and event management platform to take their threat detection and response to the next level.

View comparison

Related categories

Security Information and Event Management (SIEM)
Log Management
IT Operations Analytics