JD Edwards EnterpriseOne Asset Lifecycle Management Reviews

Any customer who has an asset-intensive business where lots of assets are involved needs a system. JD Edwards EnterpriseOne Asset Lifecycle Management helps these businesses manage their assets effectively.

The best feature is the ability to track the entire lifecycle from when the asset enters your organization until disposal. The entire lifecycle can be captured, including costs, depreciation, and any maintenance performed on the asset. All these costs can be tracked, which is the beauty of it.

The advanced analytics and reporting tools are highly advanced.

Because of the advent of AI technology, integrating it with AI will probably add much more value to JD Edwards EnterpriseOne Asset Lifecycle Management.

JD Edwards EnterpriseOne Asset Lifecycle Management is very user-friendly to set up. It gives a lot of flexibility to make changes according to business needs.

I have approximately 20 years of experience working with this solution.

It is a very stable solution.

JD Edwards EnterpriseOne Asset Lifecycle Management is definitely a scalable solution.

Any solution or system requires organizational support, whether provided internally or through a service provider. Without support, it cannot function. While everything might be running smoothly today, support is needed when encountering challenges or issues.

Oracle provides two types of support. They provide support for upgrading and updates as they release them, and they work to resolve bugs when encountered. Oracle is somewhat slow in response to these matters. This could be due to their large customer base worldwide. I would rate their support at four or five out of ten.

Neutral

I had worked with other Oracle solutions in the past.

For other tools, I have very limited experience, but my primary expertise is with JD Edwards EnterpriseOne Asset Lifecycle Management.

JD Edwards and EnterpriseOne are the same system. JD Edwards was renamed to EnterpriseOne with newer versions.

JD Edwards EnterpriseOne Asset Lifecycle Management is very user-friendly to set up. It gives a lot of flexibility to make changes according to business needs.

I am an implementer of this tool.

This solution is primarily designed for mid-tier companies. While SAP is the most expensive option, those who cannot afford SAP normally opt for JD Edwards EnterpriseOne Asset Lifecycle Management.

It is more cost-effective than the SAP solution. While on-premises deployment was common in the past, Oracle now sells only cloud solutions to clients.

This is a very good and flexible solution. It works across any kind of asset-intensive industries or organizations and would be very helpful for them in general.

I rate JD Edwards EnterpriseOne Asset Lifecycle Management an eight out of ten.

We use the solution for finance, procurement, and asset management.

It is a good solution. The product is stable for the time being.

The product will provide support only till 2030. The product must improve its usability. The UI and UX need severe improvements.

I have been using the solution since 2004.

The tool is stable. I rate the stability a seven out of ten. The product must improve its stability.

The tool is not scalable. Approximately 300 people are using the tool in our organization. We do not have plans to increase the usage.

My organization was using IBM Maximo.

The initial setup is straightforward.

We deployed the solution in-house. We have to follow the normal steps to deploy the product. We send it to staging from development, and then it goes live in the production environment. We have eight in-house developers.

The product is not expensive. It is reasonably priced.

We are using the latest version of the solution. Oracle does not even recommend continuing with the product. However, they have committed to providing support till 2030. They might replace it in the future. I will not recommend the solution to others. Overall, I rate the product a seven out of ten.

We use the solution to control our assets.

The product enables us to track our assets. We have access to the master data.

The product must improve the approval process of asset transfer and disposal.

I have been using the solution for more than ten years.

I rate the tool’s stability an eight out of ten. There is room for improvement.

The tool is very scalable. We have around 20 users in our organization.

The support is very good.

The setup is straightforward. It is a cloud solution.

We pay a yearly licensing fee. We’re fine with the cost of the product.

I recommend the product to others. Overall, I rate the solution a nine and a half out of ten.

When a company procures an asset they need to use, by placing a purchase order, we do the capitalization of the assets. Once an asset has been capitalized and the company physically uses the asset, we calculate the depreciation of that particular asset on a routine basis. Until the time the asset is in use, we continue to keep depreciating it for its use.

In certain cases, it can also happen that the asset gets disposed of. For example, if you have an asset with an eight-year lifespan, the asset may get disposed of in the eighth year or earlier in the seventh year. Generally, this is one use case that typically happens with every company.

The most demonstrable feature is the asset creation form, which is quite informative. It has a provision to capture almost every bit of information pertaining to that asset.

The solution’s depreciation calculation setup needs to be improved because it is slightly disintegrated. The depreciation formulas or rules are not quite integrated well and could have been simplified. Currently, you'll have to get into multiple screens and applications to set up various rules, methods, and formulas. They could have been simplified, whereby the system prompts one after the other on its own. However, that is not the case right now.

One has to launch multiple applications and do the configuration separately, one after the other. Instead of that, it should have been more simplified so that the system, by default, takes you one after the other screen in a sequential manner since all of them are interlinked. However, the way the solution is currently designed, they have been de-linked. This is one area where the solution needs to be improved.

I have worked on JD Edwards EnterpriseOne Asset Lifecycle Management for eight years or so as a partner.

The solution is quite stable. We do have problems, but they have nothing to do with the product as such.

I rate JD Edwards EnterpriseOne Asset Lifecycle Management an eight out of ten for stability.

Our clients, by and large, belong to medium-scale businesses. From a concurrent user count and the revenue the company makes, we have clients who are medium and big, not small-scale. The solution is absolutely scalable.

I rate JD Edwards EnterpriseOne Asset Lifecycle Management an eight out of ten for scalability.

Even the original product vendor, Oracle, does not have 100% capability. The support from Oracle has not been good, and it could be improved and made better. For example, if I have any problem with my client in a particular area and we log a case, it doesn't proceed how we want it to. Sometimes, the Oracle vendor or consultant does not have enough knowledge, and Oracle needs to improve in this area.

Neutral

Tally was one software I used. There is no comparison between JD Edwards and Tally. Tally is very simple and user-friendly. You can define the formula on the run, define your ledger types very easily and quickly, and have multiple depreciation for tax and legal separately calculated. That is pretty much easier and faster.

Since JD Edwards is an integrated product, I don't see any problem with it; it is good the way it is.

The solution’s initial setup is comfortable. It is a one time setup, which is quick and fast. It doesn't take much time. The planning exercise, which happens outside of JD, is a time-consuming activity, but within JD, it is quite easy and fast.

The solution is deployed both on-cloud and on-premises. Currently, clients are using the solution on-cloud, but there are cases where the clients are still using the solution on-premises.

The solution's deployment doesn't take too much time, and it happens seamlessly. We advise our CNC team to do the deployment, and we get an update that the objects have been deployed. I have not faced any problems from a deployment perspective

I would strongly be in favor of implementing the solution. The product is quite stable, and the offering is good. JD Edwards EnterpriseOne Asset Lifecycle Management is a good product, and I recommend going ahead and having this product.

Overall, I rate JD Edwards EnterpriseOne Asset Lifecycle Management an eight out of ten.

The most valuable feature of JD Edwards EnterpriseOne Asset Lifecycle Management is the ability to navigate through the module.

The documentation of the solution needs to be improved. It would be helpful. Additionally, more analytics would.

I have been using JD Edwards EnterpriseOne Asset Lifecycle Management for approximately 22 years.

I rate JD Edwards EnterpriseOne Asset Lifecycle Management an eight out of ten.