Lucidchart Reviews

We use Lucidchart for the lateral flow charts.

I've used Lucidchart for a status report. I gave it a particular format and was able to set it up in minutes.

It's fairly intuitive. It has a fairly low learning curve. The only tricky part, and it's only because I have not spent time on it, is some of the formatting. They should enhance the help section on the formatting.

When it comes to documenting things like processes, systems, and new teams, I'd give it an eight or nine out of ten. It's very high because it's fairly intuitive, there's a low learning curve, and it's easy to get immediate output. You can get results very quickly without a lot of direct effort. You don't usually take a week-long series of training. You don't need to go through a lot of hoops to make it work.

I would also rate Lucidchart's capabilities for visualizing and understanding process flows or workflows a nine or ten out of ten. It's much easier to use than Visio.

I plan to use Lucidchart to create database schemas or modify existing data structures. That's the next step, but I'm still at the beginner's level.

We have used Lucidchart in real-time collaboration among users. The solid collaboration has saved us time.

I have received good feedback about its ability for people to look at the diagram rather than reading through written documents.

Lucidchart has helped us realize efficiencies in the projects we use it for. I did use it for a status report. It saved emails, but I can't quantify how many emails we would have sent.

The main improvement I would like to see is for them to improve the help section on the flow charts or on the formatting.

I've only been using Lucidchart for a few months. I use the web-based application.

It's highly available. Once you have all the users on the same licenses, it's very available.

All of us are in the project. There are multiple users.

I have not actually had to call up support yet, which is a good sign. I haven't really had any calls with them.

We used PowerPoint, Word, and templates. It seems like Lucidchart is the most intuitive out of the entire set. 

The intuitiveness is the main difference. The ability to get to see it very quickly seems to be the big advantage for Lucidchart.

The initial setup was very straightforward, except for the formatting. It took a little bit more to try to add bullets or anything to touch it up.

My advice would be to give it at least a good hour to try it before you make any decisions. It shouldn't take that long, but if you put in effort for an hour, I think that you will get immediate results to see the benefits.

A nice thing is that this platform's very forgiving, so I would say to learn to experiment.

Overall, I like it. I just need to find some dedicated time to learn some of the nuances of using the tool. 

I would rate Lucidchart an eight out of ten. 

I've been using Lucidchart for process mapping and creating organograms. Primarily surface researchers use it. We're setting up a new service and that's what we're using it for.

The process mapping has improved my organization. It would have looked very messy to do it on Google Docs. We wouldn't have been able to cover such a range of things in our process mapping. We've managed to get in rows for different organizations and how they fit into the process mapping. We just wouldn't have been able to have space for that using Google Docs and it would have taken so long with the formatting.

It saves us about two hours. It only took us about an hour doing it on Lucidchart, so it probably would have taken about two and a half hours on Google Docs.

We use it to collaborate among users in real-time so that everyone is accessing and working on the same version of a document. It has been great for our project development process. In a way that's similar to Google. It's not that new for us, because we use G Suite throughout our whole organization. So we expect things to be able to do that because we do that a lot where we're all working on the same document at once. But in the same way that it does G Suite, it's really useful. It would be a real big drawback if we couldn't do that because you have to get the Word document, then you save your changes, then you send it back. It saves a lot of time being able to do it at the same time as someone else.

It's not necessarily saving time, but more saving the admin from sending it back and forth and trying to make sure that we're working on it at separate times. It probably would have taken us the same amount of time. It's more the ease of doing it.

It's hard to say whether it's saved money. It's definitely saved time. If you tried to put a process map in writing, I don't think anyone would read it. I don't know if it would save time and money, because no one would even look at it.

I've been using Lucidchart for quite simple things, but it's definitely much easier making process maps using Lucidchart than it is using Google Docs for basically everything. It's much simpler in terms of how easy it is to use Lucidchart. The way that you can get the arrows on the flow charts, based on the process mapping, you can drag the arrows from one box to another and it automatically shows you where you can put it. It makes decisions for you in terms of if you have a decision diamond, then the line is automatically a yes or no. This just makes it so much easier.

I use Lucidchart to document process workflows. We're setting up a new service. So we needed to map how the old service worked, as the exact processes of the old service, and then map how we want the new service to look.

Its capabilities for visualizing and understanding these types of workflows are really good. It's been really easy in the way that when you do a Google Doc, it's all about if it will fit on the page if you're doing a process map or something like that. Whereas Lucidchart, you can make it as big as you want, but then still when you convert it to a PDF, it will all be on one page and then you can send that PDF to people. I found that really useful.

We integrate it with G Suite. Its ability to do so is definitely important. At the moment, that's been fine, because we link it when we're doing a Google Doc, for example, and we have it find the process map and then we would just link into the Lucidchart there. As long as we can do that, I don't think that would be a problem for us. But we'd want it so that when people open Lucidchart if we were sending a paper saying, "This is how our service is going to look. Please see here," and we've linked in the Lucidchart, we would want it so that when they open the Lucidchart, it's a final copy and it doesn't come up with where it says shapes and it has all the editing toolbars. We would want it to just link to a copy of the actual process map.

It's important to us that Lucidchart accommodates both Mac and PC because in our organization, since COVID, most people are using different types of computers. Our whole organization uses Chromebooks, but some people prefer to use their personal laptops for work. For example, my personal laptop now is a Macbook, so I would need to be able to access it when I'm at work, which is on a Chromebook, and also when I'm at home using my personal laptop for work.

Lucidchart has been pretty good. I've never used it before. I didn't read any instructions on how to use it, but I still just managed to pick it up. Anyone who's generally computer savvy would be able to just pick up to use it very quickly. Maybe it would be useful for people who don't process maps not that much to where it says containers and shapes. There is diamond, round and rectangle, maybe it could be explained in brackets that that's used for in-process mapping and flow charts.

One of the issues has been that, as far as I understand, even to view it, the other person needs a Lucidchart account unless you send them a PDF. That's been a bit of an issue because some people in our organization don't have Lucidchart accounts, only certain people have logins. If we just want to collect comments from people, that's been a bit complicated.

You can't put comments into a PDF that easily. We'd want them to be able to open it on Lucidchart without having to have an account themselves and then put comments for us and be able to tag us in comments and things.

That's not possible to do now, at least in a simple way that we've been able to tell. We've had people emailing back saying, "I need my Lucidchart login. I don't know what this is."

I have been using Lucidchart for around two months. 

Web-based is much better because I'm using my personal laptop for work and loads of people are during COVID. I would never want to be downloading lots of applications onto my laptop. The fact that I can just open it in Google Chrome makes it much more accessible to me.

The initial setup was really straightforward. I've never used it before and I didn't read any of the instructions. Someone just said, "We use Lucidchart for process mapping." So I clicked on it, made my account, and then it was just intuitive. I didn't need to do anything. I didn't need to learn or anything.

I can only comment on process mapping and organograms because that's the only thing I've used it for. But I would definitely recommend using Lucidchart for this.

I would rate it a nine out of ten. 

My primary use case is for drawing technical diagrams.

I'm an engineer so I create process diagrams. 

Before we had people on Visio and Lucidchart. Now we still have some people on Visio and we can seamlessly trade Visios between machines. I anticipate that we're all going to Lucidchart.

Lucidchart provides real-time collaboration among users so that everyone is accessing and working on the same version of a document. Most of what we do is document our platform and then change it to show what it would look like in the customer's world. We're a cloud company, and our customers want to know how they connect to our cloud. We changed those diagrams to show how things would fit into the customer environment, to go from access from the customer environment to ours, and we collaborate on that. We may have a voice architect, a data architect, and an end-user architect all on the same call, and we're chatting and changing things as we go, and sharing it through Zoom or doing it through version control. It really depends on what we're going to do.

The real-time collaboration has saved us time. I have collaborated on two diagrams so far and it made it easier.

The ability for people to look at a diagram, rather than reading through written documents saved time and as a result money. Nobody reads. People look at pictures. Imagine trying to read through a diagram that's typed out as an explanation versus looking at a picture. If you look at a picture you can just get it, but with a diagram, you just understand it right away because you can see where things connect. Trying to read that, the human brain doesn't work like that. We work looking at pictures and Lucidchart is a really effective tool to help illustrate those pictures, to explain very complex technical ideas to other technical people. We can do immediate sync and realize, "Oh, it connects like that. Okay. We're done. Next."

We're a cloud company, so we have to overcome technical objections to advance the opportunity and help the customer. If we make it right for the customer and we help them, the money comes. We don't need to focus on selling. We just explain, share, and solve, and then eventually money will come.

I was using Visio before because the benefits of graphic representation of data are obvious. The ability to import Visio diagrams is really helpful because a lot of customers that are on Windows are still on Visio. It's such a pain to install Visio on a machine. If it's a Mac there are requirements and it takes a lot of RAM and it bogs down a machine. This doesn't bog down anybody's machine. It's just to have this web.

Lucidchart helped us to realize efficiencies in the projects we use it for. I can show people pictures, and I can change things in a meeting and then email it by the end of the meeting. Because most places we go, especially now with everybody in-home office, I'm going to have great internet access, and that just makes it easier to be able to change things quickly while we're in a meeting and go, "Oh, you changed this. Oh, okay.", and then send it to them as a proof and send it as a PDF or send them a link. That works great. That saves time and accelerates a sale.

The most valuable features are: 

• The network
• Great network icons
• It's easy to use.
• It's simple.
• It's easier than Visio.

Documenting things like systems and new teams is fantastic. It's even easier when you're doing process stuff. You just drag it out and use it.

Its capabilities for visualizing and understanding process flows ad workflows are very good. It's every bit the equal of Visio and that's a compliment because Visio has been developed for 20 years and Lucidchart is relatively new compared to Visio. It's every bit the equal of Visio. I haven't found any feature that I haven't needed yet.

I do not use it for integrations with Atlassian, Salesforce, Microsoft, or G Suite but I think that would be super handy. 

It's important that Lucidspark accommodates both Mac and PC users. We're a diverse company. I'm on Mac, other people on my team are on PCs and we just use whatever we're most comfortable with.

As far as I know, LucidChart can’t be automated with Visual Basic .Net like Visio.

I have been using Lucidchart for years. 

The stability is flawless. I haven't heard of any stability problems from anybody. And we're a cloud company, so we're uniquely sensitive to that. It has to work all the time.

There is no downtime.

I haven't encountered any slowdowns at all. It's a modern web solution. It's going to scale. It uses the same technology like Google and Amazon and every other cloud provider. It's going to be fine. Scalability shouldn't be a problem.

There are at least 150 people like me using it. We don't require any staff for maintenance. It's a browser app, we don't have to do anything but grant access. It's access management, that's it. Zero. There's no install. It opens in a browser.

I'm sure we will increase usage. As we grow, there'll be more licenses added. I can't imagine why we wouldn't add licenses as we gain employees.

We haven't had to contact their technical support. 

I switched from Visio. I use a Mac and the migration was simple. I just imported old Visio into Lucidchart. It's simple and effortless. The ability to import all these files is important to us. 

They're both good products but I use Lucidchart because I'm on a Mac and it's easier to use.

The initial setup was the simplest ever. A child could do it.

It's a web browser. If you can't do that, you don't need to do anything. If you can start a web browser, you can use this thing. The online help is really good.

The implementation consisted of me opening a web browser. Got it added to my Okta tile. That's about it.

We see ROI because it's cheaper than adding something to the Microsoft suite. Instead of getting Visio, we have Lucidchart. We're not buying Visio anymore.

I didn't evaluate other solutions. I went straight to Lucidchart because it came so highly recommended.

My advice would be to just buy it. You don't need to look at anything else. I wish we'd done it a long time ago.

I would rate Lucidchart a ten out of ten. 

I used Lucidchart to design flowcharts for my APIs. 

Lucidchart was able to help me design the flow of my APIs. They are quite complicated with many conditional flows and many multiple-table interactions. It would have been difficult for me to jump to the code directly, without having the clarity given me by using Lucidchart.

The problem is that it can be difficult to think about exactly what needs to be done, which is why I started using Lucidchart. I thought that it would be better if I have a pictorial representation of the flow that I wanted to implement in my system. After I had this visual, I went on to start coding it.

I have definitely realized efficiencies in the projects that I have used Lucidchart for, and it has had a major impact. As I am designing the flow of data through an API, I sometimes forget to handle some of the base cases or some of the edge cases. More importantly, there could remain some endpoints that are unfinished, or there could be some endpoints that are broken. However, if I am using a pictorial representation, such as with Lucidchart, I always know that at each particular point, I have not missed an aspect of the design that would explain what happens when a particular condition occurs.

Lucidchart's ability to create a visualization that people prefer to look at, over reading written documents, has definitely saved me a lot of time. Moreover, it has helped to make my code bug-free because I no longer have broken endpoints. For example, the system that I am working on now is pseudo-transactional, which is the model for the flows. This means that I should have a rollback mechanism if some particular condition doesn't succeed.

It is easy to check for a particular condition using a standard If and Else combination in code, but there are some scenarios in which there are nested conditions. Solutions need to implement these as well, which is more difficult. However, this is where Lucidchart helps a lot. On every particular flow, it asks me to design a new system that includes an endpoint.

I have experienced a 40% reduction in development time because I don't have to search for the use cases during the coding phase. Specifically, I don't have to search for the edge cases or the base cases because they are designed in a pictorial representation that is easy to follow. I just have to look at the diagram and write the code.

I may write a best-case scenario when I get the data, but the nested decisions or the conditional statements remain unhandled sometimes. There is always a question of what will happen to the flow if something specific occurs, or in some cases, does not occur. For example, if something is missing from the database or one of the tables, it can be difficult to forecast what the consequence will be. In cases such as this, how you react is something that needs to be defined. You should know what will happen, even when conditions result in the worst case. This is why it is best to have a pictorial representation. It will allow you to easily design fallbacks for the system.

It is important to me that Lucidchart accommodates both Mac and PC users because sometimes when you switch companies, they use a different operating system. At this point, I'm using Linux and Lucidchart is compatible. At some point in time, I may change to another organization or even just change laptops, so I need the functionality to work properly on the other operating system.

The most valuable feature is the charting, which allows me to visualize the workflows that I will be coding.

The flowcharting feature would be improved if it had some kind of prediction capability that helped to create the diagrams, such as the ability to automatically join components with my database. Another example would be having it smartly or automatically add or join conditionals.

I only used Lucidchart for two or three days before my trial subscription expired.

I did not experience any issues with stability or performance.

This product is highly scalable. I didn't have the opportunity to use the presentation feature or collaborate on designing a flowchart or UML diagram or database schema, otherwise, I could have compared it and looked at the behavior.

I have not been in contact with technical support.

Prior to Lucidchart, I did not use a similar product for this task.

The initial setup is not complex. I just used the website.

This is not a time-consuming process and I was able to start using it in just a few minutes.

I have only used the trial version and have not yet paid for it, or explored the pricing options.

After performing a simple Google search of some flow design tools, Lucidchart was the first result. I tried it and found that it was easy to work with. I've yet to explore the pricing and have not looked at other products.

My advice for anybody who is considering this product is that if you have business-related documents that you use to implement a solution, it generally takes a lot of time to build. But, if you're using Lucidchart and you have already designed the flow, including a diagrammatic or pictorial representation of what the flow would be like, then it will reduce the time required to build it. Also, the system will be better.

I would rate Lucidchart an eight out of ten.

Professionally, I am involved in marketing and I use Lucidchart to create campaign flowcharts. One of the specific things I do is create process workflows.

Lucidchart has features for documenting things such as processes and the product is very nice in terms of creating the flowchart, but it appears to lack the ability to process handwritten or textual documentation. I'm not sure if this is possible, so I would rate the capabilities a seven out of ten.

This product has very good capabilities for visualizing and understanding process flows and workflows. I would rate it an eight out of ten in this regard because we can create very good process flowcharts.

Having people look at a diagram rather than read through written documents has absolutely saved us time and money. I estimate that it saves us two hours per week.

The most valuable feature is the ease of use. The usability is very nice in terms of flowchart components that are available.

I would like to see more flexibility in terms of the components that are available. For example, I was not able to create a freeflow shape and I did not have the option to create a straight line without an arrowhead on at least one side. I only had the option of having an arrow on one side or the other, rather than a simple line. Adding these few things would make sense but overall, it is fine.

It would be really helpful if we could create a process flow based on a Word Document or a PPT file.

Having integration with a CRM would certainly help. For example, it would be better if we could extract the fields from our CRM when we are creating a process. 

I have been using Lucidchart for approximately four months.

The availability of the application is 98%. 

At this point, I am not sure of how scalable the product is.

Prior to Lucidchart, I used Microsoft Word and Microsoft PowerPoint to prepare flowcharts. I switched because it is easier to build flowchart diagrams.

The initial setup is straightforward. It is a web-based application that is easy to set up and easy to use. Getting started with inserting diagrams and workflows is not something that I found difficult.

It will take another two or three months to see ROI but as of now, we are happy with the investment.

The price of this product is a little bit high. It is probably 20% higher than what I expected to pay for such a solution.

I have not yet integrated Lucidchart with other products but this is something that I plan to do in the future. I would like to integrate it with Microsoft Teams.

My advice for anybody who is considering Lucidchart is that it's a very good tool for creating processes and documenting flows. It is plug-and-play and very easy to use.

I would rate this solution an eight out of ten.

I started using it for projects that I have to deliver at university. I see it more as a collaboration tool where you can create things, present them, and you can do idea maps. For me, it's mostly a graphics tool. If I had to present something that represents a hierarchy or a process, I could use it as well.

The ability for people to look at diagrams, rather than reading through written documents, saves time and money. It makes a presentation even easier to digest. It's faster.

The sticky notes are among the most valuable features. Also, the fact that it has templates so that I don't have to do things myself, starting from scratch, is very helpful. In addition, it's really easy to use. You can add stuff by clicking, without having to go to the options. You just click on something and the options you can use appear. So in general, what I like is how simple it is to use, and the templates.

The fact that it is compatible with both PC and Mac is important. I am a PC user, but I work with people who use Macs.

In addition, the fact that you can collaborate online and modify things in real time helps a lot. If you had to send things to a friend it would be a little more complicated. It saved me about five hours, due to the fact that we didn't have to send things back and forth.

One downside is that you can only modify things online, but when you download work, you download it as an image. It would be useful to have an option to modify it locally.

Also, in the web version, when I'm trying to log in it takes a while to load. It shows you a progression bar and that it's loading a document, but if it worked a little bit faster, it would be easier. Loading the projects I'm working on takes a lot of time.

I started using it about three or four months ago.

It's pretty stable. I haven't had any problems with it.

I would give the scalability a five out of 10. You have to download an image, which doesn't work as well.

Tech support is pretty good.

I used some online tools, but I don't remember what they were called. When I was looking for a tool to help me, I found Lucidchart easier to use, without a requirement to purchase it. The other tools ask you for your credit card to try the free trial, and I didn't like that. That's why I chose Lucidchart.

Setting it up was easy. I just created an account and started using it. It wasn't complicated.

My return on investment has been on hours spent. Going back and forth on documents is not only tiring but it takes a long time to complete a project that way. The ability to look at things in real time makes it a whole different experience. It makes work a little bit faster, helping you to more quickly finish stuff. It makes it easier for a team and makes projects easier to do.

I only use the free version.

Try it out, because it's really good. It might be good to download the desktop version. The desktop would be easier because it doesn't take as long to load. But overall, it's good.

I rate it a nine out of 10. The reason it's not a 10 is the load time. But other than that, everything is good.

I'm using their web-based application. I've just come off the free trial, so I'm a very new user.

We use it for the organizational charts and for documenting new teams. We'll probably use it for processing systems at some point.

I would rate Lucidchart a seven out of ten for documenting things like new teams. I'd give it this rating purely because I don't know all the features yet.

Lucidchart enables me to put down on paper what I was visualizing in my head. It makes it more shareable than only using words.

The ease of use is the most valuable feature. It's simple to learn pretty quickly.

I have used the organizational charts for visualizing and understanding team hierarchies and relationships. It's been very good so far. It's easy to use, it's easy to manipulate and change quickly if I need to change something. It's a good product.

A couple of times when I tried to move a line, connecting two shapes on an organizational chart, occasionally the line doesn't move as intuitively as I think it should. I have to fiddle around with it a few times to get it to do what I want it to do. That's probably because I'm a new user and I'm not experienced enough, rather than it being an issue with the software itself.

I have been using Lucidchart for around three weeks. 

It seems very available and very stable so far. The follow-ups have been good.

Nobody else is using it yet, but my business partner and our general manager will probably be using it. So there will be at least three of us.

I know I can add other users and stuff like that. So, that's good.

I tried to do charts in Word before.

Lucidchart is definitely more comprehensive, more professional-looking, and more flexible.

The initial setup was of medium-level complexity. 

It didn't take very long to set up. There wasn't anything really difficult about it. I'm just not the most computer savvy person on the planet.

I hope to see ROI soon. 

The price was low enough to make me think that it was fine, I'll go for it. I think it's $80 or so. It's not too expensive. Even if I don't end up using it that much, I feel that it's still a good deal.

I didn't evaluate other solutions.  I had a quick look at Lucidchart when a co-worker of mine used it about a month ago.

I haven't integrated it with third-party solutions. I've only shared it through its share function, like with email and Outlook.

I liked the fact that I could extend my free trial for seven days. That was good because I wasn't ready to make a decision to buy it in the first seven days. I haven't had a chance to really use it properly. I have a pretty busy life and giving me that extra seven days was very useful.

I would rate Lucidchart an eight out of ten. I only give it this rating because I haven't had a chance to really explore all its functionality yet.

I am using it for a wide range of diagrams for network configuration, process flow, etc. I am using its web version.

It is good for documenting things such as processes, systems, etc. Typically, for each project, I'll start with a new file, and for each and every step, I create more sheets under the same file. It is similar to Excel where you have multiple sheets in the same file. It is an effective way for me. It is very convenient and easy to use.

It provides real-time collaboration among users so that everyone is accessing and working on the same version of a document. We typically organize a Zoom meeting at certain times, and I do screen sharing, and a few other people join in. We work together by using collaborative editing options. Not every person who has access to the collaborative option is very technical. Sometimes, they might unknowingly delete something. When more people are collaborating, they can mix things together. Such human errors will come up, but they happen because of the people who are collaborating and not because of the tool. 

The ability for people to look at a diagram rather than reading through written documents saves time. The clients get the reality of what we are doing, which we consider as important. We can show what we are really working on, and they understand. 

I do a lot of process flows and diagrams. It is very important for me, not only for process flows but also for network designing and other such things. It has been helpful for understanding process flows or workflows, and that's the main purpose for which I use it. I have to forward the software process or application process flow to my development team. For non-technical people, such as a client who doesn't know the technical terms, Lucidchart helps in more visualization. When I present it and explain the process, people can easily understand it. That's the main advantage of using this one. For technical people, I spent a few hours defining the process flow, and they can understand it in five minutes.

Lucidchart saved us around 90% time as compared to the other solution. When you use presentation slides, it takes so much time to create a proper design. You have to insert each and every shape, and you have to connect things properly. Moreover, the slide sizes are fixed, and you can't extend the slides, which makes the work harder, whereas, in Lucidchart, you can extend a particular sheet to whatever size you want. You can also put everything together, and it still works fine. I own a development app in which we have more than 10 modules. For all 10 modules, I'm just using a single sheet. I just extend its height, and I am able to use a single sheet for the overall process flow. So, I don't need to go slide by slide to explain what is happening. Previously, to share my slides with other people, I had to put the file in one place and then send the link. If they didn't know much about designing slides, they used to mess up everything. With Lucidchart, this doesn't happen.

I really like the drag and drop feature because it makes the work easier. It is very easy to use. All the pieces are very good. All the icons and all the fields are available in the left panel. So, I just click, drag, and then edit a piece. When I showed it to my managing director, he was very inspired, and he also got a premium account for himself. 

I deal with technical sites. So, I typically use this for roster plans such as who will be on a particular project, and it has been very useful. 

When it comes to network diagrams, it gives us the flexibility to design a network on the go. This flexibility matters to us, and it makes us more productive.

It makes everything easy. It is very convenient as compared to other typical solutions. It makes my work easier. I don't need so much technical knowledge or experience of a particular software. I can just click and drag.

Wireframing can be improved. For mock-ups and wireframing, only 10% of what is required is there. If they can develop this feature, it would be much better because it will then provide everything. Currently, we can design network diagrams, processes, etc., but we should also be able to do wireframing. 

I design the process flow, and after the developer starts the process, I also have to design the UI. At present, I'm using another solution for wireframing or UI, but even in that, most of the icons are missing, so I have to get the icons from the internet. If Lucidchart can have the wireframing options into it, it will be a major success and helpful for us. Lucidchart already has the concept, but it does not have many options. You can select only limited options even if you have a premium subscription.

I used Lucidchart as a student for two years. As a professional, I have been using it for the last one month after joining this organization.

It is totally fine in terms of stability.

It is pretty okay. We haven't encountered any compatibility or accessibility issues so far. 

Currently, we have about three employees who are maintaining the Lucidchart pack. They dedicate roughly one or two hours per day. Each one has a different role. One is handling development, one is handling the testing, and another one is handling the database and backend stuff. Their roles are IT manager, system engineer, and assistant system engineer. 

It is one common license. We just share the permissions. So, we have one account, and I am the one maintaining the account. I have three other people who have fewer privileges. I share the documents with them, but they can't do much editing. They can only do limited operations.

Currently, we don't have any plans to extend its usage. After three or six months, when our initial project is rolled out, we might expand it and purchase more licenses.

I have never contacted their technical support. There was no need to contact them because it is very straightforward and easy to use.

In my organization, they were creating presentations for any kind of process flows, but they didn't have a professional look. They had to spend more time on the explanation part to help clients visualize the process. With Lucidchart, everything is in a single place, and everything is properly designed and organized. When I explain something to clients, it is easy for them to visualize and understand it.

Its initial setup was straightforward. You just create an account and make the payment. It doesn't require any implementation strategy.

The ROI is not in terms of money, but it is in terms of productivity. Previously, to explain the process flow to developers, we had to spend hours creating the presentations. The guy who held my position previously spent almost a week designing five slides that explained the process flow. He had to spend another three to four hours explaining it to our developers, so the duration was very long. With Lucidchart, I can create the whole process flow within a day, and when I show it to the developers, they can understand within five minutes. So, I can witness its effectiveness. It is also useful when there is an occasional change in the process, which sometimes can happen once in a month.

Its pricing is very affordable and reasonable for the features that it provides. I am using its basic plan, and for my usage, it is perfectly reasonable. It suits perfectly.

As a student, when I was searching for such solutions, I came across Lucidchart in Google search. I just created a trial account, and it was pretty okay. I then came to know that my university also provides premium access to Lucidchart. 

In my current organization, I didn't evaluate any other products before recommending Lucidchart to my manager. I know Lucidchart for the last two years, and I thought this would be a perfect fit for us. I recommended it to my manager and showed him how it works, and that's it. He approved to go with it.

It is very flexible and easy to use. These are the two main things about Lucidchart. Moreover, it doesn't take so much technical support. It is just click-and-drag. With some of the other solutions, you need some technical knowledge to understand how it works, whereas Lucidchart doesn't require any technical knowledge. If you have experience working with Word, PowerPoint, or Excel, you can use it easily.

I have very occasionally used Lucidchart to create database schemas or modify existing data structures. I have not used Lucidchart's ability to compare different versions of documents. I might try it in the future.

I haven't tested it with Mac. I have a Lenovo PC and an HP workstation. It works fine with both. I have also tested it with Ubuntu, and it works totally fine with that. In our organization, everyone uses Microsoft.

I would rate Lucidchart a nine out of 10. It just needs more wireframing features.