What is our primary use case?
Our usual use cases for ManageEngine AssetExplorer include contract management and managing all IT assets, alongside service catalogs and purchase inventories. We are managing purchase and inventories of the assets, along with contract management, tracking each contract's purchased assets and their status for network, servers, data centers, and other inventories.
In summary, we manage IT assets as well as non-IT assets for the project and also handle purchase contracts and license renewals, monitoring everything with ManageEngine AssetExplorer.
We are using the software license tracking feature through ManageEngine AssetExplorer.
What is most valuable?
The first valuable feature of ManageEngine AssetExplorer is its user-friendliness. Another valuable aspect is the CMDB, which makes it easy to configure each asset from the bottom to the top level, such as assigning departments and owners. The software allows access to everything, including financial implications, lifespan, usage, maintenance, and asset transfers for any completed projects or damage states. We can also track what is in use and for which projects, managing everything along with labor costs.
The software license tracking helps us manage compliance issues by scanning every connected device, whether it's a network, server, desktop, or laptop. We can identify the license type and manage unlicensed software, sending reminders to remove any unapproved software from laptops or servers. This monitoring ensures compliance during audits, showing we remain within the licensed volume and identifying any unauthorized installations or cracked licenses.
We allow globally accepted free software while monitoring unapproved software for security reasons, and monthly audits help us understand our assets and software usage.
Real-time asset discovery has significantly affected our IT asset management strategies. Once the agent is installed, it communicates directly with the server, allowing us to track all asset details. For remote items, we install remote agents, while for restricted items, we use agentless scanning through Linux kernels or Windows WMI. This enables us to easily access asset details using the scripts and agents provided by ManageEngine AssetExplorer.
What needs improvement?
Improvements do not have to be drastic; minor optimizations and increased flexibility can enhance usability. Customizations can be done through ManageEngine AssetExplorer support but may incur additional charges.
As a server management manager, requirements for improvements have not been raised because everything needed is integrated with the mail server and organization Active Directory, including security through single sign-on and Duo authentication. We utilize domain, network, and distributed asset scanning, supported once the agent is installed. We also handle purchase, recovery, and contract reports efficiently.
Continuous improvement is reflected in ManageEngine AssetExplorer with ongoing advanced updates; however, our requirements are already met with the existing product features, so we don't need the latest updates for vendor management or other enhancements.
For how long have I used the solution?
We have been working with ManageEngine AssetExplorer for the last five years.
How are customer service and support?
I often communicate with the technical support of ManageEngine AssetExplorer.
I find ManageEngine AssetExplorer's technical support to be good and satisfactory.
The technical support deserves a rating of seven out of ten.
Technical support takes longer to resolve issues than expected, often two to four days. They are maintaining their standard levels of service within their SLA, which is communicated.
How would you rate customer service and support?
What about the implementation team?
We are a customer for ManageEngine AssetExplorer, and we have implemented ManageEngine AssetExplorer server in-house.
What other advice do I have?
We create reports as required; there are inbuilt and customized reports available that we use.
We are creating reports based on asset auditing features and sending them to management for decision-making.
With role-based access control in ManageEngine AssetExplorer, every asset is assigned to a user, and our system connects to an Active Directory, making department heads the owners of those assets. A single user is assigned to each asset, maintaining responsibility. This allows us to view which department each asset belongs to and quickly identify responsibilities, security breaches, and asset status through the data model, which also provides advanced analytical reporting of IT spending trends.
We are in the process of integrating ManageEngine AssetExplorer with the Service Manager; previously, it functioned on the desktop, and now we are testing this integration with the IT Service Manager.
From my administrative perspective, I rate ManageEngine AssetExplorer as nine out of ten, saying it is safe and good software.
Which deployment model are you using for this solution?
On-premises