Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users
NGINX App Protect Logo

NGINX App Protect Reviews

Vendor: F5
4.1 out of 5
Leave a review

What is NGINX App Protect?

NGINX App Protect application security solution combines the efficacy of advanced F5 web application firewall (WAF) technology with the agility and performance of NGINX Plus. The solution runs natively on NGINX Plus and addresses some of the most difficult challenges facing modern DevOps environments:

Get the NGINX App Protect Buyer's Guide and find out what your peers are saying about NGINX App Protect, Prisma Cloud by Palo Alto Networks, Checkmarx One and more!
NGINX App Protect is the #7 ranked solution in API Security Solutions, #15 ranked solution in top Web Application Firewalls, and #27 ranked solution in Container Security Solutions. PeerSpot users give NGINX App Protect an average rating of 8.2 out of 10. NGINX App Protect is most commonly compared to Prisma Cloud by Palo Alto Networks: NGINX App Protect vs Prisma Cloud by Palo Alto Networks. NGINX App Protect is popular among the large enterprise segment, accounting for 52% of users researching this solution on PeerSpot. The top industry researching this solution are professionals from a computer software company, accounting for 13% of all views.
Buyer's Guide
NGINX App Protect
January 2026
Get the report
Helped 881,733 peers since 2012

Featured NGINX App Protect reviews

Read more reviews

NGINX App Protect mindshare

Product category:
Web Application Firewall (WAF)
As of February 2026, the mindshare of NGINX App Protect in the Web Application Firewall (WAF) category stands at 2.1%, up from 1.7% compared to the previous year, according to calculations based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Web Application Firewall (WAF) Market Share Distribution
ProductMarket Share (%)
NGINX App Protect2.1%
Fortinet FortiWeb7.8%
Imperva Application Security Platform7.8%
Other82.3%
Web Application Firewall (WAF)

PeerResearch reports based on NGINX App Protect reviews

TypeTitleDate
CategoryWeb Application Firewall (WAF)Feb 8, 2026Download
ProductReviews, tips, and advice from real usersFeb 8, 2026Download
ComparisonNGINX App Protect vs Fortinet FortiWebFeb 8, 2026Download
ComparisonNGINX App Protect vs F5 Advanced WAFFeb 8, 2026Download
ComparisonNGINX App Protect vs Imperva Application Security PlatformFeb 8, 2026Download
Suggested products
TitleRatingMindshareRecommending
Prisma Cloud by Palo Alto Networks4.22.0%98%113 interviewsAdd to research
Checkmarx One3.9N/A88%81 interviewsAdd to research
 
 
Key learnings from peers
Last updated Feb 7, 2026

Valuable Features

NGINX App Protect offers flexible security management, reverse proxy capabilities, and integration across platforms. Users value its simple command-line interface, API connectivity, and robust automation for DevOps. Features include OWASP certification, load balancing, bot and brute force protection, flexible policies, and traffic management. The tool provides comprehensive HTTP session control and auto-learning for application profiling, streamlining backend programming while enhancing security with signature-based detection, DOS protection, and effective bot detection and IP blocking.
  • "NGINX App Protect is a good product and performs very well even when it is under stress."
  • "I would say that the most valuable feature is the ability to operate in a DevOps environment and to be configured through API and pipeline by the developers themselves."
  • "Overall, I rate NGINX App Protect between eight and nine."

Room for Improvement

Configuration lacks flexibility, requiring more automation for setting policies and managing rules. High throughput challenges persist. Limited API exposure and slow bug fixes hinder performance. Licensing becomes expensive quickly. User interface and technical support need refinement. Compatibility issues with existing infrastructure are present. Integration with more security features and a clearer roadmap are desired. Documentation is insufficient, making advanced feature exploration difficult. Pricing and understanding of hardware requirements require attention.
  • "The GUI and web GUI configuration could be improved to be easier to manage and use."
  • "It would be better if it were easier to implement and if there was more information from F5 regarding hardware requirements and specifications to deploy the service, to avoid disruptions after implementation."
  • "It doesn't have more advanced features like no false-positive security, which you can configure in Advanced WAF."

ROI

Organizations experienced a notable ROI from NGINX App Protect, especially during the transition to remote work due to Covid. The investment in NGINX App Protect provided immediate advantages, enhancing application security and delivering cost-effectiveness. Some companies report being in early testing phases, lacking clear ROI visibility, although they acknowledge benefits like improved network security and integration ease with CICD pipelines. One entity invested $40,000 and anticipates $30,000 in returns within eight months.

Pricing

NGINX App Protect pricing is considered high, with licensing fees reported between $3,000 to $40,000 annually. Its subscription-based model offers flexibility with yearly or multi-year options. While some find the costs reasonable, others note it as expensive compared to alternatives like Imperva. Licensing is annual without additional fees, and pricing varies based on architecture and usage. Customers perceive it similar to top-tier Gartner Magic Quadrant products in cost.
  • "The product's price is high."
  • "NGINX App Protect is expensive."
  • "The price of NGINX App Protect is not much different from the products that fall under the leader category of Gartner Magic Quadrant."

Popular Use Cases

NGINX App Protect is mainly used for securing web applications, including internet banking and published services. It functions as a web application firewall, load balancer, and reverse proxy. Users employ it in container environments such as Kubernetes and OpenShift, in cloud perimeter security, and to protect APIs. It also integrates into deployment pipelines and guards against OWASP threats, with capabilities for automated cases and decentralized applications.

Service and Support

NGINX App Protect's customer service is fast and helpful, though some report delays in response time. Technical support is knowledgeable but sometimes asks unnecessary questions. Users experienced varying quality, with some finding it expensive, lacking technical skills, or requiring issue escalation. Previous experiences with BIG-IP were efficient. Though responsiveness has improved, some prefer alternatives. Many rate support highly, around eight to nine out of ten. Some customers rely on their expertise due to unavailable support.

Deployment

NGINX App Protect's initial setup is generally considered simple, especially for those familiar with similar tasks, but can become challenging due to security certificates and custom configurations. Most organizations faced additional work when dealing with certificates. Basic deployments are quick, but complex setups involving multiple applications or granular security require more time. Experience aids efficiency, while novices may find it more demanding. Deployment times vary from days to months, with automation and preparation easing the process.

Scalability

NGINX App Protect offers scalability with various licensing options, suitable for diverse user counts. While perceived as scalable by many, challenges exist in handling traffic and configuration complexities, especially with deployment lag and lack of centralized options. It supports a wide range of users but may require upgrading hardware for traffic expansion. Users report it to be scalable but note specific limitations related to policy design and application-specific scalability.

Stability

NGINX App Protect exhibits excellent stability. Many users highlight its dependable operation and compare it favorably against other options like Imperva. It can manage substantial traffic, handling up to 70,000 requests per second. Users often rate its stability between eight and eight-point-five out of ten, praising its lightweight and fast performance. Some mention areas for improvement but consistently note its reliability. The application is versatile, running efficiently as a module with Ingress Controller.
These insights are based on the in-depth reviews provided by peers to help you make a better buying decision.
Download our NGINX App Protect Buyer's Guide for additional reliable information.

Review data by company size

By reviewers
Company SizeCount
Small Business7
Midsize Enterprise5
Large Enterprise9
By reviewers
By visitors reading reviews
Company SizeCount
Small Business78
Midsize Enterprise29
Large Enterprise118
By visitors reading reviews

Top industries

By visitors reading reviews
Computer Software Company
13%
Financial Services Firm
13%
Comms Service Provider
10%
Manufacturing Company
8%
Retailer
6%
Healthcare Company
5%
University
4%
Marketing Services Firm
4%
Transportation Company
4%
Performing Arts
3%
Real Estate/Law Firm
3%
Insurance Company
3%
Media Company
3%
Energy/Utilities Company
3%
Educational Organization
2%
Legal Firm
2%
Outsourcing Company
2%
Recreational Facilities/Services Company
2%
Construction Company
2%
Hospitality Company
2%
Government
1%
Consumer Goods Company
1%
Non Profit
1%

Compare NGINX App Protect with alternative products

Go!

Learn more about NGINX App Protect

  • Integrating security controls directly into the development automation pipeline
  • Applying and managing security for modern and distributed application environments such as containers and microservices
  • Providing the right level of security controls without impacting release and go-to-market velocity
  • Complying with security and regulatory requirements

NGINX App Protect offers:

  • Expanded security beyond basic signatures to ensure adequate controls
  • F5 app‑security technology for efficacy superior to ModSecurity and other WAFs
  • Confidently run in “blocking” mode in production with proven F5 expertise
  • High‑confidence signatures for extremely low false positives
  • Increases visibility, integrating with third‑party analytics solutions
  • Integrates security and WAF natively into the CI/CD pipeline
  • Deploys as a lightweight software package that is agnostic of underlying infrastructure
  • Facilitates declarative policies for “security as code” and integration with DevOps tools
  • Decreases developer burden and provides feedback loop for quick security remediation
  • Accelerates time to market and reduces costs with DevSecOps‑automated security

NGINX App Protect was previously known as NGINX WAF, NGINX Web Application Firewall.

Related questions

  • 69
Which lesser known firewall product has the best chance at unseating the market leaders?
  • 42
Which WAF solution would you recommend to cater to 100 to 125 concurrent sessions?
  • 88
What do you recommend for a securing Web Application?
  • 41
Fortinet vs Sophos? Help choose a NGFW solution that can replace Microsoft TMG.
  • 25
Imperva WAF vs. Barracuda: Which One is Better?
  • 85
F5 vs. Imperva WAF?
  • 174
When should companies use SSL Inspection?
  • 219
NGFW with URL Filtering vs Web Proxy
  • 236
How does a WAF help to protect against DDoS attacks?
  • 48
What's right for me? Fortinet or Citrix?

Product Categories

Product Categories
Web Application Firewall (WAF)
Container Security
API Security

Popular Comparisons

Popular Comparisons
Prisma Cloud by Palo Alto Networks vs NGINX App Protect Logo
Prisma Cloud by Palo Alto Networks vs NGINX App Protect
Checkmarx One vs NGINX App Protect Logo
Checkmarx One vs NGINX App Protect
Imperva Application Security Platform vs NGINX App Protect Logo
Imperva Application Security Platform vs NGINX App Protect
CrowdStrike Falcon Cloud Security vs NGINX App Protect Logo
CrowdStrike Falcon Cloud Security vs NGINX App Protect
Fortinet FortiWeb vs NGINX App Protect Logo
Fortinet FortiWeb vs NGINX App Protect
Azure Front Door vs NGINX App Protect Logo
Azure Front Door vs NGINX App Protect
Microsoft Azure Application Gateway vs NGINX App Protect Logo
Microsoft Azure Application Gateway vs NGINX App Protect
F5 Advanced WAF vs NGINX App Protect Logo
F5 Advanced WAF vs NGINX App Protect
AWS WAF vs NGINX App Protect Logo
AWS WAF vs NGINX App Protect
Cloudflare Web Application Firewall vs NGINX App Protect Logo
Cloudflare Web Application Firewall vs NGINX App Protect
Akamai App and API Protector vs NGINX App Protect Logo
Akamai App and API Protector vs NGINX App Protect
Azure Web Application Firewall vs NGINX App Protect Logo
Azure Web Application Firewall vs NGINX App Protect
SUSE NeuVector vs NGINX App Protect Logo
SUSE NeuVector vs NGINX App Protect
Check Point CloudGuard WAF vs NGINX App Protect Logo
Check Point CloudGuard WAF vs NGINX App Protect
Barracuda Web Application Firewall vs NGINX App Protect Logo
Barracuda Web Application Firewall vs NGINX App Protect
See all alternatives
 
NGINX App Protect Reviews Summary
Author infoRatingReview Summary
Project Manager at a comms service provider with 10,001+ employees4.5I researched NGINX App Protect and found that its ability to detect bots and block IPs is effective for securing applications, as seen in its deployment for a medical instrument company. For smaller budgets, Cloudflare might be preferable.
Dev Ops Engineer at adesso AG3.5I've used NGINX App Protect for years as a stable, affordable, and effective proxy and web application firewall, though its GUI could improve; overall, it's easy to manage and performs well under stress in Kubernetes environments.
IT Architect at a financial services firm with 10,001+ employees4.0We are transitioning to a private cloud and needed a flexible alternative to F5 ASM. NGINX App Protect's integration in DevOps and API configurability are valuable, though easier implementation and clearer hardware specs from F5 would improve it.
Senior security architecture at National Payment Corporation Of India4.0I use NGINX App Protect for protection against external threats, including OWASP Top 10. While it provides extensive reporting and customization, it lacks a user interface for updates and configuration changes. Better documentation on deploying gRPC would be beneficial.
Security System Engineer at Ascomp S.A.4.0I found NGINX App Protect valuable for its simple functions ideal for CICD pipelines and automation, though it lacks advanced features like no false-positive security found in Advanced WAF. It enhances network security and integrates easily, despite fewer features.
Chief Information Officer at F.P. eSafe Solutions LTD4.0I find NGINX App Protect to be a robust security solution that's easy to deploy and integrates well into deployment pipelines. Effective communication between security and developer teams is crucial. It offers great value despite needing a better user interface.
Ingeniero at Servicios Eyenet S.A De C.V4.5I utilize NGINX App Protect mainly for customer platforms like e-commerce. Its OWASP certification and quick implementation of strong passwords are impressive, though e-commerce portal improvements are needed. I invested $40,000, expecting a $30,000 return in eight months.
Sr. Manager (Technology) at Contessabd5.0NGINX App Protect offers impressive mail proxy and API connectivity features but is expensive, which is concerning. It needs improved documentation and a better licensing model. If pricing is an issue, I recommend Radware, noting F5's strong OEM support.