Top 10 Parallels Mac Management for Microsoft SCCM Alternatives

Name: Parallels Mac Management for Microsoft SCCM
Brand: Parallels

Top Parallels Mac Management for Microsoft SCCM Competitors

Discover the top alternatives and competitors to Parallels Mac Management for Microsoft SCCM based on the interviews we conducted with its users. The top alternative solutions include Microsoft Configuration Manager, BigFix, and HashiCorp Terraform. The alternatives are sorted based on how often peers compare the solutions.

Parallels Alternatives Report

Learn what solutions real users are comparing with Parallels, and compare use cases, valuable features, and pricing.

Get the alternatives report

Microsoft Configuration Manager

4.1 out of 5

Microsoft Configuration Manager

4.1 out of 5

Microsoft Configuration Manager offers robust device management for Windows-focused environments. In comparison, Parallels Mac Management excels in integrating macOS support with SCCM. MCM's extensive infrastructure suits larger IT systems, while Parallels appeals to mixed OS environments with its ease of setup and integration.

Pricing

Microsoft Configuration Manager presents a modest upfront cost, while Parallels Mac Management for Microsoft SCCM requires a higher initial investment. Differences in setup and integration costs make varying impacts on budget considerations.

View comparison

Pricing

BigFix

4.3 out of 5

BigFix

4.3 out of 5

BigFix is essential for patch management, security compliance, and software distribution across Windows, Linux, and macOS. Its key features include integration with vulnerability scanners, asset management, and customizable compliance modules. Users value its scalability, real-time remediation, and ease of use. However, improvements are needed in UI, reporting, and cloud-based functionalities.

Pricing

When purchasing, buying with other IBM tools provided us with a very good discount in pricing.

I can estimate the reduced cost of servers maintenance to approximatively $500,000.

View comparison

Pricing

When purchasing, buying with other IBM tools provided us with a very good discount in pricing.

I can estimate the reduced cost of servers maintenance to approximatively $500,000.

HashiCorp Terraform

4.3 out of 5

HashiCorp Terraform

4.3 out of 5

HashiCorp Terraform enables Infrastructure as Code, automating deployment in Azure, AWS, and GCP. It excels in cloud provisioning, multi-environment management, and integration with CI/CD pipelines. Its modularity, state management, and cloud compatibility enhance deployment efficiency. Users seek UI improvement, better YAML support, and enhanced state file security.

Pricing

The setup for Terraform is quite easy and currently, we are using their community version along with Jenkins.

They have given it to us at a monthly cost, but it is on a yearly basis.

View comparison

Pricing

The setup for Terraform is quite easy and currently, we are using their community version along with Jenkins.

They have given it to us at a monthly cost, but it is on a yearly basis.

BMC TrueSight Server Automation

4.2 out of 5

BMC TrueSight Server Automation

4.2 out of 5

BMC TrueSight Server Automation automates server maintenance, including patching, compliance, and application deployment. It integrates with ITSM, enhancing patch management and security. Challenges include complex setup and reporting issues. Users seek improved patch management and APIs. The platform supports real-time data collection, centralized management, and multi-OS integration.

Pricing

Licensing is a bit pricey. Be mindful about the components that you need and buy as appropriate.

We're looking at less than $100,000 USD for this solution.

View comparison

Pricing

Licensing is a bit pricey. Be mindful about the components that you need and buy as appropriate.

We're looking at less than $100,000 USD for this solution.

Related categories

Configuration Management

Software Distribution

Server Monitoring