Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users
Radware Alteon Logo

Top 10 Radware Alteon Alternatives

Vendor: Radware
4.3 out of 5
Badge Leader
552 followers
Start review

Top Radware Alteon Competitors

Discover the top alternatives and competitors to Radware Alteon based on the interviews we conducted with its users. The top alternative solutions include Microsoft Azure Application Gateway, Azure Front Door, and AWS WAF. The alternatives are sorted based on how often peers compare the solutions. Radware Alteon surpasses its competitors by offering advanced load balancing, flexible deployment options, and enhanced security measures that ensure high availability and robust performance for complex application environments.

Radware Alternatives Report

Learn what solutions real users are comparing with Radware, and compare use cases, valuable features, and pricing.
Get the alternatives report
Radware Alteon Logo
Radware Alteon Logo
Microsoft Azure Application Gateway
3.6 out of 5
Radware Alteon offers robust application delivery for on-premises environments, excelling in load balancing, user security, and reliability, with a focus on comprehensive support and cost-effectiveness. In comparison, Microsoft Azure Application Gateway seamlessly integrates with Azure, offering cloud-native scaling and effective traffic management.
Download Microsoft Azure Application Gateway vs. Radware Alteon Report
Radware Alteon has a higher setup cost compared to Microsoft Azure Application Gateway, highlighting a significant cost difference in initial deployment expenses. Azure offers a more budget-friendly setup, appealing to businesses seeking cost-effective solutions.
View comparison
Pricing
Radware Alteon has a higher setup cost compared to Microsoft Azure Application Gateway, highlighting a significant cost difference in initial deployment expenses. Azure offers a more budget-friendly setup, appealing to businesses seeking cost-effective solutions.
Radware Alteon Logo
Azure Front Door
4.4 out of 5
Radware Alteon Logo
Azure Front Door
4.4 out of 5
Radware Alteon delivers strong on-premise capabilities, including load balancing and SSL offloading, appealing to users emphasizing application protection. In comparison, Azure Front Door's cloud-native architecture offers scalability and CDN features, catering to those prioritizing cloud-based security and global deployments.
Download Azure Front Door vs. Radware Alteon Report
Radware Alteon typically involves higher initial setup costs due to its hardware requirements, whereas Azure Front Door offers a more affordable and flexible cloud-based solution. Users often note Radware's complexity contrasts with the straightforwardness of Azure Front Door's setup.
View comparison
Pricing
Radware Alteon typically involves higher initial setup costs due to its hardware requirements, whereas Azure Front Door offers a more affordable and flexible cloud-based solution. Users often note Radware's complexity contrasts with the straightforwardness of Azure Front Door's setup.
Radware Alteon Logo
AWS WAF
4.0 out of 5
Radware Alteon Logo
AWS WAF
4.0 out of 5
Radware Alteon offers strong security and application delivery features with comprehensive load balancing and support, suitable for on-premise and hybrid deployments. In comparison, AWS WAF integrates easily with AWS services, providing scalable, cloud-based security and cost-effective pay-as-you-go pricing.
Download AWS WAF vs. Radware Alteon Report
Radware Alteon incurs a higher setup cost, focusing on advanced load balancing features, whereas AWS WAF offers a more economical initial setup, appealing to users prioritizing cost efficiency over extensive features.
View comparison
Pricing
Radware Alteon incurs a higher setup cost, focusing on advanced load balancing features, whereas AWS WAF offers a more economical initial setup, appealing to users prioritizing cost efficiency over extensive features.
Radware Alteon Logo
F5 Advanced WAF
4.3 out of 5
Radware Alteon Logo
F5 Advanced WAF
4.3 out of 5
Radware Alteon offers robust security and stability with budget-friendly pricing, attracting buyers seeking efficient load balancing. In comparison, F5 Advanced WAF provides automatic threat detection and premium security, appealing to those prioritizing comprehensive traffic management despite higher costs.
Download F5 Advanced WAF vs. Radware Alteon Report
Radware Alteon presents a lower initial setup cost, making it more accessible for smaller budgets, whereas F5 Advanced WAF demands a higher upfront investment, offering advanced features that cater to enterprises with more extensive needs.
View comparison
Pricing
Radware Alteon presents a lower initial setup cost, making it more accessible for smaller budgets, whereas F5 Advanced WAF demands a higher upfront investment, offering advanced features that cater to enterprises with more extensive needs.
Radware Alteon Logo
Fortinet FortiWeb
4.0 out of 5
Radware Alteon Logo
Fortinet FortiWeb
4.0 out of 5
Radware Alteon excels in load balancing and SSL offloading, offering robust customization and integration options. In comparison, Fortinet FortiWeb provides a comprehensive WAF with advanced threat prevention and ease of integration but may lag in load balancing capabilities.
Download Fortinet FortiWeb vs. Radware Alteon Report
Radware Alteon has a higher setup cost compared to Fortinet FortiWeb, which offers more affordable initial pricing. Radware Alteon may entail a steeper investment upfront, while Fortinet FortiWeb provides a cost-effective option for initial deployment.
View comparison
Pricing
Radware Alteon has a higher setup cost compared to Fortinet FortiWeb, which offers more affordable initial pricing. Radware Alteon may entail a steeper investment upfront, while Fortinet FortiWeb provides a cost-effective option for initial deployment.
Radware Alteon Logo
Radware Alteon Logo
F5 BIG-IP Local Traffic Manager (LTM)
4.1 out of 5
Radware Alteon offers attractive features like SSL-TLS acceleration and application protection with cost-effective pricing, appealing to budget-conscious buyers. In comparison, F5 BIG-IP Local Traffic Manager provides comprehensive traffic management and flexibility, ideal for users demanding advanced capabilities despite higher costs.
Download F5 BIG-IP Local Traffic Manager (LTM) vs. Radware Alteon Report
Radware Alteon has a lower setup cost compared to F5 BIG-IP Local Traffic Manager (LTM), making it a more cost-effective option for initial deployment. F5 BIG-IP LTM's higher setup cost may reflect its robust feature set.
View comparison
Pricing
Radware Alteon has a lower setup cost compared to F5 BIG-IP Local Traffic Manager (LTM), making it a more cost-effective option for initial deployment. F5 BIG-IP LTM's higher setup cost may reflect its robust feature set.
Radware Alteon Logo
NetScaler
4.2 out of 5
Radware Alteon Logo
NetScaler
4.2 out of 5
Radware Alteon excels with comprehensive application delivery, strong security, and scalability, ideal for SSL offloading and scripting automation. In comparison, NetScaler's flexible deployment and traffic management make it attractive for security-focused users despite its pricing complexity and configuration challenges.
Download NetScaler vs. Radware Alteon Report
Radware Alteon offers competitive setup costs with straightforward pricing, while NetScaler's setup cost is higher, reflecting its extensive feature set. Radware Alteon is budget-friendly, contrasting with NetScaler's premium positioning.
View comparison
Pricing
Radware Alteon offers competitive setup costs with straightforward pricing, while NetScaler's setup cost is higher, reflecting its extensive feature set. Radware Alteon is budget-friendly, contrasting with NetScaler's premium positioning.
Radware Alteon Logo
HAProxy
4.1 out of 5
Radware Alteon Logo
HAProxy
4.1 out of 5
Radware Alteon offers comprehensive application delivery and feature-rich security while being known for its stability. In comparison, HAProxy is valued for cost-effective flexibility and customization. Radware Alteon provides robust investment return whereas HAProxy appeals with its open-source affordability and simplicity.
Download HAProxy vs. Radware Alteon Report
Radware Alteon generally involves higher setup costs, offering advanced features, while HAProxy provides a more cost-effective setup, focusing on simplicity and efficiency.
View comparison
Pricing
Radware Alteon generally involves higher setup costs, offering advanced features, while HAProxy provides a more cost-effective setup, focusing on simplicity and efficiency.
Radware Alteon Logo
NGINX Plus
4.3 out of 5
Radware Alteon Logo
NGINX Plus
4.3 out of 5
Radware Alteon offers comprehensive application delivery with SSL-TLS acceleration and advanced load balancing for high availability. In comparison, NGINX Plus provides flexibility and performance with microservice support, favoring environments seeking efficient resource utilization over enhanced built-in security features.
Download NGINX Plus vs. Radware Alteon Report
Radware Alteon's setup cost is typically higher due to its advanced features, while NGINX Plus offers a more budget-friendly setup option.
View comparison
Pricing
Radware Alteon's setup cost is typically higher due to its advanced features, while NGINX Plus offers a more budget-friendly setup option.
Radware Alteon Logo
Radware Alteon Logo
Cloudflare Web Application Firewall
4.2 out of 5
Radware Alteon delivers advanced load-balancing and application protection suitable for scalability and security needs. In comparison, Cloudflare Web Application Firewall emphasizes DDoS protection and accurate security features, appealing to users favoring ease of configuration and minimal maintenance in cloud environments.
Download Cloudflare Web Application Firewall vs. Radware Alteon Report
Radware Alteon requires a significant setup cost compared to Cloudflare Web Application Firewall, which offers a more budget-friendly setup option. This price difference may impact the initial investment decision between the two solutions.
View comparison
Pricing
Radware Alteon requires a significant setup cost compared to Cloudflare Web Application Firewall, which offers a more budget-friendly setup option. This price difference may impact the initial investment decision between the two solutions.
Radware Alteon Logo
Radware Alteon Logo
Imperva Web Application Firewall
4.3 out of 5
Radware Alteon excels with robust hardware, load balancing, and security, appealing to those valuing integration and flexible licensing. In comparison, Imperva offers strong application security and advanced threat intelligence, ideal for those prioritizing adaptable deployment and comprehensive protection. Pricing is crucial for both products.
Download Imperva Web Application Firewall vs. Radware Alteon Report
Radware Alteon offers a cost-effective setup, while Imperva Web Application Firewall incurs higher initial expenses. Each solution presents distinct financial considerations based on setup costs.
View comparison
Pricing
Radware Alteon offers a cost-effective setup, while Imperva Web Application Firewall incurs higher initial expenses. Each solution presents distinct financial considerations based on setup costs.
Radware Alteon Logo
Fortinet FortiADC
3.9 out of 5
Radware Alteon Logo
Fortinet FortiADC
3.9 out of 5
Radware Alteon offers robust SSL offloading and high availability, appealing to businesses focusing on application protection. In comparison, Fortinet FortiADC provides a user-friendly interface and straightforward load balancing, making it ideal for companies seeking quick and efficient deployments.
Download Fortinet FortiADC vs. Radware Alteon Report
Radware Alteon has a higher setup cost compared to Fortinet FortiADC, which offers a more budget-friendly initial deployment option.
View comparison
Pricing
Radware Alteon has a higher setup cost compared to Fortinet FortiADC, which offers a more budget-friendly initial deployment option.
Radware Alteon Logo
Radware Alteon Logo
Akamai App and API Protector
4.2 out of 5
Radware Alteon offers user-friendly load-balancing with competitive pricing and reliable technical support. In comparison, Akamai App and API Protector delivers robust cloud security and scalability, though it incurs higher costs suited for enterprises prioritizing comprehensive protection and hybrid deployment options.
Download Akamai App and API Protector vs. Radware Alteon Report
Radware Alteon has a higher setup cost compared to Akamai App and API Protector, highlighting a noticeable difference in initial investment requirements for these security solutions.
View comparison
Pricing
Radware Alteon has a higher setup cost compared to Akamai App and API Protector, highlighting a noticeable difference in initial investment requirements for these security solutions.
Radware Alteon Logo
Radware Alteon Logo
Azure Web Application Firewall
4.3 out of 5
Radware Alteon offers extensive application delivery features and flexible deployment options, making it suitable for diverse environments seeking reliable load-balancing. In comparison, Azure WAF integrates seamlessly with Azure’s ecosystem, providing ease of use and robust security for users invested in cloud services.
Download Azure Web Application Firewall vs. Radware Alteon Report
Radware Alteon has a straightforward setup cost, whereas Azure Web Application Firewall might involve a more complex initial investment.
View comparison
Pricing
Radware Alteon has a straightforward setup cost, whereas Azure Web Application Firewall might involve a more complex initial investment.
Radware Alteon Logo
Kemp LoadMaster
4.7 out of 5
Radware Alteon Logo
Kemp LoadMaster
4.7 out of 5
Radware Alteon offers robust application delivery with SSL-TLS acceleration and security features, appealing to those prioritizing high availability and integration. In comparison, Kemp LoadMaster attracts buyers seeking affordability and ease of deployment with comprehensive load balancing and security features.
Download Kemp LoadMaster vs. Radware Alteon Report
Radware Alteon incurs higher setup costs than Kemp LoadMaster, which offers a more budget-friendly option. While Kemp LoadMaster provides cost-effective solutions, Radware Alteon may appeal to those seeking premium features.
View comparison
Pricing
Radware Alteon incurs higher setup costs than Kemp LoadMaster, which offers a more budget-friendly option. While Kemp LoadMaster provides cost-effective solutions, Radware Alteon may appeal to those seeking premium features.
Radware Alteon Logo
Radware Alteon Logo
Barracuda Web Application Firewall
4.1 out of 5
Radware Alteon offers extensive application delivery features like SSL-TLS acceleration and integrated security, making it ideal for high-security needs. In comparison, Barracuda Web Application Firewall provides easy setup and strong web protection, appealing to users preferring simplicity and integration capabilities.
Download Barracuda Web Application Firewall vs. Radware Alteon Report
Radware Alteon has a higher setup cost but offers advanced features, while Barracuda Web Application Firewall presents a more economical initial investment.
View comparison
Pricing
Radware Alteon has a higher setup cost but offers advanced features, while Barracuda Web Application Firewall presents a more economical initial investment.
Radware Alteon Logo
Radware Alteon Logo
A10 Networks Thunder ADC
4.2 out of 5
A10 Networks Thunder ADC offers all-inclusive licensing and excels in traffic management and security, ideal for diverse environments. In comparison, Radware Alteon emphasizes application protection and customization, appealing to those focused on load-balancing and threat mitigation.
Download A10 Networks Thunder ADC vs. Radware Alteon Report
A10 Networks Thunder ADC has a relatively lower setup cost, making it more budget-friendly, while Radware Alteon may involve higher initial expenses, reflecting its advanced features and premium capabilities.
View comparison
Pricing
A10 Networks Thunder ADC has a relatively lower setup cost, making it more budget-friendly, while Radware Alteon may involve higher initial expenses, reflecting its advanced features and premium capabilities.
Radware Alteon Logo
Radware Alteon Logo
VMWare Avi Load Balancer
4.1 out of 5
Radware Alteon offers robust security and global load balancing, ideal for users needing strong application protection and scalability. In comparison, VMware Avi Load Balancer provides deployment flexibility and advanced analytics, catering to users seeking adaptable solutions with a cloud-focused approach.
Download Radware Alteon vs. VMWare Avi Load Balancer Report
Radware Alteon has higher initial setup costs compared to VMWare Avi Load Balancer, which offers more cost-effective initial deployment while maintaining robust functionality.
View comparison
Pricing
Radware Alteon has higher initial setup costs compared to VMWare Avi Load Balancer, which offers more cost-effective initial deployment while maintaining robust functionality.
Radware Alteon Logo
Radware Alteon Logo
F5 Silverline Managed Services
3.9 out of 5
Radware Alteon excels in application delivery and security with cost-effective pricing, allowing flexibility through its Global Elastic License. In comparison, F5 Silverline Managed Services specializes in managed security with cloud-native functionality, offering flexibility in deployment but potentially higher costs based on bandwidth needs.
Download F5 Silverline Managed Services vs. Radware Alteon Report
Radware Alteon has a higher setup cost compared to F5 Silverline Managed Services, which offers a more cost-effective initial investment for users looking to implement managed security solutions.
View comparison
Pricing
Radware Alteon has a higher setup cost compared to F5 Silverline Managed Services, which offers a more cost-effective initial investment for users looking to implement managed security solutions.
Radware Alteon Logo
Loadbalancer.org
4.4 out of 5
Radware Alteon Logo
Loadbalancer.org
4.4 out of 5
Radware Alteon stands out with its command-line interface, ease of configuration, and extensive application protection like WAF and DDoS mitigation. In comparison, Loadbalancer.org offers simplicity for straightforward load balancing with fair pricing and unlimited license options for cost reduction.
Download Loadbalancer.org vs. Radware Alteon Report
Radware Alteon setup cost is often considered high, while Loadbalancer.org offers a more budget-friendly option.
View comparison
Pricing
Radware Alteon setup cost is often considered high, while Loadbalancer.org offers a more budget-friendly option.
Radware Alteon Logo
Reblaze
4.4 out of 5
Radware Alteon Logo
Reblaze
4.4 out of 5
Radware Alteon excels in load balancing and application security for on-prem deployments. In comparison, Reblaze focuses on cloud-based protection with strong security and real-time monitoring. Buyers may prefer Alteon for its on-prem features or Reblaze for its cloud compatibility.
Download Radware Alteon vs. Reblaze Report
Radware Alteon offers a straightforward setup cost, while Reblaze presents a more competitive pricing structure.
View comparison
Pricing
Radware Alteon offers a straightforward setup cost, while Reblaze presents a more competitive pricing structure.
Radware Alteon Logo
Radware Alteon Logo
Array APV Series
1 out of 5
Radware Alteon gains favorability with advanced security and scalability for complex needs. In comparison, Array APV Series offers comprehensive traffic management and cost-effective deployment, appealing to businesses prioritizing budget efficiency and rapid ROI.
Download Array APV Series vs. Radware Alteon Report
Radware Alteon's setup costs are generally higher compared to Array APV Series, which offers a more cost-effective setup option. The significant price difference can be a deciding factor for businesses prioritizing initial costs.
View comparison
Pricing
Radware Alteon's setup costs are generally higher compared to Array APV Series, which offers a more cost-effective setup option. The significant price difference can be a deciding factor for businesses prioritizing initial costs.

Related categories

Application Delivery Controllers (ADC)
Web Application Firewall (WAF)
CDN