Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users
CarlosLopez - PeerSpot reviewer
Cyber security analyst at Fujitsu
MSP
Great load-balancing services and multiple backend servers, but it would be great if it had script-sharing features in a community hub
Pros and Cons
  • "The strength of this solution is the application delivery controller."
  • "The community portal does not have a place to find scripts."

What is our primary use case?

The vendor usually overloads the devices with a lot of functionality. The strength of this solution is the application delivery controller. The best functions are load-balancing services and multiple backend servers.

What is most valuable?

The SSL uploading feature is helpful, and every vendor has it. It terminates the full connections and takes care of all the power required for the backend servers to process the SSL load. Radware Alteon also makes our environment and web applications more scalable because the devices are half-sequence and specifically designed to handle web traffic and SSL web traffic.

These devices work as hypervisors on the cluster that we have on-premises. We can run virtual applications and delivery controllers inside them. We can also isolate resources and environments. In addition, Radware Alteon has a helpful scripting engine for automation called AppShape+.

What needs improvement?

I have worked with Big IP F5. It is a veteran solution that is more stable and has more resources. Big IP F5 has a virtual hub in the community with a lot of resources and already-made scripts that can be used for free. Radware Alteon has a community portal, but the community portal does not have a place to find scripts. It would be great if they could be transparent and deploy a community where their users can share the scripts.

For how long have I used the solution?

We have been using this solution for almost 11 years. We have a cluster of two Radware 52808 devices. We are currently using version 32.2.12. Some devices are deployed on-premises, but we have a client running SIWA, a cloud web environment in Radware Alteon, so we deploy both. So it is on public and hardware cloud.

Buyer's Guide
Radware Alteon
August 2025
Learn what your peers think about Radware Alteon. Get advice and tips from experienced pros sharing their opinions. Updated: August 2025.
865,384 professionals have used our research since 2012.

What do I think about the stability of the solution?

It is pretty stable, and we are happy with the solution. We had some problems in the past, but they have been resolved. In the past, we suffered some key performance bags. For example, there was a memory leak that persisted during firmware releases. We had to reboot and failover the devices. Every Wednesday at 6:00 pm, we had failovers of the digital application delivery control from one device to another for about a year. The device had a problem where if you ran it for too long without rebooting, it generated a corrupt memory and crashed. The device stopped accepting new connections, and we couldn't see any issues in the logs. The technical support told us it could be a tricky memory leak back. When we started rebooting the devices periodically each week, we managed to resolve the situation. It took about a year, and multiple upgrades and versions before the vendor fixed the issue.

What do I think about the scalability of the solution?

Our organization usually buys load balances and hand-held devices oversized. We have not had any problem with scalability, and none of the devices fall short of our expectations. In addition, the devices are usually more powerful than the license they sell you. If there are problems with scalability, we can upgrade our license to a superior one.

We work with public institutions and have tens of thousands of potential users because we use Radware Alteon in public administration and digital offices. In Spain, the public administration sector is our biggest client.

How are customer service and support?

They have good support, and we have used them for years.

Which solution did I use previously and why did I switch?

We have used Big IP F5 for many years.

How was the initial setup?

I rate the initial setup an eight out of ten. It was not straightforward because we needed to set it up. Radware Alteon has a specific syntax requiring navigation of all menus and venues. 

Deployment depends on the area and configuration that needs to be applied. With setup experience, deployment of Radware Alteon could be reasonably fast. The initial deployment was done in-house. But now, connecting to a third-party coworker in the data center is easy. We can rack the device in the data center and plug the cables into a laptop that can plug into the Radware Alteon. The user can connect to a smartphone data plan and easily configure the device remotely. We need just two people for maintenance.

What was our ROI?

I believe there is a return on investment. Therefore, the solution is worth buying, and if you don't buy a load balancer, it is difficult because you will need more backend servers.

What's my experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing?

I do not have specific details about the costs. There is a licensing fee, and they have an SSL transaction license and others. They have two or three licenses that you pay based on the volume.

What other advice do I have?

I rate this solution a seven out of ten. Of recent, we tend to lean towards using cloud. This is because the on-premises devices are less common and are losing presence in my company's services. Regarding advice to others, I would recommend they upgrade the device before entering the production stage to reduce the bags.

Disclosure: My company does not have a business relationship with this vendor other than being a customer.
PeerSpot user
Santiago Castro - PeerSpot reviewer
Network Architect at a sports company with 1,001-5,000 employees
Real User
Reliable, quick to deploy, and easy to implement
Pros and Cons
  • "The solution has been very stable."
  • "We’d like the solution to include more security features in the standard license."

What is our primary use case?

The solution is basically used for load balancing. We do build for load balancing as well. We have several load balancers in the physical and cloud space. We started using it for GTM and also use it for some iRules scripting and to modify the SDP draft.

How has it helped my organization?

It was way cheaper than F5, so that was the reason to move from F5 to Radware. In terms of value for money, maybe it's better. F5 is very good. However, it was really expensive. This solution is also quite good, yet costs much less.

What is most valuable?

It's quite a nice solution. It's like F5. They are very good products and are very easy to use. They're very powerful, you can do a lot of things with the scripting, and also even in the interface and the graphic interface, you can configure other things without going to the scripting, to the rules.

The initial setup is easy and it was quick to deploy.

The solution has been very stable.

What needs improvement?

Maybe there are a couple of things that didn't work very well. You kind of have the same build and different build for load balancers. It can create some issues. We faced issues where we needed to have some kind of the same balance in different environments. That happened with F5. However, in Radware, you can do it when we move to production and we need to change the balance there. Different environments should be able to have some balance to be completely isolated. That's something that they could really improve to make it really, really isolated.

We’d like the solution to include more security features in the standard license.

For how long have I used the solution?

We just acquired Radware in the last few months. IT’s been about eight months.

What do I think about the stability of the solution?

The solution is stable. In the last eight months since we migrated, we’ve had no big issues. Everything is working fine. There are no bugs or glitches, and it doesn’t crash or freeze.

What do I think about the scalability of the solution?

The scalability is about licensing. You require more bandwidth and more throughput. To scale, it’s about acquiring more licensing. That’s about it.

For example, if you have a license of 30GBs of traffic and may need to support up to maybe 80GBs. You need to increase the license. You can kind of use it on demand, however. If you can change the license every three years, and you can see that your throughput is going to increase a lot, you can scale up.

We have about ten people on the solution currently. We do have plans to potentially increase usage in the future.

How are customer service and support?

Technical support was okay. We opened a couple of tickets, it was okay. They were fast and they fixed the issues.

How would you rate customer service and support?

Positive

Which solution did I use previously and why did I switch?

We just migrated to Radware from F5 APM. It’s quite new. It's really, really powerful. However, they are very good load balancers.

How was the initial setup?

The setup is relatively straightforward. To do clustering is very easy. It's way easier than F5, I would say.

The deployment was quite fast. The problem was that migrating from F5 took a lot because we had to add the Windows in place and handle the service impact. That said, deploying is fast. If you are in the integration field and you don't have to migrate, it's pretty fast.

How many people you need to maintain the solution depends on the size. However, you might need four or five people.

What about the implementation team?

There was a mix of personnel helping with the setup. I was doing it mostly myself. However, I had the help of professional services from Radware.

What was our ROI?

For the amount of traffic that we use, it's as good as F5 and way cheaper.

What's my experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing?

The pricing is much more reasonable than, for example, F5, our old solution.

I’m not sure how much the solution costs. However, my understanding is that it is moderately priced. I’d rate it a three out of five in terms of affordability. It’s not cheaper. However, it is less expensive than F5.

Which other solutions did I evaluate?

We checked in with Citrix as well. It was also good. In the end, we went to Radware.

What other advice do I have?

We’re just a customer.

We’re using one of the most recent versions of the solution.

It's a very good product, however, if it would work for your company would depend on your needs. It depends on the amount of traffic.

I’d rate the solution an eight out of ten.

Disclosure: My company does not have a business relationship with this vendor other than being a customer.
PeerSpot user
Buyer's Guide
Radware Alteon
August 2025
Learn what your peers think about Radware Alteon. Get advice and tips from experienced pros sharing their opinions. Updated: August 2025.
865,384 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Saurabh-Pal - PeerSpot reviewer
Sr. Security Specialist at a tech vendor with 11-50 employees
Real User
Supports link load balance and has good stability
Pros and Cons
  • "The most valuable feature of Radware LinkProof is that it supports link load balance."
  • "Radware LinkProof’s customer support could be improved."

What is our primary use case?

Radware LinkProof is used for link load balancing. Whenever many servers are connected with Radware LinkProof, users can use their logins to use a firewall. And when a firewall is unavailable, Radware LinkProof automatically switches to another firewall.

What is most valuable?

The most valuable feature of Radware LinkProof is that it supports link load balance.

What needs improvement?

Radware LinkProof’s customer support could be improved.

For how long have I used the solution?

I have worked with Radware LinkProof for one year.

What do I think about the stability of the solution?

I rate Radware LinkProof a nine out of ten for stability.

What do I think about the scalability of the solution?

The solution is scalable, and I rate Radware LinkProof a nine out of ten for scalability.

How are customer service and support?

I rate Radware LinkProof an eight out of ten for customer support. Whenever we raise a case at their site, it takes three to four hours for their customer support people to communicate with us.

How would you rate customer service and support?

Positive

How was the initial setup?

The initial setup was easy. Radware LinkProof takes three days to deploy.

You have to understand the different areas where you have to provide Radware LinkProof and where you have to increase it. Then you have to configure them one by one along with the proxy configuration so that it will work from outside to inside.

What's my experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing?

Radware LinkProof is neither cheap nor expensive. I rate Radware LinkProof a six or seven out of ten for pricing.

What other advice do I have?

One person can do the configuration for Radware LinkProof, but more people will be needed to complete the configuration on time if you have multiple devices.

Some people have a virtual license, while others have a license that needs to be upgraded. Depending upon the location, one or more technical persons are required for the solution's maintenance.

Many people use Radware LinkProof, and it is available for small, medium, and enterprise businesses.

I would not recommend Radware LinkProof to anyone because it only supports load balance, not DoS and WAF. If you have larger offices in different locations, you can use Radware LinkProof inside your offices. However, if you introduce it in a space open to the internet, you will have to use a separate device for DDoS and WAF.

Overall, I rate Radware LinkProof an eight out of ten.

Which deployment model are you using for this solution?

On-premises
Disclosure: My company has a business relationship with this vendor other than being a customer. Integrator
PeerSpot user
CarlosLopez - PeerSpot reviewer
Cyber security analyst at Fujitsu
MSP
It helps our organization to block threats, but the user interface could be better
Pros and Cons
  • "The device blocks threats and allows legitimate users to work correctly."
  • "The user interface can be improved."

What is our primary use case?

Our primary use case for the solution is protection. We have just one web application protected behind this AppWall, and it is automatic with the default configuration. This device periodically downloads new threat signatures from Radware, and most of the time, we let the device AppWall handle the traffic and block the threats that it thinks are ahead.

What is most valuable?

The error detection system is very valuable. When an error is encountered, the WAF blocks an illegitimate user and sends a message. The message contains a transaction ID that can be matched in the locks of the AppWall. So, it's not hard to investigate these events when people write an incident because some illegitimate user is often trying to use this web that is protected behind the WAF and getting errors.

What needs improvement?

The user interface can be improved.

For how long have I used the solution?

We have been using this solution for less than a year, and the version we use is integrated into the Alteon on-premises device.

What do I think about the scalability of the solution?

The solution is scalable. However, because we are tending towards the cloud version of these products, if we increase the usage, it would be cloud WAF versions of AppWall.

How was the initial setup?

I was not involved in the initial setup.

What was our ROI?

It's difficult to tell our precise return on investments because we let the AppWall operate by itself and don't look at the AppWall events. So we probably need to look closely at the events and everything. Still, whenever we look up the events, we see that the device blocks a fair amount of attempts to breach security, and we barely see incidents with legitimate users. So I assume it's a good return on investment because the device blocks threats and allows legitimate users to work correctly.

What's my experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing?

I cannot comment on licensing costs as I am not very knowledgeable about them.

What other advice do I have?

I rate the solution a six out of ten. The solution is good but can be improved by including a better user interface.

Disclosure: My company does not have a business relationship with this vendor other than being a customer.
PeerSpot user
reviewer2168895 - PeerSpot reviewer
Network Security Engineer at a comms service provider with 51-200 employees
Real User
An exceptionally stable and scalable solution for load balancing
Pros and Cons
  • "It is a stable solution...It is a scalable solution."
  • "The solution lacks HA configuration."

What is our primary use case?

The solution is used for load balancing.

What is most valuable?

The DGP, routing, L2, and L3 switches are the most valuable features of the Radware LinkProof.

What needs improvement?

The solution lacks HA configuration. In comparison, Alteon has a better HA configuration. Plus, the 30.5 version and 30.0 version of Alteon have some differences in relation to the HA configuration.

The HA configuration feature is important as it enables a failover with a cluster of more than LinkProof.

For how long have I used the solution?

I have been using the solution since 2017. My company has a partnership with Radware LinkProof. 

What do I think about the stability of the solution?

It is a stable solution.

What do I think about the scalability of the solution?

It is a scalable solution. Two administrators are using the solution presently.

How are customer service and support?

I contacted their technical support regarding the SysTrack migration. Still, they could not give a proper solution as I could not give them the exact data.

How was the initial setup?

The initial setup was straightforward. The deployment takes around half an hour if you go into all the specifications and functionality. Only two people are needed for the deployment process.

Initially, we configure the solution and test for functionalities like HCR and whether the load balancing is happening correctly. Once that is checked, we move into production and then upload the device for one week. If it is functioning well, then we remove the existing device. We are following the same procedure for all servers, storage, and firewalls, as we have faced issues with power fluctuations before this.

What's my experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing?

Price-wise, the solution is a reasonable one.

What other advice do I have?

Contact the technical support team and implement the suggested steps in case of migration. Otherwise, if anything goes wrong, the production will get impacted.

I rate the overall solution an eight out of ten.

Which deployment model are you using for this solution?

On-premises
Disclosure: My company has a business relationship with this vendor other than being a customer. Partner
PeerSpot user
Preshit Lanjekar - PeerSpot reviewer
Network SME at a consultancy with 10,001+ employees
Real User
Top 10
A stable firewall solution that allows for customization, but is more cost effective when using the cloud-based version
Pros and Cons
  • "his solution allows me to secure applications, by blocking suspicious traffic based on the signature that has been enabled for that particular application."
  • "I would like this solution to have an integration tool that will convert configuration from other software, into readable values for this product during implementation."

What is our primary use case?

I use this product as a web application firewall.

What is most valuable?

This solution allows me to secure applications, by blocking suspicious traffic based on the signature that has been enabled for that particular application.

What needs improvement?

I would like this solution to have an integration tool that will convert configuration from other software, into readable values for this product during implementation. 

I would also like there to be more filtering features added to this product. 

For how long have I used the solution?

I have been using this solution for around two years.

What do I think about the stability of the solution?

I have found this to be a stable solution during my time using it.  However, it is reliant on hardware working properly when deployed on-premises.

What do I think about the scalability of the solution?

I have found this solution to be easily scalable.

How are customer service and support?

I have found the support for this solution to be very good.

What other advice do I have?

For organizations that are considering this product, I would recommend that they look into the cloud-based version of the solution. This is more cost effective, as there is no need to purchase specific hardware, and all of the setup and configuration is carried out before the solution is deployed.

I would rate this solution an eight out of ten.

Which deployment model are you using for this solution?

On-premises
Disclosure: My company does not have a business relationship with this vendor other than being a customer.
PeerSpot user
Alberto Guerrero - PeerSpot reviewer
Jefe de implementaciones de Datos at RETO Industrial S.A. de. C.V.
User
Robust and simple with well-documented configurations
Pros and Cons
  • "Radware has been characterized by being extremely robust. This gives us the confidence to offer our users a continuous service."
  • "We recently had a problem with the tables Obsolete ARP which was observed by the support team. It would be good to diagnose and solve this problem with a patch since it is not documented that it will be solved in later updates."

What is our primary use case?

We use Alteon Radware to balance web page services hosted on real and virtual servers, these government portals must be available 100% of the time and must be accessible from the internet and intranet. In addition to the fact that we can add an extra layer of security (due to the use of virtual IP address and proxy IP address) When there is an impact on any of the servers, we receive an alert notification and we can attend to the impact on that server, for the end-user, this is indistinct since the service is not affected.

How has it helped my organization?

We have improved the user experience by having services available all the time, in addition to the fact that with this solution it is easier to manage from a graphical interface that is useful and intuitive, as an administrator it is important to have a clear and complete vision of the services that we operate. Simple troubleshooting tools have helped us solve problems faster and problems are more complex so analysis is complex so we asked for Radware support. This has helped us to identify exactly where the problems are in the network, correct faults, and continuous improvement.

What is most valuable?

The simple and well-documented configuration allows us to be able to implement new balancing services at the request of the user with the same conditions and good service that they expect. We can also make changes to services that are already running, as I mentioned before, the graphical interface is very intuitive and you can almost always make the most common changes quickly.

Radware has been characterized by being extremely robust. This gives us the confidence to offer our users a continuous service.

What needs improvement?

We recently had a problem with the table's Obsolete ARP which was observed by the support team. It would be good to diagnose and solve this problem with a patch since it is not documented that it will be solved in later updates. The implementation of this service has been expanding to more of our clients, it is rare that we need to contact Radware support and even more rarely a call in real-time but we have found few technicians who give us support in Spanish, we could attend to the problems much faster if language barriers weren't an issue.

For how long have I used the solution?

I used the solution two years ago.

What do I think about the stability of the solution?

The solution is extremely robust.

What do I think about the scalability of the solution?

It is highly scalable.

How are customer service and support?

99% of the time they have given us fast and efficient support.

How would you rate customer service and support?

Positive

Which solution did I use previously and why did I switch?

Manual balancing tools and changes were made as a user might experience outages.

How was the initial setup?

The initial setup was straightforward. It is well documented and we are free to do it via GUI or CLI.

What about the implementation team?

We implemented this through an internal team, which is trained to do so thanks to the training tools provided by Radware.

What was our ROI?

We can offer automation in case of impact, which translates into time savings. I do not have the exact information of the ROI in terms of cash

What's my experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing?

The licensing processes are easy and the costs are acceptable. We use permanent licenses and we have not had any problems.

Which other solutions did I evaluate?

We did not evaluate other options. 

What other advice do I have?

They could improve the solution update processes to make it easier and faster.

Which deployment model are you using for this solution?

On-premises
Disclosure: My company has a business relationship with this vendor other than being a customer. We are partners of Radware Alteon and we provide this solution to our customers
PeerSpot user
Saurabh-Pal - PeerSpot reviewer
Sr. Security Specialist at a tech vendor with 11-50 employees
Real User
Link load balancing is a great feature as is the ability to access externally
Pros and Cons
  • "The link load balancing is a great feature."
  • "Performance could be improved."

What is our primary use case?

This is an appliance device and its primary use case is for server load balancing and gate load balancing. I'm an engineer and we install and configure this solution for our customers. I'm a system integrator and our company is based in India. 

How has it helped my organization?

By providing web access specificity for different servers and different types of devices Alteon has simplified things by also enabling external user access.

What is most valuable?

The link load balancing is a great feature. We use it whenever two or three different links need to be integrated for a customer. When one link goes down, it automatically switches to another. 

What needs improvement?

I'd like to see some improvement in performance.

For how long have I used the solution?

I've been installing this product for our customers for almost four years.

What do I think about the stability of the solution?

The solution is stable. 

What do I think about the scalability of the solution?

The product has good scalability.

How are customer service and support?

The technical support is good and helpful.

How would you rate customer service and support?

Positive

Which solution did I use previously and why did I switch?

We have also installed and provide support for F5. 

How was the initial setup?

The initial setup is straightforward. There is a management tool that enables installation and configuration. We have a team that carries out the implementation for our clients. 

What's my experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing?

We have a permanent license, not an annual one. I'm unaware of the cost. 

What other advice do I have?

I recommend this solution and rate it nine out of 10. 

Disclosure: My company has a business relationship with this vendor other than being a customer.
PeerSpot user
Buyer's Guide
Download our free Radware Alteon Report and get advice and tips from experienced pros sharing their opinions.
Updated: August 2025
Buyer's Guide
Download our free Radware Alteon Report and get advice and tips from experienced pros sharing their opinions.