Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform Reviews

I like Ansible because it is:

• Easy to use.
• Easy to read.
• Easy to maintain.
• Easy to support.
• It works without an agent.

It has made software installation and updates much easier. Tasks including changing or checking configurations and files have been improved especially considering the big scope of servers.

It could work with a larger number of servers.

I've been working with Ansible since v0.7 and still use v2.2.

We only encountered issues with syntax, as sometimes it was changed and then one has to adapt.

There were a few scalability issues. I had no problems as long as the number of servers was less than 500. When the number of servers has exceeded 500, I encountered an increased number of failures when trying to provision all together. I tried to play with forks, timeouts, and other options, but as the number of servers grew, I got more failures, so I had to provision smaller groups.

I haven't yet used it.

I used bash scripts before, but bash is not idempotent and you should write more code whereas Ansible already has them as a module. Ansible gives you an informative report after each task.

It was easy to install and easy to use.

I use the free version with Jenkins, it's enough for my needs.

We did not evaluate other options.

It should work easily.

We mostly use Ansible as a configuration management, application deployment, and VM provisioning tool.

I like that Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform is easy to use.

Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform is not the best at server provisioning. Terraform is better.

Complex data structures and control flow need improvement.

I've been using it for one year.

It is a stable solution.

It is scalable.

The initial setup is easy and takes a few hours to complete.

Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform is an affordable solution. Infrastructure maintenance of the Master server comes at a cost.

If you want to do server provisioning, don't go for Ansible. However, if you want to do server/network device configuration, application deployment, or configuration management, then Ansible is the best solution for you.

Overall, I would rate Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform at eight on a scale from one to ten.

We are using the Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform for storage and for confirmation management. We are using a template in VMware.

The solution can be deployed on the cloud or on-premise.

The most valuable features of Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform are the agentless platform and writing the code is simple using the Yaml computer language.

There are some options not available in the community edition of the solution.

I have been Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform for approximately eight months.

I rate the stability of the Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform a nine out of ten.

We have approximately five people using the solution in my organization.

I rate the scalability of the Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform a nine out of ten.

I have not used the support from the vendor.

The initial setup of the Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform is simple.

We did the implementation of the solution in-house.

I am using the community edition of the solution which is free.

I rate Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform a ten out of ten.

• Agentless architecture, relying on SSH only.
• Great documentation.

Provision and configure from nothing on Amazon.

Speed but it only can go as fast as SSH does.

6 months

No.

A little slow.

Used S before.

Switched because of coworkers and even if I find SaltStack easier to learn, the documentation of Ansible made me choose it over Salt.

Not at all, just need to have general knowledge of SSH.

Open source.

It is used to support WAN network equipment.

Saved time as well as helped support compliance and standards.

The countless modules and products supported.

Error codes are not very descriptive.