SentinelOne Singularity Cloud Security Reviews

SentinelOne Singularity Cloud Security offers a variety of functionalities, including cloud configuration assessment and detailed misconfiguration reports. It automates vulnerability scanning, saving us time and effort. Additionally, SentinelOne Singularity Cloud Security allows us to filter compliance-related findings and provides consolidated reports for a comprehensive view.

Furthermore, SentinelOne Singularity Cloud Security can conduct customized posture management research for Cloud Posture Management initiatives. This eliminates the need for complex, independent research. Finally, SentinelOne Singularity Cloud Security helps us understand our readiness for specific security certifications.

One of the key features of SentinelOne Singularity Cloud Security that we utilize is its cloud-based configuration. This helps with our cloud security monitoring processes. This allows for infrastructure automation and broader implementation access. To mitigate this risk, we have multiple personnel actively monitoring activity to safeguard against vulnerabilities, employing vulnerability scanning techniques.

SentinelOne Singularity Cloud Security simplifies managing compliance. It gives us a clear compliance report, allowing us to easily identify areas for improvement and achieve full compliance. This makes it a valuable resource.

SentinelOne Singularity Cloud Security is easy to use. I would rate the ease of use 9 out of 10 compared to our previous tool which had good features but was not as intuitive as SentinelOne Singularity Cloud Security and had bugs.

SentinelOne Singularity Cloud Security's dashboard provides a single place for managing everything, including reporting and prioritization. Previously, we relied on Jira, which required submitting and closing tickets. This meant we were juggling both Jira and separate ticket management. Now, SentinelOne Singularity Cloud Security consolidates everything into a single dashboard, allowing us to see all issue priorities and address them directly. As a result, our resolution times have significantly improved, going from 9 days down to 3.

SentinelOne Singularity Cloud Security's proof of exploitability in evidence-based reporting is important. We can see all the evidence and assess it to see why the vulnerability has come up. We are also able to edit the policies and create custom policies.

Identifying preproduction issues in the IAC template or container configuration files is helpful. SentinelOne Singularity Cloud Security notifies us if the public rate defined is different which should not happen. Sometimes we encounter false positives but not many.

SentinelOne Singularity Cloud Security improved our security through the cloud configuration feature. We receive notifications if someone makes changes and our mitigation time has gone from up to 30 days down to nine.

SentinelOne Singularity Cloud Security generates some alerts that we categorize as false positives. These can occur, for instance, when someone uses a publicly available open-source tool and SentinelOne Singularity Cloud Security flags it. While SentinelOne Singularity Cloud Security's detection is valid in itself, we consider it a false positive because our development doesn't rely on that particular tool.

Our recent security assessment revealed a positive change in our security posture. We've moved from a medium to a high rating, thanks in part to SentinelOne Singularity Cloud Security.

SentinelOne Singularity Cloud Security has reduced our mean time to detect by 40 percent.

It has reduced our mean time to remediate down to 9 days.

Using SentinelOne Singularity Cloud Security, our cloud security, application development, and AppSec teams have achieved a high level of collaboration. All work is automatically updated within SentinelOne Singularity Cloud Security, allowing each team to generate reports, review identified issues, and work towards resolving them.

Integrating AI with SentinelOne Singularity Cloud Security has strengthened our security posture.

It offers three key features: vulnerability management notifications, cloud configuration assistance, and security scanning.

We can customize security policies but lack auditing capabilities. Ideally, we should be able to review logs and track user access.

I have been using SentinelOne Singularity Cloud Security for 1.5 years.

I would rate the stability of SentinelOne Singularity Cloud Security 10 out of 10.

I would rate the scalability of SentinelOne Singularity Cloud Security 10 out of 10. We are using multiple clouds and have integrated them with SentinelOne Singularity Cloud Security allowing us to easily scale.

SentinelOne Singularity Cloud Security provides excellent technical support. In addition to monthly guidance, we also receive a comprehensive quarterly business review. We haven't needed to contact their support team outside of these scheduled interactions. We also have a customer support engineer readily available to assist us whenever we encounter any issues.

We switched to SentinelOne Singularity Cloud Security because of the price and user-friendly functionality.

The initial deployment was easy because it was cloud-based and handled by SentinelOne Singularity Cloud Security. The entire deployment process only took 1 day. We had a meeting beforehand, and the next day, they provided us with the steps to follow. We successfully integrated the system by following these instructions. 2 people from our organization were involved in the deployment.

SentinelOne Singularity Cloud Security has delivered a return on investment by enabling collaborating teams to save up to 50 percent of their time.

SentinelOne Singularity Cloud Security is fairly priced.

I would rate SentinelOne Singularity Cloud Security 9 out of 10.

10 people in our organization use SentinelOne Singularity Cloud Security.

I recommend SentinelOne Singularity Cloud Security to others.

We were looking for an XDR solution that we could deploy to all of our computers since all of our users are mostly remote, and we previously had firewalls at branch locations. When workers went somewhere else, it wouldn't provide any protection. We wanted to make sure that they had protection no matter where they went. 

We were trying to cover as many security bases as possible, mostly around malware. A lot of people focus on antivirus, and most of the problems that businesses face are ransomware or malware. I wanted to make sure we had something that was competitive against that.

It's improved the organization in the sense that it's taken a lot off of our plate as far as having to track down trace vulnerabilities and remediate different threats against our end users, especially when they're in different locations all the time. The product gives us peace of mind no matter where our users are. They're always going to be protected if they have the endpoint installed on their computers.

The automation is great. Not having to focus on it is helpful. The portal itself is very easy to use. The amount of granularity that can be configured is really wonderful. There are a lot of things that it can do, however, since we're a small IT team, having it able to automate and remediate different flaws and things like that is very, very helpful.

The real-time detection and response capabilities are excellent. That's pretty much what sold us on it. We had that done in the demo, and we were shown how ransomware can be immediately stopped in real-time. That was huge.

Its automated remediation is useful for us. As a small IT team, that's something that we needed. We don't have time to be able to go in and track down and investigate every time there's a vulnerability. Being able to have it auto-remediate for us and being able to see what's going on is extremely helpful.

The historical data record provided by the product is good. We've seen a few vulnerabilities come through, and it has shown us everything we need to see. I have a somewhat limited experience with the small amount of vulnerabilities we've seen. That said, it seemed to show us everything that we needed to see. It was very good.

It has helped to reduce our organization's mean time to detect by four or five hours. It could be even more, depending on what the vulnerability is. It's at least several hours at this point. The same is true with our organization's mean time to remediate. 

It's helped free up staff time so that they can work on other projects. We're a very small IT team and most of us do everything and it's helped reduce our workload. On average it has likely saved two to three hours a day.

It's also positively affected productivity. Most security solutions can sometimes hold up files from being downloaded and things like that. So far, it's been great. It's been completely transparent to our end users as far as I know. And that those things that it has remediated have been done on the back end and it alerted us admins so as to not affect end users.

The interoperability with third-party solutions has been fine so far. 

Some of the navigation and some aspects of the portal may be a little bit confusing. That could honestly be just due to the fact that we're not used to it yet. 

We just have the cloud-based version. The complete version has some extra deep-dive stuff. There are some features that we don't have or that I would like to have in there, however, we just aren't able to afford that at this point.

I've used the solution for probably two months at this point. We are fairly new to it.

The solution has been nothing but stable. 

The product is deployed across our company and we have 450 users coast to coast. Most of our remote workers are based out of Houston.

It is scalable. As soon as we need to add somebody, we just add them to NinjaOne, and then we have a script set up where it automatically deploys and adds them to whichever group we need. 

We're in a high-turnover industry. It's easy to add or remove people, especially with NinjaOne.

I have yet to use technical support. 

We didn't use an XDR solution. We used SonicWall firewalls and we had a Check Point antivirus for a short time, however, Check Point was very intrusive, and it was difficult to work with.

With this product, everything is centralized. We don't have to go to more than one place to detect or figure out what's going on.

I was involved in the deployment. It was straightforward. We actually used another platform called NinjaOne. The process was very smooth.

We beta-tested the solution with about ten to 15 of our users and made sure it wasn't going to interfere with anything before we pushed it out completely. After testing for a week we pushed it out to the rest of the company.

We had three staff members who managed the deployment. 

It does not require any maintenance. 

We did not use any third parties. We simply used NinjaOne to help with the deployment. 

We have witnessed an ROI. So far, we've saved tons of time having to remediate and detect - things of that nature.

The pricing was competitive. The price was very, very important to us, and it came down to the price when we were doing our evaluations WatchGuard and SentinelOne. They were similarly priced. SentinelOne seems like it's more mature. It was close enough to where it was worth it to go with the SentinelOne.

We also evaluated WatchGuard and a few other options. With this product and WatchGuard, there were not a lot of differences. That said, we did not use both in our production environment. This product seemed to be easier to navigate and was a little more user-friendly as far as finding remediation options, and vulnerabilities. We also had an easy experience with the licensing. WatchGuard's licensing seemed unnecessarily complicated. 

We haven't had to look into the forensic side yet. I did again see that in the demo, yet we haven't in the real world had to do that. Hopefully, we won't have to for a very long time. Therefore, I don't have much experience with that yet.

I'd ask someone who doesn't think that they need a workload protection platform if they have a continuous security monitoring solution in place if whatever they have detects and remediates in real-time. I'd be surprised if there was something else out there that can do what this solution does for cheaper. 

It supports our ability to innovate. We don't have to worry about security aspects. We really get a chance to focus on other things. That's nice for a small department like ours. 

I'd rate the solution nine out of ten. It's been a great fit for our company. There are other solutions out there. This solution, however, is hard to beat.

We use SentinelOne Singularity Cloud Security to identify cloud security misconfigurations, ensuring compliance with Cloud Security Posture Management and Cloud Workload Protection Platform best practices, as well as relevant regulations in India. We also integrate SentinelOne Singularity Cloud Security with our GitHub repositories that store our hard-coded secrets.

We renewed our contract with SentinelOne Singularity Cloud Security for another year because it's extremely easy to use. The user-friendly UI, along with its integration with Jira and the ability to consume alerts through Slack, make it a valuable tool for our team.

Evidence-based reporting facilitates addressing complaints related to mandatory controls. SentinelOne Singularity Cloud Security offers an option for high-alert items to be kept publicly available if we're confident we have appropriate controls implemented.

SentinelOne Singularity Cloud Security's agentless vulnerability scanning has identified a significant number of vulnerabilities.

SentinelOne Singularity Cloud Security's evidence-based reporting, particularly its proof of exploitability, is highly valuable. For example, their recommendations significantly reduce investigation time and allow us to easily research vulnerabilities using tags. This targeted approach helps stakeholders prioritize and address critical vulnerabilities efficiently through the dashboard.

We utilize the offensive security engine, but fortunately, it doesn't detect many vulnerabilities. It primarily identifies publicly known patch versions and the exposure of the SMTP service. On the other hand, I would rate the ASM functionality an eight out of ten.

IaC scanning has been effective in identifying code-level issues whenever infrastructure as code is scanned.

SentinelOne Singularity Cloud Security automatically populates and maps our network, identifying any misconfigurations within the first two hours of deployment.

It has reduced false positives by around 90 percent.

Our mean time to detection has been improved, especially for critical areas. Our mean time to remediation has been improved as well.

SentinelOne Singularity Cloud Security has improved our risk posture by providing visibility into our cloud infrastructure.

SentinelOne Singularity Cloud Security improved the collaboration between the cloud security application developers and the app security team.

It helped our developers save time.

SentinelOne Singularity Cloud Security offers an intuitive user interface that lets us navigate quickly and easily. Additionally, its identification feature allows us to customize rules and configurations in the cloud.

IaS scanning identifies misconfigured code within GitHub repositories. This represents a "shift left" approach to security.

Customized queries should be made easier to improve SentinelOne Singularity Cloud Security. 

I have been using SentinelOne Singularity Cloud Security for one and a half years.

While SentinelOne Singularity Cloud Security is stable for around 90 percent of the time, there are occasional glitches in the UI. However, as a security tool, our primary focus is on the results it delivers, rather than the aesthetics of the dashboards themselves.

Scaling SentinelOne Singularity Cloud Security is easy. We recently integrated with AWS and it went well.

We regularly contact the technical support team about some UI glitches. We provide them with feedback on these glitches regularly. Additionally, we would like to see some new features added to Jira when creating tickets. We've also been in touch with the technical support team about this.

The technical support team's responses are good and have been improving.

We've noticed a decline in their response times lately. This could be due to the recent acquisition of SentinelOne Singularity Cloud Security by SentinelOne. Previously, their response times were much faster.

Positive

The initial deployment was straightforward.

Deploying SentinelOne Singularity Cloud Security is a quick process that involves creating a dedicated service account, granting the necessary roles to the service account, and attaching the service account to SentinelOne Singularity Cloud Security.

The total deployment time took around 15 minutes.

The implementation was completed in-house.

The features included in SentinelOne Singularity Cloud Security justify its price point. The agent-level monitoring for Kubernetes clusters is particularly valuable and could support a modest price increase.

Our evaluation of Prisma Cloud and Trend Micro on an open-source platform for identifying misconfigurations yielded a high number of false positives, limiting its effectiveness. We chose SentinelOne Singularity Cloud Security based on the price and the ease of use.

The setup and cleanup need to be done first to get things organized. This makes SentinelOne Singularity Cloud Security a much easier option than the other products we evaluated, which were all very complex. So, we won't be jumping straight to CWP. Instead, we'll focus on securing our perimeter. We believe SentinelOne Singularity Cloud Security can solve this issue, and the support we received during the proof of concept was also very positive. Considering all these factors, we decided to go with SentinelOne Singularity Cloud Security. 

I would rate SentinelOne Singularity Cloud Security nine out of ten.

SentinelOne Singularity Cloud Security does not require maintenance.

It is easy to use, but it works best when you have established organizational practices in place. If you feel this is critical, don't hesitate to address it directly. Integrating SentinelOne Singularity Cloud Security is straightforward, so there's no need to worry about that. It's a ready-made solution that can be integrated with just a click. You can then address the specific issues you find most important. Ideally, integrate all your relevant sources during onboarding, such as GitHub or any cloud accounts you use. This ensures you capture everything from the start and get the best possible results.

We have AWS for most of our infrastructure, however, we don't have a dedicated security team. There are a lot of potential vulnerabilities which we are concerned about. We use SentinelOne Singularity Cloud Security for security. For example, if there are open ports or incorrect configurations, we would get alerted and could fix them.

They have dedicated cloud-based configurations, which are quite helpful. 

The product works well with AWS. It can help us manage AWS security. If there are any groups or details that are incorrect or unsafe, or even misconfigured, it helps protect us. 

The product offers ISE scanning, which basically scans all activities for issues. 

We can pick up on pre-production issues. It's very helpful. They've helped us by providing a lot of CI/CD tools. Everything gets scanned so that we can get a sign-off before a deployment.

The ease of use is very good. I'd rate the ease of use 8 out of 10. They have nice UI and templates and the docmentation is very helpful. It's very thorough. 

They also have a good support system for users. If something is not working, they have a good SLA, and within a day or so, they will reach out and help you with whatever you need. 

The agentless vulnerability scanning is great.

If a protocol is not being properly followed, we'll be alerted. This helps us react faster to any production issues. 

We do use the offensive security engine. It's good for verifying exploit paths and prioritizing items. We have recently started using this. It allows us to see which endpoints, for example, are publically accessible, or what code repositories have vulnerabilities in terms of libraries we are using that may be outdated. For example, if we've noted our NGINX server is very publically exposed we can change things. 

The benefits of the product were felt almost immediately as it allowed us to handle issues in the pre-production phase. We didn't have to make anything live before finding issues. Within an hour, we'd begin to see issues, and within 4 to 6 hours, we'd have a full survey of security vulnerabilities. We also get regular notifications when the system sees something is off. Based on the information we receive, we're able to react and fix things very quickly.

We're able to see both high and low-priority issues so that we can accurately prioritize what to do first. That helps us manage bandwidth in terms of resources. 

SentinelOne Singularity Cloud Security has helped us reduce the amount of false positives we see. We've reduced false positives by around one-third. 

Our mean time to detect has been reduced, as well as our mean time to respond. We used to rely on a third-party provider to find issues, and now we can do it in-house. This means we no longer have to sync our AWS information on a daily basis. Now, we have a direct integration with SentinelOne Singularity Cloud Security. We used to have a delay of 36 to 48 hours before we would recognize if there were any vulnerabilities. On top of that, there was a reaction time delay of 4 to 6 hours, meaning issues wouldn't be dealt with until maybe 50 or so hours after the vulnerability was detected. We've reduced all of this down to maybe 8 to 10 hours.

The collaboration between cloud security, application developers, and AppSec teams has been better. It's mostly been positive for us. 

They could improve on their UI.  Sometimes it's not clear where to look when seeking information. Support often can direct us by giving us the correct link to what we are looking for. 

I'd like to see better onboarding documentation. If we want to be able to integrate something new, such as new assets, it can be difficult. 

I've used the solution for more than 2 years now. We started using it around December 2021 or January 2022. 

I haven't faced any lagging or crashing. 

For our use case, it has been scalable. 

The support they provide is good. They give you very detailed information and documentation which they have created internally. They are very informative. They've even shared their own internal documentation in terms of AWS issues or questions. 

They are quick to respond, You can rely on them. 

Positive

We did use a different solution, however, it didn't offer direct AWS integration. Due to this, we had to wait up to 48 hours for information on vulnerability issues. We were already having security issues in that timeframe, so we needed something that could help us detect faster. 

The initial deployment was easy. However, having more initial onboarding documentation would have been better. However, we've created some internal docs that have helped us with our use case. How long it takes to deploy depends on the use case, however, we were able to have it up in 12 to 14 hours. We had 2 people working on the deployment. 

SentinelOne Singularity Cloud Security did offer some assistance with the setup.

I'm not sure of the exact pricing. However, my understanding is that it is very economical. 

We did explore Crowd Strike at some point. Crowd Strike was a very big platform and we were not sure how much support we'd get. We wanted to make sure we had priority support.

I'd rate the solution 9 out of 10. The usability is very good. Both their new and mature products are good in terms of their overall usability.

Singularity Cloud Workload Security gave us the visibility we needed and freed up time to do other tasks. It narrows down the false positives that we got with the previous solution.

We use Singularity Cloud Workload Security to detect threats and protect our assets. We look at the threats that come in and whether they're being blocked. We use Singularity Cloud Workload Security as an anti-malware threat management product.

Our previous product took a lot of man hours to manage. Once we got Singularity Cloud Workload Security, it freed up our time to work on other tasks.

We had a couple of issues with the solution's deployment. We had to deploy the agent, and sometimes there were issues. It feels like we're battling a version of the software when we have to deploy an agent over another agent. It would be really helpful if the solution improves its agent deployment process.

I have been using Singularity Cloud Workload Security for over a year.

I haven't heard from our team about any stability issues with Singularity Cloud Workload Security. Singularity Cloud Workload Security is more stable than our previous solution.

Singularity Cloud Workload Security handles anything we throw at it. The scalability is good.

When we have an issue, an online engineer from their group helps us resolve it within an hour or two. I haven't heard anything negative about the solution's support from our team.

Positive

I was involved in the selection and the proof of concept process. I wasn't on the call for the installation, but I overheard our two engineers involved in the solution's installation. The solution's deployment was pretty quick, and they installed it in one day.

We implemented the solution with an in-house team.

Singularity Cloud Workload Security's licensing and price were cheaper than the other solutions we looked at. One product was a little bit cheaper, but its functionality and the overall product weren't as good as Singularity Cloud Workload Security. One of the vendors' prices was almost double what we would get thus far. Talking to their engineer and salesperson put our minds at ease when we got it. We knew they would be there for support, and they have been really good.

I'd ask users to take a good look at Singularity Cloud Workload Security because it brings a lot of value to the table. For its price, the solution does a good job compared to some other solutions.

Singularity Cloud Workload Security’s automated remediation works great.

The solution’s real-time detection and response capabilities work great for us. It frees up time, unlike our previous solution, where we had a lot of false positives. 

It's granular, and you can take a deeper dive into something if you need to. You can analyze and get a verdict. It's easier to narrow it down and pinpoint it with more detail.

The solution helped reduce our organization’s mean time to detect. Singularity Cloud Workload Security is quicker than our previous solution. We are a small group of just five people, and we have to do instantaneous detection to stop things from coming in quickly. We like that part a lot.

The solution helped reduce our organization’s mean time to remediate. It lets us analyze an incident, report the status quicker, and escalate it quicker than our previous solution.

Singularity Cloud Workload Security helped free up SOC staff to work on other projects. It probably freed up 10 to 15 hours a week. Before, we spent a couple of hours a day sifting through events and trying to see if they were false positives. The solution freed up a lot of time.

We have seen an impact on our organization's productivity using Singularity Cloud Workload Security. With the freed-up time, we're able to do a lot of other work. We use other products and look at phishing emails. It frees up our time to study more than we did in the past.

I would have users look at their visibility across their environment. The solution's quick response to threats, ability to act on them, automated incident response, and forensic investigation capabilities are really good. The solution provides you with 24/7 threat monitoring detection.

We work eight hours a day when we have someone on call. It's nice to know someone else is also looking at our events. They're there to dive in with us when we need them to help increase our team. Even though they're not on our team, they're there to help us.

Overall, I rate Singularity Cloud Workload Security a nine out of ten.

We have an environment in the cloud where we have a bunch of EC2 instances and S3 buckets. We have the SentinelOne agent installed on all of our EC2 instances, to monitor our environment, so we use it quite frequently.

We needed cloud-based endpoint protection that we could install to get a single pane of glass into our security environment. Specifically, we needed to see the version usage of the applications to ensure we didn't have any outdated applications.

It has definitely helped reduce our mean time to detect. It's much quicker than with our last platform. Singularity has also helped free up our staff to work on other projects. We don't usually come into the console unless we get an alert. In that sense, we have been working on many other projects in the last year. Now that everything is set up and running smoothly, we haven't had to spend as much time in the console as before.

And when I consider the solution's impact on overall productivity, features such as the reporting have helped. When we need to run a report on how many endpoints we have in our environment for regulatory requirements, we use the reporting feature of Singularity because we know it's installed on every endpoint, giving us full visibility. From a reporting standpoint, it has certainly helped us.

We really appreciate the Slack integration. When we have an incident, we get an instant notification. We also use Joe Sandbox, which Singularity can integrate with, so we can verify if a threat is legitimate. The third feature we use most often is the VirusTotal integration. That allows us to take the hash of a threat or virus and open it up in VirusTotal.

Also, it's amazing how quickly its real-time detection and response capabilities come through. There have been multiple times where either my coworker or I will be working on something—even in our elevated environment, and even just running a script. We wouldn't expect a pop-up, but it's good to know that it's checking for those anomalies, detecting them, and notifying us of them instantly. We love that feature.

In terms of the historical data record provided by Singularity after an attack, we like to use the Storyline feature for deep dives and threat hunting if needed. It has been very useful in our operations. We can see different event types on each endpoint, which comes in handy. Using the Storyline feature, we can dig in much quicker, connect the dots, and see what caused the alert. So it has quickened remediation.

And the SentinelOne Cloud engine detection types are useful when trying to determine whether a threat could be legitimate or a false positive.

One of our use cases was setting up a firewall for our endpoints, specifically for our remote users. We have a firewall on-premises that comes into play when someone is at our main campus. But we needed something more for our remote users. We were hoping to utilize SentinelOne's firewall capabilities, but there were limitations on how many URLs we could implement. Because of those limitations on the number of URLs, we weren't able to utilize that feature in the way we had hoped to.

I have been using SentinelOne Singularity Cloud for about two years.

Singularity has been very stable. It has never lagged or crashed that I've noticed. In my experience, there has been 100 percent uptime.

The interoperability with AWS has been very straightforward and streamlined, without any major bugs or issues that I've come across.

Its scalability is one of the main reasons we chose SentinelOne. Because it's hosted in the cloud, we can install as many agents as we're licensed for. We've never gone over that limit. As new servers and endpoints come online, it's easy to deploy. It's built into the image.

We do have a unique use case regarding scalability. We use a VDI environment in Azure, and it works. We haven't had any issues. But when we need to run updates on those machines, we have to rebuild the image. We can't have the agent built into the image because of our rebuild process. That makes it a manual process for us every month when we redeploy those desktops. We have it scripted out with a PowerShell script that helps, but it's a manual step for us. That's one area we're trying to address from a scalability standpoint.

As for auto-scaling, we're more of a static environment for most of our endpoints. The VDI is our only more fluid environment, since our VDI endpoints go up and down based on usage. Once the agent has been deployed to those images, the auto-scaling works flawlessly, and we haven't had any issues there.

We used ESET, but the decision to go with Singularity was made before my time with the company.

We have a couple different deployments: our end-user endpoints and our server fleet. I was involved with the server deployment. It was very straightforward, and we didn't run into any issues during that deployment.

The only maintenance involved is when we need to whitelist an application. For example, if a new user installs an application, we might get a false-positive pop-up. That's really the only maintenance we have to do.

We did it ourselves, and there were four people involved.

It's a fair price for what you get. We are happy with the price as it stands.

My advice is that if you want an easy-to-deploy solution where you can have a single pane of glass to get visibility into all of your endpoints and applications, and run reports on those application versions, Singularity makes it a very easy-to-use, straightforward, and streamlined process that has helped us over and over again.

If someone thinks they don't need Singularity because they already have a continuous security monitoring solution in place, using SentinelOne gives us an overarching view from the single console, giving us the entire picture of the timeline of events that happened. Going through the timeline and connecting those dots really helps when threat hunting. It helps to get the full picture instead of just a specific point in time, which is the way some of the legacy antivirus programs work.

The solution has an automated remediation feature, but we don't currently use it because we are a smaller team. We like to remediate manually. For the time being, we haven't had a reason to use the automation feature yet.

One area we're trying to innovate more in is the AWS Security Hub. Singularity, in their marketplace, has a couple of apps related to that. We're trying to build more automations within AWS Security Hub to get better overall visibility, not only of our EC2 endpoints but of our applications as well.

We currently use Cloud Native Security for cloud security posture management, leveraging both the CWP module and the authentication security tab. While we regularly utilize these features, we're planning to onboard the cloud detection and response module, along with the ISIS scanning functionality.

We implemented Cloud Native Security as a secondary control measure to complement our existing security posture. In our Prisma Cloud environment, we have a detection score threshold set at 70 or above. As Cloud Native Security was a new entrant in the market, we wanted to evaluate its capabilities. Fortunately, Cloud Native Security's unique features and policies proved valuable. For instance, Cloud Native Security detected an alert when a developer accidentally committed VS Code files to a public GitHub repository. This helped us promptly remove the VS code from GitHub.

Cloud Native Security is easy to use.

The feature that has been most effective in threat detection for our cloud environment has been the cloud visual attack tab.

Our cloud security is managed by Intel and Azure Entra. We download a report from them and send it to our team to address any identified issues.

I appreciate that Cloud Native Security incorporates evidence of exploitability into their reports, making them more reliable.

Cloud Native Security's offensive security engine excels at validating potential exploit paths and prioritizing the most critical vulnerabilities. This enables us to proactively identify and address these risks, ultimately strengthening our security posture.

Cloud Native Security has helped reduce our false positives. We can investigate and mute any false positives so they don't appear going forward.

Cloud Native Security helps us actively identify threats, ultimately improving our security posture.

Cloud Native Security has reduced our mean time to detect by 10 percent.

Cloud Native Security facilitates collaboration between our cloud security application developers and AppSec teams. This collaboration is further enhanced by a shared console that provides visibility into all active tickets. This transparency helps to reduce redundant requests, saving time.

Cloud Native Security offers a valuable tool called an offensive search engine. This tool has been helpful for us. It allows us to search for vulnerabilities and provides evidence directly on the screen. Additionally, Cloud Native Security offers a feature called Graph Explorer. This feature allows us to drill down into specific resources, search for them on the console, and view details such as open security rules and graph features.

While only 5 percent of our workload resides on the Google Cloud Platform, we would still like Cloud Native Security to be configured with automatic remediation capabilities for GCP.

In Prisma, there's a dedicated tab for managing high and medium-severity alerts. This allows us to easily enable or disable specific policies based on our current needs. With Cloud Native Security, we can't selectively enable or disable alerts based on our specific use case.

I have been using Cloud Native Security for six months.

I would rate the stability of Cloud Native Security 7 out of 10.

The only downtime we had was when switching from V1 to V2 but it was smooth.

I would rate the scalability of Cloud Native Security 8 out of 10.

The technical support is good.

For the past three years, Prisma Cloud has been our go-to security solution. Recently, we've added Cloud Native Security to our toolkit to further strengthen our security posture.

The initial deployment was straightforward. First, we onboarded the UAT account. Then, we added our product support account and other accounts. We then tested the UAT environment accounts. The entire deployment took one week to complete. Two people were involved in the deployment.   

I would rate Cloud Native Security 9 out of 10.

Our primary cloud security monitoring solution is Prisma Cloud by Palo Alto Networks, with Cloud Native Security as a secondary control measure.

We have 19 users overall in our cloud security team that utilize Cloud Native Security.

The only maintenance required is for updates.

I would recommend Cloud Native Security to others.

We are a relatively smaller organization of roughly 250 people. We utilize SentinelOne for patch management, vulnerability assessments, and remediation. So whenever one of our users has an issue on their machine, we get an immediate notification to let us know what that intrusion, infection, malware, whatever it might be, where it is, what file may have caused it, and then we can immediately take action. 

There are also default settings for ensuring the software that SentinelOne installs on all our client machines. The latest agent is up to date everywhere. They have a couple more insights, however, that's our main use case.

The big thing for us was just having optics on vulnerabilities, being able to ensure that we have a secure way to get month-over-month assessments of our security stats, and ensuring that there's something in place that can make sure that we're secure. We also wanted something that could keep up with current demands without having any sort of interference or impact on the user's end.

Minimal impact on user's, quick scans and remediation, and very precise action on quarantine and threat-elimination. This has been the most positive tool in our arsenal, and being able to get automated reports on what our security posture is helps. They've recently added an exclusion function that makes our month-over-month vulnerability management so much easier, and helps to keep track of the vulnerabilities we've accepted. While they were already a great service, they''ve continued to improve their feature stack without the cost creep of some other EDR's.

The remote shell and the remediation are the two that really stand out as valuable features. The remote shell function that it offers is something that I use almost daily. It allows us to quietly and discreetly sign in on a user's computer, but only as admin. It prevents any sort of security issues or security risks to a user, which would be probably our favorite. 

The remediation is really nice as it gives a very clear understanding of where a file came from. For example, in our use of it, there are a couple of files that we had that we didn't even know that we had. There was software that no one was aware was installed on these machines more than three years ago; we actually learned about that software once SentinelOne was installed. The level of optics it gives you is just incredible.

With that software, as soon as we installed SentinelOne, there were a couple of different applications and software that were immediately flagged as tracking user information and things like that. We found out that there was actually some sort of remote surveillance software that the past iteration of the IT team had installed and tested that just never got removed. We ended up tracking down the vendor for that and getting their assurance that that was no longer being used.

The real-time detection and response capabilities overall are great. I've never used anything that was as fast as this. The software that we used to use, Sophos, was comparable, however, it had a noticeable impact on the user. The bigger thing for me is that there isn't an impact on my end users. When we are actually running a scan, let's say, if we find that there's an impact, it's very quick. We've tested it by throwing malicious software onto our test machines just to see how quickly SentinelOne actually picks it up. And it's literally within seconds. When you actually do a scan, you can scan your higher fleet, and it's done relatively quickly as long as those machines are powered on. And it will act the second that those machines power on and connect to the Internet again to get that signal.  I've never used anything as quick, personally. 

The forensic visibility into the Linux terminal is not something we use as we actually don't use any Linux machines ourselves, so I couldn't speak to that. As far as visibility goes, we're primarily a Mac organization, and we have ten percent of our users on PC. As far as Mac goes, the visibility is fantastic. Same with the PC side of things. 

The historical data record, from what they had shown us in the demo, looks pretty incredible. We thankfully have not suffered an attack that required historical data. 

In terms of our mean time to detect, I don't think we ever had it. Since we're a small organization, we haven't had any real issues with genuine malware attacks. I can't speak to a scenario where while we were on Sophos, we experienced one. When we've had security audits that have tried to pen test for us, we have not had any issues with SentinelOne whatsoever. Every time that we've attempted to see how accurate and how quickly it can detect an infection or intrusion, it's being caught immediately.

The same is true for mean time to remediate. Any remediation that we do, for example, as soon as we block off a file, the automatic remediations are nice. In the event that we want to have something behave differently on another machine, we can quickly change that once we see it in any incident log. Setting those permanent rules is very helpful since, if you know something's malicious, chances are you don't want it showing up anywhere else.

The product has helped free up your SOC staff to work on other projects or tasks. The work that we used to have to do with our previous provider in going through our vulnerability assessments on a monthly basis and in trying to track down the install path of different applications was a headache and a half. With SentinelOne, the application management, and vulnerability assessments, are easy. You can see directly to the file path. It cuts a significant enough time out of our day.

It's had a positive impact on our overall productivity. Being able to dig through and find applications faster has drastically cut down our vulnerability position. When we first started using Singularity, we were somewhere in the thousands. Within the first month of having used it for our vulnerability assessments, we were down to just 1600, and now we're sitting well under the 500 mark when it comes to critical vulnerabilities. It's been very drastic and exponential at that. Now, any time a vulnerability does pop up, it's very quick and easy for us to track down where it is and take immediate action.

The interoperability with third-party solutions is fine. We don't currently use Kubernetes in our organization, however, we do utilize a VPN and it has no issues with adapting to that VPN. We also utilize different storage, including cloud storage accounts. There are no issues there either.

They've been fantastic at supporting innovation. We've had their support; they're always very responsive and very quick to give us the right advice on how we can execute what we're looking to do. Making sure that you have access to the necessary system without interrupting your user and without your user feeling at risk of their privacy being invaded is huge.

We export our vulnerability report to an .xlsx file, and review it in an Excel spreadsheet, and then we sort of compile a list from there. It would be cool if there was a way to actually toggle multiple applications for review and then see those file paths on multiple users rather than only one user at a time or only one application at a time.

At this time we need to use the online interface in order to retrieve the filepaths that we can target, and in some cases these aren't even available. It would be one of the only things left for them to add into their feature set, and would make this a product I can't think of improvements for.

I've been using the solution for roughly 2.5 years

I've had no stability issues at all. We have not experienced any performance decreases.

As far as deploying to more devices, there's not a problem with scaling at all. We've automated in our MDM so any device that we start in our MDM automatically installs SentinelOne, and those devices immediately show up. If we spin up a new device on Mac OS, it shows within the set the SentinelOne console within seconds.

Their support has been fantastic. They are quick to respond. 

I've never had an issue with their support. What little time I did have one scenario where it was not something that they could help with, they'd been able to provide us with all the articles and information necessary to act on it on our own, which is really all you can ask for.

Positive

We were previously using Sophos. The biggest issue that we had with them was the fact that we were a fully remote company, so a lot of our users would be traveling for client meetings or even traveling abroad for client meetings. Reliance on a secure public WiFi solution is a very big deal for us. When it comes to users on a VPN, Sophos with MacOS's more recent updates would completely cut off Wi-Fi - which was very difficult for us to work around as a remote company. Thankfully, with multiple different tests in multiple different scenarios, we've never had that issue with SentinelOne. 

The other big thing is the capability to remove a device from the network. In the event that a significant intrusion or malware, malware, ransomware, whatever it might be, is detected the ability to just isolate that one user from internet access is huge. You would hope that that's how an EDR would behave instead of completely removing all internet no matter what.

The initial setup was pretty straightforward. Our organization uses Kagi MDM. And in using that MDM solution, it was very easy for us to just quickly put together an automated installer and deploy it. 

We have multiple different groups of users, including PC and Mac. With the smaller percentage of PC users, we were able to just change the group ID in the installer, and that ensured that they were placed into the proper place for their groups. Being able to tweak and ensure that from the back end within the SentinelOne console, we could ensure that everything is set up the way we want it to be once that user gets that package installed, makes life a lot easier. You don't need to worry about signing on with a user and changing any of those settings. The installer package that they get is going to be everything that they need. Once that installs, that's it. It was very seamless. If anything, removing Sophos was the hardest part of the installation process.

We were able to deploy using a team of three people. Hypothetically, one person could do it alone as long as they are well versed in MDM.

As far as the application itself is concerned, there was no need for maintenance. You can control everything from the console. When there is a new agent to install you receive a notification when you log in to the management console. You can control when that update gets deployed to your organization. You can break it up into different groups within your organization. For ourselves, we always test on a smaller number of users. And then once we see stability, we deploy to the rest. That's what little maintenance is involved. It's a drastic improvement versus other solutions that I've used.

We were able to do the initial setup completely in-house. We were able to do that on our own. We were able to very, very quickly deploy SentinelOne to pretty much our entire fleet.

Our ability to get in and review our vulnerability stance, whether daily, monthly, weekly, or whatever it might be, has drastically improved over our prior provider. Our users have less of a performance drain when attempting to use it. That's always huge when it comes to EDR. It pretty much checks every single box for us. It's the one software in our stack that we are happiest with.

For us, the pricing is very fair. They were willing to meet our price point. With very little negotiation involved, we just let them know what we could pay and they were willing to meet us at slightly above what we paid with Sophos, which was still very fair for what we were looking at. 

We reviewed quite a few solutions. The big selling point for this product was that they were willing to work with us on a price point as a smaller organization. That was a huge reason for us actually going with them. The fact that they were willing to work with us as far as the pricing goes was the main reason that we ended up going with them. It was nice to see that they work with the little teams.

We're a customer and end-user.

We thought something as good as SentinelOne would be out of the question for an organization of our size. We assumed it would be something that's suited to larger organizations - money, obviously, being the main concern. However, the fact that they were willing to work with us changed that. Seeing that they're willing to work with smaller organizations is cool. I like that they actually give back to the tech sector that way.

I'd rate the stability ten out of ten.

I'd advise new users that they're going to need to invest a little bit of time upfront in order to make sure that their organization is set up for proper deployment. We probably spent about a week or two configuring everything and getting it to work the way we wanted. However, after that initial investment of time, the maintenance that you have to do is pretty minimal.