Snowflake Reviews

We primarily use the solution to build some cost-effective solutions for a data warehouse, mostly for all non-transactional data.

The solution is very fast. It's not clunky or slow.

The product, overall, is quite inexpensive. It's very cheap to use.

The solution is extremely user-friendly and easy to navigate. The user experience is very good.

The initial setup is pretty straightforward. It's simple.

We found that the initial setup was pretty easy.

The solution has been stable and has provided good overall performance.

A company can easily scale the solution. It's not too difficult to pull off.

The technical support on offer is excellent. They're helpful for the most part.

There are always a few operation updates here and there that can be made. However, overall, there aren't any features or glaring shortcomings. It's pretty good. We can't complain.

While the solution is quite inexpensive, there is always a push from clients that want it to be cheaper in the future.

I have about six years' worth of experience with the product. I've been using it for a while. I'm comfortable with its aspects. I've used it over the last 12 months as well.

The stability is very good. There are no bugs or glitches. It doesn't crash or freeze. It's reliable. The performance is good.

The product scales quite well. If a company needs to expand it, it can do so without any problem.

We deal mostly with clients that have medium to large-scale organizations. It works well for both.

Technical support has been excellent. I'd rate them nine out of ten. They are knowledgeable and responsive. We are quite happy with the level of assistance we receive if we need help.

We've used a few other solutions including MySQL and a few other notable databases.

Right now, we are looking for some other options as well.

The initial setup is quite simple. It's a straightforward process. It's not overly complex. A company shouldn't have any issues with the implementation process.

We are implementors. We can implement the solution for clients if they need us to.

The product is very reasonably priced. It's quite cheap to use. It's less expensive than, for example, Oracle.

We are implementors of the solution.

We are using previous versions of the solution. It may not necessarily be the latest version all the time.

I'd advise other organizations to try it out and play with it a bit to see if it would fit their needs.

Overall, I would rate the solution at a nine out of ten. We've been mostly very happy with it.

We are a consulting company so our primary use depends on the niche that we are providing the services to and on which of the different versions they have. I think we are mainly using Snowflake Enterprise.

In general, it is being used for integrating information. Snowflake is a database platform, it gives information to support analytic needs, such as advanced data analytics like machine learning. In some of those cases it is also used for descriptive analytics, for instance BI.

One of example of how Snowflake has improved a client's organization is the democratization, it makes information available to more of the users.

The features that I have found most valuable are the ease of use, the rapidness, how quickly the solution can be implemented, and of course that it's been very easy to move from the on-premise world to the Cloud world because Snowflake is based on SQL also.

I think that the area of improvement with Snowflake is to improve the administration. It would benefit from an administration that allows you to be aware of your credit consumption once you have the service so that you may be sure how many credits you are consuming when you use the platform and to make sure that you are making the most efficient use of these resources. In other words, to improve their interface so that you may monitor the consumption of your credits on Cloud.

I also heard from a company we work for that it could be more user-friendly because it provides some tools but they are not user-friendly.

Additionally, it would be very helpful if Snowflake integrated machine learning and some other advanced analytics features within their language or product capabilities. Right now, they do it through some other company where you have to buy these capabilities from other vendors. There are some customers that don't have complex needs for machine learning or advanced analytics so they don't have to buy it from another vendor but can use it from the product itself if they have it.

The whole company has been using Snowflake for about three years.

In terms of stability, so far it is very stable.

Snowflake is very scalable. Our client companies where we implement Snowflake are medium to large sized. These companies have offices in different parts of the world, not just some regions, but companies with office users in different parts of the world. We are dealing with international companies. Their tendency is to increase the use of the Snowflake platform. It would serve all the analytical needs in these companies.

I have not directly experienced the technical support. It's not part of my job to be involved on those kind of issues, but we constantly receive information as a partner from them and we are very in good touch with them and with the people we are working with, meaning the representatives that are within the Latin American market, which is where I work. They are very open and very fast with communication.

The initial setup is easy. Full deployment takes a few weeks. The initial deployment for the first initiatives might take weeks. It's not complex, really. You may have it loaded after a full day and already providing results or interacting, but there are some other companies that have to be implemented to extract and consume the information from the database. But it's very easy.

There have been a couple of other solutions that we've been participating in the evaluation process of and some others that have been included in the decision process, including Redshift from AWS and also Azure Synapse from Microsoft.

For instance, AWS Redshift looked like it was easier to implement and to be adopted by the technical users, the programmers and database programmers. So far it has been far easier to adapt this technology. I'm not saying that AWS is a better technology. It's very complex, but at least what I've seen is that for them, it looks like it's been easier to use the first time.

We liked that Snowflake is able to be used as a multi-Cloud service - it can be used in AWS Cloud, Azure Cloud, or Google Cloud. Whereas AWS, or even Synapse, can only be used in their corresponding networks.

I would definitely recommend Snowflake.

On a scale of one to ten, I would give Snowflake an eight.

I give it an eight out of 10 due to its room for improvement in the user interface for the monitoring of the credit consumption and that the user experience is not friendly. And also because the machine learning is lacking some advanced analytic features.

We are using it for our security products. We have a trial account, and we are using the trial database and practicing on top of it. We have the latest version of this solution.

Its performance is a big advantage. When you run a query, its performance is very good.

The inbound and outbound share features are also very useful for sharing a particular database. By using these features, you can allow others to access the Snowflake database and query it, which is another advantage of this solution. 

It has good security, and we can easily integrate it. We can connect it with multiple source systems.

I am still in the learning stage. It has good security, but it can always be more secure. 

I have been using this solution for a few months. I am in the learning stage.

It is stable. Its performance is very good.

It is scalable. We have four users who are using Snowflake. 

We are going through the online version, and we don't find any difficulty with this.

I also use Azure. Snowflake has more advantages than Azure.

There is no installation as such. After you register with Snowflake, you get a demo database, which you can configure and use. It only takes around 30 minutes. 

I did it myself.

Currently, we have a trial account, so we don't need a license. After our project starts, we would need a permanent license.

I would recommend this solution to others. We plan to keep using it. 

I would rate Snowflake a nine out of ten.

It was only a workshop with training to know the tool. We were just testing the technology, and it was just a demo of the tool. We wanted is to connect switches with IoT and use Snowflake as an engine to process all the big data. It was on top of AWS, but our infrastructure is on top of the Google Cloud Platform.

The intention was to see if we can process on the front-end that we have. We have a console that processes a big amount of data. Instead of using BigQuery, we used Snowflake to see if it is cheaper than using BigQuery, but Snowflake wasn't cost-effective. In the end, we didn't go for this solution. We just saw how it can be implemented, but we never bought anything.

We don't have a metric, but I would say that the processing time was a key benefit and value-add. It provided on-time processing.

Its speed and performance were the most valuable. Easy configuration of Snowflake in any cloud was also a benefit.

Its pricing or affordability is one of the big challenges. Pricing was the only thing that we didn't like about Snowflake. In terms of technical features, it is a complete solution.

Its scalability is great. We have data processing of one terabyte per month.

It was not complex. Our implementation strategy was to put Snowflake on top of Google Cloud solutions instead of BigQuery, but BigQuery was better in price. So, BigQuery won in this case instead of Snowflake.

We got the guidance directly from Snowflake. They have a technical expert for Latin America.

We used Snowflake to see if it is cheaper than using BigQuery. It was just to maintain the cost or the KPI regarding the cost of connectivity by users. Snowflake wasn't cheaper than BigQuery, and its affordability was the main issue. 

My advice is to consider Snowflake when you have more customers. I wouldn't consider Snowflake until I have sufficient customers. 

Whether we will consider Snowflake in the future depends on how BigQuery behaves. If the cost of BigQuery starts increasing and becomes similar to Snowflake, we're going to switch. If not, we're going to remain with BigQuery. 

We might also consider other similar solutions, such as Yellowbrick, or switch to another cloud solution, such as Azure or AWS, depending on the price. Right now, we are paying about $2,000 per month. Our goal is to have the total cost of everything to be around $3,000 per month. It is more or less our goal for KPI kind of thing.

I would rate Snowflake an eight out of ten.

We use this solution for business intelligence. We have three persons in the team for developing the end product.

Snowflake is a database, and it is very good and useful. The most interesting part is that memory management is very good in Snowflake. For a business intelligence project, SQL Server is taking a lot of time for reporting services. There are a lot of calculations, and the reporting time is shown as two minutes, whereas Snowflake is taking just two seconds for the same reporting services.

For the Snowflake database, there should be some third-party features for the ETL. It would also be good to be able to use some kind of controls to get the data either from another database or a flat file.

Its price should be improved. It should be cheaper than Microsoft.

I have been using this solution for eight to ten months.

It is stable.

It is scalable.

Their technical support is good. I always get a response from them when I send an email to their support team.

It is very easy to install. After the installation, you just have to input some information into the Snowflake database. It is very easy.

Its price should be improved. It should be cheaper than Microsoft.

I would recommend this solution. I would rate Snowflake an eight out of ten.

We are a management consulting firm and do not use this product for ourselves. Rather, it is a service for our clients.

The overall package is quite nice, and there is not one specific feature that I have found more valuable than the others.

The vendor is quite willing to implement requests for development, in particular for larger clients. It is a nice company to work with.

Every product has room for improvement, although in this case, it needs some broadening of the functionality. They could become more complete.

Including more AI functionality would be nice. Microsoft does have more in this regard, although that also has to do with the size of the company.

We have been using Snowflake for a couple of years.

Snowflake is a stable product.

This is definitely a scalable solution.

The technical support is pretty good, particularly if you are a more technical user. The people they have are quite technical, so compared to a lot of other companies where you first get somebody on the phone who has never seen the product, but he or she just works at the center and has to answer the first calls, if you connect with Snowflake, you immediately get somebody who is actually at the proper level.

It also means that if you have less experienced users, it's not that they find it difficult, but then they may get some questions to resolve the issue, which they don't really know the answer to. Sometimes, users may find themselves a bit lost because they don't know how to answer those questions. However, it's not in a negative way. It's more like you get a proper engineer to respond to your issues with Snowflake.

The price of Snowflake is quite reasonable.

Personally, if I have the choice, I would rather recommend Snowflake to my clients over a product from Microsoft, for example. They have some overlapping functionality, but they also have some separate stuff. Snowflake does not have the size to develop at that pace but personally, I find them a more sympathetic company than Microsoft.

I would rate this solution an eight out of ten.

We use it for presentations to clients. 

The syntax is advanced which reduces the time to write code. 

They should improve the reporting tools. 

They could increase their bandwidth to connect to other ETL tools. 

I have been using Snowflake for around six months. 

The stability is good. There is no performance downtime. 

If there is a need for scaling the setup is not so good. 

Their support is good. 

The initial setup was not complex. We needed a dedicated person for the setup. Once we know the requirements, it's not that complex. It has straightforward parameters. 

I would rate Snowflake an eight out of ten. 

I work for a company that are Snowflake partners and help clients implement solutions using Snowflake.

Snowflake solves many of the challenges that traditional data warehousing tools have such as a lack of agility, scalability and fine-tuning.

The use of micropartitions and metadata means that there is very little management needed and the user can focus purely on actually getting value out of their data. In addition, the cloning feature makes problem resolution and cutover extremely pain-free.

Whilst flexibility is one of its key strengths, it would be useful if there could be some better governance built into the product. In addition, functionality out of the box to deal with common data warehousing scenarios (e.g. slowly-changing dimensions etc.) would be great.

I have been using Snowflake for about a year and a half.

It is extremely stable.

The support from Snowflake is absolutely great. All kinds of content and things are available to support yourself as well as to be able to talk through issues and have their engineers take a look at the problems. They are very responsive.

We use Snowflake alongside other data warehousing tools. Ultimately it depends on what the client wants to implement and their existing architecture as to what would be the best choice.

The initial setup is very straightforward.

Snowflake has a very efficient pricing mechanism where you only pay for what you use by the second making it very easy to control costs.

The best advice I would give is to push for a POC. Pick a couple of use cases where you think you could quickly get value and just see how quickly you can get it implemented. One of the key features of Snowflake is that you can get it up and running straight away.