Splunk Enterprise Security Reviews

I use Splunk on-and-off — I started with in-house projects, then moved up to commercial projects. 

Splunk can extract all kinds of data. There's no limitation on what kind of structured and unstructured data one needs to extract — it can access any kind of data, including machine-generated data. 

The ease of deploying the agent is great in Splunk. One can easily deploy the Universal Forwarder which can extract any amount of information and put it into an indexer. The flexibility of ingesting any kind of data is good with Splunk.

In regards to action-oriented tasks, If an alert is triggered where I have to perform a certain action in the form of executing a Python script or invigorating a PowerShell script — this is easy to do with Splunk. 

The Splunkbase is great. There are thousands of apps that are already available, I can install those apps with full-connectivity and use them to extract any form of data. The community in the Splunkbase is also really strong. 

The ease of integration with third-party tools is great. In the Splunkbase, there are so many apps that are easy to integrate with. 

The user interface is really good. There is a machine learning toolkit — I like it a lot. They have use cases in place so that people with little experience in machine learning can go through these examples of use cases and gain a better understanding. 

Sometimes we experience issues when formatting and configuring files; however, this is a very technical issue that's hard to explain.

When extracting the data or structuring the data in the right format, sometimes it becomes challenging. It's up to the user to understand the regex commands. 

Our customers often complain that the price of Splunk is too high.

When Splunk is deployed on the cloud, there are certain considerations that cannot be met. Cloud-based configuration cannot be done by our Splunk admin team. It needs to be routed via a ticket. You don't have more control on the cloud from a configuration point of view, whereas, with on-premise, you are in control — you can define any configuration settings. 

When you install on-premise, many types of configurations can be done but when Splunk is on the cloud, you're dependent on their specific configurations.

I started using Splunk in 2018.

The scalability is good. If you have the money, you can expand — it's volume-based, not instance-based. 

I'd say I am happy with the technical support, not elated. They provide great support, but sometimes they don't have the answers that I need. I've only ever raised two big support issues, and both times they haven't been about to fully resolve the issue. In the end, I had to figure it out myself.

We have one or two engineers that take care of all maintenance-related issues. It really depends on the scale of your project. One of our projects required a huge deployment — we needed a huge team to match. If it's a small deployment, then two people are enough.

Its cost model is dependent upon the amount of data used — how many GBs we extract in a day determines our price. The price is not dependent upon how many instances we installed in Splunk. I can install thousands of instances, but it will only charge me according to how many GBs I extract per day. 

Overall, our customers complain that the price is too high.

I would definitely recommend using Splunk. They have free learning models available. There are models available on their learning page where you can gain a better understanding of how to use Splunk. Within one month alone, you can at least understand how to operate Splunk, whereas, with other tools, it can take a lot of time to understand.

On a scale from one to ten, I would give Splunk a rating of nine. The only downside is the cost. Price is the only factor; sometimes, companies shy away from Splunk because of the price.

We are a software development company and Splunk is one of the products that we have implemented for our clients. It is used for log analytics as well as the mobile SDK for checking the stability of mobile applications.

It's the completeness of the solution that we like the most. It has a solution for backend log analytics, but also one for mobile applications.

Our two main complaints are about the difficulty of the initial setup and the licensing model.

The billing model is a little bit complicated because you have to predict in advance how much data you'll have and how much storage you'll need. When you start, you don't really have those numbers but to get the licensing, you need them. It is only at that point that you'll know how much the product is going to cost you.

I have been working with Splunk for more than five years.

There have been no issues in particular. What we are using has not been that heavy.

We have not had any problems with respect to scalability.

Based on when we have been in contact with them, I think that technical support was fine.

I'm not sure if they have different support models but I think it took a long time for them to respond. It may be a consequence of the support contract our client had with them.

This is a complicated product to use and you need constant help to set it up. I really wish that it was easier to set up and use.

We do not have any dedicated people who are working on Splunk, but we have a team of approximately 100 people that are responsible for the development of mobile applications, backend systems, DevOps, etc.

I think that most of the log analytics solutions are expensive and I'm not sure if it's worth it. However, I wish that they were less expensive. I am not talking about a single product but rather, all of the ones that are in the domain of log analytics.

Splunk is a good product but I would definitely tell people to analyze their requirements to see if Splunk fits their use case, or not. The licensing model is very complicated, so if there is a product that has a better licensing model then it would probably be good to start with that. Then, later on, if the product is not working well enough, then they can switch to Splunk. At that point, they will have knowledge of the data they are using and will understand the costs that they might incur while using it. 

The only way that I would suggest somebody use this as their first solution is if they already had all of the data that is required to get a cost estimate.

I would rate this solution a seven out of ten.

We are using the mobile SDK to check the stability of mobile applications.

The completeness of the solution is what we like the most.

It's difficult to set up initially, and their billing model is also a bit complicated. 

We have to predict in advance how much data we will have and what the storage would be that we don't have. This makes the licensing complicated because when you start you don't have these numbers.

In order to know how much it will cost, you need those numbers.

I really wish that it was an application that was easier to use.

I have been working with Splunk for more than five years.

We have not experienced any issues.

For our use cases, we have not required any scaling.

The technical support is fine. At times, they take time to respond back but it may have been the support contract that our client had.

I would assume that they are not as responsive as we want them to be.

We have a team of approximately 100 people who are responsible for the development of mobile applications, DevOps, and application development.

The licensing cost model is complicated.

I think that most of the monitoring solutions are expensive. I wish they were less expensive, for all types of products for monitoring.

We work with Splunk, but we are looking for some LOG Kinetics solutions for our clients.

I would definitely suggest sending people to analyze or evaluate Splunk.

Because the licensing model is very complicated to understand, it would be better to start with another product that provides a better licensing model. Later, if the product is not working well, they can consider using Splunk and may have a better understanding of the cost.

For me, I would not recommend Splunk as their first solution unless they have all of the data that is required.

I would rate Splunk a seven out of ten.

We are using it for logging and monitoring.

Splunk Enterprise Security helps with application events. It provides end-to-end visibility into our environment which is most important for us. It reduces the time to react to an event.

Splunk Enterprise Security has helped improve our organization’s ability to ingest and normalize data. It can help identify and solve problems in real-time, but we have mainly utilized it for post-identification correction.

It provides us with the relevant context to help guide our investigations. It is easier for developers to take action once an anomaly is detected. We have been leveraging Splunk dashboards for that.

Splunk Enterprise Security has helped speed up our security investigations, but I do not have the metrics.

They are a good partner for Google Cloud. It provides great visibility, threat detection, and proactive mitigation of risks for our mutual consumers.

We have been selling Splunk Enterprise Security along with Google Cloud for about two years.

We had a very bespoke solution. It was a shared model. The scalability was good.

Their technical support has been good. I would rate them an eight out of ten.

Positive

We have not used any other solution previously.

Our customers have seen an ROI, but I do not have the metrics.

The variables and the flexibility that Splunk provides are helpful, especially in a hybrid and multi-cloud environment.

I would advise others to start early.

Overall, I would rate Splunk Enterprise Security a ten out of ten.

We use Splunk Enterprise Security for our enterprise security.

Adding more use cases to Splunk can improve our threat detection speed.

It has helped normalize our data.

Splunk Enterprise Security has helped reduce our alert volume and speed up our security investigations.

The graph visualization is the most valuable feature.

Splunk Enterprise Security needs to improve its stability.

The UI can be difficult to understand for non-technical people.

I have been using Splunk Enterprise Security for four months.

I would rate the stability of Splunk Enterprise Security a four out of ten. Some bugs cause downtime.

I would rate the scalability a six out of ten.

I would rate Splunk Enterprise Security an eight out of ten.

Splunk Enterprise Security's robust framework enables it to support a wider range of use cases, making it more adaptable and versatile for tackling diverse security challenges.

We have Splunk Enterprise Security deployed across multiple locations.

Splunk Enterprise Security's visualizations are detailed and help users normalize data, making it extremely useful.

The vast array of use cases enabled by Splunk Enterprise Security empowers security teams to address diverse threats and enhance overall security posture.

I used it in the SOC environment to get logs, create dashboards, and filter out data.

The indexing and data collection are valuable. 

Its search or filtering capability is nice, but it can be improved. It is currently a bit complicated, and it should be simplified. If we can write the search filter in a more simplified way, it would be better.

Their sales support and tech support need improvement. Their support is really bad.

I used it for nearly one year in my previous organization. I last used it about seven months ago.

It is stable.

Its scalability is good.

Their sales support and tech support are really bad. They take really long to respond.

We were using AlienVault. We switched because we weren't really happy with it. So, we looked into different solutions, such as Splunk.

Its initial setup was okay.

We did it ourselves. We had around two people for deployment and maintenance, but we had around 15 users. They all were SOC people.

We had a yearly subscription.

I can recommend this solution to others. It is a great product. 

I would rate it an eight out of 10.

We work with Splunk. We use it for our own services, and we also integrate and resell Splunk. It is used for cyber security. 

Different clients have different versions. They have Splunk Cloud and Splunk on-premises with different versions.

It is very easy to use and integrate. There are connectors for every technology.

The UI can be improved. Dashboards and reports can be better in terms of graphics.

We have been using this solution for a few years. In 2016, we became a Splunk partner.

It is very stable.

Its scalability is very good. We work with this platform for our own services. We use Splunk extensively, and we also offer it to our clients. We plan to increase its usage.

Our company has three offices. We have offices in Spain, Columbia, and Mexico. We have around 100 people, and about 50 people are working with Splunk. They all are focused on cyber security. They are security engineers or security specialists.

I don't know about their support. I don't work with it much. On an activity level, I'm not so close to the platform. I'm the country manager, so I am a bit far from the operation.

We tried to work with Exabeam for user behavior analytics, but we stopped it.

Its setup is very easy, but we have been working with Splunk for a lot of years. We have all the certifications in Splunk, and we are a specialist in Splunk. So, for us, it is very easy to set it up and integrate it, but it might not be easy for other companies.

Splunk is a very good platform for analytics and cybersecurity. We use it very extensively. It is very easy to use, and it is very stable and scalable.

I would rate it a nine out of 10.

We are a solution provider and Splunk is one of the products that we distribute.

The primary use case is for SIEM and we have approximately 35 customers.

The fact that Splunk is a platform and not just a SIEM solution is a key benefit.

Our customers like that they can use Splunk to optimize their security.

The Splunk licensing model should be more flexible.

The support that is included with the standard licensing fee is very bad.

We have been working with Splunk since 2017.

Stability-wise, it's perfect. We haven't had any problem with Splunk. It's good software.

One of the key benefits and differences with this software is that the customer can scale up as much as they need to. Our largest Splunk customer is using between three and four petabytes of data per day.

If you don't pay extra for technical support then it is very bad. If you pay extra for it, then the technical support is normal.

I am familiar with other products and Splunk can handle much more data than IBM QRadar or any other competing product.

Direct competitors are more flexible when it comes to licensing.

We have not had any problems installing Splunk.

For a standard case, it takes between one and two weeks to install correctly and deploy. This is for situations where the client has less than 50 gigabytes of data per day.

Problems during the implementation are typically due to something on the customer's side. For example, if the client does not have somebody that is responsible for the deployment, helping to speed up the various procedures, then this is a key problem for us.

It takes two people to deploy and maintain.

Splunk is not a cheap solution and the license is billed annually. The licensing model should be improved and the price should be lower, in general.

You can purchase additional technical support, which is much better than the support that is included.

I would rate this solution an eight out of ten.