We used to have four Dell EMC PowerEdge hosts running various versions of Microsoft Hyper-V with no redundancy.
We are also running out of storage space and have been dealing with an increasing complexity of Windows Server licensing.
We investigated and received proposals from three vendors (Dell EMC, Scale Computing and StarWind). Ultimately, the main decision point was cost. StarWind is the only vendor that only needs two nodes to set up the cluster. Not only have we saved on the extra node, but we also don't have to license another Windows Server Datacenter edition.
Our StarWind HCA has been in production over 12 months, and we have had no issues or single downtime so far.
It has achieved our goals of centralizing storage management because of the StarWind Virtual SAN, added fault tolerance, and simplified Microsoft server licensing, by using the Datacenter edition.
It could potentially be less reliable due to the Hypervisor, and the cluster relies on Microsoft Windows Server. However, we have not had any issue since putting them in production 12 months ago.
One to three years.
We have not had any issue since putting it in production 12 months ago.
It's good for what we do — an SMC with hybrid cloud.
Tech support has been quick, has a very quick response, and they also provocatively monitor the appliance's status.
Fairly straightforward because StarWind handles most of the setup. We did handle the network setup because we added redundancy at the switch level.
A combination of vendor team and in-house team. Their level of expertise is good.
We reduced manpower on managing servers and storage. It helps us by not having to hire an extra IT person.
It's the only vendor that allow two nodes, all other vendors I researched at that time (late 2017) requires at least three nodes.
Yes, we evaluated Dell EMC VxRail and Scale HC3.