Symantec Data Loss Prevention Reviews

The use case for Symantec Data Loss Prevention depends on the requirements, for example, customer requirements and needs. Overall, the solution is used for identifying data and handling exact data matching criteria.

What I like about Symantec Data Loss Prevention is the technical support it provides. It's good.

Currently, I can't see any areas for improvement in Symantec Data Loss Prevention because the solution seems to be better than all the other vendors out there. It seems all the other vendors are trying to mimic what Symantec Data Loss Prevention is doing in terms of components, practice, and modules.

Sometimes setting up the solution can get a little tricky because it would depend on your internal infrastructure. For example, you have to connect the Symantec Data Loss Prevention platform and you need to integrate it, so that could make the process somewhat difficult.

I've been dealing with Symantec Data Loss Prevention for ten years. I'm using the most up-to-date version of the solution.

Symantec Data Loss Prevention is a stable solution.

Symantec Data Loss Prevention is a scalable solution.

I like the technical support for Symantec Data Loss Prevention. It's pretty good. Support is one of the advantages of the solution. Support is a little costly, but you get what you pay for.

The initial setup for Symantec Data Loss Prevention is straightforward, particularly if you use the guide, but it gets a little complex based on the networking connectivity you have within your environment. Sometimes setting up the solution can get a little tricky because it would depend on your internal infrastructure. For example, you have to connect the Symantec Data Loss Prevention platform and you need to integrate it, so that could make the process somewhat difficult.

The advice I would give to others looking into implementing Symantec Data Loss Prevention is to make sure they have a lot of resources on their servers, particularly in terms of disc size, CPU, etc. The bigger the box is, the better.

There's no perfect solution, so I'm giving Symantec Data Loss Prevention a rating of nine.

We have several use cases, the main one is probably the prevention of prohibited files from being uploaded. I'm a user of this product and a network engineer. 

Reporting is the most valuable feature the solution offers. It provides information on any incidents that occur in our environment. 

Symantec doesn't necessarily catch things that are happening in the DLP features such as someone attempting credit card fraud. For the future, I'd like to see better documentation with a more informative focus. 

I've been using this solution for about three years. 

This solution is stable. 

This is a scalable solution. We currently have 15,000 users so it's very scalable.

We have primary support from one of the vendors and they are good. 

The initial setup is not very complex but it's not simple either. We had assistance from the vendor. There is no maintenance required - at the initial stage we created a policy for monitoring only and we get the day to day logs. After that we impose a policy for blocking and justification. This solution is used on a daily basis. 

I've worked with other DLP solutions that I think were better than Symantec, but it's working well for us currently.

This is a good solution for us and I would recommend it. I'd rate Symantec DLP a nine out of 10. 

The main usage of Symantec DLP is concerned with its baseline performance. Also, from my experience, their support SLA seems slower compared to Forcepoint.

Among the many features, I like the comprehensive support for features across network stages and email. Customers are very happy with its prevention capabilities, as there is no delay in action when new policies are applied. Regarding incident response abilities, it is helpful, although we receive about 10%-20% false positives. 

In my opinion, Symantec DLP could improve by offering a better online service option, making it more competitive compared to Forcepoint. Performance could also be enhanced, especially in terms of prevention capabilities. Additionally, it would be beneficial to add features that allow for better policy integration with GDPR, such as international credit, bank account, or identity management. This would make it more straightforward for IT, especially in regions like Indonesia.

I have been working with Symnatec Data Loss Prevention for the past three months.

For stability, I would also rate it a seven out of ten. 

It can be complex to scale the product, especially for services. I find it suitable for enterprise-level companies with over a thousand employees.

I rate Symantec DLP a seven out of ten for scalability. 

In terms of support from Symantec, I have had a positive experience with their Data Loss Prevention (DLP) support. The support is helpful, but in Malaysia, we sometimes face delays due to integration policies.

Positive

Setting up Symantec DLP can be complex. From the initial check and invitation, deploying Axion solutions requires human-added calls by email. If they provide more information, it would save us time and be less costly. We often deploy performance on Windows servers, AWS, web applications, and other platforms. Users find it easier when we restart with the fit for the OCA, avoiding a complicated installation process. If they added a feature that allows us to refresh it easily, it would be much better. 

We typically use a SaaS model, but our other option, cloud office base, can be frustrating, so we often deploy on-premises.

For pricing, I rate Symantec DLP an eight out of ten.

Comparing Symantec DLP to Forcepoint, I prefer Forcepoint for its more intuitive dashboard, better reporting, and smoother deployment process.

Overall, I rate Symantec DLP a seven out of ten and would recommend it to other users.

The tool helps to block based on different classifications such as characters and channels. 

Users like the product because of its simplicity and the rate of detection. 

Symantec Data Loss Prevention's setup needs to be easier and support needs to be improved. 

I have been working with the product for ten years. 

The tool is stable. 

The product is scalable. My company has 1000 users for Symantec Data Loss Prevention. 

The product's setup is not easy. 

The tool's licensing costs are yearly. 

I would rate Symantec Data Loss Prevention a six out of ten. I wouldn't recommend the solution for micro SMEs or small enterprises. It is not recommended for organizations that do not have the technical expertise or in-house support.

We use Symantec Data Loss Prevention mostly for preventing and protecting against email threats. The tool tracks internal to external emails. Whatever attachment there is that's moving from internal to external is also tracked. If someone's sending a file, it would also be forwarded to the team lead or manager. The password for signing into the email should not be shared because when shared, it will be blocked. We have configured these policies in Symantec Data Loss Prevention. The tool also tracks whenever a user transfers data from one machine to another. These are our use cases for it.

What we like about Symantec Data Loss Prevention is that it's a very good product. We never faced any problems with its performance. It has very good performance. There was this RAM issue, but it was an internal issue which we've sorted out. Apart from the RAM issue, there are no other issues with Symantec Data Loss Prevention.

What could be improved in Symantec Data Loss Prevention is its security. It should be more secure.

I've been dealing with Symantec Data Loss Prevention for almost four years.

Symantec Data Loss Prevention is a stable tool.

The technical support for Symantec Data Loss Prevention is very good.

The installation for Symantec Data Loss Prevention was straightforward. It took almost fifteen days to completely roll it out.

I have experience with Symantec Data Loss Prevention. I've implemented it. I was the Symantec expert, and I've also implemented Symantec Endpoint Protection, Symantec Mail Security for Exchange, Symantec SharePoint, and Symantec network storage devices, in my previous projects.

Symantec Data Loss Prevention was deployed on-premises only because the customer requirement was to not forward the logs through the cloud directly, so the solution was installed on-premises.

In terms of the number of clients my company has for Symantec Data Loss Prevention, there are currently two thousand clients.

I would surely recommend the tool to others. Whenever my company goes to the customers, the team always recommends either Forcepoint or Symantec Data Loss Prevention.

My rating for Symantec Data Loss Prevention is nine out of ten.

We are managed service provider and system integrator. We have different deployment models and scenarios for different customers, but usually, we deploy Symantec Data Loss Prevention on-premise.

Our clients that are using Symantec Data Loss Prevention have massive use of documentation and they are supporting the digital signatures happening now everywhere. They wanted to secure this information with the solution.

We typically add another solution with Symantec Data Loss Prevention from Titus. It is used for data classification, allowing us to have the DLP and the data classification in one offering.

The most valuable feature of Symantec Data Loss Prevention is the ease of modification.

There should be more documentation with Symantec Data Loss Prevention. We had trouble with the first few deployments.

I have been using Symantec Data Loss Prevention for approximately five years.

Symantec Data Loss Prevention is highly scalable.

We didn't find a lot of need to test the scalability because usually, we do our designs with scalability in place. We didn't need to add licenses, servers, compute capacity, or data center footprints later.

The support can improve in the future. They can use some training to help them have a better understanding of their knowledge of the solution.

The ease of deployment of Symantec Data Loss Prevention is great. We can deploy it easily and it is flexible after the deployment. The deployment difficulty can depend on the client's requirements, there was not a client that took us more than eight weeks to complete which included the assessment, the design, the data classification, which is the second part of the solution,

There is an annual license required to use this solution.

I would recommend this solution to others.

I rate Symantec Data Loss Prevention a seven out of ten.

The most valuable features of Symantec Data Loss Prevention are endpoint security,  endpoint agent, and DLP. Additionally, we have been satisfied with the policies.

Symantec Data Loss Prevention could improve by having better system resource management, cloud option, and more features.

I have been using Symantec Data Loss Prevention for approximately eight years.

The solution is stable.

I have been satisfied with the technical support.

The price of Symantec Data Loss Prevention could be reduced.

I rate Symantec Data Loss Prevention an eight out of ten.

Where we are so far deployed is into the financial sector and in telecom, and they want to evaluate what kind of information users are usually trying to touch, which they're not supposed to be touched. They want to see that analysis. If there are any outflows, they want to mediate that as well - especially if there is any breach on the team.

Overall, it is an excellent product.

The product is stable. 

Technical support is very professional and responsive.

It's not a scalable product.

It only works on the Windows platform. It doesn't support Linux, which is unfortunate. Most of the clients these days use Linux. It would be ideal if Symantec could have more integrations with the different operating systems as well on the DLP. That would be much better.

The deployment is complex.

We have been dealing with Data Loss Prevention since 2008.

The stability of the solution is great. There are no bugs or glitches. It doesn't crash or freeze.

The solution isn't very scalable. A company can expand if they need to.

I currently have three customers using the solution at this point. 

Technical support is good. They are responsive and professional and the solution is stable. Clients are well looked after.

On the DLP side, we do Forcepoint and Symantec. It depends on the client and, and at which stage of the business cycle you are engaged with the end-user. If someone's already engaged with Symantec, then it's no use to follow up on the same product with the client. In that scenario, we go for Forcepoint. If the client is new and we are initiators of the solution, in that case, we prefer Symantec.

The installation of Symantec DLP is not straightforward. You need to understand the concept of the technology before you can deploy it. It's not as simple or straightforward and a certain level of skill set is definitely required. 

You need one engineer, a person in presales, and a backup in order to deploy the product.

Customers do have to pay a yearly licensing fee in order to use the solution.

The solution is deployed mostly on-premises, however, you can have agents on the cloud as well, and data classification can be done there. The server can be deployed on the cloud. It can be a hybrid as well. That said, it's mostly deployed on-prem.

I'd rate the solution at an eight out of ten.