What is our primary use case?
We are a service-based company, having a team size of 120 RPA developers.
What is most valuable?
The core technology of UiPath Document Understanding is OCR, which can be either ABBYY or Google Vision. The drag-and-drop facility, decision-making accuracy, and user-friendly actions make UiPath Document Understanding helpful for users.
UiPath Document Understanding offers a feature that allows users to process specific documents, such as purchase orders or invoices. The tool provides the ability to define and segregate actions and highlight fields using something similar to rubber band techniques. This means, in an invoice, users can easily highlight specific fields within the document and train the model accordingly. The process is user-friendly and can be easily executed even by those with basic knowledge of flow.
What needs improvement?
One area of improvement for UiPath Document Understanding is the accuracy of handwritten documents. While the solution supports handwritten documents, the accuracy percentage is not as high as desired. Therefore, it would be preferable if UiPath could focus on improving the accuracy of handwritten documents in their next release. Although they currently support handwritten documents, the accuracy is still low.
Also, the documents for the solution are lengthy, and because of this, I say that the solution should incorporate some video sessions.
For how long have I used the solution?
I have experience with UiPath Document Understanding, in which the users are provided with multiple types of Document Understanding and a process-wise range of available documents. Overall, I have been using the solution for three to five years. Also, I am using the latest version.
What do I think about the stability of the solution?
The solution is quite stable, and I am happy with its performance in my programs and processes. I would rate the solution's stability an eight out of ten
What do I think about the scalability of the solution?
The solution's scalability with the cloud version is really good. I rate the solution's scalability an eight out of ten.
Around 30-40 people work on UiPath Document Understanding in our company. The extent to which we use the solution, particularly in terms of utilization of bots or document processing, is dependent upon the volume of usage. In other words, if there is an increase in the number of customers, we will likely increase the usage of the solution.
How are customer service and support?
UiPath's technical support is good. Even in emails, they are responsive and helpful. They also have a very good library of troubleshooting documents and other resources. Overall, I am happy with the solution's technical support.
Which solution did I use previously and why did I switch?
I have experience with Automation Anywhere. Also, UiPath Process Mining is a pretty good tool since they have documents which provide its users with a clear understanding. On top of that, they also provide videos. So it's quite easy for an end-user to understand.
How was the initial setup?
Although the solution's initial setup is not overly complex, UiPath could work to make it more understandable for a layperson. They could improve the setup process by creating a more structured flow.
The time needed for deployment varies, depending on factors like the use of cloud services. With a Plug and Play model, UiPath provides cloud services and a link, after which we can begin using the solution. However, deploying on a private cloud may take longer, up to three to five days or even two weeks, depending on the hardware readiness.
In terms of the maintenance of the solution, let's consider a scenario where we need to initiate a programming project to develop a bot that can help in invoice transactions. Typically, this process can take anywhere from three to five weeks and requires at least one project manager who oversees a team member who understands UiPath and business processes. To successfully develop the bot, we need to first analyze and understand the relevant business processes. Once we have derived the business processes, we need to document the solution, including creating a PDD. This document outlines the process and how it will appear once automated. Apart from that, you should have a good set of developers who understand UiPath.
What about the implementation team?
In our organization, we implemented the solution with the help of integrators.
What was our ROI?
The ROI from using UiPath Document Understanding is really good, and we currently see a return on investment of around 40% to 50%.
What's my experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing?
For the licensing part, in our company, we initially started off with a monthly plan, but yearly plans are also there. Cost-wise, UiPath Document Understanding is good since it provides flexibility in its pricing. So, smaller firms, especially MSMEs, can opt for monthly or yearly plans based on their budget. As an end user, I wish they reduce the price of their pro version to 300 dollars since UiPath Pro starts somewhere around 400 dollars per month. UiPath's competitor, Automation Anywhere, offers a plan for 99 dollars per month.
What other advice do I have?
I can definitely recommend the solution to other users. Overall, I rate this product somewhere around eight out of ten.
Disclosure: My company does not have a business relationship with this vendor other than being a customer.