Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

ElectroNeek vs UiPath IXP comparison

 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive SummaryUpdated on Jan 18, 2026

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Categories and Ranking

ElectroNeek
Ranking in Intelligent Document Processing (IDP)
23rd
Average Rating
7.4
Reviews Sentiment
6.9
Number of Reviews
9
Ranking in other categories
Robotic Process Automation (RPA) (37th)
UiPath IXP
Ranking in Intelligent Document Processing (IDP)
2nd
Average Rating
8.0
Reviews Sentiment
5.1
Number of Reviews
57
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
 

Mindshare comparison

As of January 2026, in the Intelligent Document Processing (IDP) category, the mindshare of ElectroNeek is 1.4%, up from 1.0% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of UiPath IXP is 7.3%, down from 15.1% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Intelligent Document Processing (IDP) Market Share Distribution
ProductMarket Share (%)
UiPath IXP7.3%
ElectroNeek1.4%
Other91.3%
Intelligent Document Processing (IDP)
 

Featured Reviews

Sarath Gopinathan Nair - PeerSpot reviewer
RPA Developer at DigiStaff
User-friendly, good UI, but does not work well with Microsoft Edge
We use the solution to automate processes such as the pay slips within the consol portal The solution is user-friendly with a really good UI and ID. The support is good. ElectroNeek has video recordings that enable us to easily automate tasks, and it includes a wide variety of activities. The…
Gangadhar Wali - PeerSpot reviewer
Founder and COO at InVibes
Pre-trained models work well, but it is very expensive
We have to do manual validation for some of the things due to the OCR engine not being so accurate. For example, S is read as 5, 5 as S, 2 as Z, and Z as 2. In the case of currency, if one dot is missing, it gives a completely incorrect number. These discrepancies should be fixed because if the OCR itself doesn't work properly, then AI doesn't help with that. When AI is used for training models, the AI Center works precisely, but if the data itself is wrong, we can't do anything. If the extraction of data is proper, it definitely helps. However, 20% errors could be reduced if the OCR engine were better. In future updates, I would like to see better handling of issues such as when a dot is missing in currency, for example, with dollars, it should handle that automatically. It's very expensive. If the volume increases, we can't afford to use Document Understanding. We are thinking of moving to another solution because we are expecting 80,000 to 100,000 invoices.

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Pros

"ElectroNeek was extremely easy to use, especially its UI was easy to navigate with limited training."
"The solution is user-friendly with a really good UI and ID."
"My favorite feature is that you can have unlimited bots without having to buy more licenses. That's a powerful option for scalability."
"The most valuable feature is the price."
"The drag and drop feature, which is no code, is very useful for me because I am not a technical person. It is very user-friendly."
"The product's initial setup phase was easy."
"The cost is the best thing about ElectroNeek."
"We find the OCR feature very valuable, due to the corrector recognition that it provides; this is very useful for document processing."
"We are working with 40,000 different vendor templates. Document Understanding can understand and process various formats without much manual effort to configure the templates. That wasn't the case when we were using Microsoft."
"I like UiPath's machine-learning capabilities. My first impressions were good, but we only use it in a few processes. We intend to expand our use of these features in other situations, but we're still learning how to use the AI functions. We use the OCR much more."
"OCR technology is undoubtedly the most valuable feature and the feasibility of integrating data processes with AI and machine learning models is fascinating."
"UiPath Document Understanding cuts down a lot of order processing time and agents' time, saving both human effort, which in turn translates to better cost efficiency."
"The scalability it offers is truly exceptional, making it arguably the best in the market."
"The solution is quite stable, and I am happy with its performance in my programs and processes."
"Machine learning is the most valuable feature of UiPath Document Understanding."
"The most valuable feature is the ability for humans to train the bot."
 

Cons

"When I wanted to use web scraping for tables in web applications, I found through online forums that such functionality or activity is currently not working as it shows."
"Its price could definitely be lower."
"It's not applicable to very large enterprises and for difficult work or more complex processes."
"ElectroNeek comes with three activities and we cannot add activities like we can with uiPADs."
"The solution needs to improve its stability."
"The solution works well with Google Chrome, but not with Microsoft Edge, which is the browser we use for automation."
"I think that this solution could improve remote desktop interactions."
"The integrating capability of the product needs to be improved, to ensure that it works with all systems involved in a process."
"The results of classifying patient documents within UiPath Document Understanding need to be more accurate."
"One area of improvement for UiPath Document Understanding is the accuracy of handwritten documents. While the solution supports handwritten documents, the accuracy percentage is not as high as desired."
"The solution must localize the built-in features for supporting Arabic scripts so we do not rely on third-party tools."
"There is also room for improvement in long-running table extraction. If a table continues for more than 10 pages, in some cases, we have observed that it only extracts six or seven pages and skips the last pages."
"UiPath Document Understanding, while effective for its own platform, could be even more valuable if it integrated with other commonly used platforms, allowing for a more universal approach to document processing."
"The rising annual licensing cost of UiPath's Document Understanding product is a major turnoff for users."
"The documentation should be more clear, or better training should be provided."
"This is an expensive solution."
 

Pricing and Cost Advice

"I give the price an eight out of ten."
"I believe we had a Silver Membership or something similar annually."
"On a scale of one to ten, where one is cheap, and ten is expensive, I rate the pricing a seven."
"It's very affordable and the licensing is billed on a yearly basis."
"Its price could definitely be lower. Its licensing is on a yearly basis. There is no additional cost to the standard licensing fees."
"My company has made a payment towards the purchase of a license from ElectorNeek."
"I do not know about its price, but for large organizations, UiPath is cheap, whereas, for small organizations, UiPath is high. For example, if 500 licenses are needed for one company, UiPath is cheap. If only 5 licenses are required, UiPath is costly."
"I find the pricing to be somewhat on the higher side."
"UiPath Document Understanding compared to the competitors is high."
"We received a 60-day free trial before having to purchase a license to continue using UiPath Document Understanding."
"Our clients are concerned about the volume-based pricing model, as UiPath charges more than other vendors in the market."
"The price for UiPath Document Understanding is a bit expensive."
"The pricing is reasonable."
"On a scale of one to ten, where one is cheap, and ten is expensive, I rate the solution a nine."
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Intelligent Document Processing (IDP) solutions are best for your needs.
881,114 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Educational Organization
13%
Comms Service Provider
11%
Computer Software Company
9%
Financial Services Firm
9%
Financial Services Firm
19%
Computer Software Company
12%
Manufacturing Company
8%
Real Estate/Law Firm
6%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
By reviewers
Company SizeCount
Small Business7
Midsize Enterprise1
Large Enterprise9
By reviewers
Company SizeCount
Small Business19
Midsize Enterprise11
Large Enterprise26
 

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about UiPath Document Understanding?
The solution allows us to continue with vendors whose information comes in correctly and to stop the automation for vendors with many items that are not clearly defined.
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for UiPath Document Understanding?
Both UiPath and Blue Prism are expensive. Customers are trying to move to some other Agentic space because of high pricing, so the new initiatives are put on hold, and they're looking for alternati...
What needs improvement with UiPath Document Understanding?
The challenge is more on handwriting and language-specific document extraction. There is some room for improvement when it comes to understanding handwriting. Document Understanding at the current ...
 

Comparisons

 

Also Known As

ElectroNeek RPA
No data available
 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

UFP, Clariant, Ricoh, FMBCapital, RePower
Information Not Available
Find out what your peers are saying about ElectroNeek vs. UiPath IXP and other solutions. Updated: December 2025.
881,114 professionals have used our research since 2012.