Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

ElectroNeek vs UiPath IXP comparison

 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive SummaryUpdated on Jan 18, 2026

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Categories and Ranking

ElectroNeek
Ranking in Intelligent Document Processing (IDP)
22nd
Average Rating
7.4
Reviews Sentiment
6.9
Number of Reviews
9
Ranking in other categories
Robotic Process Automation (RPA) (35th)
UiPath IXP
Ranking in Intelligent Document Processing (IDP)
1st
Average Rating
8.0
Reviews Sentiment
5.1
Number of Reviews
57
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
 

Mindshare comparison

As of February 2026, in the Intelligent Document Processing (IDP) category, the mindshare of ElectroNeek is 1.5%, up from 1.0% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of UiPath IXP is 6.6%, down from 14.7% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Intelligent Document Processing (IDP) Market Share Distribution
ProductMarket Share (%)
UiPath IXP6.6%
ElectroNeek1.5%
Other91.9%
Intelligent Document Processing (IDP)
 

Featured Reviews

Sarath Gopinathan Nair - PeerSpot reviewer
RPA Developer at DigiStaff
User-friendly, good UI, but does not work well with Microsoft Edge
We use the solution to automate processes such as the pay slips within the consol portal The solution is user-friendly with a really good UI and ID. The support is good. ElectroNeek has video recordings that enable us to easily automate tasks, and it includes a wide variety of activities. The…
Gangadhar Wali - PeerSpot reviewer
Founder and COO at InVibes
Pre-trained models work well, but it is very expensive
We have to do manual validation for some of the things due to the OCR engine not being so accurate. For example, S is read as 5, 5 as S, 2 as Z, and Z as 2. In the case of currency, if one dot is missing, it gives a completely incorrect number. These discrepancies should be fixed because if the OCR itself doesn't work properly, then AI doesn't help with that. When AI is used for training models, the AI Center works precisely, but if the data itself is wrong, we can't do anything. If the extraction of data is proper, it definitely helps. However, 20% errors could be reduced if the OCR engine were better. In future updates, I would like to see better handling of issues such as when a dot is missing in currency, for example, with dollars, it should handle that automatically. It's very expensive. If the volume increases, we can't afford to use Document Understanding. We are thinking of moving to another solution because we are expecting 80,000 to 100,000 invoices.

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Pros

"The product's initial setup phase was easy."
"We find the OCR feature very valuable, due to the corrector recognition that it provides; this is very useful for document processing."
"The most valuable feature is the price."
"The solution is user-friendly with a really good UI and ID."
"The cost is the best thing about ElectroNeek."
"My favorite feature is that you can have unlimited bots without having to buy more licenses. That's a powerful option for scalability."
"The product's setup is straightforward."
"The drag and drop feature, which is no code, is very useful for me because I am not a technical person. It is very user-friendly."
"The most valuable feature is the ability for humans to train the bot."
"The most valuable aspects of UiPath Document Understanding are its accuracy, ability to automate processes end-to-end, and the availability of a free trial period to conduct a proof of concept and assess its accuracy and speed."
"It's helped us free up time for other staff projects."
"It is a pretty scalable tool, and it works well for big companies."
"The prebuilt algorithm for extracting foreign invoices is the most valuable feature because it eliminates the need for us to build anything from scratch."
"Pre-trained models are valuable, and they work well."
"In UiPath Document Understanding, I use two extractors. One is the Intelligent Form Extractor and the other is the Machine Learning Extractor. The first one is very useful and user-friendly. When we have a single template or two to three templates, Intelligent Form Extractor is much easier to use. But if we have multiple templates, it's better to go with ML Extractor as you can train the model with different templates."
"We can integrate document understanding with other systems and applications."
 

Cons

"ElectroNeek comes with three activities and we cannot add activities like we can with uiPADs."
"I think that this solution could improve remote desktop interactions."
"The integrating capability of the product needs to be improved, to ensure that it works with all systems involved in a process."
"When I wanted to use web scraping for tables in web applications, I found through online forums that such functionality or activity is currently not working as it shows."
"The pricing is an area with a shortcoming, and from an improvement perspective, it needs to be made cheaper."
"Its price could definitely be lower."
"The solution needs to improve its stability."
"The solution works well with Google Chrome, but not with Microsoft Edge, which is the browser we use for automation."
"It would be ideal if they could include more packages for more use cases."
"The machine learning model needs improvement, as we receive more and more unstructured documents from clients that require a lot of manual validation."
"This is an expensive solution."
"They could work on the digitizing and classification of documents."
"UiPath Document Understanding has difficulty identifying handwritten documents, and there is room for improvement."
"Its pricing can be improved."
"The results of classifying patient documents within UiPath Document Understanding need to be more accurate."
"The UiPath APIs lack reliable table parsing."
 

Pricing and Cost Advice

"My company has made a payment towards the purchase of a license from ElectorNeek."
"It's very affordable and the licensing is billed on a yearly basis."
"On a scale of one to ten, where one is cheap, and ten is expensive, I rate the pricing a seven."
"I give the price an eight out of ten."
"Its price could definitely be lower. Its licensing is on a yearly basis. There is no additional cost to the standard licensing fees."
"I believe we had a Silver Membership or something similar annually."
"Its pricing can be looked into because it is on the higher side for developing economies, such as India, where the cost of labor is a little cheaper compared to advanced technologies."
"UiPath is a pricey tool for small customers."
"Document Understanding's price is quite high."
"On a scale of one to ten with ten being the most expensive, I rate UiPath Document Understanding an eight on cost."
"UiPath Document Understanding carries a premium price tag, but its current technological capabilities may not yet fully justify the cost."
"The pricing is reasonable."
"The price for UiPath Document Understanding is a bit expensive."
"While Robotic Process Automation tools can be expensive, UiPath Document Understanding is no exception."
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Intelligent Document Processing (IDP) solutions are best for your needs.
881,665 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Educational Organization
13%
Comms Service Provider
11%
Computer Software Company
9%
Financial Services Firm
9%
Financial Services Firm
18%
Computer Software Company
12%
Manufacturing Company
8%
Real Estate/Law Firm
6%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
By reviewers
Company SizeCount
Small Business7
Midsize Enterprise1
Large Enterprise9
By reviewers
Company SizeCount
Small Business19
Midsize Enterprise11
Large Enterprise26
 

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about UiPath Document Understanding?
The solution allows us to continue with vendors whose information comes in correctly and to stop the automation for vendors with many items that are not clearly defined.
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for UiPath Document Understanding?
Both UiPath and Blue Prism are expensive. Customers are trying to move to some other Agentic space because of high pricing, so the new initiatives are put on hold, and they're looking for alternati...
What needs improvement with UiPath Document Understanding?
The challenge is more on handwriting and language-specific document extraction. There is some room for improvement when it comes to understanding handwriting. Document Understanding at the current ...
 

Comparisons

 

Also Known As

ElectroNeek RPA
No data available
 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

UFP, Clariant, Ricoh, FMBCapital, RePower
Information Not Available
Find out what your peers are saying about ElectroNeek vs. UiPath IXP and other solutions. Updated: December 2025.
881,665 professionals have used our research since 2012.