ElectroNeek vs UiPath Platform comparison

ElectroNeek and UiPath are both solutions in the Robotic Process Automation (RPA) category. ElectroNeek is ranked #37, while UiPath is ranked #1 with an average rating of 8.5. ElectroNeek holds a 0.7% mindshare in RPA, compared to UiPath’s 12.9% mindshare. Additionally, 95% of ElectroNeek users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 98% of UiPath users who would recommend it.

ElectroNeek

Read 9 ElectroNeek reviews

897 Views
691 Comparison Views

95% willing to recommend

UiPath Platform

Read 911 UiPath Platform reviews

24,084 Views
22,880 Comparison Views

98% willing to recommend

ElectroNeek

UiPath Platform

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Jan 25, 2026

UiPath and ElectroNeek compete in the RPA (Robotic Process Automation) category. UiPath appears to have the upper hand due to its comprehensive suite of features, seamless integration capabilities, and strong community support, which make it an attractive choice for businesses seeking extensive automation capabilities.

Features: UiPath provides a robust low-code platform with features like UiPath Studio for development, Orchestrator for bot management, and Document Understanding for data extraction. It supports Python and .NET code and offers AI capabilities for intelligent automation, all complemented by a supportive community and educational resources like UiPath Academy. ElectroNeek offers unlimited bots without extra licenses, an intuitive user interface, and video training resources, making it particularly accessible for non-technical users and cost-effective, especially in budget-conscious markets.

Room for Improvement: UiPath could improve by simplifying its integration for complex automation tasks and enhancing real-time customer support. Reducing complexity in configuration and better onboarding processes would benefit new users. ElectroNeek can enhance its scalability options, broaden its custom activity library, and improve its AI and integration capabilities to match the depth offered by UiPath.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: UiPath's deployment benefits from extensive documentation, community support, and a structured academy, ensuring users can easily onboard and troubleshoot issues. Its cloud and on-premise deployment options cater to diverse organizational needs. ElectroNeek provides a user-friendly UI and easy deployment with helpful video resources, although there is room for enhancing its customer service support to offer more comprehensive assistance.

Pricing and ROI: UiPath offers various pricing models, including a free Community Edition, which provides learners with robust resources while its enterprise solutions might be costlier but justify the investment through significant ROI and resource savings. ElectroNeek, with its competitive entry-level deployment costs and unlimited bot licensing, offers a cost-effective solution particularly beneficial for small to medium businesses in cost-sensitive regions, potentially enhancing ROI through reduced manual intervention.

To learn more, read our detailed ElectroNeek vs. UiPath Platform Report (Updated: December 2025).

Buyer's Guide

ElectroNeek vs. UiPath Platform

December 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 881,114 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

ElectroNeek

Ranking in Robotic Process Automation (RPA)

37th

Average Rating

7.4

Reviews Sentiment

6.9

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Intelligent Document Processing (IDP) (23rd)

UiPath Platform

Ranking in Robotic Process Automation (RPA)

1st

Average Rating

8.8

Reviews Sentiment

7.0

Number of Reviews

911

Ranking in other categories

Agentic Automation (2nd), AI-Agent Builders (1st), Business Orchestration and Automation Technologies (1st), AI Finance & Accounting (2nd)

Mindshare comparison

As of January 2026, in the Robotic Process Automation (RPA) category, the mindshare of ElectroNeek is 0.7%, up from 0.7% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of UiPath Platform is 12.9%, down from 25.0% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Robotic Process Automation (RPA) Market Share Distribution
Product	Market Share (%)
UiPath Platform	12.9%
ElectroNeek	0.7%
Other	86.4%

Robotic Process Automation (RPA)

Featured Reviews

Sarath Gopinathan Nair

RPA Developer at DigiStaff

User-friendly, good UI, but does not work well with Microsoft Edge

We use the solution to automate processes such as the pay slips within the consol portal The solution is user-friendly with a really good UI and ID. The support is good. ElectroNeek has video recordings that enable us to easily automate tasks, and it includes a wide variety of activities. The…

Read full review

reviewer2761431

Manager Rpa at a retailer with 10,001+ employees

Significantly reduces manual effort and improves team workflows through automated ticketing

We've used Agent Builder, IXP, and Maestro for orchestration. We have created context-grounded searches or chatbots using context grounding, and we also use context grounding within an Agentic flow where a bot or agent reads ServiceNow tickets to determine whether it has been assigned to the right work group. If it has not been assigned correctly due to human error, it automatically reassigns it to the right group. I would assess Agentic AI's ability to extract data points as effective. We created an agent for the purpose of extracting data, though not in a document. We created what we call an email conversation agent that engages with a customer, vendor, or someone in an email conversation with a set goal of extracting specific data points for an action to be performed subsequently. The one automation we have deployed in production involves the agent interacting with team members to collect data points and create a ServiceNow ticket. We appreciate almost all features of UiPath Platform, with one of the most successful ones being the use of Coms Mining. Most of the new features related to AI have all been good, and we use Agentic. We have already created a few agents and have started to use Maestro for a few flows, though we are not yet there to orchestrate an end-to-end workflow. We have good ROI from the automations we have developed with UiPath Platform, which far exceeds the investment in the platform. It has saved us tens of thousands of hours in manual effort, making the team members happy to pursue other things of value.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"ElectroNeek was extremely easy to use, especially its UI was easy to navigate with limited training."

"The product's initial setup phase was easy."

"The most valuable feature is the price."

"The cost is the best thing about ElectroNeek."

"We find the OCR feature very valuable, due to the corrector recognition that it provides; this is very useful for document processing."

"My favorite feature is that you can have unlimited bots without having to buy more licenses. That's a powerful option for scalability."

"The drag and drop feature, which is no code, is very useful for me because I am not a technical person. It is very user-friendly."

"The solution is user-friendly with a really good UI and ID."

More ElectroNeek pros

"It is easy to go to the code level and write automations that only require a couple lines of code."

"There's a monthly upload process in my order management team. Every month, this team uploads a bunch of files to SAP. Now they don't need to do that because the bot does that for them at a given time period. The team members need to just upload a file to SharePoint and then the bot will pick it up."

"UiPath has helped to make all of the internal business processes lighter, enabling my company to save costs in time and speed for all of them."

"The most valuable features are the UiPath studio tools with the recording feature to capture the navigation of the process on the screen."

"A key feature of this solution is its built-in VM orchestration capabilities, allowing us to manage virtual machines without additional setup."

"It has reduced human error because there would be some different document types. It's able to detect multiple types versus a user finding one document type when there could be multiple document types that are associated with a letter, while the user is browsing over it that can be missed in the second document type. But when you're looking at machine learning and at the text, it'll be able to easily pick out those keywords from a document that has multiple document types."

"The speed is much better because we're doing it on the cloud. With other solutions there were network problems, but in UiPath I have found that network connectivity is much stronger when transferring data from the back end to the front end. It is much faster."

"The best feature of UiPath is the integration. UiPath works very well for the automation of our facilities and systems. It not only integrates with our production systems but also with our ERP and CRM. It integrates with all of our processes so that we work in a unified manner and efficient manner."

More UiPath Platform pros

Cons

"Its price could definitely be lower."

"When I wanted to use web scraping for tables in web applications, I found through online forums that such functionality or activity is currently not working as it shows."

"The solution works well with Google Chrome, but not with Microsoft Edge, which is the browser we use for automation."

"I think that this solution could improve remote desktop interactions."

"It's not applicable to very large enterprises and for difficult work or more complex processes."

"The integrating capability of the product needs to be improved, to ensure that it works with all systems involved in a process."

"The pricing is an area with a shortcoming, and from an improvement perspective, it needs to be made cheaper."

"The solution needs to improve its stability."

More ElectroNeek cons

"There is a big room for improvement when it comes to mobile automation. The Find Element activity is not present in mobile automation. There are activities to extract data, but we don't have data scraping in mobile automation. These activities are available for UI automation of web applications, but they are not available for mobile automation, which is a drawback when working on mobile automation with UiPath."

"I would like to see more options in terms of configuration."

"The initial setup is complex. Building the organizational scalability is more complex: How to combine process knowledge, programming knowledge, and maintenance knowledge, since these are three different types of skills which are needed. It's not straightforward to do in a global company."

"I would like to have the ability to make changes at different stages of the development process without having to start from the beginning each time."

"The cost can be a barrier."

"I rate UiPath support six out of 10. It's primarily an email-based model. Sometimes we have questions, and it takes days for them to respond and sort our issue out."

"I want our relationship to be better because of the nature of what we do."

"It needs improvement in terms of optimization. Sometimes the tools slow down when you are working on a huge data set or if the internet connectivity is slow in your area."

More UiPath Platform cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"I give the price an eight out of ten."

"I believe we had a Silver Membership or something similar annually."

"Its price could definitely be lower. Its licensing is on a yearly basis. There is no additional cost to the standard licensing fees."

"My company has made a payment towards the purchase of a license from ElectorNeek."

"On a scale of one to ten, where one is cheap, and ten is expensive, I rate the pricing a seven."

"It's very affordable and the licensing is billed on a yearly basis."

"For our first customer, we started with Orchestrator, an unattended bot, and a couple of Studio licenses, all of which cost $25,000 USD for the year. It is definitely worth the money."

"The main problem around scalability is the licensing structure and the inability to dynamically assign licenses across robots. While I know this is coming, this is our main gripe with scalability: the licensing structure. Because we are part of a larger setup with our own IT supplier, who does a multitenancy setup with Orchestrator, to have more flexibility with the use of licenses would be very valuable."

"Some features are very costly, like Document Understanding. That is why in India many customers are not using the Document Understanding license. This is a premium feature and its licensing costs are high compared to other tools."

"This solution has a very competitive and flexible pricing scheme that depends on the process complexity."

"The pricing is quite reasonable."

"The solution is definitely expensive but is a powerful technology that we do not expect for free."

"I'd advise others to consider sharing the costs after ensuring they understand their expectations for utilizing the capacity of the robots."

"Overall, the model is fine except for AI units. It is usage-based, which makes sense if you are processing documents, and you have one unit per page. It is the hosting cost of the models where there are issues, so we are running into potentially designing poor solutions because we are having to say, "If the documents are very similar but different enough, even though you would prefer to use two models, maybe consider not using two because of the hosting costs.""

More UiPath Platform pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Robotic Process Automation (RPA) solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

881,114 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Educational Organization

13%

Comms Service Provider

11%

Computer Software Company

Financial Services Firm

11%

Computer Software Company

10%

Manufacturing Company

10%

Performing Arts

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	7
Midsize Enterprise	1
Large Enterprise	9

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	249
Midsize Enterprise	143
Large Enterprise	667

Questions from the Community

RPA that Bots can run without centralized control?

Yea there are. For example Electroneek.

See all answers

Best RPA tools for IBM iSeries

I can only speak to UiPath since that is the only RPA solution that I have used. I know that there are specific packages that you can integrate into your project that is specifically made to work w...

See all answers

RPA that Bots can run without centralized control?

Yes, Attended Bots which can run without centralized control Module. RPA Tools like Automation Anywhere, uiPath ,Power Automation they do support this.

See all answers

How do I choose between UiPath and Microsoft Power Automate?

Microsoft‌ ‌Power‌ ‌Automate‌ ‌is‌ ‌intuitive‌ ‌and‌ ‌easy‌ ‌to‌ ‌integrate‌ ‌and‌ ‌use.‌ ‌I‌ ‌like‌ ‌that‌ ‌there‌ ‌is‌ ‌no‌ ‌coding‌ ‌experience‌ ‌necessary,‌ ‌and‌ ‌appreciate‌ ‌the‌ ‌automated‌...

See all answers

Comparisons

Microsoft Power Automate vs ElectroNeek

Compared 22% of the time

Automation Anywhere vs ElectroNeek

Compared 14% of the time

Robocorp vs ElectroNeek

Compared 14% of the time

BotFarm vs ElectroNeek

Compared 13% of the time

More ElectroNeek Competitors

Microsoft Power Automate vs UiPath Platform

Compared 15% of the time

Automation Anywhere vs UiPath Platform

Compared 11% of the time

Blue Prism vs UiPath Platform

Compared 9% of the time

ServiceNow Automation Engine vs UiPath Platform

Compared 5% of the time

Pega Robotic Process Automation vs UiPath Platform

Compared 5% of the time

More UiPath Platform Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Robotic Process Automation (RPA)

December 2025

Download ElectroNeek product report

Buyer's Guide

UiPath Platform

January 2026

Download UiPath Platform product report

Also Known As

ElectroNeek RPA

UiPath Maestro, UiPath Apps, UiPath Agent Builder

Overview

ElectroNeek is an Intelligent Automation Platform transforming business process management in enterprises by integrating AI bots with employee workflows, automating routines, and helping humans to focus on more creative and strategic tasks. ElectroNeek provides a wide range of exciting low-code automation tools based on RPA, IDP, AI and GPT-4 (Conversational and Generative) technologies.

ElectroNeek

UiPath Platform is appreciated for its user-friendly interface and extensive automation capabilities, offering seamless integration with diverse applications. Its intuitive drag-and-drop functionality enables users to design efficient workflows with minimal technical expertise.

UiPath Platform delivers a robust set of features that enhance automation and productivity. With components like Orchestrator, task management is optimized, facilitating better scalability. Users benefit from advanced AI and document understanding tools, boosting data handling accuracy and reducing errors. Despite its strengths, UiPath faces challenges with upgrading processes, AI enhancements, and user documentation. Integration and selector sensitivity issues, along with support and licensing complexities, highlight areas for potential improvement. Users request smoother deployment, error handling, and migration processes. Enhanced support for RHEL/Ubuntu, LINQ, and Lambda and improved real-time insights, automation recording, and scheduling are desired. Streamlining the experience for non-technical users with simplified workflows remains a priority.

What are the key features of UiPath Platform?

Drag-and-Drop Functionality: Allows users to design workflows easily without extensive technical skills.
Orchestrator: Enhances task management and enables scalable automation.
AI and Document Understanding: Improves data accuracy and minimizes errors.
System Integration: Offers seamless integration with SAP, CRM, Oracle, and more.
Active Community and Training: UiPath Academy provides resources for skill development.

What benefits should users look for in reviews?

Increased Efficiency: Reduction in manual workloads through automation of repetitive tasks.
Improved Accuracy: Enhanced data handling capabilities reduce errors.
Productivity Boost: Supports both attended and unattended automations to streamline operations.
Scalability: Ability to handle growing automation demands efficiently.
Integration Benefits: Easy integration with enterprise systems for streamlined operations.

UiPath Platform is widely implemented across sectors such as finance, healthcare, insurance, HR, IT, and supply chain to automate repetitive business tasks. Common uses include automating data entry, invoice processing, document management, report generation, and customer service operations. Organizations value the platform's ability to integrate seamlessly with systems like SAP, CRM, and Oracle, allowing for enhanced efficiency and accuracy in processing both structured and unstructured data.

UiPath

Sample Customers

UFP, Clariant, Ricoh, FMBCapital, RePower

1. Accenture 2. Deloitte 3. PwC 4. IBM 5. Capgemini 6. KPMG 7. Ernst & Young 8. Infosys 9. Cognizant 10. Wipro 11. Tata Consultancy Services 12. HCL Technologies 13. Genpact 14. Tech Mahindra 15. DXC Technology 16. Atos 17. NTT Data 18. CGI 19. L&T Infotech 20. Hexaware Technologies 21. Mindtree 22. Mphasis 23. Virtusa 24. Syntel 25. Zensar Technologies 26. WNS Global Services 27. Hexaware Technologies 28. Larsen & Toubro Infotech 29. Persistent Systems 30. QuEST Global 31. Sonata Software 32. Zensar Technologies

Buyer's Guide

ElectroNeek vs. UiPath Platform

December 2025

Free Report: ElectroNeek vs. UiPath Platform

Find out what your peers are saying about ElectroNeek vs. UiPath Platform and other solutions. Updated: December 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

881,114 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our ElectroNeek vs. UiPath Platform report.

See our list of best Robotic Process Automation (RPA) vendors.

We monitor all Robotic Process Automation (RPA) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.