Windows Server Reviews

Windows Server is easy to use. It's user-friendly for the admin guys.

Windows should add some more compatibility tools to Windows Server.

We've been using Windows Server ever since it was first released. 

Windows Server is quite stable.

We haven't had any issues with Microsoft support thus far. 

Installing Windows Server is quite easy. I'm not exactly sure how long it takes to deploy. My team does that. We have a team of two to three Windows admin guys who manage the solution.

I rate Windows Server nine out of 10. I would recommend it to others.

We use Windows Server for process control in process control systems. Right now, the operations team is the only one using the solution. They conduct day collection for our process control system.

Windows Server provides a robust operating system that keeps our processes running 24 hours a day without any downtime.

The most valuable feature of Windows Server is its scalability and robustness. 

Windows could add more tools to monitor the health of the server.

I've been using Windows Server for 15 years. 

Windows Server is highly robust. We only have to do maintenance on the system once yearly.

Windows Server is very scalable, but we don't have any plans to increase our usage in the near term.

So far, we've only had good experiences with Windows support.

We were previously running Unix, but the manufacturer of our control system forced us to switch to Windows Server. We didn't have a choice.

We set up the servers ourselves. The time needed to deploy varies from server to server.

Windows could always lower the cost.

I rate Windows Server about a nine out of 10. It's very robust, but there is always room for improvement in monitoring and other features.

What I like most about Windows Server is that it's easy to use.

I would like to see better performance and more integration options in the next release of Windows Server. 

I've been using Windows Server for quite a while now. I'm not sure how long.

Windows Server is stable.

I would rate Windows support five out of 10. 

Installing Windows Server is pretty straightforward. You don't really need much IT knowledge to deploy it.

We pay for a yearly license

I would rate Windows Server five out of 10. I would recommend it to others. 

We used Windows Server to run SQL applications and a few remote desktop applications.

The solution is easy to use.

I have been using Windows Server for approximately four years.

The solution is stable.

Windows Server is scalable.

We have approximately 20 people in my organization using this solution.

Windows Server is easy to configure. However, it takes approximately three months for the full implementation.

We used integrators to do the implementation of the solution. We have one technician that works on the solution.

Windows Server's whole licensing model is complex because if you have, for example, Microsoft Office and end-user applications installed on a server with a remote desktop, then the licensing can be complex. If the model could be simplified it would be better.

I would recommend this solution to others.

I rate Windows Server an eight out of ten.

We use Windows Server for sharing files and running applications, for example, Microsoft Exchange for correspondence.

The solution could improve by being more user-friendly.

I have been using Windows Server for approximately three months.

The newer version of this solution is highly stable.

The solution is scalable.

We have approximately 50 users using the solution.

I have not needed to use the support.

We use Ubuntu Linux for some servers.

The solution is straightforward to install and took approximately 30 minutes.

Our IT department did the implementation of the solution. We have a team of engineers and administrators that do the implementation and maintenance.

I recommend this solution to others.

I rate Windows Server an eight out of ten.

I use the solution when I'm working from home. 

For our company the Terminal Service is a valuable feature. 

Rebooting is sometimes required to resolve certain issues, but we've never been able to determine the root cause. The problem gets solved but we'd like to know what causes it.

I have been using Windows Server for five years.

The solution is stable. 

The initial setup was straightforward.

I would recommend Windows Server to other users and rate this solution an eight out of ten.

We use this solution to run our applications and overall our day-to-day activities.

Windows Server is a good solution.

It is easy to use.

There is a need for improved security.

I have been using Windows Server for four or five years.

Windows Server is a stable solution.

Window Server is a scalable product.

We have approximately 400 users in our organization.

We have not contacted technical support. We are able to resolve issues.

We are also using the Linux Server.

It is easy to install Windows Server.

It took three to four hours to install.

We have a team of three engineers to complete the installation and maintain it.

Our licensing fees are paid on a yearly basis.

I would recommend this solution to others.

I would rate Windows Server an eight out of ten.

We are using Windows Server to run applications.

The solution could improve by being more secure.

I have been using Windows Server for a couple of years.

We have been using this solution for a long time and it has been stable.

The solution is scalable.

We are using virtualization servers, and on average we have installed approximately 200 servers.

We have not needed to contact the support.

The installation is straightforward.

We have two managers doing the maintenance of the solution and a team of five that handles the operations.

There is an annual license required for this solution.

I would recommend this solution to others.

I rate Windows Server an eight out of ten.

We use Windows Server for applications, data storage, and communication.

Windows Server is easy to use.

The solution could improve by being more user-friendly.

I have been using Windows Server for approximately three years.

The solution is stable.

We have not had any scalability issues.

We had approximately three customers last year.

The technical support has been good.

The installation is straightforward.

We have a team that does the implementation and maintenance of the solution. We have recently done smaller implementations only requiring one manager and a few technicians as support.

Our customers had a bundle package with Microsoft that included Windows Server.

I rate Windows Server an eight out of ten.

The product is primarily used for applications, data storage, and communications. We also use it for the directory.

The solution is very user-friendly. 

The scalability is very good.

You can deploy the solution either on the cloud or on-premises. 

The solution needs more integration capabilities. 

I've been using the solution for 15 years at this point. It's been well over a decade. I've used it for a long time. 

The scalability of the solution is good. It's not a problem to expand it. 

Likely the entire company is using the solution, however, I cannot speak to exact numbers that are on the solution right now. 

I've never been in touch with technical support in the past. I cannot speak to how helpful or responsive they are. 

We did not previously use a different operating system.

I wasn't a part of the installation process. I can't speak to how straightforward or complex it was.

We have 12 to 15 team members that can handle deployment and maintenance tasks. There are a manager, an admin, and engineers.

I don't handle the licensing costs. I don't have any visibility as to how much the company pays for licenses. 

We use multiple deployment models, including on-premises and cloud. 

I'm not sure which version of the solution we're using. 

I'd recommend using the solution to other companies.

I'd rate the solution at an eight out of ten.