Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users
WithSecure Elements Endpoint Protection Logo

WithSecure Elements Endpoint Protection Reviews

Vendor: WithSecure
4.0 out of 5
Leave a review

What is WithSecure Elements Endpoint Protection?

WithSecure (formerly F-Secure) Elements Endpoint Protection is cloud-native, AI-powered endpoint protection that you can deploy instantly from your browser and manage easily from a single console. It integrates across all your endpoints, keeping your organization fenced in from attacks.WithSecure Elements Endpoint Protection is a module of the Elements cyber security platform. The cloud-based platform provides effective protection against ransomware and advanced attacks. Elements brings together vulnerability management, automated patch management, dynamic threat intelligence and continuous behavioral analytics. Use individual solutions for specific needs or combine them all seamlessly for maximum defense.
Get the WithSecure Elements Endpoint Protection Buyer's Guide and find out what your peers are saying about WithSecure Elements Endpoint Protection, CrowdStrike Falcon, Microsoft Defender for Endpoint and more!
WithSecure Elements Endpoint Protection is the #39 ranked solution in endpoint security software. PeerSpot users give WithSecure Elements Endpoint Protection an average rating of 8.0 out of 10. WithSecure Elements Endpoint Protection is most commonly compared to CrowdStrike Falcon: WithSecure Elements Endpoint Protection vs CrowdStrike Falcon. WithSecure Elements Endpoint Protection is popular among the large enterprise segment, accounting for 42% of users researching this solution on PeerSpot. The top industry researching this solution are professionals from a comms service provider, accounting for 21% of all views.
Buyer's Guide
WithSecure Elements Endpoint Protection
February 2026
Get the report
Helped 884,976 peers since 2012

Featured WithSecure Elements Endpoint Protection reviews

Read more reviews

WithSecure Elements Endpoint Protection mindshare

As of March 2026, the mindshare of WithSecure Elements Endpoint Protection in the Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP) category stands at 1.0%, up from 0.6% compared to the previous year, according to calculations based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP) Mindshare Distribution
ProductMindshare (%)
WithSecure Elements Endpoint Protection1.0%
Microsoft Defender for Endpoint7.8%
CrowdStrike Falcon6.6%
Other84.6%
Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP)

PeerResearch reports based on WithSecure Elements Endpoint Protection reviews

TypeTitleDate
CategoryEndpoint Protection Platform (EPP)Mar 27, 2026Download
ProductReviews, tips, and advice from real usersMar 27, 2026Download
ComparisonWithSecure Elements Endpoint Protection vs CrowdStrike FalconMar 27, 2026Download
ComparisonWithSecure Elements Endpoint Protection vs Microsoft Defender for EndpointMar 27, 2026Download
ComparisonWithSecure Elements Endpoint Protection vs SentinelOne Singularity CompleteMar 27, 2026Download
Suggested products
TitleRatingMindshareRecommending
CrowdStrike Falcon4.36.6%97%138 interviewsAdd to research
Microsoft Defender for Endpoint4.17.8%95%213 interviewsAdd to research
 
 
Key learnings from peers
Last updated Feb 15, 2026

Valuable Features

WithSecure Elements Endpoint Protection offers centralized management, robust antivirus capabilities, and tamper protection. It supports various browsers with a seamless plugin and features AMSI and DeepGuard for enhanced security. Users appreciate the intuitive portal, protection efficiency, reliable notifications, and patch management. The antivirus ranks highly among competitors like Kaspersky and Symantec. Setup is straightforward, with local support options available, and it effectively handles network vulnerabilities and software updates while facilitating easy remote monitoring.
  • "It's pretty simple to use, with the console and the dashboard there is no information overload, it's easy to follow, and it's pretty straightforward to do things like web filtering, generating reports, creating profiles, and deploying it to machines remotely, which is convenient for us."
  • "It's a very good and reliable product as we have no problems with it generally."
  • "The customer portal by WithSecure is a lot better with WithSecure Elements Endpoint Protection than it was with Countercept."

Room for Improvement

WithSecure Elements Endpoint Protection needs improvements in deployment tools and patch management. Language support is limited to English. Memory and CPU consumption are high, affecting device performance. Real-time response issues, especially in license updates, need attention. Hash Analysis requires broader integration, and compatibility issues exist with other solutions like Microsoft Office 365. Support and integration options in the Middle East are inadequate. Users prefer a subscription-based model over the current prepaid system.
  • "But the biggest one for us is patch management because this has been our top priority when looking at alternatives."
  • "The program and cloud service management is in English. It's not a problem for me, however, it might be for users who don't speak English or use it regularly."
  • "In my opinion, there is room for improvement for WithSecure Elements Endpoint Protection, especially in the deployment tools, which could be a little better, but not by much."

ROI

Users indicated that WithSecure Elements Endpoint Protection provided significant cost savings by reducing unwanted security incidents and minimizing IT staff hours needed for system maintenance. It enabled better resource allocation and higher efficiency. Feedback often highlights quicker threat detection and resolution, enhancing user confidence in data safety. Businesses noted improved financial outcomes from the tighter cybersecurity measures implemented through the service.

Pricing

WithSecure Elements Endpoint Protection's pricing experience varies based on company size and license type like EPP or EPP Plus EDR. Bulk purchases may offer discounts, while local governments might negotiate special rates. The pricing is scalable and includes all necessary add-ons. The average yearly fee is about €20 per computer. Prices increased by seven percent due to rebranding, but the solution remains cost-effective, especially compared to competitors requiring additional hardware.
  • "The price is comparable."
  • "The product has average pricing."
  • "If you purchase licenses in bulk the price of the licenses can decrease."

Popular Use Cases

Organizations primarily use WithSecure Elements Endpoint Protection for central management, securing computers, and monitoring patches and device status through a central console. Users install it on employees' devices, especially in environments with Windows users and some Mac users. Some companies utilize its intrusion detection and response capabilities, while others focus on threat intelligence. Remote workers benefit from critical security updates. Entities prefer its assertiveness in positive detections, although some seek alternatives for bundled features.

Service and Support

WithSecure Elements Endpoint Protection's customer service shows mixed results. Many users rate support positively, highlighting effective third-party assistance and localized language help. Others report challenges or rely on internal management without external support. Some regions like the Middle East lack technical support, causing confusion. A few users express dissatisfaction with partner-provided support and suggest direct assistance. Overall, opinions vary depending on geographical location and support structure.

Deployment

WithSecure Elements Endpoint Protection's initial setup is straightforward, simple, and supported by detailed instructions. It can be performed with cloud management or on-premises, depending on preference. Many find it quick, taking about five minutes with a clean installation and a good connection. Users can deploy across multiple devices through Active Directory, and some rate ease of setup around seven or eight out of ten. Implementation may take a few days with a small team.

Scalability

WithSecure Elements Endpoint Protection is known for its scalability, handling varied environments seamlessly. Companies experience no challenge increasing licenses and adapting to changes, supporting extensive numbers of devices efficiently. Users highlight the ability to easily scale from small to large operations, accommodating growth and adjusting licenses as needed. Despite one user rating scalability low, most rate it favorably. This adaptability is beneficial for dynamic user bases and varying organizational needs.

Stability

WithSecure Elements Endpoint Protection demonstrates strong stability, unlike Kaspersky which can be resource-heavy. Users note rare crashes, usually tied to hardware issues. Cloud functionality ensures stability above 99%. Ratings vary, with some scoring stability low due to resource usage and reliance on RAM. While generally considered stable without major disruptions, a need for more expert support in tackling issues is observed. Ratings range from three to seven out of ten for stability.
These insights are based on the in-depth reviews provided by peers to help you make a better buying decision.
Download our WithSecure Elements Endpoint Protection Buyer's Guide for additional reliable information.

Review data by company size

By reviewers
Company SizeCount
Small Business6
Large Enterprise1
By reviewers
By visitors reading reviews
Company SizeCount
Small Business62
Midsize Enterprise38
Large Enterprise71
By visitors reading reviews

Top industries

By visitors reading reviews
Comms Service Provider
21%
Manufacturing Company
9%
University
8%
Computer Software Company
7%
Government
7%
Healthcare Company
6%
Hospitality Company
5%
Educational Organization
3%
Non Profit
3%
Outsourcing Company
3%
Retailer
3%
Real Estate/Law Firm
3%
Media Company
2%
Transportation Company
2%
Financial Services Firm
2%
Construction Company
2%
Wholesaler/Distributor
2%
Marketing Services Firm
2%
Insurance Company
1%
Logistics Company
1%
Recreational Facilities/Services Company
1%
Consumer Goods Company
1%
Agriculture
1%
Leisure / Travel Company
1%
Legal Firm
1%
Pharma/Biotech Company
1%
Renewables & Environment Company
1%
Performing Arts
1%
Energy/Utilities Company
1%

Compare WithSecure Elements Endpoint Protection with alternative products

Go!

Learn more about WithSecure Elements Endpoint Protection

WithSecure Elements Endpoint Protection was previously known as F-Secure Elements Endpoint Protection, F-Secure Protection Service for Business.

Product Demo

Interactive WithSecure Elements Endpoint Protection demo

Related questions

  • 333
What is the biggest difference between EPP and EDR products?
  • 86
Can Cylance be used with Symantec or Kaspersky endpoint solutions without conflict?
  • 107
When evaluating Endpoint Security, what aspect do you think is the most important to look for?
  • 68
What's the best way to trial endpoint protection solutions?
  • 183
What are the threats associated with using ‘bogus’ cybersecurity tools?
  • 364
Which Endpoint Protection Solution offers Zero Trust (ZTN) as a feature?
  • 119
What to choose: an endpoint antivirus, an EDR solution or both?
  • 68
Which ransomware is the biggest threat in 2020?
  • 53
Are you aware of SIEM platforms that integrate both Active Directory auditing and security monitoring tools?
  • 44
What is the best solution for ransomware attack?

Product Categories

Product Categories
Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP)

Popular Comparisons

Popular Comparisons
CrowdStrike Falcon vs WithSecure Elements Endpoint Protection Logo
CrowdStrike Falcon vs WithSecure Elements Endpoint Protection
Microsoft Defender for Endpoint vs WithSecure Elements Endpoint Protection Logo
Microsoft Defender for Endpoint vs WithSecure Elements Endpoint Protection
Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks vs WithSecure Elements Endpoint Protection Logo
Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks vs WithSecure Elements Endpoint Protection
SentinelOne Singularity Complete vs WithSecure Elements Endpoint Protection Logo
SentinelOne Singularity Complete vs WithSecure Elements Endpoint Protection
HP Wolf Security vs WithSecure Elements Endpoint Protection Logo
HP Wolf Security vs WithSecure Elements Endpoint Protection
Trellix Endpoint Security Platform vs WithSecure Elements Endpoint Protection Logo
Trellix Endpoint Security Platform vs WithSecure Elements Endpoint Protection
Fortinet FortiClient vs WithSecure Elements Endpoint Protection Logo
Fortinet FortiClient vs WithSecure Elements Endpoint Protection
Check Point Harmony Endpoint vs WithSecure Elements Endpoint Protection Logo
Check Point Harmony Endpoint vs WithSecure Elements Endpoint Protection
Symantec Endpoint Security vs WithSecure Elements Endpoint Protection Logo
Symantec Endpoint Security vs WithSecure Elements Endpoint Protection
Kaspersky Endpoint Security for Business vs WithSecure Elements Endpoint Protection Logo
Kaspersky Endpoint Security for Business vs WithSecure Elements Endpoint Protection
ESET Endpoint Protection Platform vs WithSecure Elements Endpoint Protection Logo
ESET Endpoint Protection Platform vs WithSecure Elements Endpoint Protection
TrendAI Vision One – Endpoint Security vs WithSecure Elements Endpoint Protection Logo
TrendAI Vision One – Endpoint Security vs WithSecure Elements Endpoint Protection
Intercept X Endpoint vs WithSecure Elements Endpoint Protection Logo
Intercept X Endpoint vs WithSecure Elements Endpoint Protection
WatchGuard EPDR vs WithSecure Elements Endpoint Protection Logo
WatchGuard EPDR vs WithSecure Elements Endpoint Protection
Microsoft Defender for Business vs WithSecure Elements Endpoint Protection Logo
Microsoft Defender for Business vs WithSecure Elements Endpoint Protection
See all alternatives
 
WithSecure Elements Endpoint Protection Reviews Summary
Author infoRatingReview Summary
IT-Manager at MKF-Schimanski-ERGIS GmbH4.0We use WithSecure Elements Endpoint Protection primarily for securing our computers across the organization. It's easy to set up and monitor but uses too much RAM. We switched from Darktrace to WithSecure due to its simplicity and software-only nature.
Head Of IT at a financial services firm with 11-50 employees4.0I've been generally satisfied with WithSecure Elements Endpoint Protection; it's cost-effective, easy to manage, and has strong support, though deployment tools—especially for Intune—could improve. We're switching due to new ownership, not dissatisfaction.
Chief Information Officer at Future Generations Computers LLC3.5I use WithSecure Elements Endpoint Protection for detecting network vulnerabilities and managing software updates. However, I find that there is insufficient support from distributors and a need for more integration options in the product.
office manager at MaxBuild Oy3.5WithSecure Elements Endpoint Protection is valuable for its clear portal and comprehensive protection. However, it needs better real-time responses and improved integration with other solutions, as I experienced issues with Microsoft Office 365 and Windows Defender compatibility.
Senior IT Support at a hospitality company with 51-200 employees3.5F-Secure keeps our endpoints updated and is stable. However, its biggest drawback is lacking built-in patch management, forcing us to use separate software. We are now seeking an all-in-one alternative, like SentinelOne.
Chief Information Officer at Future Generations Computers LLC3.5WithSecure Elements Endpoint Protection satisfies our clients with its notifications and patch management features. However, the lack of technical partners in the Middle East and the current prepaid model are drawbacks. We prefer a subscription-based model for better flexibility.
information security analyst at Brasiline5.0I work at a security solutions provider and find WithSecure Elements Endpoint Protection valuable for its features like Tamper Protection, AMSI, and DeepGuard. It needs better hash analysis integration, but it offers significant ROI with proper adjustments.
System Specialist at Fix-Forum Oy4.5I find WithSecure Elements Endpoint Protection to be a reliable option for detecting zero-day vulnerabilities, especially given its superior performance in protecting mobile to server environments. However, its resource consumption is high, affecting device performance during active use.