I read that on January 31, 2017 HP released a new version of UFT, named UFT 14.00. Has anyone compared the run time performance of UFT 14.00 vs UFT 12.54 and if so were there any significant differences?
Any updates on this @Don Ingerson. I am trying to pre-assess the same question. Whether I would get any performance improvements in executing scripts (VBScripts) in UFT 14.XX or UFT 15.XX compared to UFT 12.02 that I have currently.
If yes, it would also be good to know by what factor would it reduce the execution time e.g., 1/4th or 1/5th of execution time on UFT 12.02.
To elaborate, if you had the same exact script and executed it using UFT 12.54 and UFT 14.00 with the environment being the same are there any significant differences in execution speed, memory usage, etc?
OpenText Functional Testing provides automated testing with compatibility across technologies, browsers, and platforms. It targets APIs, GUIs, and applications like SAP and Oracle for efficient test automation, emphasizing usability and integration with tools such as Jenkins and ALM.OpenText Functional Testing offers wide-ranging automation capabilities for functional and regression testing, API testing, and automation across web, desktop, and mainframe applications. It supports script...
Any updates on this @Don Ingerson. I am trying to pre-assess the same question. Whether I would get any performance improvements in executing scripts (VBScripts) in UFT 14.XX or UFT 15.XX compared to UFT 12.02 that I have currently.
If yes, it would also be good to know by what factor would it reduce the execution time e.g., 1/4th or 1/5th of execution time on UFT 12.02.
To elaborate, if you had the same exact script and executed it using UFT 12.54 and UFT 14.00 with the environment being the same are there any significant differences in execution speed, memory usage, etc?
Ok. Thank you.
We have not built any cases yet where these parameters have been compared. I will keep you posted
What is your question?