The pricing for Azure Firewall Manager is expensive. In our project, we have used both Palo Alto Firewall and Azure Firewall. Azure charges for many aspects including scaling, automated scaling deployment, and traffic management, which leads to higher costs. In Palo Alto, we had around 3,000 US dollars per month, but for the same traffic flowing through Azure Firewall, they charge around 5,000 to 6,000 USD. Thus, it is about 2x the cost compared to other vendors such as Palo Alto.
The pricing for Azure Firewall Manager seems okay compared to its good features. Although extra expenses are incurred for additional services, these are not directly related to the firewall, and there are no specific comments about those costs.
The Azure pricing is good, although there are a lot of minor details compared to AWS. Azure stack pricing, but only thing is it has too many nitty gritties and minor details, compared to AWS. AWS, definitely the pricing is reasonable to a normal human. Then it becomes a shopping cart of intellectual cart. So that part is definitely eliminated in Azure. You're able to see what you will lose, very obvious in front of your eyes by choosing any plan and what is the cost for it. That visibility is better, competitive. Yes.
Azure Firewall Manager is a security management service that provides central security policy and route management for cloud-based security perimeters.
To learn more about our solution, ask questions, and share feedback, join our Microsoft Security, Compliance and Identity Community.
The pricing for Azure Firewall Manager is expensive. In our project, we have used both Palo Alto Firewall and Azure Firewall. Azure charges for many aspects including scaling, automated scaling deployment, and traffic management, which leads to higher costs. In Palo Alto, we had around 3,000 US dollars per month, but for the same traffic flowing through Azure Firewall, they charge around 5,000 to 6,000 USD. Thus, it is about 2x the cost compared to other vendors such as Palo Alto.
The pricing for Azure Firewall Manager seems okay compared to its good features. Although extra expenses are incurred for additional services, these are not directly related to the firewall, and there are no specific comments about those costs.
The price of the solution is reasonable but it is reasonable for the features.
The Azure pricing is good, although there are a lot of minor details compared to AWS. Azure stack pricing, but only thing is it has too many nitty gritties and minor details, compared to AWS. AWS, definitely the pricing is reasonable to a normal human. Then it becomes a shopping cart of intellectual cart. So that part is definitely eliminated in Azure. You're able to see what you will lose, very obvious in front of your eyes by choosing any plan and what is the cost for it. That visibility is better, competitive. Yes.
The pricing is reasonable. We don't have any capital expenditures. It is only an operational expenditure.
The price is okay. This said, the solution is certainly expensive in comparison with other cloud services.