HeadSpin definitely helps us cut costs because earlier, when we owned devices, our testing cost for each project was around thirteen thousand dollars per month. After starting to use HeadSpin, the cost reduced to around six thousand to seven thousand dollars per month, as we are using it on a very large scale with a large number of QAs, which helps us reduce costs. It also allows us to ship and fix bugs faster, benefiting our users with fewer issues. HeadSpin definitely helps us reduce costs, making it a win-win situation for both of us.
It has a yearly license. There is no other option. It is expensive. There are a lot of other cheaper players in the market, but it is like a Mercedes. You pay an extra premium for it, but you get the benefits. I would love to see them come up with project-based costing. Companies that are low on funds or new-age can do with pricing that is easily digestible. They can give them a pricing model for three months. They can provide a startup package.
Founder at a computer software company with 11-50 employees
Real User
Mar 29, 2020
It's not cheap, but there are a few different packages and different prices for enterprises with different product versions. If I am not mistaken, they do not have support for all services. It's available with enterprise packages.
HeadSpin offers integrated performance testing with automation, providing an all-in-one platform to enhance app diagnostics and user experience across devices.
HeadSpin is an advanced tool for testing applications on Android and iOS, supporting automated, manual, and performance assessments. It enables quick debugging and integration with other tools for element searches. ERP report-based insights help management make strategic decisions. Users find its remote testing capabilities...
HeadSpin definitely helps us cut costs because earlier, when we owned devices, our testing cost for each project was around thirteen thousand dollars per month. After starting to use HeadSpin, the cost reduced to around six thousand to seven thousand dollars per month, as we are using it on a very large scale with a large number of QAs, which helps us reduce costs. It also allows us to ship and fix bugs faster, benefiting our users with fewer issues. HeadSpin definitely helps us reduce costs, making it a win-win situation for both of us.
We have a yearly license for 16 devices costing 35 - 40 lakhs in rupees.
It has a yearly license. There is no other option. It is expensive. There are a lot of other cheaper players in the market, but it is like a Mercedes. You pay an extra premium for it, but you get the benefits. I would love to see them come up with project-based costing. Companies that are low on funds or new-age can do with pricing that is easily digestible. They can give them a pricing model for three months. They can provide a startup package.
It's not cheap, but there are a few different packages and different prices for enterprises with different product versions. If I am not mistaken, they do not have support for all services. It's available with enterprise packages.