AI Engineer at a insurance company with 10,001+ employees
Real User
Top 20
Jun 26, 2026
The experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing has been on the higher side. I believe that if some features were made open source, it would improve accessibility and broaden its market reach beyond just large corporations.
I am not much aware about how Palantir Foundry was purchased because that was not under our team's scope. That was something in another team's scope. I cannot answer on that. My experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing is limited. My team worked solely on Palantir Foundry for data engineering. We were mostly dealing with data pipelines, code repositories, workshops, and other components of Palantir Foundry such as ontology, and not setting up and deciding on the cost. However, we did perform some automations on Palantir Foundry which reduced the cost significantly for the team.
My experience with the price, implementation cost, and licensing model of Palantir Foundry is limited because that data is managed by another department and I, as an engineer, don't have access to that information.
Regarding pricing, setup cost, and licensing, while those are determined by our admins and upper management, I know we are paying substantial charges, and if those could be reduced, it would be more accessible for people.
I have no experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing for Palantir Foundry because for me, essentially, it is free. NHS England pays for that as part of their procurement process. That is why I can't answer this question. But in terms of getting a contractor to work on that, I would probably say it is more expensive because there are fewer people with that skillset compared to, say, Databricks or Azure.
My experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing has not been too overwhelming; I worked closely with a management colleague who explained how they check for cost based on user activity and individual vertical usage.
Palantir Foundry is expensive to start, but not costly in terms of total cost of ownership. Its high initial pricing can be intimidating, but it becomes cost-effective as it reduces the need for a development team. Traditional data management is being transformed to bi-directional, near real-time data flow using data virtualization.
Palantir Foundry offers intuitive data management and application development, prioritizing accessibility through low-code/no-code tools, enabling users to integrate, analyze, and collaborate efficiently.Palantir Foundry centers on user accessibility, data governance, and real-time capabilities, streamlining processes with low-code/no-code development. It supports comprehensive data analysis and integration, enhanced by digital twin features that align virtual and physical interactions....
The experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing has been on the higher side. I believe that if some features were made open source, it would improve accessibility and broaden its market reach beyond just large corporations.
At this stage, it is fine.
I am not much aware about how Palantir Foundry was purchased because that was not under our team's scope. That was something in another team's scope. I cannot answer on that. My experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing is limited. My team worked solely on Palantir Foundry for data engineering. We were mostly dealing with data pipelines, code repositories, workshops, and other components of Palantir Foundry such as ontology, and not setting up and deciding on the cost. However, we did perform some automations on Palantir Foundry which reduced the cost significantly for the team.
My experience with the price, implementation cost, and licensing model of Palantir Foundry is limited because that data is managed by another department and I, as an engineer, don't have access to that information.
Regarding pricing, setup cost, and licensing, while those are determined by our admins and upper management, I know we are paying substantial charges, and if those could be reduced, it would be more accessible for people.
I have no experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing for Palantir Foundry because for me, essentially, it is free. NHS England pays for that as part of their procurement process. That is why I can't answer this question. But in terms of getting a contractor to work on that, I would probably say it is more expensive because there are fewer people with that skillset compared to, say, Databricks or Azure.
My experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing has not been too overwhelming; I worked closely with a management colleague who explained how they check for cost based on user activity and individual vertical usage.
Regarding pricing for Palantir Foundry, I am not entirely sure about the exact pricing because it is centrally managed by the organization.
Palantir Foundry is expensive to start, but not costly in terms of total cost of ownership. Its high initial pricing can be intimidating, but it becomes cost-effective as it reduces the need for a development team. Traditional data management is being transformed to bi-directional, near real-time data flow using data virtualization.
Palantir Foundry is an expensive solution. However, it works because we need to develop a little less compared to Databricks or any other environment.
The solution’s pricing is high.
I don't deal with the price or license. That is not in my scope of work.
While I do not know the exact cost, I have heard that it is quite expensive.
Palantir Foundry has different pricing models. Large companies will have contract negotiations. Start-ups would have a different program.