For improvement, I suggest adopting more automation and making the solution AI-enabled. If Armis can be autonomous, it will be more useful for customers. If it can respond to threats in real-time, it will also be more helpful. Everything is positive regarding Armis's performance. I observe that Armis provides very positive use cases to customers. A few improvements could be aligned with market trends, as the market is moving towards AI-driven technology, which is why I suggest that it should be AI-driven and powered by artificial intelligence and autonomous capabilities.
My experience with Armis has been positive, especially around asset visibility, unmanaged device monitoring, and risk intelligence. However, there are a few areas for improvement. Some features I can suggest include more granular role-based access control and dashboard personalization, better long-term historical trend visualization, improved asset grouping and tagging automation, and more AI-driven insights which would be beneficial for addressing future AI-related threats and exposure prioritization and anomaly detection. These are expected improvement areas for Armis in the future.
IDM Consultant at GCA Consultoria de Informática Ltda
Real User
Top 10
Mar 11, 2026
The OpenText solution we used had to improve its development in relation to cloud environments. They have started to offer a version that works on the cloud, but they are really behind in that aspect today. I am studying other solutions such as ForgeRock or SailPoint, which are much better in this regard. The needed improvements I see include implementing cloud features, as the market, particularly in Brazil, is moving to cloud environments to reduce costs and time spent on upgrades and server management.
Armis can be somewhat expensive and there is not much sales presence for Armis. Without any existing security solution on the customer's end, Armis will only collect telemetry data, which is the device IP address. After implementing Armis, an organization experiences it as an add-on. Without asset visibility or vulnerability prioritization, it becomes a useless product. Armis cannot be used as a standalone solution and should be integrated with other solutions. It cannot be used standalone because it requires other security solutions for the integration part.
The vulnerability assessment for Windows is not that great. It misses out on a lot of vulnerabilities. Additionally, the filtration process in Armis is not that great.
We face many issues while implementing Armis in the pharma sector. Some of the customer applications are not supported well by the tool. The applications do not communicate well if we implement Armis. We generally face such issues during implementation. We are planning to implement the product in the wind energy sector, but we don't have any idea how to do it. Currently, it is a very big challenge for us. Products like Dragos, Claroty, and Nozomi provide a much better experience during implementation. If any issues arise, we are told how to resolve such issues during the POC. Armis does not provide the secure remote access feature Claroty provides.
Armis is a comprehensive cybersecurity solution used for continuous monitoring and threat detection across IT and IoT devices. It excels in spotting vulnerabilities, managing device compliance, and tracking assets to enhance security protocols and network management. Key features include real-time threat detection, comprehensive visibility, and granular risk assessments. Armis boosts organizational productivity by streamlining workflows and enhancing operational accuracy.
For improvement, I suggest adopting more automation and making the solution AI-enabled. If Armis can be autonomous, it will be more useful for customers. If it can respond to threats in real-time, it will also be more helpful. Everything is positive regarding Armis's performance. I observe that Armis provides very positive use cases to customers. A few improvements could be aligned with market trends, as the market is moving towards AI-driven technology, which is why I suggest that it should be AI-driven and powered by artificial intelligence and autonomous capabilities.
My experience with Armis has been positive, especially around asset visibility, unmanaged device monitoring, and risk intelligence. However, there are a few areas for improvement. Some features I can suggest include more granular role-based access control and dashboard personalization, better long-term historical trend visualization, improved asset grouping and tagging automation, and more AI-driven insights which would be beneficial for addressing future AI-related threats and exposure prioritization and anomaly detection. These are expected improvement areas for Armis in the future.
AI is one improvement I noted for Armis, and I may have other examples as well.
The OpenText solution we used had to improve its development in relation to cloud environments. They have started to offer a version that works on the cloud, but they are really behind in that aspect today. I am studying other solutions such as ForgeRock or SailPoint, which are much better in this regard. The needed improvements I see include implementing cloud features, as the market, particularly in Brazil, is moving to cloud environments to reduce costs and time spent on upgrades and server management.
I cannot identify specific ways Armis can be improved. I would consider potential integrations with other tools as small improvements.
Armis can be somewhat expensive and there is not much sales presence for Armis. Without any existing security solution on the customer's end, Armis will only collect telemetry data, which is the device IP address. After implementing Armis, an organization experiences it as an add-on. Without asset visibility or vulnerability prioritization, it becomes a useless product. Armis cannot be used as a standalone solution and should be integrated with other solutions. It cannot be used standalone because it requires other security solutions for the integration part.
The vulnerability assessment for Windows is not that great. It misses out on a lot of vulnerabilities. Additionally, the filtration process in Armis is not that great.
Armis could improve its geographic spread and marketing campaigns across regions.
There isn't anything specific that needs improvement.
We face many issues while implementing Armis in the pharma sector. Some of the customer applications are not supported well by the tool. The applications do not communicate well if we implement Armis. We generally face such issues during implementation. We are planning to implement the product in the wind energy sector, but we don't have any idea how to do it. Currently, it is a very big challenge for us. Products like Dragos, Claroty, and Nozomi provide a much better experience during implementation. If any issues arise, we are told how to resolve such issues during the POC. Armis does not provide the secure remote access feature Claroty provides.
We face difficulties in integrating the product with ticketing tools like ServiceNow.
Armis doesn't have a back intel feature.