F5 BIG-IP Access Policy Manager (APM) is not user-friendly and operates slowly. Additional features for architecture such as Anycast would be beneficial. The ability to run the Anycast feature would be valuable, as the current solution only operates on-premises. The interface is slow, and the speed needs improvement.
F5 BIG-IP Access Policy Manager (APM ( /categories/application-performance-monitoring-apm-and-observability )) does not have a direction for SaaS. Most solutions focus more on remote access and access management going towards the SaaS direction. However, for APM, this direction is not evident.
Professional Services Specialist at a security firm with 51-200 employees
Real User
Top 20
Jan 22, 2025
Sometimes, if I erase or add a new agent in the policy, I can't go backwards, even if I haven't saved the access policy. I want the option to delete it, however, there's no option. I need to create the object from the beginning. If I could copy and paste objects instead of picking and configuring them from scratch each time, it would be great.
IT Security Specialist at a educational organization with 201-500 employees
Real User
Top 5
Sep 10, 2024
Regarding price, I'm not directly involved in purchasing, but our CIO thinks the product is very expensive. He's considering moving from the tool to Citrix NetScaler WAF because it's cheaper, and we already have Citrix for VDI. We got NetScaler almost free as part of our VDI deal. Three years ago, I convinced him to use the solution because it's better, but now, with budget constraints, he may want to switch.
Associate Network Engineer at a computer software company with 11-50 employees
Real User
Mar 18, 2024
I'd suggest improved documentation integration directly within the GUI. Right now, finding comprehensive documentation often requires going to external websites like the community portal. In the APM interface itself, they could add direct hyperlinks to relevant online documentation. This would provide easy access to admin guides and other resources when working within the GUI.
Senior Network Engineer at a financial services firm with 10,001+ employees
Real User
Feb 12, 2024
In my opinion, the GUI side needs some improvement based on my usage. Sometimes, it doesn't work as efficiently as the CLI side. Feature-wise, sometimes when I log in to the GUI and want to see the pool members, and I click on that, it sometimes goes and shows me some traffic details for that specific node, inside, outside, page traffic, everything. But when I click the back arrow to go back, it takes me to a different page, not the page I was on before. So those are some of the things I think could be improved upon.
Learn what your peers think about F5 BIG-IP Access Policy Manager (APM). Get advice and tips from experienced pros sharing their opinions. Updated: May 2026.
Network and Security Engineer at CITG - Continental Information and Telecom Group
Real User
Oct 27, 2023
They should work on issues related to login and access for MacOS addresses. They could provide us with direct access to edit the policies. Additionally, there need to be more features for network, portal, and VPN access. Integrating identity providers and single sign-on solutions can simplify user authentication and access control.
Director of consulting at a marketing services firm with 51-200 employees
Real User
Jun 27, 2022
The initial setup was complex. They could do a better job on the reporting and how we can use the data, provide more detail on the reporting logs, and show how we can export them and have graphical views. The reporting doesn't have graphical views, which makes things hard. You have basic reports that you can export, however, it's not that easy to use. The reporting needs to be improved a bit.
The solution is pretty technical. The initial setup is complex. The solution is quite costly. The solution could offer better reporting. The management aspect of the solution needs improvement.
Cyber Security Solution Architect at a tech consulting company with 1,001-5,000 employees
Real User
Aug 19, 2020
Cloud services are something that F5 Access Policy Manager could do better. In the last two to three years, there has been a slight degradation in regards to their service. Another company bought them and from that point on, their service hasn't been the same. I think it's a very mature product. I have known them for more than 10 years and I have yet to witness any scenario or use case that they are not capable of handling. In order to reach more customers, their marketing could be better. They are a nice company but they are not aggressive like their main competitors; they are trying, but if they're serious, they need to focus on the cloud in order to compete with larger companies. It would be nice if they would incorporate their own SSO solution, so you don't have to use a third-party. At the same time, customers don't want to pay for a service like Cisco Duo, mostly, they just want a free token.
F5 BIG-IP Access Policy Manager (APM) enhances access management by offering remote application access through SSL VPN, secure access verification, and login capabilities. Its user-friendly interface and robust security ensure efficient scalability and performance.F5 BIG-IP APM serves enterprises by integrating multiple authentication protocols and supporting remote access via SSL VPN for secure application and network connections. Known for its strong performance and reliable scalability,...
F5 BIG-IP Access Policy Manager (APM) is not user-friendly and operates slowly. Additional features for architecture such as Anycast would be beneficial. The ability to run the Anycast feature would be valuable, as the current solution only operates on-premises. The interface is slow, and the speed needs improvement.
F5 BIG-IP Access Policy Manager (APM ( /categories/application-performance-monitoring-apm-and-observability )) does not have a direction for SaaS. Most solutions focus more on remote access and access management going towards the SaaS direction. However, for APM, this direction is not evident.
Sometimes, if I erase or add a new agent in the policy, I can't go backwards, even if I haven't saved the access policy. I want the option to delete it, however, there's no option. I need to create the object from the beginning. If I could copy and paste objects instead of picking and configuring them from scratch each time, it would be great.
Regarding price, I'm not directly involved in purchasing, but our CIO thinks the product is very expensive. He's considering moving from the tool to Citrix NetScaler WAF because it's cheaper, and we already have Citrix for VDI. We got NetScaler almost free as part of our VDI deal. Three years ago, I convinced him to use the solution because it's better, but now, with budget constraints, he may want to switch.
I'd suggest improved documentation integration directly within the GUI. Right now, finding comprehensive documentation often requires going to external websites like the community portal. In the APM interface itself, they could add direct hyperlinks to relevant online documentation. This would provide easy access to admin guides and other resources when working within the GUI.
In my opinion, the GUI side needs some improvement based on my usage. Sometimes, it doesn't work as efficiently as the CLI side. Feature-wise, sometimes when I log in to the GUI and want to see the pool members, and I click on that, it sometimes goes and shows me some traffic details for that specific node, inside, outside, page traffic, everything. But when I click the back arrow to go back, it takes me to a different page, not the page I was on before. So those are some of the things I think could be improved upon.
Most support teams are from other countries. We do not have knowledgeable support teams locally.
The technical support’s response time must be improved.
They should work on issues related to login and access for MacOS addresses. They could provide us with direct access to edit the policies. Additionally, there need to be more features for network, portal, and VPN access. Integrating identity providers and single sign-on solutions can simplify user authentication and access control.
The solution’s automation is not good. The solution’s GUI looks very old.
The operational deployment is not great and can be improved.
F5 BIG-IP APM disconnects when you leave it for long enough, but that is natural for IT solutions to do. That's a little bit frustrating.
The initial setup was complex. They could do a better job on the reporting and how we can use the data, provide more detail on the reporting logs, and show how we can export them and have graphical views. The reporting doesn't have graphical views, which makes things hard. You have basic reports that you can export, however, it's not that easy to use. The reporting needs to be improved a bit.
F5 BIG-IP Access Policy Manager has room for improvement in integration with other products.
The solution is pretty technical. The initial setup is complex. The solution is quite costly. The solution could offer better reporting. The management aspect of the solution needs improvement.
The price of this product can be improved.
Cloud services are something that F5 Access Policy Manager could do better. In the last two to three years, there has been a slight degradation in regards to their service. Another company bought them and from that point on, their service hasn't been the same. I think it's a very mature product. I have known them for more than 10 years and I have yet to witness any scenario or use case that they are not capable of handling. In order to reach more customers, their marketing could be better. They are a nice company but they are not aggressive like their main competitors; they are trying, but if they're serious, they need to focus on the cloud in order to compete with larger companies. It would be nice if they would incorporate their own SSO solution, so you don't have to use a third-party. At the same time, customers don't want to pay for a service like Cisco Duo, mostly, they just want a free token.