For improvement, I think the cost is a definite concern. With the licensing model, if you have more users, there might be options available. When thinking about buying multiple licenses for different team members, sometimes I feel that purchasing high-end devices might be more economical because you can keep the devices for a long time. If you are sitting in the same office space, then buying real devices is definitely cheaper in terms of pricing. That is something to consider. Additionally, there is the Google Play services issue. I am not certain how legal it is to package Google services, but that is something we currently lack. If you could include Google Play services somehow, perhaps through a partnership with Google and introducing a limited version inside Genymotion Cloud, that would be very interesting.
Genymotion Cloud, in terms of cost, although it offers a lot of prerequisites for running Android applications within itself, could be improved regarding the pricing point of Genymotion Cloud instances. In terms of usability, I am satisfied with what Genymotion Cloud has to offer. I would argue that the cost could be improved. I chose a rating of 9 out of 10 because the pricing point is something I am not satisfied with regarding Genymotion Cloud. I believe improvements can be made there; otherwise, I am satisfied with the feature set.
Chapter Lead at a energy/utilities company with 10,001+ employees
Real User
Top 20
Dec 2, 2025
Genymotion Cloud can be improved with better ARM native platform performance. Better ARM native performance is needed as Genymotion Cloud is mainly with virtual devices with ARM translation. I would like to see more device profiles and manufacturers or improved network simulation for Genymotion Cloud.
Mobile App Testing Tools elevate software quality by automating testing processes, ensuring reliability across different devices and operating systems. Designed for developers and testers, these tools enhance the user experience by identifying issues efficiently.
These tools streamline testing by offering automation capabilities, reducing the need for manual intervention. They simulate various user environments, helping identify compatibility issues early in the development cycle....
For improvement, I think the cost is a definite concern. With the licensing model, if you have more users, there might be options available. When thinking about buying multiple licenses for different team members, sometimes I feel that purchasing high-end devices might be more economical because you can keep the devices for a long time. If you are sitting in the same office space, then buying real devices is definitely cheaper in terms of pricing. That is something to consider. Additionally, there is the Google Play services issue. I am not certain how legal it is to package Google services, but that is something we currently lack. If you could include Google Play services somehow, perhaps through a partnership with Google and introducing a limited version inside Genymotion Cloud, that would be very interesting.
Genymotion Cloud, in terms of cost, although it offers a lot of prerequisites for running Android applications within itself, could be improved regarding the pricing point of Genymotion Cloud instances. In terms of usability, I am satisfied with what Genymotion Cloud has to offer. I would argue that the cost could be improved. I chose a rating of 9 out of 10 because the pricing point is something I am not satisfied with regarding Genymotion Cloud. I believe improvements can be made there; otherwise, I am satisfied with the feature set.
Genymotion Cloud can be improved with better ARM native platform performance. Better ARM native performance is needed as Genymotion Cloud is mainly with virtual devices with ARM translation. I would like to see more device profiles and manufacturers or improved network simulation for Genymotion Cloud.