The most significant case I have for how Plesk can be improved is pricing, as in Poland it is quite expensive for a panel compared to other options. Compared to X-Cloud, the other panel that I use, Plesk is lacking some features that are now implemented in X-Cloud, such as one-click installs of various applications, for example the Hermes agent. I would find Plesk's user interface a little bit dated, but it is usable. Plesk has fewer features than X-Cloud compared to other control panels I have used, such as cPanel or X-Cloud, in terms of features and usability.
For our user case, I think Plesk is pretty much very complete software. I think it could be improved by helping to install cloud services with some automatic installations and apps; it is a feature it had in the past and has been removed, which I think is really useful. It could help us find and install open-source apps, for example, a QR code generator. The only thing missing from Plesk is helping install apps and finding open-source apps. Plesk should have a safer update for Linux packages because once an Apache update broke our website, and I believe they should implement a safer update process for this package.
Plesk does not need improvement at the moment, as they are always working on improvements and every new feature is great. They implement features and work on customer feedback, so Plesk is excellent.
I have no additional feedback about the features; I believe I have covered everything. There are no improvements needed for Plesk that I have not mentioned yet; nothing comes to mind.
To improve Plesk, one frustration I experienced was when it raised prices without informing individual users, which put me in a difficult position when needing to communicate these changes to my clients. Plesk should communicate updates to all users, not just hosting providers, which would be beneficial. Another improvement could be making the UI more modern, as it still feels somewhat outdated and possibly confusing to clients who need to find options without asking for help. As for needed improvements, implementing SSL is currently a huge task, so simplifying the process into clear, sequential steps would make my life easier, especially for those who do not have extensive information about it.
The system can get a bit cluttered if there are too many integrations set up at once. Training and adoption could use some improvement, especially online videos on how to use certain features would be beneficial.
When a subscription is cancelled, the license should not continue regardless of the server state. If continued access is needed, users should purchase a monthly or alternative option directly via Plesk or another provider.
Plesk offers a user-friendly control panel for managing web projects and hosting websites, streamlining tasks like domain and email management while supporting multiple sites to save users time.Plesk provides a versatile and integrated platform, ideal for server management and scalability. It consolidates tasks such as automatic updates, flexible customization, and centralized website control, offering organizations cost-effective solutions. With tools like File Manager and WordPress Toolkit,...
The most significant case I have for how Plesk can be improved is pricing, as in Poland it is quite expensive for a panel compared to other options. Compared to X-Cloud, the other panel that I use, Plesk is lacking some features that are now implemented in X-Cloud, such as one-click installs of various applications, for example the Hermes agent. I would find Plesk's user interface a little bit dated, but it is usable. Plesk has fewer features than X-Cloud compared to other control panels I have used, such as cPanel or X-Cloud, in terms of features and usability.
For our user case, I think Plesk is pretty much very complete software. I think it could be improved by helping to install cloud services with some automatic installations and apps; it is a feature it had in the past and has been removed, which I think is really useful. It could help us find and install open-source apps, for example, a QR code generator. The only thing missing from Plesk is helping install apps and finding open-source apps. Plesk should have a safer update for Linux packages because once an Apache update broke our website, and I believe they should implement a safer update process for this package.
Plesk does not need improvement at the moment, as they are always working on improvements and every new feature is great. They implement features and work on customer feedback, so Plesk is excellent.
I have no additional feedback about the features; I believe I have covered everything. There are no improvements needed for Plesk that I have not mentioned yet; nothing comes to mind.
To improve Plesk, one frustration I experienced was when it raised prices without informing individual users, which put me in a difficult position when needing to communicate these changes to my clients. Plesk should communicate updates to all users, not just hosting providers, which would be beneficial. Another improvement could be making the UI more modern, as it still feels somewhat outdated and possibly confusing to clients who need to find options without asking for help. As for needed improvements, implementing SSL is currently a huge task, so simplifying the process into clear, sequential steps would make my life easier, especially for those who do not have extensive information about it.
The system can get a bit cluttered if there are too many integrations set up at once. Training and adoption could use some improvement, especially online videos on how to use certain features would be beneficial.
Plesk could be improved by making the UI a little more friendly.
When a subscription is cancelled, the license should not continue regardless of the server state. If continued access is needed, users should purchase a monthly or alternative option directly via Plesk or another provider.