AWS CodeBuild Reviews

AWS CodeBuild offers flexible pricing without the necessity for dedicated infrastructure, charging only for computing resources during builds. While initial expenses might occur, strategies such as caching and artifact usage help reduce costs. The service is considered affordable, especially for those seeking scalability, with fees based on compute time rather than a flat rate. Some organizations mention cost concerns for new users unfamiliar with optimizing expenses, but many find value in the pricing model compared to other solutions.

• "AWS CodeBuild is free. We only pay for our code's compute resources during the build process. For example, if our code takes ten minutes to build, we only pay for those ten minutes of computing time. CodeDeploy and CodePipeline are free because they're serverless and don't require computing resources. CodeCommit has minimal costs for storing code."
• "Despite the cost, it is worth the investment."
• "We pay a monthly licensing fee."

Organizations use AWS CodeBuild primarily for continuous integration and building pipelines. They integrate CodeBuild with CodePipeline for CI/CD processes, involving Docker images and application binaries. Utilizing CodeBuild with GitHub and CodeCommit, they automate builds and deployments for microservices, websites, and containerized applications. Employing CodeBuild with Amazon EKS, Elastic Kubernetes Service, and relational databases, they effectively transition applications through cloud automation and environment configuration. CodeBuild manages repository integration and automates task execution in varied IT environments.

AWS CodeBuild customer service and support are generally well-regarded. Users appreciate the prompt responsiveness and effectiveness of AWS support teams, rating them eight or nine out of ten. Enterprise-level users report high satisfaction, citing excellent issue resolution. Comparisons to Azure highlight AWS's faster response times, especially in higher-tier subscriptions. Despite some users not directly contacting support, they still express confidence in its reliability and stability.

Users found AWS CodeBuild's initial setup to have a learning curve, better than Jenkins yet not as simple as some open-source tools. While the configuration required significant attention, especially initially, logging into an account and starting was straightforward. Some rated the setup highly for simplicity despite its length and complexity involving cluster updates. The process benefited from AWS knowledge, leveraging its full CICD suite including CodeCommit, CodeDeploy, and CodePipeline.

AWS CodeBuild exhibits strong scalability, dynamically adjusting capacity to fit demands. Users find its automatic scaling beneficial for handling multiple deployments and concurrent builds. However, some users note limitations in CPU allocation compared to alternatives. Generally, organizations experience flexibility, accommodating numerous simultaneous builds without storage concerns. Though scaling meets most requirements efficiently, there are concerns about potential cost implications for new users due to unexpected scalability features.

AWS CodeBuild is often considered highly stable, with many users rating its stability between eight to ten out of ten, citing minimal crashes. Occasional issues arise due to Java or processing speed, yet users appreciate its ability to avoid storage problems and downtimes. CodeBuild’s autoscaling efficiently manages load, ensuring performance in modern environments. Some users experience setup difficulties or intertwining issues, but the service remains stable after initial configuration.