AWS CodeBuild vs Tekton comparison

Amazon Web Services (AWS) and Google are both solutions in the Build Automation category. Amazon Web Services (AWS) is ranked #8 with an average rating of 8.2, while Google is ranked #2 with an average rating of 7.8. Amazon Web Services (AWS) holds a 1.5% mindshare in BA, compared to Google’s 11.5% mindshare. Additionally, 91% of Amazon Web Services (AWS) users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 89% of Google users who would recommend it.

AWS CodeBuild

Read 12 AWS CodeBuild reviews

548 Views
548 Comparison Views

91% willing to recommend

Tekton

Read 37 Tekton reviews

4,059 Views
4,059 Comparison Views

89% willing to recommend

AWS CodeBuild

Tekton

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Mar 5, 2025

Tekton and AWS CodeBuild compete in the CI/CD tools category, with Tekton having an edge for Kubernetes-centric environments due to its native Kubernetes integration, while AWS CodeBuild works best for those deeply invested in the AWS ecosystem.

Features: Tekton excels in Kubernetes environments, offering seamless integration, scalability, and customization for CI/CD processes. It provides strong support for executing tasks and allows for significant pipeline customization. AWS CodeBuild offers robust integration with other AWS services, supports various platforms and coding languages, and features a reliable, serverless setup that simplifies resource allocation.

Room for Improvement: Tekton needs to enhance its flexibility and integration with non-native tools, improve user-friendly configurations, and refine its documentation. It heavily relies on Kubernetes expertise, which can be challenging for users without it. AWS CodeBuild could improve its customer notifications and interface, and address occasional deployment failures.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Tekton supports on-premises and hybrid cloud deployments, with notable Red Hat support but slower community assistance. AWS CodeBuild is fully cloud-based, offering straightforward integration within AWS but lacks on-premises depth. It largely depends on AWS's customer support lacking a community-driven approach like Tekton.

Pricing and ROI: Tekton is cost-effective due to its open-source nature, saving operational costs, especially for Kubernetes-invested companies. It's free to use with high resource efficiency. AWS CodeBuild, although competitive in AWS bundles, incurs costs for compute resources, with optimization strategies available for AWS-heavy users to improve ROI.

To learn more, read our detailed AWS CodeBuild vs. Tekton Report (Updated: July 2025).

Buyer's Guide

AWS CodeBuild vs. Tekton

July 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 865,295 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

AWS CodeBuild

Ranking in Build Automation

8th

Average Rating

8.2

Reviews Sentiment

6.3

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Tekton

Ranking in Build Automation

2nd

Average Rating

7.8

Reviews Sentiment

6.8

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of August 2025, in the Build Automation category, the mindshare of AWS CodeBuild is 1.5%, up from 1.5% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Tekton is 11.5%, up from 11.4% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Build Automation

Featured Reviews

Mahadev Metre

DevOps Engineer at Paydoh

Integration with diverse environments boosts productivity and automation

AWS CodeBuild's support for a wide range of programming languages and build environments benefits development teams significantly in terms of productivity and ease of use. There are extensive libraries of code structures available, making it a universal pipeline. All programming languages I have worked with are supported in AWS CodeBuild, eliminating the need for alternative deployment services. The service supports iOS builds, Kotlin, Java, NodeJS, and ReactJS. AWS has made it accessible to all languages, allowing developers to simply open the console and trigger builds. AWS manages all the background server operations for building or deploying code. For standard builds such as ReactJS or Java, a Linux or Ubuntu server suffices. AWS provides its own operating system for these purposes. For builds requiring physical servers, such as Apple macOS server, AWS rents Mac minis specifically for iOS and SwiftUI builds. While this incurs higher charges, it demonstrates AWS's commitment to providing comprehensive solutions for all use cases.

Read full review

Prasad Gupta

Software Engineer at IBM Software Labs

Efficient CI/CD management with significant cost reduction and a user-friendly setup

One area for improvement is the number of CRDs created during installation. Tekton currently creates 10 to 11CRDs, which can be overwhelming. Instead, it would be better to have just one CRD that can handle all the information and create other necessary components automatically. Additionally, more integration capabilities for security, such as DAST, SAST, and IAST, should be directly built into Tekton to facilitate easier implementation of security features.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"One of the main features I value in CodeBuild compared to previous experiences, like using Jenkins, is its ability to handle tasks automatically with AWS, requiring only proper setup of the check file."

"It works seamlessly with AWS Elastic Container Registry (ECR)."

"A valuable feature is the support for third-party repositories such as Bitbucket, GitLab, or GitHub."

"CodeBuild supports various platforms and coding."

"The most important thing is that it's self-contained in an AWS account, and it's all linked to the customer's AWS account."

"The tool is used to build and test code. I find its biggest advantages are elasticity and reliability. We can easily assign as many computing resources as needed to build our code, which is much simpler than traditional methods that require server upgrades. It's a serverless tool, so it's very flexible and elastic."

"The integration with other AWS services has streamlined our workflow."

"The initial setup of CodeBuild is easy."

More AWS CodeBuild pros

"You can isolate most Tekton assets in the Kubernetes namespace for your feature branch. This allows you to freely change Tekton assets and objects to adapt to your feature branch and requirements."

"Tekton is highly customizable, with Kubernetes, we can customize on our own and create custom builders."

"Its seamless integration with Kubernetes, being built on top of it and utilizing Custom Resource Definitions, ensures a smooth experience within Kubernetes environments exclusively."

"The 'promote' feature is beneficial as it simplifies deployment processes by allowing easy promotion of applications to different environments without needing to re-run CI/CD processes."

"The flexibility of Tekton is the most valuable feature"

"I would say the customization ability that Tekton provides is good."

"We can make a lot of customizations, and data sharing between tasks using workspaces is very convenient."

"I like the branching and visualization tools for the pipeline."

More Tekton pros

Cons

"While working on building images for multiple applications within a single script, I encountered an issue where looping functionality was not supported as expected."

"There have been times when CodeBuild has shown some instability, like bugs or breakdowns."

"The front-end interface and the management are somewhat challenging, and there's a lot of space for improvement."

"There is no persistent storage or preservation of workspace between the builds."

"The deployment fails sometimes."

"One of the main challenges is that if the environment is not set up properly, it will result in issues such as image errors."

"For improvement, I'd suggest more build instance-type options. There's a big jump from 15 gigabytes of RAM to 150, and I'd like something in between as the larger option is too expensive for our needs."

"They can further improve the integration of the Bitbucket for CodeBuild."

More AWS CodeBuild cons

"Improvement is needed in the documentation and the overall integration process."

"The product's scalability can be challenging when multiple users access it simultaneously."

"The tool should improve in terms of output flexibility. It runs on a specific Kubernetes machine, and the persistent memory storage is on a single partition. Improving this aspect could make analyzing logs and toolchain outputs from external tools easier."

"The stability issues can be there."

"The product's documentation is an area of concern, making it an area where improvements are required."

"It tends to occupy a significant amount of disk space on the node, which could potentially pose challenges."

"One area for improvement is the number of CRDs created during installation. Tekton currently creates 10 to 11 CRDs, which can be overwhelming."

"Tekton could improve by adding better documentation."

More Tekton cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"AWS CodeBuild is free. We only pay for our code's compute resources during the build process. For example, if our code takes ten minutes to build, we only pay for those ten minutes of computing time. CodeDeploy and CodePipeline are free because they're serverless and don't require computing resources. CodeCommit has minimal costs for storing code."

"Despite the cost, it is worth the investment."

"We pay a monthly licensing fee."

"The tool is open-source and free to use."

"The product is free of cost."

"Tekton is an open-source tool."

"The product is free and open-source."

"It is entirely open source and free of charge."

"The solution is open-source."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Build Automation solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

865,295 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Computer Software Company

16%

Media Company

11%

Financial Services Firm

10%

Manufacturing Company

10%

Financial Services Firm

21%

Manufacturing Company

13%

Computer Software Company

10%

Government

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about AWS CodeBuild?

It works seamlessly with AWS Elastic Container Registry (ECR).

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for AWS CodeBuild?

The cost structure is affordable for most builds except macOS servers. Standard builds can utilize AWS EC2 servers for background operations. However, macOS or iOS builds require physical servers m...

See all answers

What needs improvement with AWS CodeBuild?

The servers used for macOS and iOS builds are limited in availability, operating only in US East 1 and East 2, and US West 1 and West 2. This geographical limitation causes latency issues and exten...

See all answers

How does Tekton compare with Jenkins?

When you are evaluating tools for automating your own GitOps-based CI/CD workflow, it is important to keep your requirements and use cases in mind. Tekton deployment is complex and it is not very e...

See all answers

What do you like most about Tekton?

Its seamless integration with Kubernetes, being built on top of it and utilizing Custom Resource Definitions, ensures a smooth experience within Kubernetes environments exclusively.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Tekton?

I didn't get the intention of scalability. Scalability means based on the load, it will automatically gain resources and run. The question of pipeline scalability remains unclear. It's quite easy t...

See all answers

Comparisons

GitHub Actions vs AWS CodeBuild

Compared 37% of the time

AWS CodePipeline vs AWS CodeBuild

Compared 23% of the time

GitLab vs AWS CodeBuild

Compared 22% of the time

Jenkins vs AWS CodeBuild

Compared 18% of the time

More AWS CodeBuild Competitors

GitHub Actions vs Tekton

Compared 31% of the time

GitLab vs Tekton

Compared 25% of the time

Harness vs Tekton

Compared 8% of the time

Jenkins vs Tekton

Compared 7% of the time

CircleCI vs Tekton

Compared 6% of the time

More Tekton Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

AWS CodeBuild

August 2025

Download AWS CodeBuild product report

Buyer's Guide

Tekton

July 2025

Download Tekton product report

Also Known As

CodeBuild

No data available

Overview

AWS CodeBuild is a fully managed continuous integration service that compiles source code, runs tests, and produces software packages that are ready to deploy. With CodeBuild, you don’t need to provision, manage, and scale your own build servers. CodeBuild scales continuously and processes multiple builds concurrently, so your builds are not left waiting in a queue. You can get started quickly by using prepackaged build environments, or you can create custom build environments that use your own build tools. With CodeBuild, you are charged by the minute for the compute resources you use.

Amazon Web Services (AWS)

Tekton is a powerful yet flexible Kubernetes-native open-source framework for creating continuous integration and delivery (CI/CD) systems. It lets you build, test, and deploy across multiple cloud providers or on-premises systems by abstracting away the underlying implementation details.

Google

Sample Customers

Expedia, Intuit, Royal Dutch Shell, Brooks Brothers

The Home Depot, PayPal, Target, HSBC, McKesson, Oncology Venture

Buyer's Guide

AWS CodeBuild vs. Tekton

July 2025

Free Report: AWS CodeBuild vs. Tekton

Find out what your peers are saying about AWS CodeBuild vs. Tekton and other solutions. Updated: July 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

865,295 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our AWS CodeBuild vs. Tekton report.

See our list of best Build Automation vendors.

We monitor all Build Automation reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.