AWS CodeBuild vs Bamboo comparison

Amazon Web Services (AWS) and Atlassian are both solutions in the Build Automation category. Amazon Web Services (AWS) is ranked #9 with an average rating of 8.3, while Atlassian is ranked #11 with an average rating of 8.0. Amazon Web Services (AWS) holds a 2.4% mindshare in BA, compared to Atlassian’s 4.3% mindshare. Additionally, 92% of Amazon Web Services (AWS) users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 78% of Atlassian users who would recommend it.

AWS CodeBuild

Read 13 AWS CodeBuild reviews

941 Views
922 Comparison Views

92% willing to recommend

Bamboo

Read 23 Bamboo reviews

2,004 Views
1,884 Comparison Views

78% willing to recommend

AWS CodeBuild

Bamboo

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Mar 5, 2025

Bamboo and AWS CodeBuild are leading tools in the CI/CD pipeline category. AWS CodeBuild seems to have the upper hand due to its serverless architecture and strong cloud-native integrations.

Features: Bamboo offers seamless integration with Atlassian products like Jira and Bitbucket, provides a flexible setup for diverse build environments, and includes a robust suite of plugins. AWS CodeBuild integrates deeply with AWS services, supports serverless architecture, and manages multiple CI/CD pipelines with automatic scaling.

Room for Improvement: Bamboo faces challenges with plugin compatibility, a steep learning curve, and cumbersome manual configurations. AWS CodeBuild needs enhancements in its user interface and has occasional deployment failures. Both require better logging, notifications, and integration with external platforms.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Bamboo supports on-premises and hybrid cloud deployments but requires infrastructure management, while AWS CodeBuild focuses on public cloud solutions and eliminates infrastructure concerns. Bamboo's community support is comprehensive, and AWS CodeBuild offers prompt technical assistance within the AWS ecosystem.

Pricing and ROI: Bamboo uses a pricing model based on remote agent usage, which can challenge scalability. AWS CodeBuild charges only for used compute resources, offering potential savings and scalability benefits. Both provide good ROI, yet AWS CodeBuild's serverless and pay-as-you-go model facilitates better cost management.

To learn more, read our detailed AWS CodeBuild vs. Bamboo Report (Updated: March 2026).

Buyer's Guide

AWS CodeBuild vs. Bamboo

March 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 884,873 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

AWS CodeBuild

Ranking in Build Automation

9th

Average Rating

8.2

Reviews Sentiment

6.4

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Bamboo

Ranking in Build Automation

11th

Average Rating

7.4

Reviews Sentiment

6.3

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of March 2026, in the Build Automation category, the mindshare of AWS CodeBuild is 2.4%, up from 1.2% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Bamboo is 4.3%, down from 7.8% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Build Automation Mindshare Distribution
Product	Mindshare (%)
AWS CodeBuild	2.4%
Bamboo	4.3%
Other	93.3%

Build Automation

Featured Reviews

SomdipRoy

Solution Architect at Skillnetinc

Has enabled automated deployments through continuous integration and supports multi-environment delivery

My recommendation for AWS CodeBuild to make it better for the next release would be something within AWS CodeBuild which can support the repository functions as well. It may not be as powerful as GitHub Actions, but it provides a very competitive price compared to GitHub Actions. GitHub Actions, if you want to use the YML CI/CD pipeline, gives a free tier of around three thousand hours per month. AWS CodeBuild is a little more expensive than that. However, if it supports the repository function as well along with it, then it will be a complete package. Everything would be in AWS, including the code versioning, code commit to the code infrastructure, to the code database, to the networking, and how the applications are accessed. Everything would be in one place, which would be very helpful. I believe AWS CodeBuild is a bit expensive because GitHub provides around three thousand minutes free, plus it has the free repository function as well. At the enterprise level, it charges maybe around nineteen dollars per user, though I do not remember exactly. In terms of AWS CodeBuild, I believe it is a bit expensive because it is providing only the deployment features. It is not providing the repository. In that comparison, I would say it is a little bit expensive.

Read full review

Christo Louw

Director at a computer software company with 11-50 employees

Automation has streamlined build and deployment workflows and provides clear project reporting

Regarding improvements for Bamboo, I can't think of anything right now. Bamboo is serving the purpose that we needed it for. I would say pipelines for model building could be an area of focus. However, I can't really comment on that because I haven't looked at Bamboo to assist with machine learning pipelines. If they haven't focused on building MLOps pipelines, that's definitely an area where they could assist businesses. I haven't looked at what Bamboo offers for MLOps, so it's possible that they've already built in features. Machine learning and AI are in big demand at the moment. If they haven't focused too much on MLOps, that's probably where they can improve.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"AWS CodeBuild's support for a wide range of programming languages and build environments benefits development teams significantly in terms of productivity and ease of use."

"The tool is used to build and test code. I find its biggest advantages are elasticity and reliability. We can easily assign as many computing resources as needed to build our code, which is much simpler than traditional methods that require server upgrades. It's a serverless tool, so it's very flexible and elastic."

"CodeBuild supports various platforms and coding."

"The integration is a good feature."

"The most important thing is that it's self-contained in an AWS account, and it's all linked to the customer's AWS account."

"One of the main features I value in CodeBuild compared to previous experiences, like using Jenkins, is its ability to handle tasks automatically with AWS, requiring only proper setup of the check file."

"A valuable feature is the support for third-party repositories such as Bitbucket, GitLab, or GitHub."

"AWS CodeBuild's support for popular languages and tools has enhanced my productivity; it supports the three most popular stacks that are in the world: the Python stack, the Node.js stack or framework, and the Java framework, along with other technology stacks such as Ruby on Rails."

More AWS CodeBuild pros

"One of the big things that made us choose Bamboo, is it seamlessly integrates its APIs into NetSuite, which is our main ELP system."

"The most useful feature of Bamboo is its integration with other solutions such as Jira and BitBucket, also offered by Atlassian. It is easier to use tools all provided by one vendor."

"In my experience Bamboo is scalable."

"One of the significant benefits of Bamboo is its built-in support for numerous clients and the ability to tailor its capabilities to your specific requirements. This high level of customization enables you to create pipelines that are ideally suited to your needs, making it an invaluable tool for conducting advanced testing."

"The tool is useful for continuous deployment."

"The most valuable features are compiling and deployment."

"The most valuable feature of Bamboo is that it is a good tool for CI/CD integration."

"It's one of the best solutions in this line of work. We have many Atlassian products. We use Bamboo, JIRA, Service Desk, and some other Atlassian plugins. We like that it's easy to integrate into each other. It's a suite of services."

More Bamboo pros

Cons

"Notifications could be added, or SNS integration could be included so that notifications can be received on every build, whether the build fails or succeeds."

"There have been times when CodeBuild has shown some instability, like bugs or breakdowns."

"The front-end interface and the management are somewhat challenging, and there's a lot of space for improvement."

"We had integration issues with a tool called Octopus Deploy while using CodeBuild. AWS support helped us resolve it, however, it could be better."

"While working on building images for multiple applications within a single script, I encountered an issue where looping functionality was not supported as expected."

"One of the main challenges is that if the environment is not set up properly, it will result in issues such as image errors."

"There is no persistent storage or preservation of workspace between the builds."

"I believe AWS CodeBuild is a bit expensive because GitHub provides around three thousand minutes free, plus it has the free repository function as well."

More AWS CodeBuild cons

"Bamboo could improve by having compatibility with GitLab. It would be better to have this platform for deploying code and storing container registries. Bamboo does not have a container registry. Additionally, there could be more features added."

"From my personal experience regarding scalability and the ability to scale, I find that sometimes the agents run out of resources and then it takes quite a while to get additional infrastructure."

"The tool is not capable of using YAML efficiently."

"One area that could be enhanced is the governance process, particularly with regard to building approvals and transitions between stages. In comparison to other solutions, such as Jira, which features a workflow that supports approval processes, this capability is not natively available in Bamboo. To implement this functionality, integration with other solutions, such as GSM may be necessary. Although some add-ons, such as Adaptavist ScriptRunner, are available in the market to circumvent this limitation, they may not offer the exact functionality needed. Therefore, there is certainly room for improvement in this area."

"Bamboo’s technical support services, in terms of speed of response, need improvement."

"Bamboo can improve by providing more with scripting, such as they have with Jenkins. Bamboo is more UI-driven at this time, Jenkins is going in that direction too."

"It would be great if Bamboo could introduce a more containerized deployment model."

"Scalability depends on the use case. If it is really a big customer with a lot of tests, it might not be a scalable option for them."

More Bamboo cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"We pay a monthly licensing fee."

"Despite the cost, it is worth the investment."

"AWS CodeBuild is free. We only pay for our code's compute resources during the build process. For example, if our code takes ten minutes to build, we only pay for those ten minutes of computing time. CodeDeploy and CodePipeline are free because they're serverless and don't require computing resources. CodeCommit has minimal costs for storing code."

"There is a subscription required to use Bamboo."

"I rate the product’s pricing a five out of ten."

"If Bamboo could provide more flexibility on pricing, that would help. On the agent side, if you want to increase the number of agents it should be less expensive. If they can provide some better pricing model, it will help, whether we are going to use it or are already using it."

"I rate the solution's pricing a three out of five."

"The server products for small teams used to offer excellent pricing. However, Atlassian has since changed the offering and the pricing is more expensive. I do still think the solution offers good value for money."

"The price of Bamboo is reasonable."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Build Automation solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

884,873 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Comparison Review

it_user217035

Senior iOS Developer at a media company with 5,001-10,000 employees

May 27, 2015

Bamboo vs. Jenkins

A biased and subjective comparison of Bamboo and Jenkins as CI servers for mobile development, based on practical experience with both. Continuous Integration and Continuous Deployment (Delivery, Distribution) has been around for quite a while. But surprisingly enough on a global scale it pretty…

Read full review

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Manufacturing Company

11%

Computer Software Company

11%

Media Company

11%

Financial Services Firm

11%

Financial Services Firm

16%

Manufacturing Company

13%

Government

Computer Software Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	6
Midsize Enterprise	5
Large Enterprise	2

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	8
Midsize Enterprise	6
Large Enterprise	9

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about AWS CodeBuild?

It works seamlessly with AWS Elastic Container Registry (ECR).

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for AWS CodeBuild?

The cost structure is affordable for most builds except macOS servers. Standard builds can utilize AWS EC2 servers for background operations. However, macOS or iOS builds require physical servers m...

See all answers

What needs improvement with AWS CodeBuild?

See all answers

What do you like most about Bamboo?

Bamboo's integration with the rest of Atlassian's tech tools, like Jira, helps manage the end-to-end development and release process.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Bamboo?

I rate the solution's pricing a three out of five.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Bamboo?

See all answers

Comparisons

AWS CodePipeline vs AWS CodeBuild

Compared 12% of the time

GitHub Actions vs AWS CodeBuild

Compared 11% of the time

GitLab vs AWS CodeBuild

Compared 10% of the time

IBM Rational Build Forge vs AWS CodeBuild

Compared 9% of the time

Harness vs AWS CodeBuild

Compared 8% of the time

More AWS CodeBuild Competitors

GitLab vs Bamboo

Compared 11% of the time

GitHub Actions vs Bamboo

Compared 10% of the time

Jenkins vs Bamboo

Compared 9% of the time

Tekton vs Bamboo

Compared 7% of the time

JRebel vs Bamboo

Compared 4% of the time

More Bamboo Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

AWS CodeBuild

March 2026

Download AWS CodeBuild product report

Buyer's Guide

Bamboo

March 2026

Download Bamboo product report

Also Known As

CodeBuild

No data available

Overview

AWS CodeBuild is a fully managed continuous integration service that compiles source code, runs tests, and produces software packages that are ready to deploy. With CodeBuild, you don’t need to provision, manage, and scale your own build servers. CodeBuild scales continuously and processes multiple builds concurrently, so your builds are not left waiting in a queue. You can get started quickly by using prepackaged build environments, or you can create custom build environments that use your own build tools. With CodeBuild, you are charged by the minute for the compute resources you use.

Amazon Web Services (AWS)

Bamboo is a continuous integration and delivery tool that ties automated builds, tests and releases together in a single workflow. It works great alongside JIRA and Stash providing a fully traceable deployment pipeline.

Atlassian

Sample Customers

Expedia, Intuit, Royal Dutch Shell, Brooks Brothers

Neocleus, MuleSoft, Interspire

Buyer's Guide

AWS CodeBuild vs. Bamboo

March 2026

Free Report: AWS CodeBuild vs. Bamboo

Find out what your peers are saying about AWS CodeBuild vs. Bamboo and other solutions. Updated: March 2026.

DOWNLOAD NOW

884,873 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our AWS CodeBuild vs. Bamboo report.

See our list of best Build Automation vendors.

We monitor all Build Automation reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.