AWS CodeBuild vs Bamboo comparison

Why PeerSpot?

Amazon Web Services (AWS) and Atlassian are both solutions in the Build Automation category. Amazon Web Services (AWS) is ranked #10 with an average rating of 7.7, while Atlassian is ranked #13 with an average rating of 8.0. Amazon Web Services (AWS) holds a 2.3% mindshare in BA, compared to Atlassian’s 4.4% mindshare. Additionally, 92% of Amazon Web Services (AWS) users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 78% of Atlassian users who would recommend it.

AWS CodeBuild

Read 13 AWS CodeBuild reviews

2,677 Views
2,650 Comparison Views

92% willing to recommend

Bamboo

Read 23 Bamboo reviews

4,199 Views
4,031 Comparison Views

78% willing to recommend

AWS CodeBuild

Bamboo

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Mar 5, 2025

Bamboo and AWS CodeBuild are leading tools in the CI/CD pipeline category. AWS CodeBuild seems to have the upper hand due to its serverless architecture and strong cloud-native integrations.

Features: Bamboo offers seamless integration with Atlassian products like Jira and Bitbucket, provides a flexible setup for diverse build environments, and includes a robust suite of plugins. AWS CodeBuild integrates deeply with AWS services, supports serverless architecture, and manages multiple CI/CD pipelines with automatic scaling.

Room for Improvement: Bamboo faces challenges with plugin compatibility, a steep learning curve, and cumbersome manual configurations. AWS CodeBuild needs enhancements in its user interface and has occasional deployment failures. Both require better logging, notifications, and integration with external platforms.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Bamboo supports on-premises and hybrid cloud deployments but requires infrastructure management, while AWS CodeBuild focuses on public cloud solutions and eliminates infrastructure concerns. Bamboo's community support is comprehensive, and AWS CodeBuild offers prompt technical assistance within the AWS ecosystem.

Pricing and ROI: Bamboo uses a pricing model based on remote agent usage, which can challenge scalability. AWS CodeBuild charges only for used compute resources, offering potential savings and scalability benefits. Both provide good ROI, yet AWS CodeBuild's serverless and pay-as-you-go model facilitates better cost management.

To learn more, read our detailed AWS CodeBuild vs. Bamboo Report (Updated: November 2026).

Buyer's Guide

AWS CodeBuild vs. Bamboo

November 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 920,769 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

AWS CodeBuild

Ranking in Build Automation

10th

Average Rating

8.2

Reviews Sentiment

6.4

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Bamboo

Ranking in Build Automation

13th

Average Rating

7.4

Reviews Sentiment

6.3

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of November 2026, in the Build Automation category, the mindshare of AWS CodeBuild is 2.3%, up from 1.8% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Bamboo is 4.4%, down from 4.6% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Build Automation Mindshare Distribution
Product	Mindshare (%)
AWS CodeBuild	2.3%
Bamboo	4.4%
Other	93.3%

Build Automation

Featured Reviews

SomdipRoy

Solution Architect at Skillnetinc

Has enabled automated deployments through continuous integration and supports multi-environment delivery

My recommendation for AWS CodeBuild to make it better for the next release would be something within AWS CodeBuild which can support the repository functions as well. It may not be as powerful as GitHub Actions, but it provides a very competitive price compared to GitHub Actions. GitHub Actions, if you want to use the YML CI/CD pipeline, gives a free tier of around three thousand hours per month. AWS CodeBuild is a little more expensive than that. However, if it supports the repository function as well along with it, then it will be a complete package. Everything would be in AWS, including the code versioning, code commit to the code infrastructure, to the code database, to the networking, and how the applications are accessed. Everything would be in one place, which would be very helpful. I believe AWS CodeBuild is a bit expensive because GitHub provides around three thousand minutes free, plus it has the free repository function as well. At the enterprise level, it charges maybe around nineteen dollars per user, though I do not remember exactly. In terms of AWS CodeBuild, I believe it is a bit expensive because it is providing only the deployment features. It is not providing the repository. In that comparison, I would say it is a little bit expensive.

Read full review

Christo Louw

Director at a computer software company with 11-50 employees

Automation has streamlined build and deployment workflows and provides clear project reporting

Regarding improvements for Bamboo, I can't think of anything right now. Bamboo is serving the purpose that we needed it for. I would say pipelines for model building could be an area of focus. However, I can't really comment on that because I haven't looked at Bamboo to assist with machine learning pipelines. If they haven't focused on building MLOps pipelines, that's definitely an area where they could assist businesses. I haven't looked at what Bamboo offers for MLOps, so it's possible that they've already built in features. Machine learning and AI are in big demand at the moment. If they haven't focused too much on MLOps, that's probably where they can improve.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The solution provides good integrations."

"The tool is used to build and test code. I find its biggest advantages are elasticity and reliability. We can easily assign as many computing resources as needed to build our code, which is much simpler than traditional methods that require server upgrades. It's a serverless tool, so it's very flexible and elastic."

"CodeBuild supports various platforms and coding, which offers an advantage."

"The integration is a good feature."

"The initial setup of CodeBuild is easy."

"A valuable feature is the support for third-party repositories such as Bitbucket, GitLab, or GitHub."

"Scalability is a great feature with AWS CodeBuild, because after deploying applications the service automatically scales up and down according to our AWS needs using load balancing, which makes managing applications much easier without significant interruptions."

"One of the main features I value in CodeBuild compared to previous experiences, like using Jenkins, is its ability to handle tasks automatically with AWS, requiring only proper setup of the check file."

More AWS CodeBuild pros

"The deployment mechanism was neat, and I liked how it allowed you deploy the same release to multiple environments."

"We use Bamboo to automate all our test builds and deployments. It integrates with tools like the ReportPortal to help us check and evaluate processes. When we initiate commands, it automatically checks for scaling issues or failures related to new code. Based on these evaluations, it provides reports in the ReportPortal, helping us decide whether to implement changes."

"We had done some research and found the Microsoft Azure DevOps VSTS was not competent enough to support Core Java lambda functions, so we picked up Atlassian Bamboo and we are happy with it."

"One of the big things that made us choose Bamboo is it seamlessly integrates its APIs into NetSuite, which is our main ELP system, and the fact that it's integrated within Oracle products and can manage statutory people in our organization, with features and functionality that are all huge selling points."

"It's one of the best solutions in this line of work; we have many Atlassian products, including Bamboo, JIRA, Service Desk, and other Atlassian plugins, and we like that it's easy to integrate them with each other as a suite of services."

"Ability to interface easily with other Atlassian applications."

"The most valuable feature of Bamboo is that it is a good tool for CI/CD integration."

"In Bamboo, build and deployment have been segregated. The build plan and deployment plan are different. When comparing Bamboo to other solutions, the native feature you will not find in another tool, such as Jenkins. They have segregated the build and deployment plan. This means, building the application and deploying it are two separate parts in Bamboo, they have segregated it apart from the UI. This makes the tool a bit better compared to other tools."

More Bamboo pros

Cons

"There is no persistent storage or preservation of workspace between the builds."

"Multiple clients have faced issues with pricing. After migrating from Azure to EC2, they were unexpectedly charged 100,000 rupees because the pricing details were not clearly visible."

"The servers used for macOS and iOS builds are limited in availability, operating only in US East 1 and East 2, and US West 1 and West 2. This geographical limitation causes latency issues and extended build times for regions such as India, impacting production efficiency."

"The front-end interface and the management are somewhat challenging, and there's a lot of space for improvement."

"We had integration issues with a tool called Octopus Deploy while using CodeBuild. AWS support helped us resolve it, however, it could be better."

"The deployment fails sometimes."

"While working on building images for multiple applications within a single script, I encountered an issue where looping functionality was not supported as expected."

"There have been times when CodeBuild has shown some instability, like bugs or breakdowns."

More AWS CodeBuild cons

"The performance around the deployment feature could be improved."

"From my personal experience regarding scalability and the ability to scale, I find that sometimes the agents run out of resources and then it takes quite a while to get additional infrastructure."

"Bamboo is a bit complicated to use compared to other solutions, such as GitLab. You have to integrate different actions that are difficult that could be made easier."

"We are lacking proper support for branched builds using multiple source repositories."

"It's a little outdated. It's three years old."

"Integrating workflows with other platforms can be challenging. The capabilities of these platforms sometimes fall short compared to others. Initially, it was difficult for us because the plugins were very limited."

"The tool is not capable of using YAML efficiently."

"Yes, it needs to allow multiple plans to run on an agent at the same time; dedicating one whole agent is not fair, and in terms of buying and maintaining more infrastructure, it is not scalable either."

More Bamboo cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"AWS CodeBuild is free. We only pay for our code's compute resources during the build process. For example, if our code takes ten minutes to build, we only pay for those ten minutes of computing time. CodeDeploy and CodePipeline are free because they're serverless and don't require computing resources. CodeCommit has minimal costs for storing code."

"Despite the cost, it is worth the investment."

"We pay a monthly licensing fee."

"The server products for small teams used to offer excellent pricing. However, Atlassian has since changed the offering and the pricing is more expensive. I do still think the solution offers good value for money."

"If Bamboo could provide more flexibility on pricing, that would help. On the agent side, if you want to increase the number of agents it should be less expensive. If they can provide some better pricing model, it will help, whether we are going to use it or are already using it."

"There is a subscription required to use Bamboo."

"The price of Bamboo is reasonable."

"I rate the product’s pricing a five out of ten."

"I rate the solution's pricing a three out of five."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Build Automation solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

920,769 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Manufacturing Company

14%

Outsourcing Company

12%

Financial Services Firm

Comms Service Provider

Financial Services Firm

15%

Government

11%

Comms Service Provider

Manufacturing Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	7
Midsize Enterprise	4
Large Enterprise	2

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	8
Midsize Enterprise	6
Large Enterprise	10

Questions from the Community

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for AWS CodeBuild?

The cost structure is affordable for most builds except macOS servers. Standard builds can utilize AWS EC2 servers for background operations. However, macOS or iOS builds require physical servers m...

See all answers

What needs improvement with AWS CodeBuild?

See all answers

What is your primary use case for AWS CodeBuild?

My use of AWS CodeBuild is focused on the CI/CD part, which stands for continuous integration and continuous deployment. Basically, we write the code and then commit it into a repository, which cou...

See all answers

What needs improvement with Bamboo?

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Bamboo?

My current use case for Bamboo is not as active as it once was. The team that I worked for still uses it, but I don't work on it as much anymore. Basically, Bamboo is used for CI/CD pipelines to bu...

See all answers

What advice do you have for others considering Bamboo?

The term multi-stage building plans in Bamboo doesn't really ring a bell for me. I just use the standard features. I would rate my overall experience with Bamboo an eight out of ten.

See all answers

Comparisons

AWS CodePipeline vs AWS CodeBuild

Compared 11% of the time

GitLab vs AWS CodeBuild

Compared 11% of the time

Jenkins vs AWS CodeBuild

Compared 10% of the time

GitHub Actions vs AWS CodeBuild

Compared 8% of the time

IBM Rational Build Forge vs AWS CodeBuild

Compared 5% of the time

More AWS CodeBuild Competitors

Jenkins vs Bamboo

Compared 14% of the time

GitHub Actions vs Bamboo

Compared 8% of the time

GoCD vs Bamboo

Compared 7% of the time

Harness vs Bamboo

Compared 6% of the time

More Bamboo Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

AWS CodeBuild

October 2026

Download AWS CodeBuild product report

Buyer's Guide

Bamboo

October 2026

Download Bamboo product report

Also Known As

CodeBuild

No data available

Overview

AWS CodeBuild provides automated build services with seamless AWS service integrations and third-party tools, supporting multiple programming languages. It features serverless architecture, facilitating flexible and efficient workflows.

AWS CodeBuild enables automation of builds through webhooks and integrates smoothly with platforms like GitLab and Jenkins. Its architecture allows multiple concurrent builds, enhancing productivity and speed. With features like CloudWatch logging and IAM permissions, users can easily manage security and debugging processes. Challenges such as limited integrations, geographic efficiencies, and pricing transparency are areas for growth. Notably used for building microservice applications and CI/CD pipelines, it integrates well with GitHub, GitLab, CodeCommit, and CodeDeploy, managing permissions with IAM policies for secure operations.

What are the key features of AWS CodeBuild?

Elastic Serverless Architecture: Increases flexibility and workflow efficiency.
CloudWatch Logging: Simplifies debugging and security management.
CI/CD Integration: Streamlines processes with platforms like GitLab and Jenkins.
Support for Multiple Languages: Offers broad programming language support.

What benefits should users look for in AWS CodeBuild reviews?

Improved Build Speed: Multiple concurrent build requests enhance productivity.
Security Management: Simplified through IAM permissions and integrations.
Flexibility and Efficiency: Serverless architecture supports diverse workflows.
CI/CD Streamlining: Reduces setup efforts with automated workflows.

In various industries, AWS CodeBuild is leveraged for developing microservices, utilizing its capability to manage CI/CD pipelines effectively. Teams often employ it for generating Docker images, automating the deployment process to services such as EKS and ECS, and harnessing platform extensions for comprehensive integrations.

Amazon Web Services (AWS)

Bamboo offers seamless integration with Atlassian apps and Oracle products, along with flexible customization and automation in CI/CD pipelines. Its intuitive interface and support for build and deployment segregation enhance functionality, while managing complex multi-environment deployments efficiently.

Bamboo is renowned for its flexibility in managing CI/CD pipelines that automate development, testing, and deployment processes. It supports extensive customization through multi-build agents and custom pipelines, integrating effectively with Bitbucket, Jira, and a wide marketplace of connectors. Despite a limited REST API and certain integration challenges, Bamboo remains effective for complex deployments. Users seek better YAML capabilities, branched builds support, and improved training to mitigate its learning curve. Enhancing approval workflows and adding GitLab compatibility could further refine its usability.

What are Bamboo's most valuable features?

Seamless Integration: Works well with Atlassian apps, Oracle products, and third-party tools like Bitbucket and Jira.
Customizable Pipelines: Supports custom pipelines tailored to user needs, enhancing automation and flexibility.
Build and Deployment Segregation: Allows for clear separation, improving overall process management.
Marketplace Connectors: Offers extensive connectors for efficient workflows.
Multi-Environment Management: Handles complex deployments across different environments effectively.

What benefits and ROI can users expect?

Increased Efficiency: Automation in CI/CD pipelines saves time and resources.
Scalability: Supports management of multiple applications, enhancing scalability.
Integration Capability: Effective integration with Bitbucket for smoother deployments.
Enhanced Flexibility: Customization allows adaptation to unique workflows.
Reduced Complexity: Manages complex environments, reducing manual intervention.

Organizations implement Bamboo to automate tasks like data replication, backup, and recovery, benefiting from seamless integration in development workflows. In industries focusing on scalability, Kubernetes training alongside Bamboo usage enhances deployment efficiency, making it a vital tool for managing multi-environment applications.

Atlassian

Sample Customers

Expedia, Intuit, Royal Dutch Shell, Brooks Brothers

Neocleus, MuleSoft, Interspire

Buyer's Guide

AWS CodeBuild vs. Bamboo

November 2026

Free Report: AWS CodeBuild vs. Bamboo

Find out what your peers are saying about AWS CodeBuild vs. Bamboo and other solutions. Updated: November 2026.

DOWNLOAD NOW

920,769 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our AWS CodeBuild vs. Bamboo report.

See our list of best Build Automation vendors.

We monitor all Build Automation reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.