AWS CodeBuild vs Bamboo comparison

Why PeerSpot?

Amazon Web Services (AWS) and Atlassian are both solutions in the Build Automation category. Amazon Web Services (AWS) is ranked #12 with an average rating of 8.0, while Atlassian is ranked #14 with an average rating of 8.0. Amazon Web Services (AWS) holds a 2.3% mindshare in BA, compared to Atlassian’s 4.1% mindshare. Additionally, 92% of Amazon Web Services (AWS) users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 78% of Atlassian users who would recommend it.

AWS CodeBuild

Read 13 AWS CodeBuild reviews

2,293 Views
2,270 Comparison Views

92% willing to recommend

Bamboo

Read 23 Bamboo reviews

3,668 Views
3,485 Comparison Views

78% willing to recommend

AWS CodeBuild

Bamboo

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Mar 5, 2025

Bamboo and AWS CodeBuild are leading tools in the CI/CD pipeline category. AWS CodeBuild seems to have the upper hand due to its serverless architecture and strong cloud-native integrations.

Features: Bamboo offers seamless integration with Atlassian products like Jira and Bitbucket, provides a flexible setup for diverse build environments, and includes a robust suite of plugins. AWS CodeBuild integrates deeply with AWS services, supports serverless architecture, and manages multiple CI/CD pipelines with automatic scaling.

Room for Improvement: Bamboo faces challenges with plugin compatibility, a steep learning curve, and cumbersome manual configurations. AWS CodeBuild needs enhancements in its user interface and has occasional deployment failures. Both require better logging, notifications, and integration with external platforms.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Bamboo supports on-premises and hybrid cloud deployments but requires infrastructure management, while AWS CodeBuild focuses on public cloud solutions and eliminates infrastructure concerns. Bamboo's community support is comprehensive, and AWS CodeBuild offers prompt technical assistance within the AWS ecosystem.

Pricing and ROI: Bamboo uses a pricing model based on remote agent usage, which can challenge scalability. AWS CodeBuild charges only for used compute resources, offering potential savings and scalability benefits. Both provide good ROI, yet AWS CodeBuild's serverless and pay-as-you-go model facilitates better cost management.

To learn more, read our detailed AWS CodeBuild vs. Bamboo Report (Updated: September 2026).

Buyer's Guide

AWS CodeBuild vs. Bamboo

September 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 913,806 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

AWS CodeBuild

Ranking in Build Automation

12th

Average Rating

8.2

Reviews Sentiment

6.4

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Bamboo

Ranking in Build Automation

14th

Average Rating

7.4

Reviews Sentiment

6.3

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of September 2026, in the Build Automation category, the mindshare of AWS CodeBuild is 2.3%, up from 1.7% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Bamboo is 4.1%, down from 5.3% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Build Automation Mindshare Distribution
Product	Mindshare (%)
AWS CodeBuild	2.3%
Bamboo	4.1%
Other	93.6%

Build Automation

Featured Reviews

SomdipRoy

Solution Architect at Skillnetinc

Has enabled automated deployments through continuous integration and supports multi-environment delivery

My recommendation for AWS CodeBuild to make it better for the next release would be something within AWS CodeBuild which can support the repository functions as well. It may not be as powerful as GitHub Actions, but it provides a very competitive price compared to GitHub Actions. GitHub Actions, if you want to use the YML CI/CD pipeline, gives a free tier of around three thousand hours per month. AWS CodeBuild is a little more expensive than that. However, if it supports the repository function as well along with it, then it will be a complete package. Everything would be in AWS, including the code versioning, code commit to the code infrastructure, to the code database, to the networking, and how the applications are accessed. Everything would be in one place, which would be very helpful. I believe AWS CodeBuild is a bit expensive because GitHub provides around three thousand minutes free, plus it has the free repository function as well. At the enterprise level, it charges maybe around nineteen dollars per user, though I do not remember exactly. In terms of AWS CodeBuild, I believe it is a bit expensive because it is providing only the deployment features. It is not providing the repository. In that comparison, I would say it is a little bit expensive.

Read full review

Christo Louw

Director at a computer software company with 11-50 employees

Automation has streamlined build and deployment workflows and provides clear project reporting

Regarding improvements for Bamboo, I can't think of anything right now. Bamboo is serving the purpose that we needed it for. I would say pipelines for model building could be an area of focus. However, I can't really comment on that because I haven't looked at Bamboo to assist with machine learning pipelines. If they haven't focused on building MLOps pipelines, that's definitely an area where they could assist businesses. I haven't looked at what Bamboo offers for MLOps, so it's possible that they've already built in features. Machine learning and AI are in big demand at the moment. If they haven't focused too much on MLOps, that's probably where they can improve.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The integration with other AWS services has streamlined our workflow."

"Scalability is a great feature with AWS CodeBuild, because after deploying applications the service automatically scales up and down according to our AWS needs using load balancing, which makes managing applications much easier without significant interruptions."

"AWS CodeBuild reduces wait time and optimizes workflows."

"AWS CodeBuild's support for a wide range of programming languages and build environments benefits development teams significantly in terms of productivity and ease of use."

"One of the main features I value in CodeBuild compared to previous experiences, like using Jenkins, is its ability to handle tasks automatically with AWS, requiring only proper setup of the check file."

"It works seamlessly with AWS Elastic Container Registry (ECR)."

"AWS CodeBuild's support for popular languages and tools has enhanced my productivity; it supports the three most popular stacks that are in the world: the Python stack, the Node.js stack or framework, and the Java framework, along with other technology stacks such as Ruby on Rails."

"The tool is used to build and test code. I find its biggest advantages are elasticity and reliability. We can easily assign as many computing resources as needed to build our code, which is much simpler than traditional methods that require server upgrades. It's a serverless tool, so it's very flexible and elastic."

More AWS CodeBuild pros

"We had done some research and found the Microsoft Azure DevOps VSTS was not competent enough to support Core Java lambda functions, so we picked up Atlassian Bamboo and we are happy with it."

"In Bamboo, build and deployment have been segregated. The build plan and deployment plan are different. When comparing Bamboo to other solutions, the native feature you will not find in another tool, such as Jenkins. They have segregated the build and deployment plan. This means, building the application and deploying it are two separate parts in Bamboo, they have segregated it apart from the UI. This makes the tool a bit better compared to other tools."

"The main benefits Bamboo provides for me and my team are the automation to pick up code changes and automate the deployments, building images."

"Thanks to Bamboo we are able to build changes made by development quite quickly and allow them to deploy to our internal environments when needed (as well as automated during the night)."

"Bamboo has proven its value for the teams."

"The platform helps us with automated and timely backup. It provides data replication as well."

"Ability to interface easily with other Atlassian applications."

"In my experience Bamboo is scalable."

More Bamboo pros

Cons

"There have been times when CodeBuild has shown some instability, like bugs or breakdowns."

"One of the main challenges is that if the environment is not set up properly, it will result in issues such as image errors."

"Notifications could be added, or SNS integration could be included so that notifications can be received on every build, whether the build fails or succeeds."

"The front-end interface and the management are somewhat challenging, and there's a lot of space for improvement."

"For improvement, I'd suggest more build instance-type options. There's a big jump from 15 gigabytes of RAM to 150, and I'd like something in between as the larger option is too expensive for our needs."

"We had integration issues with a tool called Octopus Deploy while using CodeBuild. AWS support helped us resolve it, however, it could be better."

"While working on building images for multiple applications within a single script, I encountered an issue where looping functionality was not supported as expected."

"The servers used for macOS and iOS builds are limited in availability, operating only in US East 1 and East 2, and US West 1 and West 2. This geographical limitation causes latency issues and extended build times for regions such as India, impacting production efficiency."

More AWS CodeBuild cons

"Bamboo could improve by having compatibility with GitLab. It would be better to have this platform for deploying code and storing container registries. Bamboo does not have a container registry. Additionally, there could be more features added."

"While the community may grow over time, please ensure your current/future processes are not hindered by Bamboo's faults."

"The marketing strategy of Bamboo is an area of concern where improvements are needed."

"We are lacking proper support for branched builds using multiple source repositories."

"The solution needs to support more customization in the training. What's offered is pretty generic. They need better training and should offer more guidance."

"The REST API for our deployment project is still very basic and lacks the ability to provide a decent amount of custom automation."

"It's a little outdated. It's three years old."

"Yes, it needs to allow multiple plans to run on an agent at the same time; dedicating one whole agent is not fair, and in terms of buying and maintaining more infrastructure, it is not scalable either."

More Bamboo cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"We pay a monthly licensing fee."

"Despite the cost, it is worth the investment."

"AWS CodeBuild is free. We only pay for our code's compute resources during the build process. For example, if our code takes ten minutes to build, we only pay for those ten minutes of computing time. CodeDeploy and CodePipeline are free because they're serverless and don't require computing resources. CodeCommit has minimal costs for storing code."

"The price of Bamboo is reasonable."

"If Bamboo could provide more flexibility on pricing, that would help. On the agent side, if you want to increase the number of agents it should be less expensive. If they can provide some better pricing model, it will help, whether we are going to use it or are already using it."

"There is a subscription required to use Bamboo."

"I rate the solution's pricing a three out of five."

"The server products for small teams used to offer excellent pricing. However, Atlassian has since changed the offering and the pricing is more expensive. I do still think the solution offers good value for money."

"I rate the product’s pricing a five out of ten."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Build Automation solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

913,806 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Manufacturing Company

12%

Outsourcing Company

12%

Financial Services Firm

Comms Service Provider

Financial Services Firm

16%

Government

11%

Comms Service Provider

Manufacturing Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	7
Midsize Enterprise	4
Large Enterprise	2

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	8
Midsize Enterprise	6
Large Enterprise	10

Questions from the Community

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for AWS CodeBuild?

The cost structure is affordable for most builds except macOS servers. Standard builds can utilize AWS EC2 servers for background operations. However, macOS or iOS builds require physical servers m...

See all answers

What needs improvement with AWS CodeBuild?

See all answers

What is your primary use case for AWS CodeBuild?

My use of AWS CodeBuild is focused on the CI/CD part, which stands for continuous integration and continuous deployment. Basically, we write the code and then commit it into a repository, which cou...

See all answers

What needs improvement with Bamboo?

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Bamboo?

My current use case for Bamboo is not as active as it once was. The team that I worked for still uses it, but I don't work on it as much anymore. Basically, Bamboo is used for CI/CD pipelines to bu...

See all answers

What advice do you have for others considering Bamboo?

The term multi-stage building plans in Bamboo doesn't really ring a bell for me. I just use the standard features. I would rate my overall experience with Bamboo an eight out of ten.

See all answers

Comparisons

AWS CodePipeline vs AWS CodeBuild

Compared 11% of the time

GitLab vs AWS CodeBuild

Compared 11% of the time

Jenkins vs AWS CodeBuild

Compared 10% of the time

GitHub Actions vs AWS CodeBuild

Compared 8% of the time

IBM Rational Build Forge vs AWS CodeBuild

Compared 6% of the time

More AWS CodeBuild Competitors

Jenkins vs Bamboo

Compared 13% of the time

GitHub Actions vs Bamboo

Compared 9% of the time

GoCD vs Bamboo

Compared 7% of the time

Harness vs Bamboo

Compared 6% of the time

More Bamboo Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

AWS CodeBuild

September 2026

Download AWS CodeBuild product report

Buyer's Guide

Bamboo

September 2026

Download Bamboo product report

Also Known As

CodeBuild

No data available

Overview

AWS CodeBuild provides automated build services with seamless AWS service integrations and third-party tools, supporting multiple programming languages. It features serverless architecture, facilitating flexible and efficient workflows.

AWS CodeBuild enables automation of builds through webhooks and integrates smoothly with platforms like GitLab and Jenkins. Its architecture allows multiple concurrent builds, enhancing productivity and speed. With features like CloudWatch logging and IAM permissions, users can easily manage security and debugging processes. Challenges such as limited integrations, geographic efficiencies, and pricing transparency are areas for growth. Notably used for building microservice applications and CI/CD pipelines, it integrates well with GitHub, GitLab, CodeCommit, and CodeDeploy, managing permissions with IAM policies for secure operations.

What are the key features of AWS CodeBuild?

Elastic Serverless Architecture: Increases flexibility and workflow efficiency.
CloudWatch Logging: Simplifies debugging and security management.
CI/CD Integration: Streamlines processes with platforms like GitLab and Jenkins.
Support for Multiple Languages: Offers broad programming language support.

What benefits should users look for in AWS CodeBuild reviews?

Improved Build Speed: Multiple concurrent build requests enhance productivity.
Security Management: Simplified through IAM permissions and integrations.
Flexibility and Efficiency: Serverless architecture supports diverse workflows.
CI/CD Streamlining: Reduces setup efforts with automated workflows.

In various industries, AWS CodeBuild is leveraged for developing microservices, utilizing its capability to manage CI/CD pipelines effectively. Teams often employ it for generating Docker images, automating the deployment process to services such as EKS and ECS, and harnessing platform extensions for comprehensive integrations.

Amazon Web Services (AWS)

Bamboo offers seamless integration with Atlassian apps and Oracle products, along with flexible customization and automation in CI/CD pipelines. Its intuitive interface and support for build and deployment segregation enhance functionality, while managing complex multi-environment deployments efficiently.

Bamboo is renowned for its flexibility in managing CI/CD pipelines that automate development, testing, and deployment processes. It supports extensive customization through multi-build agents and custom pipelines, integrating effectively with Bitbucket, Jira, and a wide marketplace of connectors. Despite a limited REST API and certain integration challenges, Bamboo remains effective for complex deployments. Users seek better YAML capabilities, branched builds support, and improved training to mitigate its learning curve. Enhancing approval workflows and adding GitLab compatibility could further refine its usability.

What are Bamboo's most valuable features?

Seamless Integration: Works well with Atlassian apps, Oracle products, and third-party tools like Bitbucket and Jira.
Customizable Pipelines: Supports custom pipelines tailored to user needs, enhancing automation and flexibility.
Build and Deployment Segregation: Allows for clear separation, improving overall process management.
Marketplace Connectors: Offers extensive connectors for efficient workflows.
Multi-Environment Management: Handles complex deployments across different environments effectively.

What benefits and ROI can users expect?

Increased Efficiency: Automation in CI/CD pipelines saves time and resources.
Scalability: Supports management of multiple applications, enhancing scalability.
Integration Capability: Effective integration with Bitbucket for smoother deployments.
Enhanced Flexibility: Customization allows adaptation to unique workflows.
Reduced Complexity: Manages complex environments, reducing manual intervention.

Organizations implement Bamboo to automate tasks like data replication, backup, and recovery, benefiting from seamless integration in development workflows. In industries focusing on scalability, Kubernetes training alongside Bamboo usage enhances deployment efficiency, making it a vital tool for managing multi-environment applications.

Atlassian

Sample Customers

Expedia, Intuit, Royal Dutch Shell, Brooks Brothers

Neocleus, MuleSoft, Interspire

Buyer's Guide

AWS CodeBuild vs. Bamboo

September 2026

Free Report: AWS CodeBuild vs. Bamboo

Find out what your peers are saying about AWS CodeBuild vs. Bamboo and other solutions. Updated: September 2026.

DOWNLOAD NOW

913,806 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our AWS CodeBuild vs. Bamboo report.

See our list of best Build Automation vendors.

We monitor all Build Automation reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.