Bamboo and AWS CodePipeline are prominent contenders in the CI/CD tools category, competing on features, deployment ease, and integration. AWS CodePipeline holds an upper hand due to its robust integration within AWS services and scalable solutions.
Features: Bamboo integrates seamlessly with Atlassian products like Jira and Bitbucket, providing high customization in setup and build configurations. It supports multiple build agents, offering flexibility in deployment without complex templates. AWS CodePipeline excels in its integration within the AWS ecosystem, offering easy environment transitions and scalability. It also supports robust CI/CD processes with seamless AWS service integrations.
Room for Improvement: Bamboo users seek improved ease of use with added third-party plugin support and better deployment customization. There are limitations in version control and the integration of older plugins. AWS CodePipeline could enhance documentation, support for multi-cloud environments, and expand built-in functionalities for evidence collection and SMS notifications. Setup time and customization options also require improvement.
Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Bamboo is primarily deployed in on-premises and hybrid cloud environments, providing flexibility for internal infrastructure management. Support is generally well-regarded, though security support needs enhancement. AWS CodePipeline functions mainly in the public cloud, ideal for users favoring cloud-native solutions. Its users rely more on community and managed AWS services, with less direct interaction with traditional support.
Pricing and ROI: Bamboo's costs depend on agent usage and infrastructure, which can become expensive with higher deployment volumes. AWS CodePipeline offers a pay-as-you-go model, presenting flexibility and scalability. While AWS services may seem more costly compared to alternatives like Jenkins, the integration and scalability aspects offer substantial value.
AWS CodePipeline is good for scalability, and I rate it as nine out of ten.
If you need more agents, you just switch on more agents.
I rate the stability of AWS CodePipeline as a ten out of ten because I have not experienced any issues with it.
The documentation for AWS CodePipeline is lacking and makes it difficult to find information due to its complexity.
Machine learning and AI are in big demand at the moment.
I estimated it costs around $5 monthly.
It allows me to test changes in an isolated environment before deploying them to the entire user base.
The main benefits Bamboo provides for me and my team are the automation to pick up code changes and automate the deployments, building images.
| Product | Market Share (%) |
|---|---|
| AWS CodePipeline | 3.3% |
| Bamboo | 4.3% |
| Other | 92.4% |
| Company Size | Count |
|---|---|
| Small Business | 13 |
| Midsize Enterprise | 4 |
| Large Enterprise | 7 |
| Company Size | Count |
|---|---|
| Small Business | 8 |
| Midsize Enterprise | 6 |
| Large Enterprise | 9 |
AWS CodePipeline is a fully managed continuous delivery service that helps you automate your release pipelines for fast and reliable application and infrastructure updates. CodePipeline automates the build, test, and deploy phases of your release process every time there is a code change, based on the release model you define. This enables you to rapidly and reliably deliver features and updates. You can easily integrate AWS CodePipeline with third-party services such as GitHub or with your own custom plugin. With AWS CodePipeline, you only pay for what you use. There are no upfront fees or long-term commitments.
We monitor all Build Automation reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
