Axway Synchrony was previously known as Synchrony.
| Author info | Rating | Review Summary |
|---|---|---|
| Delivery Module Lead at a tech services company with 10,001+ employees | 3.0 | I've used Axway Synchrony Gateway for over five years. It's robust, flexible, and stable, offering centralized monitoring. While my version is unsupported, I recommend it for its features and good support, despite a potentially complex initial setup. |
| Director - Service Operations at a tech services company with 51-200 employees | 3.5 | I find this EDI solution easy to use, stable, and feature-rich, with good support. Setup was straightforward. However, after six years, I am exploring cheaper alternatives, as its cost is a concern. |
| Tactisch Middleware beheerder at a financial services firm with 1,001-5,000 employees | 3.5 | I've used XFB for secure file exchange for three years; it's stable. Logging could improve, but customer support is good. I recommend looking at this solution for B2B file exchange. |
It is robust and flexible on new flow configurations. It provides an API for advanced configuration.
It provides centralized monitoring and managing of organization application file transfers, which helps to reduce the time of monitoring of individual applications. It also helps us understand the file flow between applications and helps with troubleshooting issues.
Axway Synchrony Gateway 6.11.4 is no longer supported by the vendor. However, the latest Axway Gateway version has many features and functionalities.
I’ve used this for more than five years.
We had very little issue with stability. This occurs only once a year due to OS related issues.
We did not have scalability issues.
Vendor support of this application is really good if you have opted for that.
We did not have a previous solution.
It depends on how the organization wants to create the MFT setup. If they want a gateway server with a DMZ sever, then the setup will be complex. It will then involve a network, a firewall, the OS, SSH keys, etc.
I have no information about this.
We didn’t look at other alternatives. It was business user choice
I certainly recommended Axway Synchrony Gateway MFT since it is robust, flexible on new flow configuration, and has an API for advanced configuration.
It is easy to use and is a feature-rich application in the EDI space. This solution has a user-friendly interface.
There are cheaper alternatives available in the market.
I have used this solution for more than six years now.
We have not experienced a single problem in the last six years.
We use it for a very specific business process and we didn’t have any requirement to scale up.
The technical support is very good.
This was the first solution that we have used. Recently, we have been exploring other options, as there are cheaper alternatives available in the market.
The setup was very straightforward, and it required a little bit of training.
The pricing policy is good and comparable to the other products available in the market.
The most valuable features are XFB for its FTPS and SFTP. XIB is the more powerful tool, but it was only used in a simple way.
Provides B2B exchange of files.
The logging could be better in XFB.
I have used this for close to three years.
We haven’t had any problems. It is rather stable.
We did not scale, so I have no experience with it.
I would give technical support a rating of 8/10. When we needed a consultant, he came.
We didn’t have a previous solution.
I did not set up the software. I just configured the interfaces.
I don’t know. It’s not my cup of tea. I know nothing about pricing of the product.
I was not employed before they started using the product.
For sure have a look at it.
