No more typing reviews! Try our Samantha, our new voice AI agent.

Axway Synchrony vs IBM B2B Integrator comparison

 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive Summary

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Categories and Ranking

Axway Synchrony
Average Rating
6.6
Number of Reviews
3
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
IBM B2B Integrator
Average Rating
8.0
Reviews Sentiment
6.8
Number of Reviews
47
Ranking in other categories
Business-to-Business Middleware (1st)
 

Featured Reviews

it_user651522 - PeerSpot reviewer
Delivery Module Lead at a tech services company with 10,001+ employees
It provides an API for advanced configuration. Version 6.11.4 is no longer supported by the vendor.
It is robust and flexible on new flow configurations. It provides an API for advanced configuration It provides centralized monitoring and managing of organization application file transfers, which helps to reduce the time of monitoring of individual applications. It also helps us understand the…
reviewer2742345 - PeerSpot reviewer
General Manager Neverhack Spain at a tech vendor with 11-50 employees
Experience with robust integrator reveals strong performance and potential for interface updates
Based on my experience and my clients' feedback, there are a few points IBM can improve for IBM B2B Integrator. One of these is the graphical user interface. For several years, IBM has been promising to renew this interface, which has an ancient, old aesthetic, though it contains many functionalities. Creating a new interface would incur a very high internal cost with no new profitability for IBM. This is one of the points where customers say it feels like working in the 1990s with this interface. Another significant issue is that the platform is not multi-tenant. It's not possible to have different tenants in the cloud. This creates problems when trying to create SaaS offers based on IBM B2B Integrator, as there is the possibility that some workflow for a customer can be visible to another one. Since it's not multi-tenant, it's running on the same tenant of the platform. This is the main issue that the platform has.

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Pros

"The most valuable features are XFB for its FTPS and SFTP."
"It is easy to use and is a feature-rich application in the EDI space."
"It provides centralized monitoring and managing of organization application file transfers, which helps to reduce the time of monitoring of individual applications and helps us understand the file flow between applications and helps with troubleshooting issues."
"There are also different tabs where we can check the status of file transfers and business processes, and we can monitor adapters and services in the link."
"It is the best for the business."
"From the scalability standpoint, not having to do upgrades is a valuable feature."
"It has a lot more capabilities in terms of scalability and adaptability, so that we can use IBM Sterling B2B Integrator to scale to our growth, whereas the old platform we could not."
"This solution allows for easy integration with heterogeneous applications."
"They get better and better every time they have a new version."
"The product is easily transportable - it'll go to any platform."
"B2B Integrator is multi-platform, so it can be integrated with Windows, Unix, or whatever, and it can work with almost all programming languages. It can also transfer a lot of data in a short time. For instance, a system I recently implemented exchanges about 20 million files a day."
 

Cons

"The logging could be better in XFB."
"There are cheaper alternatives available in the market."
"Axway Synchrony Gateway 6.11.4 is no longer supported by the vendor."
"One of the top most features that is missing is the integration with the ASPERA FASP protocol for us, which is still missing on the B2B Integrator."
"With the most recent releases of this product, the installation and administration have become much more complex."
"Another significant issue is that the platform is not multi-tenant. It's not possible to have different tenants in the cloud."
"Visibility and reporting is lacking."
"The dashboard is not integrated and should be bundled by the product vendor."
"We often need to change property files for accounts, and I don't always have access to them. For core mapping, we need to install JDK"
"The user interface is outdated. B2B Integrator was developed in the United States in the nineties, and the graphical user interface hasn't improved since. It's tough because you have to program the software in XML. Nowadays, other methods are easier to work with."
"Technical support is the issue I have. I think IBM has to do much better in terms of product support."
 

Pricing and Cost Advice

Information not available
"We pay an annual fee based on the number of VPUs. It's fairly reasonable. We're in the middle of analyzing other products, and they're all pretty much in the same range."
"The product costs more than 40K."
"The pricing is based on how many cores are used and the type of cores."
"Licensing depends upon the package you opt for within the solution. The solution is a bit costly compared to the other integration tools in the market."
"The solution is priced at $20,000 to $30,000 per year with no extra costs."
"The price of IBM B2B Integrator is too high. However, IBM may be willing to give a discount if there are negotiations. If they see that there is a good opportunity for them they can provide a discount."
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Business-to-Business Middleware solutions are best for your needs.
908,800 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
No data available
Financial Services Firm
14%
Outsourcing Company
9%
Manufacturing Company
8%
Construction Company
8%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
No data available
By reviewers
Company SizeCount
Small Business9
Midsize Enterprise8
Large Enterprise32
 

Questions from the Community

Ask a question
Earn 20 points
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for IBM B2B Integrator?
Regarding pricing, IBM B2B Integrator rates in the middle range. This integrator has embedded all the functionality needed to handle files and messages. It tends to be very expensive because the IB...
What needs improvement with IBM B2B Integrator?
From the automation perspective, IBM B2B Integrator has its own powerful workflow, but compared to other applications such as MuleSoft or Boomi, they have many cloud connectors and multiple connect...
What is your primary use case for IBM B2B Integrator?
IBM B2B Integrator is majorly used in banks for managed file transfer, integrating with their external and internal applications for large files, especially huge files which need to be transferred,...
 

Also Known As

Synchrony
IBM Sterling B2B Integrator, Sterling Gentran Integration Suite
 

Overview

Information not available
 

Sample Customers

AIFE - Chorus, Soci_t_ Financire de Distribution (SFD) B2B, International Post Corporation, Union Nationale de Mutualit_s Socialistes, State of California, BHF-BANK, DHL, Clearstream MFT, CITIC Pacific Limited, Genzyme, AstraZeneca, Bollor_ Logistics, STET, MOgroep, Dartford Borough Council
Bonnie Plants, Toshiba Europe, Florida Hospital
Find out what your peers are saying about IBM, Informatica, Seeburger and others in Business-to-Business Middleware. Updated: July 2026.
908,800 professionals have used our research since 2012.