Couchbase Reviews

Couchbase facilitated cost reduction and accelerated market entry, eliminating the need for Redis and cutting expenses significantly. Users experienced increased throughput, with operational costs halved and the ability to support approximately five times more non-peak users during peak times. Couchbase maintained consistent efficiency, allowing users to avoid dealing with less effective alternatives.

Couchbase offers flexible licensing options, including monthly, quarterly, and annual payments. Enterprises find its pricing competitive, though often integrated costs arise, such as data integration with third-party solutions. While some view Couchbase as affordable, others consider it expensive compared to competitors. Costs typically range from 25,000 to 40,000 Euros annually, with enterprise plans sometimes being a five-figure sum per year. Integration costs may apply due to limited built-in solutions, necessitating external tools.

• "It can range between 25,000 to 40,000 Euros per year depending on company requirements."
• "The licensing cost of Couchbase is quite expensive compared to other databases."
• "I would rate this solution a nine out of ten for pricing as it is affordable."

The primary use case includes data storage, caching, logging, and synchronization across various industries such as healthcare, gaming, and telecommunications. Users utilize Couchbase for document-based storage, integration with Elasticsearch, managing metadata, querying with N1QL, and enabling cloud migrations. Its capabilities support high-volume transactions in e-commerce, real-time data management, and persistent caching across regions. Couchbase's flexibility allows adoption in applications needing efficient data handling and scalability.

Customer service and support of Couchbase receive mixed feedback with ratings from seven to ten out of ten for effectiveness and helpfulness. Some users praise the responsiveness and assistance with technical issues; others mention inconsistent communication and the need for better project-specific responses. Many prefer self-reliance due to documentation quality, while others occasionally highlight the need for improved post-upgrade processes and proactive support. Large organizations sometimes require more assertive actions to gain attention.

Couchbase's initial setup experiences range from complex to straightforward. Many find deploying it easy, particularly using Docker or Couchbase Capella. Complexity arises when drawing schemas or for engineers new to the implementation. Some describe setup as having a steep learning curve initially, but report stability issues without proper tuning. Installation takes varying times from a few minutes to months. Separate teams often handle cloud and on-premises installations for maintenance activities.

Couchbase exhibits scalable capabilities, benefitting multiple organizations. Users find adding nodes straightforward, handling substantial data sizes efficiently. However, the necessity to properly structure data and configure nodes for performance is evident. Some mention hardware limitations, while others appreciate the solution for enterprise expansion. Reports indicate varied satisfaction levels, with ratings ranging between seven to ten. The adaptability of Couchbase Capella's configurations is highlighted, showcasing its flexibility against different throughput requirements.

Couchbase is generally stable, with users noting reliable performance and minimal downtime. Stability varies based on deployment environment and expertise in managing indexes. Some rate its stability highly, while others mention bugs addressed in updates. Couchbase handles node failures well, redistributing data seamlessly. Users appreciate its consistent performance but highlight occasional compatibility challenges with certain technologies. Despite this, its ease of use and effective operation prompt recommendations, especially for those familiar with server setups.