Endevor provides automatic build processes, history logging, source code management, and integration for agile development. It focuses on lifecycle management, catering to code security and traceability with flexibility and scalability.
| Product | Mindshare (%) |
|---|---|
| Endevor | 13.7% |
| IBM Rational ClearCase | 11.2% |
| BMC AMI DevX | 10.6% |
| Other | 64.5% |
| Type | Title | Date | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Category | Software Configuration Management | May 7, 2026 | Download |
| Product | Reviews, tips, and advice from real users | May 7, 2026 | Download |
| Comparison | Endevor vs BMC AMI DevX | May 7, 2026 | Download |
| Comparison | Endevor vs Microsoft Azure DevOps Server | May 7, 2026 | Download |
| Comparison | Endevor vs IBM Engineering Workflow Management | May 7, 2026 | Download |
| Title | Rating | Mindshare | Recommending | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| BMC AMI DevX | 4.0 | 10.6% | 91% | 20 interviewsAdd to research |
| IBM Engineering Workflow Management | 3.4 | 10.0% | 66% | 18 interviewsAdd to research |
| Company Size | Count |
|---|---|
| Small Business | 4 |
| Midsize Enterprise | 4 |
| Large Enterprise | 31 |
| Company Size | Count |
|---|---|
| Small Business | 108 |
| Midsize Enterprise | 41 |
| Large Enterprise | 247 |
Endevor is designed for mainframe environments, offering features like version control, automated compilation, and code integrity. Its integration capabilities facilitate development transitions from development to production, ensuring auditing, security, and synchronization. The flexibility it provides accommodates changing technologies, supporting a wide range of application lifecycle processes. While it excels in many areas, some aspects, such as integration with open systems and the modernization of ISPF and Eclipse Plugin, require enhancements.
What are the key features of Endevor?Industries traditionally utilize Endevor for structured mainframe code management, ensuring consistency and reliability in software lifecycles. It's used to transition code through phases like development and QA, intensively managed to retain code stability and security, key for sectors reliant on large-scale legacy system operations.
Endevor was previously known as CA Endevor Software Change Manager, Endevor Software Change Manager, CA Software Change Manager for Mainframe, CA Endevor SCM.
| Author info | Rating | Review Summary |
|---|---|---|
| R&D Team Leader at First International Bank of Israel | 4.0 | We use Endevor to manage sales operations, appreciating its safe component management and mainframe-specific features. However, the outdated interface and complex customization are drawbacks. We're considering alternatives like BMC for a more updated solution. |
| Security Manager & CM Specialist & Mainframe Specialist en eSoft at eSoft 2006 | 5.0 | In my experience, Endevor effectively maintains code integrity and automates compilation, supports both mainframe and distributed environments, and integrates well with enterprise DevOps, although I would like to see AI-assisted coding enhancements in the future. |
| Head of Team Products and Communications Mainframe (MF) at a financial services firm with 10,001+ employees | 4.0 | I find Endevor valuable as a software controller, though it needs improvement in supporting parallel development. I haven't explored alternate solutions or different providers, so my focus remains on enhancing its capabilities for better performance in software control. |
| Technical Advisory Consultant at BT Financial Group | 2.5 | I value its secure source management, but find the setup complex and customer service poor. It lacks modern parallel development and Git integration, leading me to advise exploring alternatives. My rating is 5/10. |
| 0 at a tech services company with 10,001+ employees | 3.5 | I use Endevor as a source and program manager for managing mainframe code and data migrations. It's user-friendly, but the implementation process is complicated and restrictive, making it difficult to find files and necessitating a switch to MySQL. |
| CTO at a tech services company with 11-50 employees | 4.0 | We primarily use Endevor for management and version control on local storage. Its robustness in process management is valuable, though integration with open environments can improve. It provides excellent automation, versioning, security, and flexibility, delivering significant ROI. |
| IT analyst at a financial services firm with 5,001-10,000 employees | 4.5 | We use Endevor to manage our software for environment promotion. Its customization and ease of use are the most valuable features, though its scalability could improve. We haven't used other similar solutions and haven't deployed it with a cloud provider. |
| Sr. Consultant at a consultancy with 1-10 employees | 4.5 | I am using Endevor for application development, and I find the source integrity feature quite valuable. However, there is room for improvement in concurrent development, cost, and initial setup complexity. Despite these, I have seen a return on investment. |
