F5 BIG-IP Local Traffic Manager (LTM) specializes in load balancing, iRules, and application security. It provides flexibility and stability, supporting SSL offloading and enhancing application performance and reliability with low downtime.

| Product | Mindshare (%) |
|---|---|
| F5 BIG-IP Local Traffic Manager (LTM) | 13.0% |
| NetScaler | 12.1% |
| HAProxy | 8.9% |
| Other | 66.0% |
| Type | Title | Date | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Category | Application Delivery Controllers (ADC) | May 9, 2026 | Download |
| Product | Reviews, tips, and advice from real users | May 9, 2026 | Download |
| Comparison | F5 BIG-IP Local Traffic Manager (LTM) vs NetScaler | May 9, 2026 | Download |
| Comparison | F5 BIG-IP Local Traffic Manager (LTM) vs HAProxy | May 9, 2026 | Download |
| Comparison | F5 BIG-IP Local Traffic Manager (LTM) vs Radware Alteon | May 9, 2026 | Download |
| Title | Rating | Mindshare | Recommending | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| NetScaler | 4.2 | 12.1% | 91% | 107 interviewsAdd to research |
| Microsoft Azure Application Gateway | 3.7 | 5.2% | 80% | 50 interviewsAdd to research |
| Company Size | Count |
|---|---|
| Small Business | 39 |
| Midsize Enterprise | 21 |
| Large Enterprise | 45 |
| Company Size | Count |
|---|---|
| Small Business | 344 |
| Midsize Enterprise | 166 |
| Large Enterprise | 560 |
F5 BIG-IP LTM is designed for efficient traffic management and security. Its intuitive interface allows users to customize traffic through iRules and ensures stable application delivery. Its performance stability and ability to inspect TLS traffic, along with web application firewall features, make it preferred for consistent application delivery. While praised for its capabilities, users note its challenges with complex configuration and management. Calls for streamlined processes, training, support, better logging, and cloud integration highlight areas for improvement.
What are the key features of F5 BIG-IP LTM?F5 BIG-IP LTM is widely used in industries requiring robust application delivery and security, such as finance and healthcare. It supports load balancing and traffic management across different environments and acts as a reverse proxy, helping companies secure their infrastructure against cyber threats while facilitating high availability and scalability.
F5 BIG-IP Local Traffic Manager (LTM) was previously known as F5 BIG-IP, BIG-IP LTM, F5 ASM, Viprion, F5 BIG-IP Virtual Edition , Crescendo Networks Application Delivery Controller, BIG IP.
Riken, TransUnion, Tepco Systems Administration, Daejeon University, G&T Bank, Danamon, CyberAgent Inc.
| Author info | Rating | Review Summary |
|---|---|---|
| Network Engineer at Stryker | 5.0 | I use F5 BIG-IP LTM on-premises for HA load balancing with VIPs and pools across data centers and for SSL renewals. It’s stable, scalable, and the R-series improved performance and throughput. Support is good but case uploads/downloads could be faster; I rate it 10/10. |
| Project Manager at IBM | 4.5 | I've used F5 BIG-IP LTM for years to securely load balance applications across data centers, and it's been stable and effective, though pricey. Support could improve, but overall, I'm very satisfied with its performance and features. |
| Infrastructure Manager at Madfooat.com | 4.5 | I've used F5 BIG-IP LTM for 1.5 years and find its load balancing and WAF features excellent and stable, though the GUI feels outdated. Deployment was easy, and overall, it's a reliable on-premises solution I recommend. |
| IT Manager at Chong Hua Hospital | 4.0 | We use F5 BIG-IP Local Traffic Manager for managing traffic and securing data, benefiting from its ability to identify compromised traffic and enhance authentication. Although effective, it is costly, and we also use Fortinet alongside it without AI integration. |
| Information Security Consultant-Risk at a computer retailer with 11-50 employees | 4.5 | I used F5 BIG-IP LTM to segment and secure server traffic, appreciating its DOS, SQL injection, and bot protection. It improves efficiency with load-balancing algorithms, though customizable algorithms would enhance it. It outperformed Citrix and delivered excellent ROI. |
| General Manager at Seriti Resources | 4.5 | We deployed F5 BIG-IP LTM for two clients for load balancing. It's easy to deploy, stable, and offers unique features like templates for Office 365, though configuring takes time. Pricing could be more competitive compared to alternatives like Kemp. |
| Solutions Engineer at a tech services company with 1,001-5,000 employees | 5.0 | I use F5 BIG-IP LTM for server load balancing and SSL offloading, which enhances application uptime and security. Despite a dated UI, its customizable iRules and comprehensive features make it a leader in load balancing solutions. |
| Information Security Engineer at BigFish Enterprise Ltd. | 5.0 | I use F5 BIG-IP Local Traffic Manager (LTM) primarily for load balancing and find its DDoS and WAF features valuable. However, I believe pricing needs improvement and would like CDN capabilities. Its ease of installation and good UI make it preferable. |