Forcepoint CASB offers robust features for integrating with Forcepoint DLP, implementing adaptive security, and ensuring cloud application visibility. Its real-time monitoring and management simplicity are valued. Integration ease with macro and credential IDs, favorable pricing, and a straightforward setup are additional strengths.

| Product | Mindshare (%) |
|---|---|
| Forcepoint CASB | 1.4% |
| Prisma Access by Palo Alto Networks | 13.2% |
| Netskope | 13.2% |
| Other | 72.2% |
| Type | Title | Date | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Category | Cloud Access Security Brokers (CASB) | May 9, 2026 | Download |
| Product | Reviews, tips, and advice from real users | May 9, 2026 | Download |
| Comparison | Forcepoint CASB vs Prisma Access by Palo Alto Networks | May 9, 2026 | Download |
| Comparison | Forcepoint CASB vs Cisco Umbrella | May 9, 2026 | Download |
| Comparison | Forcepoint CASB vs Cisco Secure Access | May 9, 2026 | Download |
| Title | Rating | Mindshare | Recommending | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cisco Umbrella | 4.4 | 7.3% | 97% | 123 interviewsAdd to research |
| Prisma Access by Palo Alto Networks | 4.1 | 13.2% | 92% | 65 interviewsAdd to research |
The investment in Forcepoint CASB is currently yielding a positive return.
| Company Size | Count |
|---|---|
| Small Business | 6 |
| Midsize Enterprise | 2 |
| Large Enterprise | 2 |
| Company Size | Count |
|---|---|
| Small Business | 32 |
| Midsize Enterprise | 13 |
| Large Enterprise | 43 |
Forcepoint CASB supports data protection in cloud environments, empowering organizations to manage and monitor access seamlessly across devices and locations. It provides behavior analytics, advanced notifications, and geo-specific login detections. However, there are integration challenges and backend reliability concerns. Enhancements are needed in system integration and dashboard usability. Authentication options are limited, and there are complexities with multiple agents that affect ease of use.
What features make Forcepoint CASB effective?In industries relying on remote workforces, Forcepoint CASB integrates with tools like Secure Web Gateway to unify and secure access. It is instrumental in providing analytics for connection monitoring and notifications for proactive threat management. Its applications in telecommunications and finance sectors demonstrate the importance of protecting remote environments and controlling access efficiently.
Forcepoint CASB was previously known as Imperva Skyfence.
Zions Bank, GE Healthcare, HomeAway, Logitech, Universal, California National Resources Agency and many mor
| Author info | Rating | Review Summary |
|---|---|---|
| Director at LiveFromSpace Limited | 4.0 | Forcepoint CASB helps us secure cloud access for remote workers, offering strong behavior analytics and adaptive policies, though support could improve; it's moderately priced, stable, and essential for our compliance, especially when expertly configured. |
| System Engineer at a computer software company with 1,001-5,000 employees | 3.0 | I've offered Forcepoint CASB to clients for years; it works but lacks user-friendliness, cloud depth, and features compared to competitors like Zscaler. It’s stable but needs better integration, dashboards, and overall support to compete. |
| Technical Lead at a tech vendor with 10,001+ employees | 3.0 | I found Forcepoint CASB easy to manage, but it lacks complete public cloud visibility and had past network issues. Although support is generally good, it sometimes isn't responsible. I've previously used Zscaler and Netskope for web security. |
| Regional Solutions Manager (Sub-Sahara Africa) at Infodata | 4.5 | I appreciate its strong cloud application visibility, easy setup, and stability, offering good ROI. I'd prefer better on-prem custom app protection and for unsanctioned app discovery to return to the CASB. |
| Cyber Security Engineer at Paysafe / IBM | 1.5 | I used Forcepoint CASB for 1.5 years, finding its separate CASB and Secure Web Gateway caused latency. Remote workers needed an agent, and support was terrible. I've since migrated to Microsoft Cloud security and advise finding an alternative. |
| Lead at Infrastructure Solutions ALM | 5.0 | I use Forcepoint for endpoint security, valuing its macro integration and easy configuration. It's stable, scalable, and the setup was straightforward. Although I'd like more authentication options, I highly recommend this cost-effective solution. |
| Regional Solutions Manager at a tech services company with 11-50 employees | 4.0 | I use Forcepoint CASB to monitor geolocation-based logins and detect malware in cloud services. The Shadow IT Discovery feature helps identify unauthorized apps, though the tool needs better integration with Azure AD and consolidated agents for efficiency. |
| Professional Services Coordinator at a tech vendor with 11-50 employees | 2.0 | I use Forcepoint CASB to protect cloud data. While its DLP integration is valuable, the backend is buggy, installation is difficult, and support is inconsistent. I'd rate it 4/10 and prefer Netskope for its superior maturity and ease of use. |