Juniper QFabric Reviews

Name: Juniper QFabric
Brand: Juniper
Rating: 4.3 (10 reviews)

4.3 out of 5

10 reviews
100% willing to recommend

What is Juniper QFabric?

Juniper QFabric System is composed of multiple components working together as a single switch to provide high-performance, any-to-any connectivity and management simplicity in the data center. The QFabric System flattens the entire data center network to a single tier where all access points are equal, eliminating the effects of network locality and making it the ideal network foundation for cloud-ready, virtualized data centers.The highly scalable QFabric System improves application performance with low latency and converged services in a nonblocking, lossless architecture that supports Layer 2, Layer 3, and Fibre Channel over Ethernet (FCoE) capabilities.

Get the LAN Switching Buyer's Guide and find out what your peers are saying about Juniper QFabric, Cisco Nexus, HPE ProCurve and more!

Juniper QFabric is the #8 ranked solution in top LAN Switching solutions. PeerSpot users give Juniper QFabric an average rating of 8.6 out of 10. Juniper QFabric is most commonly compared to Cisco Nexus: Juniper QFabric vs Cisco Nexus.

Buyer's Guide

LAN Switching

August 2025

Get the category report

Helped 866,218 peers since 2012

Featured Juniper QFabric reviews

Suresh Pathipatti

Senior Information Technology Administrator at Aighospital

QFabric is the core switch. We also have two Brocade switches for the Fibre level The product works fine. It is an excellent product. There are different element systems and different options for each generation of the tool. We maintain the data center and analyze issues. I have no negative…

Read full review

OusaidAbaz

Security Network Architect at Inmac

QFabric simplified our data center network architecture by reducing configuration complexity compared to Cisco devices. It required fewer CLI commands, making configuration quicker and easier, especially for scalable deployments. QFabric improved scalability in our data center by simplifying the addition of new switches to existing configurations. The process was straightforward to manage. Implementing QFabric can affect overall IT infrastructure costs differently based on configuration needs. For small businesses with stable configurations, costs remain unchanged. However, for scalability and expansion, additional configuration and time may increase costs. My advice for those using Juniper is to ensure staff are well-trained and certified in Juniper technologies, such as JNCIA, JNCIS, JNCIP, or JNCIE. With these skills, you can effectively manage and troubleshoot Juniper solutions, minimizing potential issues and maximizing performance. Overall, I would rate Juniper QFabric as a seven out of ten.

Read full review

Anoop-Kumar

Video conferencing Admin at Akshara Enterprises India Pvt Ltd

It would be nice if Juniper provided the system integrator with training, similar to that of Cisco. This is very important. People the world over talk about Cisco. I worked for Juniper for approximately two-and-a-half years, from 2011 to 2013. If Juniper would follow the route of Cisco, I believe its market share would increase, as the switches are stable and scalability exists. Absent this, it faces a challenge when going up against such competitors as Cisco. Juniper's market system is driven down by the systems integrators and end users not having familiarity with the systems they use. As such, there is a need for more training documentation and integration with Cisco.

Read full review

Juniper QFabric mindshare

As of August 2025, the mindshare of Juniper QFabric in the LAN Switching category stands at 2.4%, up from 1.4% compared to the previous year, according to calculations based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

LAN Switching Market Share Distribution
Product	Market Share (%)
Juniper QFabric	2.4%
Cisco Catalyst Switches	27.7%
HPE ProCurve	12.8%
Other	57.1%

LAN Switching

Key learnings from peers

Valuable Features

Juniper QFabric offers high-performance features including a 40 gig backbone, scalable spine-leaf topology, and a 160 GB fabric backplane. Its straightforward CLI and excellent technical support stand out. Key elements include Genos OS, automation integration, and user familiarity with similar Juniper products. It's noted for agility, flexibility, and cost-effectiveness in vendor operations, excelling in stability and user-friendliness. Ideal for low latency, high-density, and scalable data center needs.

"The most valuable feature of QFabric for network performance is its stability."
"The vendor maintains the product well."
"QFabric supports redundancy and includes all of the enterprise and service provider features that customers would want in data center or service provider network."

Room for Improvement

Juniper QFabric faces challenges with virtualization of the fabric layer, complex configurations, and a confusing CLI for new users. Limited support for OpenFlow and stability issues are noted. The system requires more training documentation and integration, especially compared to Cisco. The upgrade process can be disruptive, and there's a need for a more budget-friendly pricing structure. Users experience difficulties with memory leakage. Lifecycle management and extending product support are cited as necessary improvements.

"Improvements could be made to QFabric's life cycle management, particularly in maintaining stable versions and extending product support."
"The stability needs to be improved."
"Having support for all OpenFlow versions would be beneficial."

Pricing

Juniper QFabric pricing is considered mid-range for a fabric solution, with licensing on a flexible three-year term. Costs include subscriptions, maintenance, and add-ons, catering primarily to large enterprises and ISPs. Though the solution offers superior performance and functionality, many acknowledge room for pricing improvement. Licensing is mandatory for specific features, but some configurations, like virtual chassis setup, require no extra license. It's noted for high licensing costs despite its enterprise-level benefits.

"The price is relatively high, but it offers an advantage over its competitors by providing better performance and functionality."
"The pricing is high and it is possible to find better pricing option solutions on the market, but the licensing model is quite flexible."
"The pricing is high."

Popular Use Cases

Juniper QFabric is used primarily for data center networking, facilitating efficient and reliable connections. It consolidates network infrastructure, reduces complexity, and provides seamless connectivity across racks for high-performance data transfer. QFabric is ideal for enterprise environments, including financial institutions, by offering core switching and routing capabilities. It helps organizations efficiently connect access points across sites and enhances troubleshooting by providing insights into the networking domain, ensuring redundancy and robust data center operations.

Service and Support

Many users find Juniper QFabric's support efficient, quick to escalate issues, and knowledgeable. They praise JTAC for responsiveness and expertise. However, some face delays, especially when expertise is unavailable, which frustrates them and impacts resolution times. While some appreciate local vendor support, others experience poor service, particularly from teams in Bangalore and San Francisco. Quality can decline with outsourced services, leading some to consider alternatives. Most users rate the support positively, but a few express dissatisfaction.

Deployment

Initial setup of Juniper QFabric varies. Some found it complex, requiring technical knowledge, especially for detailed architectures or dynamic protocols. For others, setup was easier with preconfigured options and specific configurations. Setup complexity often depended on familiarity with Cisco configurations. Previous issues with SFPs were resolved by 2014, improving consistency. Juniper's special setup feature and single-controller application were seen positively. Overall experiences were diverse, with technical expertise significantly impacting effort and ease of installation.

Scalability

Juniper QFabric is noted for its scalability, accommodating numerous nodes and offering flexibility for infrastructure expansion. Its capabilities are highly rated, supporting various architectures to meet diverse networking needs. Users appreciate its adaptability, managing significant user bases with expectations for future growth. While some suggest node improvements, updates have addressed this, enhancing scalability. It integrates well with enterprise environments, ensuring effective server and storage connectivity, and is considered reliable for different requirements.

Stability

Juniper QFabric exhibits commendable stability with some users rating it ten out of ten. Many attest to its reliability, highlighting effective contingency plans and redundancy. Some early tripping points were noted due to its pioneering fabric infrastructure; however, experiences have improved considerably. Some users still seek further enhancements in stability, rating it an eight. Generally, it is perceived as stable, with notable reliability in network infrastructure, earning praise for being trustworthy and dependable.

These insights are based on the in-depth reviews provided by peers to help you make a better buying decision.

Download our LAN Switching Buyer's Guide for additional reliable information.

Compare Juniper QFabric with alternative products

Learn more about Juniper QFabric

Juniper QFabric was previously known as QFabric.

Juniper QFabric customers

MCB Bank

Product Categories

LAN Switching

Popular Comparisons

Cisco Nexus vs Juniper QFabric

HPE ProCurve vs Juniper QFabric

Cisco FabricPath vs Juniper QFabric

See all alternatives

Juniper QFabric Reviews Summary
Author info	Rating	Review Summary
Senior Information Technology Administrator at Aighospital	4.0	I find Juniper QFabric to be an excellent core switch with a variety of options. It integrates well in our data center, but I think its stability could be improved. We're also evaluating tools from Palo Alto for future consideration.
Security Network Architect at Inmac	3.5	I use Juniper QFabric for efficiently connecting access points across sites with ease due to its stability and reliable performance. However, its lifecycle management needs improvement, as the product's rapid updates and complexity can be challenging compared to competitors like Cisco.
Cybersecurity specialist at a tech services company with 1,001-5,000 employees	4.5	I primarily use Juniper QFabric in data centers for efficient networking. Its Genos OS is valuable and easy to deploy, but it lacks a GUI and OpenFlow support, which are expected to improve. Overall, it enhances connectivity and reduces complexity.
Senior Manager at Systems Limited	5.0	I've found Juniper QFabric beneficial for its scalability, simplicity, performance, and flexibility, making troubleshooting easier. It excels in low latency and automation for data centers but could improve its pricing structure. Its Linux system expertise provides reliable support.
Manager, VoIP Architect Engineer at Telesystem	4.5	I find Juniper QFabric to be agile, flexible, and cost-effective across various vendors. However, it frequently requires rebooting, and I've noticed some memory leakage issues. Despite these drawbacks, no alternative solutions have been considered.
Video conferencing Admin at Akshara Enterprises India Pvt Ltd	4.0	No summary available
Managing Consultant at a computer software company with 51-200 employees	4.0	No summary available
Managing Consultant at a computer software company with 51-200 employees	4.0	No summary available

Juniper QFabric Reviews

What is Juniper QFabric?

Featured Juniper QFabric reviews

Juniper QFabric mindshare

Valuable Features

Room for Improvement

Pricing

Popular Use Cases

Service and Support

Deployment

Scalability

Stability

Compare Juniper QFabric with alternative products

Learn more about Juniper QFabric

Juniper QFabric customers

Related questions

Product Categories

Popular Comparisons