Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users
Runscope [EOL] Logo

Runscope [EOL] Reviews

Vendor: Broadcom
4.4 out of 5

What is Runscope [EOL]?

Featured Runscope [EOL] reviews

PeerResearch reports based on Runscope [EOL] reviews

TypeTitleDate
CategoryAPI Monitoring SoftwareMar 26, 2026Download
ProductReviews, tips, and advice from real usersMar 26, 2026Download
Suggested products
TitleRatingMindshareRecommending
Postman Enterprise4.136.3%95%65 interviewsAdd to research
AlertSite4.014.7%100%7 interviewsAdd to research
 
 
Key learnings from peers
Last updated Mar 26, 2026

Valuable Features

Room for Improvement

Pricing

Compare Runscope [EOL] with alternative products

Learn more about Runscope [EOL]

Runscope [EOL] customers

Related questions

Product Categories

Product Categories

Popular Comparisons

 
Runscope [EOL] Reviews Summary
Author infoRatingReview Summary
Director of Engineering at a consultancy with 1-10 employees4.0I use Runscope for production API monitoring, finding it stable, scalable, and easy to set up, appreciating its cloud-based JavaScript. However, I've faced occasional webpage refresh issues and find its built-in script editor basic, needing significant improvement.
Lead QA Engineer at a financial services firm with 51-200 employees4.5We use Runscope for scheduled API testing across environments, appreciating its organization and team collaboration over Postman. While setup was easy and support good, navigation for environment changes and integrating results could be improved.
QA Analyst at a tech services company with 51-200 employees4.0I use Runscope for testing, valuing its scripts for saving time and speeding up deployments. Setup was easy, and scalability is good, but documentation lacks examples, and I experienced a stability issue after a patch.
Director, QA5.0I use Runscope for API regression and monitoring, significantly improving our automated testing with its cloud-based environment. While I appreciate its ease of use, I still rely on Selenium for file uploads, which is a major missing feature for my needs.
Quality Analyst at a tech vendor with 10,001+ employees5.0I find this solution great for regression testing, catching issues quickly. Its intuitive UI and features like sub-tests and custom assertions are valuable. While I'd like specific scheduling times and API documentation, setup was easy and support fantastic.
DevOps Engineer at a tech company with 1-10 employees4.0I find this solution greatly improves issue responsiveness and testing feedback with strong API monitoring and integrations. Yet, I'm concerned by limited historical data, inflexible test pausing, and occasional outages, which impact our production environment.
Director of Engineering at a tech services company with 11-50 employees5.0We use it for API end-to-end testing, appreciating dynamic variable population and stability. However, sharing tests across environments is complex, the UI requires excessive clicking, and the initial setup was manual and repetitive.
QA Manager at a retailer4.0I find Runscope excellent for REST API automation, with environment variables saving my QA team significant time. Stability, support, and pricing are great. My only frustration is the manual default environment setting per test.