SoapUI is a leading tool for testing SOAP and REST web services, known for its robust functionality and user-friendly interface. It supports functional, automated, and load testing, and offers powerful scripting and automation. Organizations appreciate its efficiency, protocol flexibility, and integration capabilities.



| Product | Mindshare (%) |
|---|---|
| SoapUI | 2.0% |
| Tricentis Tosca | 19.2% |
| OpenText Functional Testing | 13.2% |
| Other | 65.6% |
Users report that the return on investment (ROI) from implementing SoapUI is generally positive. They highlight significant time savings in testing processes, which leads to decreased costs and faster project completion. Many have experienced improved efficiency and productivity in their testing workflows. Enhanced automation capabilities are frequently mentioned as a key benefit, allowing teams to focus on other critical tasks. Overall, SoapUI contributes to optimized resource usage and better project outcomes, translating into financial and operational gains for organizations.
Users have reported that SoapUI offers a variety of pricing options, including both free and paid versions, which makes it adaptable for different budgets. The initial setup is generally straightforward, though some users mentioned complexities when integrating with larger systems or additional plugins. Licensing is seen as flexible, with users appreciating that the free version provides substantial functionality, while the paid version offers more advanced features. Some users expressed that the cost for the advanced version is reasonable given the extensive capabilities it adds.
Based on user feedback, SoapUI's customer service and support have received mixed reactions. Some users find the support team to be helpful and responsive, addressing issues promptly and effectively. However, others have experienced delays and found the support lacking in depth and knowledge. Overall, the quality of assistance can vary, with some customers praising the experience while others suggest there is room for improvement.
Many users find SoapUI's scalability to be limited for large-scale projects. While it's effective for smaller tasks and initial testing phases, performance issues often arise when dealing with more extensive and complex testing scenarios. Some users report that as the volume of tests and data increases, the tool can become slow and less reliable. Additionally, there are mentions of SoapUI requiring more robust management and maintenance efforts for larger implementations.
Users have generally positive feedback about the stability of SoapUI. They mention that the software is reliable for their testing needs and performs consistently well. It effectively handles various testing scenarios without frequent crashes or errors. Occasionally, there are references to minor bugs or issues, but these do not seem to significantly impact the overall dependability of the solution.
| Author info | Rating | Review Summary |
|---|---|---|
| Senior at Ernst & Young | 4.0 | I've used SoapUI for five years for REST/SOAP API testing, appreciating its automation and test suites, saving 30% time. While stable, I desire a more modern UI and improved collaboration features, rating it 8.5/10. |
| Test Manager at Happiest Minds Technologies | 4.0 | I primarily use SoapUI for API testing, and its valuable features include API design, Property Transfer, and the Groovy plugin. It saves time and money, simplifies automation, and offers cohesive reporting compared to tools like Postman. |
| Senior associate at a financial services firm with 10,001+ employees | 4.5 | I use SoapUI primarily for API testing, and its ability to handle AWS security and mutual SSL authentication is valuable. However, it would benefit from a Chrome browser extension. Unlike Postman, SoapUI supports uploading visual files. |
| Application performance tester at a tech vendor with 11-50 employees | 4.0 | I use SoapUI for API testing due to its simplicity and intuitive interface, showing payloads and responses clearly. Although straightforward, it lacks advanced features compared to tools like Postman, which I find more robust for API testing needs. |