The primary use case of this solution is to migrate our customers into the cloud, integrating all of their applications.
In my previous organization, we moved some customers from on-premises to the cloud, and they are happy with the change.
The primary use case of this solution is to migrate our customers into the cloud, integrating all of their applications.
In my previous organization, we moved some customers from on-premises to the cloud, and they are happy with the change.
The most valuable feature is that it is simple. We don't use complex services for our small business customers.
When it was only Amazon AWS in the market, no one was concerned about the pricing. However, now that there are so many competitors, there is more comparison for cloud service providers. They should look into reducing the price of this solution to stay competitive. It would be a benefit.
The current trend is multi-cloud. They can launch the Oracle service in Azure, and we expect that this should be possible in Amazon AWS as well.
I would like to see better integration between Oracle and AWS.
I have been using Amazon AWS for two years.
Amazon AWS is stable and we have not faced any issues.
It's a scalable solution.
We have not used technical support. We provide that to our customers.
The initial setup is easy.
Deployment is not a problem for us because we have experience. For new people, they are a bit worried about new features, until they develop a routine.
The Oracle licensing is higher than it is with Amazon AWS.
The deployment varies, as some of our customers would like the hybrid cloud while others want a public cloud.
I have recommended this product to our customers and will continue to do so.
I would rate this solution an eight out of ten.
We are a solution provider and we use this solution to host applications for our customers. Their use cases are related to legal and advisory matters.
The most valuable features are load balancers, databases, and S3 buckets.
I have found some problems related to the database.
The price of this solution could be reduced to make it more competitive.
There are some limitations for certain applications that happen regionally and it is an issue for us. If we work with an application that is set up in New York, for example, then it has to be able to work in Pakistan.
I have been using Amazon AWS for between six and eight months.
We have not experienced any issues in terms of stability.
Scalability is not a problem. We are currently extending our use of Amazon AWS and have acquired a partnership with them. With this, we are creating a cloud department for which we will offer Amazon Web Services.
I did not have to call technical support.
Our deployment took between five and ten months.
I find that Amazon AWS is expensive.
I recently evaluated the Oracle Cloud Platform, and I find that Amazon is more expensive.
My advice to anybody who is researching AWS is to consider their budget. If the budget is available then it is a good choice, whereas, for those who want to spend less, I would suggest using Oracle instead.
I would rate this solution an eight out of ten.
Our primary use case is an end-to-end cloud solution and design.
As a service vendor, we have helped clients to achieve faster "go to market" on their products, and have provided highly flexible cost-effective system management solutions.
The most valuable features of this solution are Compute, Security, Database, Media, Management, and Governance.
This solution would be improved with the inclusion of hybrid Kubernetes management.
Our primary use case for this solution is commercial cloud computing, analytics, and storage.
We have seen an improvement in our infrastructure, as the code makes it very easy to deploy quickly to AWS.
The features that we have found most valuable are IAM, KMS, and Security Groups for customizable security. Cloud formation for well-defined blueprints is also useful.
An easier way to determine estimated costs quickly would be helpful.
I use this product for hosting business applications like SAP on the AWS infrastructure. We have some new customers in Egypt and out of Egypt. This solution is magnificent.
In our company, Amazon provides us with a lot of help like training for our staff. They always support us with any service or any solution. The security updates is perfect. and also supports for customers.
There are many benefits to AWS. For our customers, it optimizes their TCO. In terms of computing, they can scale up and out.
There's not specific things for improvement but that being said, they can improve the overall process and features of the product and to enhancement the stability.
It's stable enough. In terms of actual numbers, it's 99.99% stable.
Scalability is really perfect. I can make any scale anytime, whether I scale out or scale up.
Their technical support is really good. I am very satisfied.
Amazon is the leader in the public cloud categories, it has the largest market shares. I ask our customers why they're not using it.
I would rate this solution a 9.5 out of ten. It's the leader in the public cloud and a leader in the market.
I would recommend it to any customer using another solution. I would offer it as an alternative to another similar solution like IBM, Google and Azure.
Hands-on experience with more than five implementation projects, working on different projects that are related to cloud with different vendors. AWS features exist to make your life easier.
AWS provides full IaaS and PaaS for any company with a perfect price, with features that exist in this vendor I don't see in any other vendor.
All of these features I've used heavily provide the best solution for any client.
Regarding to my work i am dealing with different cloud vendor all the time, but i never switch one solution to another.
AWS pricing Reasonable & affordable by any business size, Small, Medium or large.
None
None
The primary use case is that we run all our IT on it. The performance has been okay so far.
With the pay-as-you-go model, we don't have to predict future IT needs. We can just scale up as we want. That helps with a lot of agility in deploying stuff in our IT infrastructure.
The AWS documentation is written in a way that is not very intuitive. That's an area they can improve.
Stability is really good. We have not had downtime so far.
Ours is a new company and we decided to go with AWS right from the beginning.
The most important criterion when selecting a vendor is their ability to help us get started as soon as we can. From the time we decide to deploy something to the time when the application is deployed, we look at which vendor will help us reduce that time.
The initial setup was straightforward.
I think the pricing becomes a problem as the IT organization grows. They need to give better pricing when companies grow.
We looked at all the cloud platforms. AWS had more breadth in the services they offered.
Look for what is required to deploy the apps in your particular organization. For example, if it's AI-driven then probably Google is a better cloud to go after. If there are a lot of Microsoft applications or if developers or the IT staff were trained in Microsoft software, then Microsoft Azure is a better fit.
I would rate AWS an eight out of 10 because it helps companies get started fast.
IaaS, PaaS, and a wide range of AWS services, including Aurora Postgre.
We use this for two solutions that we provide to our clients.
We are an ISV. AWS helped us to dramatically transform our business model into a cloud based subscription service.
RDS (Relational database service), specifically Aurora. It offers durability, high availability, fault tolerance, and a high TCO benefit.
The rate of new services and features released by AWS has dramatically accelerated. AWS should provide even more support and engagement to accelerate adoption.

Amazon Web Services is a very helpful platform because of its attractive interface that allows me to obtain and configure capacity information, with minimal friction, that perfectly suits our company. Moreover, it helps me to take complete control of my computer resources and helps to reduce the time required to obtain and to boot new servers, as well. Apart from this, it provides tools to be build-failure resilient applications and to isolate them from common failure scenarios, in a very efficient manner.