Amazon AWS Reviews

We are using this solution for internet applications.

I have found the trusted advisor tool works well, we are using it to get some insight into the security status and the processing of the applications. Additionally, the portal for management has clear well-written documentation.

I have been using the solution for two years.

We have not had any major issue with stability, it is quite stable.

The scalability is good.

The technical support can take longer than expected sometimes. They could improve on this.

The initial installation was easy.

We did the deployment ourselves.

The price of the solution is fair compared to competitors.

I would recommend this solution to others.

I rate Amazon AWS a seven out of ten.

We need to do the ticket exchange with external customers for the ITSM domain. There is an exchange of the service requests between our customer and our company.

It is enough for us in terms of features. We don't have too many transactions, and it is sufficient for our current needs.

Our API Management solution is integrated with Lambda, and last year, we had an issue while upgrading Lambda from version 8.0 to version 10. It seemed like Lambda runtime was changed by AWS, and there was a bug that caused the downtime.

The loading of the dashboard is slow. It could be because I am located in China.

I have been using this solution for about two years.

It is reliable. We had a downtime only once. The issue was not with the production environment. It was with the lower environment.

There are a lot of people who are using this solution in our organization. There are not many transactions between the customers and our internal system, and we don't have a high workload.

I had contacted them for another solution, and they got back just in a day.

It was easy for us.

It is subscription-based, and we are happy with its pricing.

I would recommend this solution to others. I would rate Amazon AWS an eight out of ten.

We used it for hosting our ERP and databases and the applications that we develop for working with our customers. We are using a lot of Amazon AWS services. It is a mixed environment, and we have a lot of components.

The capacity to grow dynamically based on our needs is most valuable. We can increase resources dynamically. It is also very reliable and fast to implement.

Their support can be improved. In some cases, their support is not as proficient as it can be. They should be quicker at getting back.

I have been using this solution for two years.

It is stable.

It is scalable. It is very easy to scale if you need more resources. We have around 150 users of this solution in our company.

They need to be faster.

It was very easy and fast.

I would rate Amazon AWS a nine out of ten.

It is very easy to set up. It is also easy to use. 

It has a lot of services and integrations. We've been able to integrate whatever we need until now.

Its subscription model or pricing model is too complex, which should be improved.

I have been using this solution for three years. 

It is stable. We have not seen any issues so far.

It is scalable.

We have interacted with them. They are good, and we've not had any issues with them.

It is very easy to set up.

Its pricing model is too complex.

I would advise others to do a test before going ahead and buying it. They should look at other cloud options as well. If you are going to use mostly Microsoft products, then go with Azure. For non-Microsoft products, go with AWS.

I would rate Amazon AWS an eight out of ten.

We use this solution for the EC2, and IAM Management, and Lambda. I am using this solution to gain more knowledge, to educate myself.

I like that is very easy to use and that it's flexible.

The price needs improvement.

I have been using this solution for one month.

We are using the latest version.

It's a stable solution.

It's a scalable product. I am the only user of this solution.

We plan to continue using this solution.

I am a beginner, I am satisfied with the support.

I did not use any other solution.

There is no installation, it's a cloud solution.

It's expensive.

It should be cheaper.

I would recommend this solution to others who are interested in using it.

I would rate Amazon AWS a nine out of ten.

We are using it for File Transfer Protocol (FTP) services. We are using it for file transfers from the US to India via FTP.

It is flexible. It is quite comfortable to use for organizations.

It just needs to be improved from the security perspective.

I have been using this solution for five years.

It is stable.

It is scalable. We have 200 to 300 users currently, and we might increase its usage.

We don't have any challenges with technical support. We are fine with it.

There isn't much installation. It is just about hosting things, which doesn't take that much time. It was quite easy configuration-wise and implementation-wise.

We did it ourselves.

We evaluated Azure and other products.

I would recommend this solution. I would rate Amazon AWS a ten out of ten.

We use Amazon AWS for cloud deployment of Automation Anywhere tool.

It should be more secure and have more integrations. 

I used Amazon AWS for about three months.

It is stable. For the cloud version, we require some installation platforms and we don't have a server with us right now. We require it from Amazon AWS. We can just plan and get the AWS server.

It's scalable.

We have one contact person for our organisation. Through him, we gave him our requirements, and he arranged all those things about AWS for our installation. We gave him the details of the quantity of RAM & hard disks, and our expectations.

It's perfect to use.

I use Amazon AWS in a Windows environment.

I like everything about AWS, especially the reporting.

I am happy with the dashboard.

I have trouble with the AWS command-line interface.

The security could be improved.

I have been using Amazon AWS for approximately three months.

AWS is a stable solution.

I have not tried to scale when using AWS.

The initial setup is easy.

The price is good and licensing fees are paid on a monthly basis.

I would rate this solution a ten out of ten.