Automic Continuous Delivery Director [EOL] pros and cons

Name: Automic Continuous Delivery Director [EOL]
Brand: Broadcom
Rating: 4.0 (5 reviews)

Vendor: Broadcom

4.0 out of 5

5 reviews
80% willing to recommend

Leave a review

Automic Continuous Delivery Director [EOL] Pros review quotes

Suzan Liu

Principal Engineer - IT Quality and Release at a transportation company with 10,001+ employees

Aug 29, 2018

Its ability to automate release deployments, streamline release scope, and reduce the cost of and time for deployment.

Read full review

AlmDevOp5991

ALM DevOps Senior Consultant at a tech services company with 51-200 employees

Sep 16, 2018

The most valuable feature is the thorough coordination of software delivery across multiple environments, where multiple actors (typically business stakeholders, devs and ops engineers, release engineers, testers, and change managers) can easily cooperate to ensure a proper and repeatable delivery by combining constant follow-up on manual and automated activities.

Read full review

DevOpsAr5d4f

DevOps Architect at a tech services company with 51-200 employees

Nov 22, 2018

The most valuable feature for me is the fact that you can easily design a pipeline to promote applications from a development environment up to a production environment, and the team can become autonomous in designing those pipelines.

Find out what your peers are saying about Broadcom, Microsoft, Arcad Software and others in Release Automation. Updated: March 2026.

DOWNLOAD NOW

884,933 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Mohammed Hashim

Senior Presales Engineer at a computer software company with 51-200 employees

May 16, 2023

The most valuable features of Automic Continuous Delivery Director are the UI, release planning, and tracking, and you can do your soft and hard freeze through CDP.

Read full review

Umair (Abu Mohaymin) Akhlaque

Group CEO at Flexsolutions

Jan 30, 2024

Its extensive range of available connectors eliminates the need for manual code writing when implementing solutions, thus reducing coding efforts.

Read full review

Automic Continuous Delivery Director [EOL] Cons review quotes

Suzan Liu

Principal Engineer - IT Quality and Release at a transportation company with 10,001+ employees

Aug 29, 2018

CDD and RA should be two modules in the same product. They do not automatically “talk” to each other. and they require endpoint definition.

Read full review

AlmDevOp5991

ALM DevOps Senior Consultant at a tech services company with 51-200 employees

Sep 16, 2018

Reporting and dashboarding could be improved. Release pipelines should be creatable via templates as well as easily integrable/chained together. Visual navigation could also be improved when the pipelines become too large.

Read full review

DevOpsAr5d4f

DevOps Architect at a tech services company with 51-200 employees

Nov 22, 2018

We have rolled out the SAFe model, but what we would like to have is better integration with Agile Central, for instance, or at least at the plugin level, where we would select only certain stories instead of many stories in the sprint.

Find out what your peers are saying about Broadcom, Microsoft, Arcad Software and others in Release Automation. Updated: March 2026.

DOWNLOAD NOW

884,933 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Mohammed Hashim

Senior Presales Engineer at a computer software company with 51-200 employees

May 16, 2023

Automic Continuous Delivery Director can improve the integrations. We have 25 but would like more.